Out of 27 compounds identified in the D.
benenica oil, 19 of them are also found in the
rhizome essential oils of D. rubrostriata, D. citrea,
and D. orlowii. The most abundant class of the
rhizome essential oil of D. benenica is oxygenated
monoterpenes (75.89%), similar to those of D.
rubrostriata (64.92–94.06%) [21] and of D. citrea
(79.47–90.73%) [22, 23]. However, this finding is
very different from that of the essential oil of D.
orlowii, which comprises oxygenated monoterpenes
(29.4%), monoterpene hydrocarbons (23.9%),
sesquiterpene hydrocarbons (33.7%), and oxygenated
sesquiterpenes (11.2%) [23]. Furthermore, 1,8-cineole
presented in rhizome essential oil of D. benenica, D.
rubrostriata, and D. citrea as the major component
with 54.39%, 13.2–22.0% and 23.00–43.67%,
respectively [21-23]. Surprisingly, this compound
is not identified in D. orlowii [23]. Similarly, a
remarkable amount of (E)-citral is found in the
rhizome essential oil of D. benenica, D. rubrostriata,
and D. citrea but conspicuously absent in D. orlowii.
Besides, a significant quantity of -pinene (7.50%),
(Z)-citral (6.79%), and -pinene (4.51%) in D.
benenica is previously reported on three other
Distichochlamys species [21-23]. All of the data in
the present and previous studies indicate a
similarity in the chemical composition of the
rhizome essential oil of D. rubrostriata, D. citrea, and
D. benenica.
7 trang |
Chia sẻ: hachi492 | Lượt xem: 3 | Lượt tải: 0
Bạn đang xem nội dung tài liệu Chemical composition and acetylcholinesterase inhibitory activity of essential oil from rhizomes of distichochlamys benenica, để tải tài liệu về máy bạn click vào nút DOWNLOAD ở trên
Hue University Journal of Science: Natural Science
Vol. 129, No. 1D, 43–49, 2020
pISSN 1859-1388
eISSN 2615-9678
DOI: 10.26459/hueuni-jns.v129i1D.5804 43
CHEMICAL COMPOSITION AND ACETYLCHOLINESTERASE
INHIBITORY ACTIVITY OF ESSENTIAL OIL FROM RHIZOMES OF
DISTICHOCHLAMYS BENENICA
Hanh Thi Nhu Hoang1, Thanh Thu Thi Dinh1, Ty Viet Pham2, Hien Bich Thi Le3, Duc Viet Ho3*
1 University of Agriculture and Forestry, Hue University, 102 Phung Hung St., Hue, Vietnam
2 University of Education, Hue University, 34 Le Loi St., Hue, Vietnam
3 University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Hue University, 6 Ngo Quyen St., Hue, Vietnam
* Correspondence to Duc Viet Ho
(Received: 03 May 2020; Accepted: 08 September 2020)
Abstract. Twenty-seven constituents were identified by using GC/MS, representing 99.57% of the
rhizome oil of Distichochlamys benenica. The major constituents of the essential oil are 1,8-cineole (54.39%),
β-pinene (7.50%), (E)-citral (7.26%), and (Z)-citral (6.79%). The rhizome essential oil has anti-
acetylcholinesterase activity with an IC50 value of 136.63 2.70 g/mL.
Keywords: Distichochlamys benenica, essential oil, acetylcholinesterase, 1,8-cineole
1 Introduction
Essential oils, which are complex mixtures of
volatile compounds, mainly terpenes, are extracted
from plants by using steam distillation and various
solvents [1, 2]. All over the world, around 3000
essential oils have been extracted from at least 2000
plant species, out of which approximately 300
essential oils are considered important in
commerce [1]. Since ancient times, essential oils
have been used in traditional medicines to treat
inflammatory disease, pain relief, gastrointestinal
disease, or the reduction of stress. Modern
pharmacological studies have shown that essential
oils exhibit biological activity such as antifungal,
antibacterial [3-6], anti-inflammatory [7-9],
cytotoxicity, cancer chemoprotective [10, 11],
cardiovascular effects [12, 13], anticonvulsant [14],
and anti-insect [15, 16]. With a broad spectrum of
biological activity and aromatic properties,
essential oils are increasingly popular, especially in
cosmetics, food products and pharmaceuticals.
