Effect of airflow on the Bio-Electro-Fenton
process
Oxy is one of the key parameters in the BEF system,
which is the electron acceptor in the cathode chamber to produce H2O2. High airflow rate could enhance the dissolved oxygen in solution and promote
the oxygen mass transfer rate, and thus, is beneficial
for H2O2 production and accumulation in bioelectrochemical systems6. It is important to set the optimal
airflow rate because if the speed is too low, it will not
maintain enough dissolved oxygen and if the speed is
too high, it will cost a lot of operating energy for the
system.
COD treatment efficiency increased with increasing
airflow rate and reached 68.20 ± 1.04 % (Figure 6)
at the maximum airflow rate of 12 L air/minute. The
reason is that the excessive high airflow rate could also
disturb the mass transfer between catholyte and electrode and lead to a low catalytic efficiency for pollutants degradation by the Fenton process6. The ratio of BOD5/COD also increased significantly due
to (•OH) hydroxyl free radicals non-selectively reacts with POPs compounds to create more easily
biodegradable compounds.
However, when continuing to increase the airflow
rate, from 12 to 16 L air/minute, COD treatment efficiency decreased from 68.20 ± 1.04 % to 62.22 ± 1.12
%, respectively. This is explained by the extremely
high airflow rate which leads to a chemical imbalance
of reaction (2) O2 + 2H+ + 2e− ! H2O2 and reduces
the accumulation of H2O
2 14 .
9 trang |
Chia sẻ: hachi492 | Lượt xem: 1 | Lượt tải: 0
Bạn đang xem nội dung tài liệu Bio-Electro-Fenton: A novel method for treating leachate in Da Phuoc Landfill, Viet Nam, để tải tài liệu về máy bạn click vào nút DOWNLOAD ở trên
Science & Technology Development Journal, 23(1):461-469
Open Access Full Text Article Research Article
Faculty of Environment, University of
Science, Vietnam National University
- Ho Chi Minh City
Correspondence
Ho Truong NamHai, Faculty of
Environment, University of Science,
Vietnam National University - Ho Chi
Minh City
Email: htnhai@hcmus.edu.vn
History
Received: 2019-12-14
Accepted: 2020-02-17
Published: 2020-03-19
DOI : 10.32508/stdj.v23i1.1736
Copyright
© VNU-HCM Press. This is an open-
access article distributed under the
terms of the Creative Commons
Attribution 4.0 International license.
Bio-Electro-Fenton: a novel method for treating leachate in Da
Phuoc Landfill, Vietnam
Ho Nhut Linh, Ho Truong NamHai*
Use your smartphone to scan this
QR code and download this article
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Leachate is a noticeable pollution problem because it contains a considerable
amount of persistent organic pollutants (POPs). If leachate isn't treated thoroughly, its leak will
negatively affect the environment. Therefore, appropriate treatment technologies are required to
remove them. Bio-Electro-Fenton (BEF) is a newmethod usingmicroorganisms such as electrolytes
to convert chemical energy into electricity to help createH2O2 support advancedoxidation process
(AOPs). Realizing the potentials that BEF brings, this study applies BEF to assess the effectiveness of
leachate treatment at Da Phuoc landfill (operation period > 12 years), Ho Chi Minh City, which to
save costs and energy for Fenton process. Methods: The BEF pilot scale model (30 x 10 x 10 cm)
is divided by a proton exchange membrane (PEM) (Nafion®112) into two chambers (anode and
cathode). Cathode chamber used a graphite electrode, the anode chamber used a carbon fabric
electrode. The experiments aimed to determine the optimal conditions of parameters affecting
the BEF system by determining the efficiency of COD removal and BOD5/COD ratio in leachate.