Distichochlamys, a genus belonging to
Zingiberaceae family, was first discovered in 1995
by Newman [17]. Up to now, only four species of
this genus have been identified, all endemic to
Vietnam. These include D. benenica Q.B. Nguyen &
Skornick [18], D. citrea M. F. Newman [17], D.
orlowii K. Larsen & M. F. Newman [19], and D.
rubrostriata W. J. Kress & Rehse [20]. The
composition of rhizome essential oils from D.
rubrostriata, D. citrea, and D. orlowii has been
reported. 1,8-Cineole (13.2–22.0%), -citral (18.5–
22.1%), β-citral (14.2–22.3%), trans-geraniol (12.5–
12.8%), and geranyl acetate (6.6–14.9%) are the
main constituents in D. rubrostriata [21]. The
phytochemical investigation of the rhizome
essential oil of D. citrea indicates that 1,8-cineole is
the main component (30.71–43.67%) [22], while
high contents of geranyl acetate (16.5%), β-elemene
(9.2%), β-pinene (9.0%), and β-caryophyllene
(7.9%) are present in the rhizome essential oil of D.
orlowii [23]. To the best of our knowledge, the
phytochemical analysis and biological activity of
Hanh Thi Nhu Hoang et al.
44
D. benenica have not been performed yet. This
article aims to report the chemical composition
from the rhizome essential oil of D. benenica as well
as its acetylcholinesterase (AChE) inhibitory
activity.
2 Material and methods
2.1 Plant collection and extraction of
essential oil
D. benenica Q.B.Nguyen & Škorničk species was
collected in Tay Giang district, Quang Nam
province, Vietnam in February 2020. A voucher
specimen (B.En.01) was deposited at the Faculty of
Fundamental Sciences, University of Agriculture
and Forestry, Hue University, Vietnam.
Fresh rhizomes of D. benenica (0.2 kg) were
shredded and their essential oil obtained was by
hydrodistillation for 6 hours. The oil was dried
with Na2SO4 and kept under refrigeration (4 °C)
until analysis. The experiments were performed in
triplicates.
2.2 Analysis of essential oil
A Shimadzu Technologies GCMS-QP2010 Plus
chromatograph fitted with a fused silica Equity-5
capillary column (30 m × 0.25 mm, film thickness
0.25 µm, Supelco, USA) and coupled with a mass
spectrometer (MSD QP2010 Plus) was used for GC-
MS analysis. The analytical conditions are as
follows: carrier helium (1.78 mL/min), injector
temperature of 250 °C, interface temperature of 250
°C, and a column temperature programmed from
40 °C (1 min hold) to 285 °C (5 min hold) at 3
°C/min. Samples were injected using a split ratio of
30:1. The injected volume is 1.0 µL, and the inlet
pressure is 100 kPa.
The MS conditions are as follows: ionization
voltage 70 eV, detector voltage 0.82 kV, and
acquisition scan mass range 40–350 amu at a
sampling rate of 0.5 scans/s. The MS fragmentation
patterns were checked against those of other
essential oils of known compositions by using
NIST 11 and WILEY 7 Libraries (on ChemStation
HP) and by comparison of mass spectra of the
separated constituents with the data reported in
the literature [24]. The relative percentage of
particular components in the essential oils was
calculated from the area percent report
(Uncalibrated calculation procedure) generated in
the GC software.
2.3 Acetylcholinesterase inhibition
assay
The AChE inhibition assay was determined with a
modified version of the Ellman colorimetric
method [25]. Each of the reaction mixtures contains
140 µL of Tris-HCl buffer (pH 8.0), 20 µL of the
tested sample solution, and 20 µL of the AChE
solution (0.25 units/mL). After incubation for 15
min, the reaction was initiated by adding 10 µL of
0.24 mM 5,5′-dithiobis-(2-nitrobenzoic acid)
(DTNB) and 10 µL of 0.24 mM acetylthiocholine
iodide (ACTI). The final mixture then was
incubated at ambient temperature for 15 min. The
same reaction mixture without sample was used as
a negative control. The optical density was
measured at 405 nm on an ELISA microplate
reader (EMR-500, Labomed Inc.) and the
percentage inhibition was calculated.
Galanthamine was used as a positive control. All
tested samples and the positive control,
galanthamine, were dissolved in 10% DMSO
(analytical grade). The reaction was performed in
triplicates in 96-well microplates. The percentage
inhibition (I%) was calculated according to the
following equation:
𝐼% =
𝐴control − 𝐴sample
𝐴control
× 100
where Asample is the absorbance of the sample
solution; Acontrol is the absorbance of the negative
control. Each sample was assayed at 5
Hue University Journal of Science: Natural Science
Vol. 129, No. 1D, 43–49, 2020
pISSN 1859-1388
eISSN 2615-9678
DOI: 10.26459/hueuni-jns.v129i1D.5804 45
concentrations (60, 80, 100, 120, and 140 g/mL) so
that the IC50 value could be calculated from the
logarithmic dose-inhibition curve.