Results: At optimal conditions of the model including pH 3, [Fe2+ ] = 4g/L, current intensity = 1A,
reaction time 60 minutes and airflow = 12 L/min, as a result COD was reduced by 68.2 1.04 %
from 4950 14 mgO2/L to 1574.1 51.4 mgO2/L, the ratio of BOD5/COD = 0.1 Conclusion: The
study result showed thatBio-electro-Fenton process is effective for wastewater with high concen-
trations of pollutant and difficult to treat as leachate suggesting that the appropriate method for
pre-treatment processes support the thorough elimination of pollutants.
Key words: Leachate, Bio-Electro-Fenton, AOPs, treatment.
INTRODUCE
The population explosion and industrialization in re-
cent years have increased the demand for consump-
tion of goods, materials, and energy which leads to
a rapidly increasing amount of domestic waste gen-
erated. According to the estimation of The National
Environment Statistics report in 2017 of The Ministry
of Natural Resources and Environment, the amount
of domestic solid waste in urban areas increases by
an average of 10 - 16% per year. The majority of do-
mestic waste in Vietnam has been treated by the land-
fill method. When using this method, a consider-
able amount of leachate will be generated, which does
harm to the environment because leachate contains
heavy metals, ammonium, and POPs. The composi-
tion and characteristics of leachate are complicated by
seasonal changes and burial time hence leachate treat-
ment is extremely sophisticated.
There are many different methods for treating
leachate such as flocculation, adsorption, oxidation,
etc. AOPs are themost outstanding treatmentmethod
which form hydroxyl (OH) free radicals to decom-
pose organic pollutants base on characteristics such
as non-selective pollutants oxidation, easily react at
room temperature. Typical AOPs such as tradition
Fenton and Electro-Fenton have been proven to effi-
ciently treat leachate. However, the traditional Fen-
ton process requires the supply of a large amount of
H2O2 and Fe2+. Besides the amount of reagent added
is unstable and requires partial treatment of the chem-
icals remain after the reaction. For Electro-Fenton,
the process requires large energy for the generation of
H2O2 . To deal with these disadvantages, it is nec-
essary to progress a low-cost Fenton process which
ensures treatment efficiency, therefore BEF method
was invented. The BEF method uses microorganisms
to decompose organic matter creating energy to form
H2O2 for Fenton processes. As a result of the BEF
method is a multipurpose method which save costs
by reducing electrical energy consumption and using
chemicals.
The BEF is a completely new technology. In Viet-
nam, there has not been any previous article about
BEF application in wastewater treatment. Therefore,
in this study, we optimize the parameters affecting the
BEFmethod in a complexmatrix, with the purpose of
Cite this article : Nhut Linh H, Truong Nam Hai H. Bio-Electro-Fenton: a novel method for treating
leachate in Da Phuoc Landfill, Vietnam. Sci. Tech. Dev. J.; 23(1):461-469.
461
Science & Technology Development Journal, 23(1):461-469
evaluating the applicability of the method in leachate
treatment. The experiments had been conducted to
find optimal conditions through COD treatment effi-
ciency and BOD 5/COD ratio of leachate.
MATERIALS ANDMETHODS
Sampling
Samples had collected at the Da Phuoc Solid Waste
Treatment Complex in Ho Chi Minh City in March
2019. Sampling, transportation, and preservation
techniques complied with TCVN 5999: 1995. Sam-
ples had precipitated and stored in 2 plastic containers
30L.
According to Table 1, leachate has neutral pH, COD
is 4950 mgO2/L, BOD5 is 1500 59.7 mgO2/L, and
BOD5/COD ratio of 0.3 is quite low. Da Phuoc land-
fill came into operating in 2007, after over 10 years,
themain component of leachate is organic substances,
which are difficult or non-biodegradable. Leachate is
gradually shifted to the stable phase.
BEF pilot system and operation
BEF pilot scale model (30 x 10 x 10 cm) divided by
a PEM (Nafion r112) into two chambers. The vol-
ume of each chamber (anode and cathode chambers)
was 1.5 L with a working volume of 1.134 L. Cathode
chamber used a graphite electrode, the anode cham-
ber used a carbon fabric electrode with size (7.5 x 5 x
0.4 cm). The electrodes connected with copper wire
of 2 mm diameter and 40 cm length through an exter-
nal transistor of 100W and DC supply with voltage 0 -
30V, current 0 - 5A to adjust to each test requirement
(Figure 1a, c).