3 Results and discussion
3.1 Essential oils composition
The rhizome essential oil of D. benenica is a pale
yellow liquid with a characteristic aromatic odor
and lighter than water. The yield of essential oil is
0.2% (v/w), calculated on a fresh weight basis. A
total of 27 components are identified, representing
99.57% of the oil content. Oxygenated
monoterpene derivatives are the major type of
compounds present in the rhizome essential oil
with 75.89%, followed by monoterpene
hydrocarbons (19.97%), sesquiterpene
hydrocarbons (0.5%), and other compounds
(3.21%). Moreover, 1,8-cineole (54.39%), -pinene
(7.50%), (E)-citral (7.26%), (Z)-citral (6.79%), and -
pinene (4.51%) are found in this oil as main
constituents (Table 1).
Table 1. Chemical composition of the rhizome essential oil of Distichochlamys benenica
No. Compound Class Percentage composition (%)
1 (Z)-3-Propylidenecyclopentene NT 0.04
2 -Thujene MH 0.12
3 -Pinene MH 4.51
4 Camphene MH 2.53
5 2,4,4-Trimethyl-2-penten-1-ol NT 0.04
6 Isopropyl glycolate NT 0.06
7 Sabinene MH 0.93
8 β-Pinene MH 7.50
9 6-Methylhept-5-ene-2-one NT 2.97
10 (5S,8R)-5-Isopropyl-8-methyl-2-methylene-3,9-decadien-1-ol NT 0.09
11 -Phellandrene MH 0.77
12 Limonene MH 2.93
13 1,8-Cineole OM 54.39
14 γ-Terpinene MH 0.59
15 Terpinolene MH 0.09
16 Linalool OM 2.10
17 Borneol OM 1.33
18 Terpinene-4-ol OM 1.68
19 Arthole OM 0.67
20 -Terpineol OM 0.73
21 Fenchyl acetate OM 0.56
22 (Z)-Geraniol OM 0.23
23 (Z)-Citral OM 6.79
24 β-Farnesene SH 0.50
Hanh Thi Nhu Hoang et al.
46
No. Compound Class Percentage composition (%)
25 (E)-Citral OM 7.26
26 Neryl acetate OM 0.14
27 Isovalerone NT 0.01
Total 99.57
MH (Monoterpene Hydrocarbons) 19.97
OM (Oxygenated Monoterpenes) 75.89
SH (Sesquiterpene Hydrocarbons) 0.5
NT (Non-Terpenes) 3.21
Out of 27 compounds identified in the D.
benenica oil, 19 of them are also found in the
rhizome essential oils of D. rubrostriata, D. citrea,
and D. orlowii. The most abundant class of the
rhizome essential oil of D. benenica is oxygenated
monoterpenes (75.89%), similar to those of D.
rubrostriata (64.92–94.06%) [21] and of D. citrea
(79.47–90.73%) [22, 23]. However, this finding is
very different from that of the essential oil of D.
orlowii, which comprises oxygenated monoterpenes
(29.4%), monoterpene hydrocarbons (23.9%),
sesquiterpene hydrocarbons (33.7%), and oxygenated
sesquiterpenes (11.2%) [23]. Furthermore, 1,8-cineole
presented in rhizome essential oil of D. benenica, D.
rubrostriata, and D. citrea as the major component
with 54.39%, 13.2–22.0% and 23.00–43.67%,
respectively [21-23]. Surprisingly, this compound
is not identified in D. orlowii [23]. Similarly, a
remarkable amount of (E)-citral is found in the
rhizome essential oil of D. benenica, D. rubrostriata,
and D. citrea but conspicuously absent in D. orlowii.
Besides, a significant quantity of -pinene (7.50%),
(Z)-citral (6.79%), and -pinene (4.51%) in D.
benenica is previously reported on three other
Distichochlamys species [21-23]. All of the data in
the present and previous studies indicate a
similarity in the chemical composition of the
rhizome essential oil of D. rubrostriata, D. citrea, and
D. benenica.
3.2 Acetylcholinesterase inhibition
The essential oil is tested for AChE inhibitory
activity at various concentrations. Galanthamine is
used as a positive control. The essential oil exhibits
moderate AChE inhibition with an IC50 value of
136.63 2.70 g/mL. However, this oil displays a
much weaker activity compared with
galanthamine (IC50 = 0.33 ± 0.01 g/mL) (Table 2).
The potency of D. benenica essential oil is stronger
than that of Lavandula officinalis (IC50 = 820 g/mL)
and Ocimum sanctum oils (IC50 = 1600 g/mL) [26],
but slightly weaker than that of Artemisia
maderaspatana, Artemisia dracunculus, Pinus
heldreichii subsp. leucodermis, and Pinus nigra subsp.
nigra oils with IC50 values of 31.33, 58, 51.1, and 94.4
g/mL, respectively [26-28]. A literature survey
indicates that 1,8-cineole, -pinene, and β-pinene
possess a potent AChE inhibitory effect with IC50
values of 0.06 ± 0.01, 0.09 ± 0.005, and 0.2 ± 0.004
mg/mL, respectively [29]. These components are
found in the essential oil of D. benenica with a high
content (4.51–54.39%). Therefore, it is reasonable to
believe that these compounds contribute
significantly to the AChE inhibition of D. benenica
oil.
Hue University Journal of Science: Natural Science
Vol. 129, No. 1D, 43–49, 2020
pISSN 1859-1388
eISSN 2615-9678
DOI: 10.26459/hueuni-jns.v129i1D.5804 47
Table 2. AChE inhibitory activity of rhizome essential oil of Distichochlamys benenica
Samples Concentration (g/mL) Percentage of AChE inhibiton (%) IC50 (g/mL) SD
Essential oil
140 51.56 0.58
136.63 2.70
120 45.72 0.53
100 39.89 0.38
80 33.67 0.91
60 25.69 0.62
Galanthamine#
0.5 57.86 1.79
0.33 ± 0.01
0.4 52.88 0.75
0.3 47.61 0.34
0.2 42.44 1.09
0.1 28.37 1.23
#Positive control
4 Conclusion
In this study, we report the phytochemical
composition and AChE inhibitory activity of the
rhizome essential oil of D. benenica for the first
time. The oil is a pale yellow liquid with a
characteristic aromatic odor. Twenty-seven
constituents are present in the oil, in which 1,8-
cineole (54.39%), -pinene (7.50%), (E)-citral
(7.26%), (Z)-citral (6.79%), and -pinene (4.51%)
are major compounds. In addition, the essential oil
has moderate AChE inhibitory activity with an IC50
value of 136.63 2.70 g/mL. The obtained results
contribute positively in the establishment of the
database on Vietnamese endemic plants.
Funding statement
This work is financially supported by University of
Agriculture and Forestry, Hue University (ID No.
DHL2020-CB-02).
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank Mr. Cam Xuan Do,
University of Agriculture and Forestry, Hue
University for plant identification.
References
1. Raut JS, Karuppayil SM. A status review on the
medicinal properties of essential oils. Industrial
Crops and Products. 2014;62:250-264.
2. Swamy MK, Akhtar MS, Sinniah UR. Antimicrobial
properties of plant essential oils against human
pathogens and their mode of action: An updated
review. Evidence-Based Complementary and
Alternative Medicine. 2016;2016:1-21.
3. Reichling J, Schnitzler P, Suschke U, Saller R.
Essential oils of aromatic plants with antibacterial,
antifungal, antiviral, and cytotoxic properties-an
overview. Complementary Medicine Research.
2009;16(2):79-90.
4. Solórzano-Santos F, Miranda-Novales MG. Essential
oils from aromatic herbs as antimicrobial agents.
Current Opinion in Biotechnology. 2011;23(2):136-
141.
Hanh Thi Nhu Hoang et al.
48
5. Bassolé IHN, Juliani HR. Essential oils in
combination and their antimicrobial properties.
Molecules. 2012;17(4):3989-4006.
6. Lakhdar L, Hmamouchi M, Rida S, Ennibi O.
Antibacterial activity of essential oils against
periodontal pathogens: A qualitative systematic
review. Odontostomatol Trop. 2012;35(140):38-46.
7. Woollard AC, Tatham KC, Barker S. The influence
of essential oils on the process of wound healing: A
review of the current evidence. Journal of Wound
Care. 2007;16(6):255-257.
8. Rakover Y, Ben-Arye E, Goldstein LH. The
treatment of respiratory ailments with essential oils
of some aromatic medicinal plants. Harefuah.
2008;147(10):783-838.
9. Taga I, Lan CQ, Altosaar I. Plant essential oils and
mastitis disease: Their potential inhibitory effects on
pro-inflammatory cytokine production in response
to bacteria related inflammation. Natural Products
Communication. 2012;75(5): 1934578X1200700.
10. Buchbauer G. On the biological properties of
fragrance compounds and essential oils. Wiener
Medizinische Wochenschrift. 2004;154(21-22):539-
547.