At the first stage of the survey, anode chamber was
loaded with anaerobic sludge and 500 mL of artifi-
cial wastewater (glucose 30 g/L, KH2 PO4 4.33 g/L,
Na2HPO4 2 g/L, NH 4Cl 0.2 g/L, KCl 0.13 g/L) 1 to
help anaerobicmicroorganisms grow and develop sta-
bly. The microorganisms decompose glucose to H+
and produce electrons (Equation (1)):
C6H12O6+6H2O! 6CO2+24H++24e (1)
Then ion H+ passed through the PEM to the cath-
ode chamber. Due to the potential difference in volt-
age, electrons formed at the anode chamberwill trans-
fer the external resistor and to the cathode electrode.
In the cathode chamber, the pump supplies oxygen
for the reaction (Equation (2)) to form H2O2. The
amount of H2O2 produced will immediately react
with the amount of Fe (II) added to form hydroxyl
radicals (OH) (Equation (3)) which oxidize persis-
tent organic compounds in leachate (Equation (4)).
In addition, the energy generated helps restore Fe2+
(Equation (5)).
O2+2H++2e! H2O2 (2)
H2O2+Fe2+! OH+OH+Fe3+ (3)
OH+RP! oxidationproducts (CO2;H2O) (4)
Fe3++ e ! Fe2+ (5)
All chemicals and reagents used for the experiments
were of analytical grade and supplied by Merck (Ger-
many). In each experiment, 500 mL of leachate was
added at the cathode chamber, pH was adjusted us-
ing NaOH 1N, H2SO4 1N. The agents used in the
Fenton process includes FeSO4.7H2O 5%. All exper-
iments were performed at 30oC temperature and at-
mospheric pressure in a batch mode manner. Data
are representative with three replicates and their av-
erage are reported.
Chemical analysis
pH value of wastewater wasmeasured by Schott - LAB
850 - Germany. The parameters COD, BOD5, Total
Phosphor, Total Nitrogen, and TSS were determined
according to the Standard Methods for the examina-
tion of water and wastewater2.
COD, BOD5 were observed throughout the exper-
iment. For the Bicromate method, the amount of
residual H2O2 and Fe2+ in sample after the reaction
affect the results of COD determination according to
the reaction (Equations (6) and (7))3.
Cr2O2 7 +3H2O2+8H
+! 2Cr3++
3O2+7H2O
(6)
Cr2O2 7 +Fe
2++H+! Cr3++Fe3++H2O (7)
In this study, reaction in sample after treatmentwill be
stopped immediately by adding NaOH 2.5 N to pH 10
- 11 to precipitate iron, then heat at 70-800Cwithin 30
minutes to completely remove residual H2O2 before
conducting COD analysis4.
Data processing
- Processing efficiency (H%) is calculated according
to the formula:
H =
C0 C
C0
100
Where: C0 is the initial concentration (mg/L)
C is the final concentration (mg/L)
462
Science & Technology Development Journal, 23(1):461-469
Table 1: Composition, characteristics of Da Phuoc leachate
Parameter Unit Result Viet Nam National Technical Regula-
tion – 25:2009/MONRE Column B1
pH - 7.8 -
BOD5 mgO2/L 1500 59.7 100
COD mgO2/L 4950 14 400
BOD5/COD - 0.3 -
Total Phosphor mg/L 12.4 0.43 -
[Fe] total mg/L 44.1 2.24 -
Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen mg/L 1477 62.6 60
Ammonium mg/L 589.67
22.11
25
Total Suspended Solid mg/L 15.3 -
Figure 1: (a) Photograph (b) Electro transfer mechanism in the BEF system (c)Schematic drawing of the experi-
mental setup of the BEF system
463
Science & Technology Development Journal, 23(1):461-469
Figure 2: COD removal efficiency (%) (SD) and BOD5/COD ratio of treated leachate following various pH
in cathode chamber onthe Bio-Electro-Fenton process. Reaction conditions: [Fe2+]= 1.4 g/L, reaction time 60
minutes, current intensity = 1 A, airflow = 4 Lair/minute
RESULTS
To determine the maximum treatment efficiency of
the method for leachate as well as evaluate the influ-
ence of important parameters in the BEF model, ex-
periments are performed to optimize each parameter
in a complex matrix of effects. The result show sim-
ilarity to other Fenton processes, the optimal pH of
BEF is at 3 (Figure 2).
A larger concentration of Fe2+ catalyst will increase
COD treatment efficiency significantly, up to 4 g/L.
However, when concentration is too high, it will
reduce processing efficiency. Treatment efficiency
tends to decrease at increasing iron concentration
(Figure 3). The COD removal efficiency decreased
from 54.82 2.04 % to 51.22 1.53 %, while
the BOD5/COD ratio increased when concentration
[Fe2+] increased from 1 g/L to 1.4 g/L, respectively.
When the concentration [Fe2+] is from 1.4 g/L to 4
g/L, the treatment efficiency increases linearly with
[Fe2+]. The BOD5/COD ratio reached the highest
values of 0.15 at 3 g/L and the lowest value of 0.04 at
6 g/L.
For current intensity, the addition of an external cur-
rent to the system helps to accelerate the Fenton pro-
cess due to electrons are increased with electrons
made from anaerobic organisms decompose glucose
in the anode chamber. The optimum current for the
system is recorded at 1 A (Figure 4).
The reaction time and airflow rate provided to the sys-
tem were also surveyed. (Figures 5 and 6) The reac-
tion time of 60 minutes, the airflow rate of 12 L/min
yiel ded the highest COD removal efficiency, reaching
62.42 0.99 % and 68.20 1.04 %, respectively.
DISCUSSION
Effect of pH on the Bio-Electro-Fenton pro-
cess
Both of case pH is too low and too high are effect to
the efficiency of the Fenton process4. The Fenton pro-
cess can be inhibited because of very low pH values
(pH < 3). Fe2+ , which exists as Fe[H2O6]2+ , has a
slower reaction rate with H2O2 than Fe[H2O5]2+ at
pH = 3 which leads to less hydroxyl (OH) genera-
tion5. Besides, when the pH is too low H+ will react
with H2O2 to form peroxone (H3 O2+) according to
the reaction H2O2 + H+ ! H3 O2+. The peroxone
do not react with Fe2+ therefore it will decrease OH
formation efficiency which leads to reduces the pro-
cessing efficiency of the Fenton process.
At high pH (pH 4), the formation of ferrous/ferric
hydroxide complexes leads to the catalyst deactiva-
tion, which decreases the quantity of OH6. In ad-
dition, the decomposition of H2O2 into H2O and O2
also increases with increasing pH7,8. The accumula-
tion of protons due to the slow and insufficient pro-
tons diffusion through membrane would cause a de-
crease of pH in anode chamber6. Therefore, the cath-
ode electrode material as a source to self-regulate the
supply of Fe2+ under neutral conditions is necessary
to reduce the cost of pH adjusting chemicals.