11. Edris AE. Pharmaceutical and therapeutic potentials
of essential oils and their individual volatile
constituents: A review. Phytotherapy Research.
2007;21(4):308-323.
12. Bester D, Esterhuyse AJ, Truter EJ, van Rooyen J.
Cardiovascular effects of edible oils: a comparison
between four popular edible oils. Nutrition
Research Reviews. 2010;23(2):334-348.
13. Nóbrega de Almeida R, Agra MDF, Negromonte
Souto Maior F, De Sousa DP. Essential oils and their
constituents: anticonvulsant activity. Molecules.
2011;16(3):2726-2742.
14. Bagetta G, Morrone LA, Rombolà L, Amantea D,
Russo R, Berliocchi L, et al. Neuropharmacology of
the essential oil of bergamot. Fitoterapia. 2010;
81(6):453-461.
15. Fallatah SA, Khater EI. Potential of medicinal plants
in mosquito control. Journal of the Egyptian Society
of Parasitology. 2010;40(1):1-26.
16. Pohlit AM, Lopes NP, Gama RA, Tadei WP, Neto
VF. Patent literature on mosquito repellent
inventions which contain plant essential oils--a
review. Planta Medica. 2011;77(6):598-617.
17. Newman MF. Distichochlamys, a new genus from
Vietnam. Edinburgh Journal of Botany.
1995;52(1):65-69.
18. Binh NQ, Jana LŠ. Distichochlamys benenica
(Zingiberaceae), a new species from Vietnam. The
Gardens’ Bulletin Singapore. 2012;64(1):195-200.
19. Larsen K, Newman MF. A new species of
Distichochlamys from Vietnam and some
observations on generic limits in Hedychieae
(Zingebraceae). Natural History Bulletin of the Siam
Society. 2001;49(1):77-80.
20. Rehse T, Kress WJ. Distichochlamys rubrostriata
(Zingiberaceae), a new species from northern
Vietnam. Brittonia. 2003;55(3):205-208.
21. Tuyet NTB. Research on the chemical compositions
of some Vietnamese Distichochlamys species of
Distichochlamys rubrostriata W. J. Kress & Rehse
and Pukdarak. Vietnam Journal of Material
Medicine. 2012;17(2):112-116. Vietnamese
22. Ty PV, Duc HV, Thang LQ. Chemical composition
of essential oil from the rhizomes of
Distichochlamys citrea collected in Central Vietnam.
Journal of Sciences, An Giang University. 2015;8(4):
60-65. Vietnamese
23. Huong LT, Chau DTM, Hung NV, Dai DN,
Ogunwande IA. Volatile constituents of
Distichochlamys citrea M. F. Newman and
Distichochlamys orlowii K. Larsen & M. F. Newman
(Zingiberaceae) from Vietnam. Journal of Medicinal
Plants Research. 2017;11(9):188-193.
24. Adams RP. Identification of essential oil components by
gas chromatography/mass spectrometry. 4th Edition.
Illinois: Allured Publishing. 2017. 804 p.
25. Ellman GL, Courtne KD, Andres VJ, Feather-Stone
RM. A new and rapid colorimetric determination of
acetylcholinesterase activity. Biochemical
Pharmacology. 1961;7(2):88-95.
26. Dohi S, Terasaki M, Makino M. Acetylcholinesterase
inhibitory activity and chemical composition of
commercial essential oils. Journal of Agricultural
and Food Chemistry. 2009;57(10):4313-4318.
27. Srivastava N, Singh B, Chanda D, Shanker K.
Chemical composition and acetylcholinesterase
inhibitory activity of Artemisia maderaspatana
essential oil. Pharmaceutical Biology. 2015;53(11):
1677-1683.
28. Bonesi M, Menichini F, Tundis R, Loizzo MR, Conforti
F, Passalacqua NG, et al. Acetylcholinesterase and
butyrylcholinesterase inhibitory activity of Pinus species
Hue University Journal of Science: Natural Science
Vol. 129, No. 1D, 43–49, 2020
pISSN 1859-1388
eISSN 2615-9678
DOI: 10.26459/hueuni-jns.v129i1D.5804 49
essential oils and their constituents. Journal of Enzyme
Inhibition and Medicinal Chemistry. 2010;25(5):622-628.
29. Savelev S, Okello E, Perry NS, Wilkins RM, Perry EK.
Synergistic and antagonistic interactions of
anticholinesterase terpenoids in Salvia lavandulaefolia
essential oil. Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior.
2003;75(3):661-668.
Các file đính kèm theo tài liệu này:
chemical_composition_and_acetylcholinesterase_inhibitory_act.pdf