464
Science & Technology Development Journal, 23(1):461-469
Figure 3: COD removal efficiency (%) (SD) and BOD5/CODratio of treated leachate following various
Fe2+concentration in cathode chamber on the Bio-Electro-Fenton process. Reaction conditions: pH = 3, re-
action time 60 minutes, current intensity = 1 A, airflow = 4 Lair/minute
Figure 4: COD removal efficiency (%) (SD) and BOD5/CODratio of treated leachate following various cur-
rent intensity incathode chamber on the Bio-Electro-Fenton process. Reaction conditions: pH = 3, reaction
time 60 minutes, [Fe2+] = 4 g/L, airflow = 4 Lair/minute
465
Science & Technology Development Journal, 23(1):461-469
Figure 5: COD removal efficiency (%) (SD) and BOD5/COD ratio of treated leachate following various re-
action times on the Bio-Electro-Fenton process. Reaction conditions: pH = 3, [Fe2+] = 4 g/L, current intensity =
1 A, airflow = 4Lair/minute
Figure 6: COD removal efficiency (%) (SD) and BOD5/COD ratio of treated leachate following various air-
flow into cathode chamber on the Bio-Electro-Fenton process. Reaction conditions: pH = 3, [Fe2+] = 4 g/L,
reaction time 60 minutes, current intensity = 1A
466
Science & Technology Development Journal, 23(1):461-469
Effect of [Fe2+ ] on the Bio-Electro-Fenton
process
Fe2+ is an extremely important factor that directly af-
fects the Fenton process. Considering that the H2O2
production rate and yield could be constant at de-
fined conditions in bio-electro-chemical system, Fe2+
as catalyst could be a key factor for the final treatment
performance9. As a result, a certain amount of Fe2+
saves chemicals and makes the process more efficient.
At low [Fe2+ ] concentration, hydroxyl (OH) pro-
duced just enough to oxidize the biodegradable or-
ganic compounds. When the dose of Fe2+ increased,
amount of hydroxyl is more produced. The oxida-
tion of organics withOHoccurs throughwell-known
pathways, principally H atom abstraction (mainly
from aliphatics) and addition to C = C bonds (mainly
with aromatics leading to the formation of hydrox-
ylated aromatic derivatives)10. The persistent or-
ganics changes into a biodegradable form, increasing
the BOD value, increasing the BOD5/COD ratio and
leading to a reduction in processing efficiency.
At higher concentration [Fe2+], from 4 g/L to
6 g/L, treatment efficiency decreases due to re-
duction of radicalsOH according to the reaction
(Equation (8))11:
OH+Fe2+! Fe3++OH (8)
In addition, the Fe3+ ions formed can react with
H2O2 to reduce the mineralization of organic sub-
stances (Equation (9))12 :
H2O2+Fe3+! Fe2++OOH+H+ (9)
Excess iron salts increase the amount of dissolved salt
(TDS) and conductivity. Besides, after stopping the
reaction, treated wastewater must be adjusted to neu-
tral pH. pH raising create a large amount of iron de-
posits in the sludge12.
Effect of current intensity on the Bio-
Electro-Fenton process
The current intensity produced by themicroorganism
system in the cathode chamber to create H2O, which
is an extremely important catalyst in the BEF. Higher
current will increase the amount of H2O2 , thus in-
creasing the number of (OH) hydroxyl radicals in
the electrolyte environment. However, in the experi-
ments, the efficiency of the current generation by the
microorganism system was quite low, therefore to in-
crease the processing efficiency, the experiment used
an external power (DC) to connect the BEF system
to supplement the process. The technology converts
from microbial electrolysis cells (MEC) to the micro-
bial fuel cell (MFC). Besides, increasing the current
too highwill affect processing efficiencywhile wasting
a significant amount of energy. In this case, optimized
current intensity is usually chosen to attain the max-
imum H2O2 production rate and yield, and its value
quite depends on the cathode material used 6.
The current increased (0,5 to 1A) with the increas-
ing rate of pollutant degradation (49.60 2.17 % to
62.42 1.81 %) since more HO are formed at a given
time. However, the COD concentration decreased
as the current increased above 1A, the efficiency de-
creased from 62.42 1.81 % to 50.75 1.72 % at
2.5A. The current cannot be increased indefinitely
since the cathode potential would be changed by the
applied voltage, resulting in the side reactions, and
thereby decreasing current efficiency and pollutants
removal efficiency. The side reactions can involve:
(i) high current density by adding high external volt-
age would enhance the H2O2 electrochemical reduc-
tion through (Equation (10)), (ii) the H2O2 reaction
with Fe3+ via (Equation (11)) and (Equation (12))
(iii) the destruction of OH with H2O2 and Fe2+ via
(Equation (13)) and (Equation (8))6 , (iv) The reac-
tions forming H2 at the cathode are more dominant
via (Equation (14))4.
H2O2+2H++2e ! 2H2O (10)
Fe3++H2O2 ! Fe2++HO2+H+ (11)
Fe3++HO2 ! Fe2++O2+H+ (12)
H2O2+ OH! H2O+HO2 (13)
2H++2e ! H2 (14)
Effect of reaction time on the Bio-Electro-
Fenton process
The time needed to complete a Fenton reaction will
depend on the many variables such as catalyst dose
and wastewater strength. For more complex or more
concentrated wastes as leachate, the reaction in var-
ious studies fluctuated between 30 minutes and 3
hours13.
COD removal efficiency increased gradually and
reached the highest of 62.42 0.99 % at 60 min-
utes, BOD in leachate also increased from 50mgO2/L
to 191 mgO2/L. The complex organic is decom-
posed into simpler organic substances, thus reduced
COD concentration, increased BOD concentration in
wastewater, contributed to an increase BOD5/COD
467
Science & Technology Development Journal, 23(1):461-469
Figure 7: Samples of current intensity after processing.
ratio. Increasing the reaction time will create more
OH radicals to form H2O2, while also fostering the
Fenton reactions occur more to thoroughly oxidize
the pollution.
After the equilibrium time, COD concentration de-
creased, the BOD5/COD ratio did not change signifi-
cantly. The BOD concentration raised, this can be ex-
plained by the persistent organic pollutant degrada-
tion which still continues to occur but tends to slow
down. In addition, intermediates created are more
difficult to oxidize, which inhibits the Fenton reac-
tion. The amount of Fe2+ when being regenerated
will be oxidized to Fe2O3, thus reducing treatment ef-
ficiency 4.
Effect of airflow on the Bio-Electro-Fenton
process
Oxy is one of the key parameters in the BEF system,
which is the electron acceptor in the cathode cham-
ber to produce H2O2. High airflow rate could en-
hance the dissolved oxygen in solution and promote
the oxygen mass transfer rate, and thus, is beneficial
forH2O2 production and accumulation in bioelectro-
chemical systems6. It is important to set the optimal
airflow rate because if the speed is too low, it will not
maintain enough dissolved oxygen and if the speed is
too high, it will cost a lot of operating energy for the
system.
COD treatment efficiency increased with increasing
airflow rate and reached 68.20 1.04 % (Figure 6)
at the maximum airflow rate of 12 L air/minute. The
reason is that the excessive high airflow rate could also
disturb the mass transfer between catholyte and elec-
trode and lead to a low catalytic efficiency for pol-
lutants degradation by the Fenton process6. The ra-
tio of BOD5/COD also increased significantly due
to (OH) hydroxyl free radicals non-selectively re-
acts with POPs compounds to create more easily
biodegradable compounds.
However, when continuing to increase the airflow
rate, from 12 to 16 L air/minute, COD treatment effi-
ciency decreased from 68.20 1.04 % to 62.22 1.12
%, respectively. This is explained by the extremely
high airflow rate which leads to a chemical imbalance
of reaction (2) O2 + 2H+ + 2e !H2O2 and reduces
the accumulation of H2O2 14 .
CONCLUSIONS
The results obtained in the study show that the use of
the Bio-electro-Fenton process is effective for wastew-
ater with large concentrations and difficult to treat as
leachate. At optimal conditions of the model includ-
ing pH 3, [Fe2+] = 4g/L, current intensity = 1A, re-
action time 60 minutes and airflow = 12 LO2/min, as
a result COD from 4950 14 mgO2/L to 1574.1
51.4 mgO2/L (decreased 68.2 1.04 %). The ratio
of BOD5/COD decreased from 0.3 to 0.1 due to Fen-
ton reactions which reduced a large amount of easily
biodegradable organic matter, suggesting that the ap-
propriatemethod for pre-treatment processes support
to thoroughly eliminate pollutants.
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
AOPs: Advanced oxidation process
BEF: Bio-electro-Fenton
PEM: Proton exchange membrane
POPs: Persistent organic pollutants
AUTHORS’ CONTRIBUTIONS
The author Ho Nhut Linh did the experiment. The
author Ho Truong NamHai discussed the results and
468
Science & Technology Development Journal, 23(1):461-469
wrote the final manuscript. All authors approved the
final manuscript.
COMPETING INTERESTS
The authors declare that they have no competing in-
terests.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This study is funded by University of Science, VNU –
HCM, under grant number T2019 – 30. The author
wish to thank Bui Thi Nhu Quynh for revising and
editing the English text.
REFERENCES
1. Birjandi N, Younesi H, Ghoreyshi AA, Rahimnejad M. Electric-
ity generation, ethanol fermentation and enhanced glucose
degradation in a bio-electro-Fenton system driven by a mi-
crobial fuel cell. Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotech-
nology. 2016 Jun;91(6):1868–1876.
2. American Public Health Association. Standard methods for
the examination ofwater andwastewater. 23nd Edition. 2017.
3. Talinli I, Anderson GK. Interference of hydrogen peroxide on
the standard COD test. Water Research. 1992 Jan;26(1):107–
110.
4. Loan NTH, Huy DH, Hien TT, Canh TT. Nghiên cứu tiền xử lý
nước rỉ rác bãi chôn lấp Gò Cát, thành phố Hồ Chí Minh bằng
phương pháp Fenton truyền thống và Fenton điện hóa.” Tạp
chí khoa học Đại học Quốc gia Hà Nội. 2018.
5. Gallard H, Laat JD. Kineticmodelling of Fe (III)/H2O2 oxidation
reactions in dilute aqueous solution using atrazine as amodel
organic compound. Water Research. 2000 Aug;34(12):3107–
3116.
6. Li X, Chen S, Angelidaki I, Zhang Y. Bio-electro-Fenton pro-
cesses for wastewater treatment: Advances and prospects.
Chemical Engineering Journal. 2018 Dec;354:492–506.
7. Zhang H, Zhang D, Zhou J, Wang YT. Removal of COD from
landfill leachate by Electro-Fenton method. Journal of Haz-
ardous Materials. 2006 Aug;135(1-3):106–111.
8. Nidheesh PV, Gandhimathi R. Trends in electro-Fenton pro-
cess for water and wastewater treatment: an overview. De-
salination. 2012 Aug;299:1–15.
9. Wu JC, Wang CH, Wang CT, Wang CT, Wang YT. Effect of
FeSO4onbio-electro-fentonmicrobial fuel cellswith different
exchange membranes. Materials Research Innovations. 2015
May;19(5):S5–1276–S5–1279.
10. Olvera-Vargas H, Trellu C, Oturan N, Oturan MA. Bio-electro-
Fenton: anewcombinedprocess–principles andapplications.
Springer. 2017 Jan;61:29–56.
11. Kang YW, Hwang KY. Effects of reaction conditions on the oxi-
dation efficiency in the Fenton process. Water Research. 2000
Jul;34(10):2786–2790.
12. Gogate PR, Pandit AB. A review of imperative technologies
for wastewater treatment I: oxidation technologies at ambi-
ent conditions. Advances in Environmental Research. 2004
Mar;8(3-4):501–551.
13. Ahmadian M, Reshadat S, Yousefi N, Mirhossieni SH, Zare MR,
Ghasemi SR, et al. Municipal leachate treatment by Fenton
process: effect of some variable and kinetics. Journal of envi-
ronmental and public health. 2013 Jun;2013.
14. Ling T, Huang B, Zhao M, Yan Q, Shen W. Repeated oxidative
degradation of methyl orange through bio-electro-Fenton in
bioelectrochemical system (BES). Bioresource technology.
2015 Dec;203:89–95.
469
Các file đính kèm theo tài liệu này:
bio_electro_fenton_a_novel_method_for_treating_leachate_in_d.pdf