Đề tài So sánh đối chiếu về ngữ âm học giữa Tiếng Anh và Tiếng Việt

nd /a/. In fact, most of the difficulties are not really the types which will hinder communication. Nevertheless, they sound foreign to the ears of the native speakers of English and thus deserve sufficient attention. The Consonants Distinctions in Vietnamese The Vietnamese and English consonant chart shows the phonemes unique to one system and absent from the 7 other. There are three classes of consonants^ exclu• sively existing in Vietnamese: (1) The alveolar stops: the aspirated /th/ and the retroflex /t/ (2) The voiceless palatal velar spirant /kh/, which resembles the Greek velar fricative /x/ and is approximately close to the German /ch/ (3) The palatal /c/ and nasal /n/, which resembles the Spanish /n/ These distinctions would present serious problems for English students in learning Vietnamese, They would probably substitute their English /O/ for Viet• namese /th/ and their aspirated (k'] for Vietnamese /kh/, '^ See their full phonetic description in the Viet• namese consonant section. S6 TABLE IV: VIETNAMESE AND ENGLISH CONSONANTS Vietnamese English Labials -p b- f- V -P- -b- -f- -v -m- -w- -m- -w- Vietnamese English Dentals and alveolars -t- th- d- t s- -t- -0- --&- -d- -s- -n- 1- -n- -1- -r- Vietnamese English Vietnamese Engl ish - c - -c- - J - Palatals S« Z_ -s- -z Velars -n- -y -y Vietnamese kh- -k- g- -'vj- Engl ish -k - - g - -^ Glo t t a l s h- -h- ^Vietnamese and English consonants are grouped according to their respective point of articulation. A hyphen before and after each consonant indicates the distributional pattern of that consonant in relation to neighboring vowels (pre- or post-vocalic or both). S7 TABLE V: CONSONANT DISTRIBUTIONS OF VIETNAMESE AND ENGLISH Vietnamese*!* English*'^ ' Initial c cc c cc ccc Medial c cc ccc cccc Final c c cc ccc cccc *!*Vietnamese: Initial c: any consonant Final c:/p, t, c, k, n, ,n, m, y, w/ Initial cc: any consonant except hi) -^hl '•"J^ English: Initial c: any consonant except /z/ Medial c: any consonant Final c: any consonant For the consonant clusters see C. C, Fries, Teaching and Learning English as a Foreign Language (Ann Arbor, Mich., 1963), pp. I7-2O0 respectively. The retroflex /t/ and the palatal nasal /n/ are unmatched by anything in English. They are real problems for English learners, yet they can overcome the difficulty by simply being instructed very carefully about the phonetic nature of the new sounds in order to learn to pronounce them with adequate accuracy. Viet• namese learners, in turn, tend to substitute the Viet• namese stop /th/ for the nearest English sound, the fricative /Q/, and the aspirated stop /kh/ for the Eng• lish aspirated allophone [kOof [k]. These Vietnamese sounds and some others which in some respects are pho• netically similar to some sounds in English but are not sufficiently like the English sounds to be classified as the same cause critical trouble for the native speakers of Vietnamese, It is more difficult to break an old habit than to learn a new one, e.g., Vietnamese /t/ is unaspirated in the initial position, its aspi• rated variety /th/ is phonemic, and its allophone, the unreleased (t'^J occurs only in the final position, Viet• namese /t/ is matched by the English /t/; both are voice• less dental stops. In English, aspiration following the phoneme /t/ is allophonic, while in Vietnamese it is pho• nemic. Furthermore, Vietnamese dentals /t, d/ are more tense and articulated more front than the English equi• valents. Nevertheless this phonetic difference does not cause any hindrance in communication. They only sound 9^ odd to the native speakers of English. Distinctions in English Four classes of consonants are observed unique to English: (1) The affricates /c, j7 (2) The interdental fricatives /©, ^ / (3) The bilabial voiceless stop /p/ The latter phoneme /p/ is phonemically significant in English, while in Vietnamese it is in complementary dis• tribution with its voiced partner (bj, It is in the ini• tial position in some loan words, but not all the Viet• namese succeed in pronouncing it as a voiceless consonant (see the Vietnamese consonant section). (4) The voiced alveolar flap /r/ It "occurs at least (the exact conditioning factors are still unknovjn) between a stressed and unstressed vowel as an allophone of both /t/ and /d/ for example in matter, latter, sadder, etc," Besides these peculiar consonants, aspiration in English after certain consonants is allophonic but pho• nemic in Vietnamese, cf.: /kh/ (k'j /th/ (tj d Andreas Koutsoudas and Olympia Koutsoudas, "A Con• trastive Analysis of the Segmental Phonemes of Greek and English," Language Learning, XII (1962) 214. 90 These distinctions which are unique in English cause real conflicts and critical difficulties for the Viet• namese students. They tend to carry their own pho• nemic habits into English and fail to imitate a proper pronunciation. The teacher should call the students' special attention to those sounds. The same is true with the problems of the new vowel sounds. These new consonant sounds should be described clearly in terms of their phonetic qualities. Once the students know how the new sounds are articulated, they should be given proper drill to master a new set of habits gov• erning their vocal apparatus. It is helpful for the teacher, in drilling the new sounds, to start from the native sound closest to the point of articulation of the new sound and glide or change to the position of the new sound. For example, to help Vietnamese stu• dents produce the English palatal affricate /^/ or (ts), the students can be instructed to start from the position of [tj , then draw the apex backward to the position of [sj, slowly at first, then faster and faster until the student can reach an acceptably approximate pronunciation. If we have to teach Vietnamese to native speakers of English, we can do the same thing with the phonemes foreign to English. Finally, to avoid negative substitution, the teacher can make up a vocabulary list which shows that the foreign sound is phonemically in 91 contrast with the sound the students are familiar with, e-g., English /p-/ vs. /b-/ /c/ vs. /s/ Since /s/ does exist in Vietnamese, too, students tend to substitute /s/ for /c/, with which they are not fami• liar. The details of the contrastive analysis of the tv/o consonant systems are given in the next paragraph. Teaching Problems The labials Vietnamese -p b- f- v- -m- -w- English -p- -b- -f- -v- -m- -w- Distributional problems As the diagram shows, both languages have the same ntmiber of labials; the distribution of these phonemes is, however, not the same in both languages, and it will pre• sent troublesome conflicts. In Vietnamese, initial bilabial (p-J is rare (see the Vietnamese consonant system); it is normally an allophone of the initial tb-J ; f-p) is always found in the final position and unreleased. Vietnamese labiodentals /f, v/ occur initially, while the English labiodental equiva• lents occur freely in all positions. The Vietnamese consequently fail to pronounce English /p/ in the ini• tial and medial positions; they will say /b/ instead. 92 Also, they have trouble distinguishing the English fi• nal and medial voiceless and voiced fricatives since in Vietnamese we do not have any medial consonant and all the final consonants are either voiceless stops /P, t, c, k/ or nasals /m, n, n,^/o We have diffi• culty with the allophones of /p/ in English also. It is difficult for us to pronounce (p'] with a "puff of air" and the unaspirated medial (pj which are foreign to our phonetic habits. The bilabial sets Vietnamese -m- -w- English -m- -w- The bilabial sets cause less trouble. Since Viet• namese is a monosyllabic language, it does not have any medial consonant; however, our students can pronounce the English medial (^-m-) with ease and enough accuracy: Mommy : /mami/ Since we have a compound word like mau - man , : /mau + maj;/ the students can be instructed to pronounce the two ele-- ments of Mommy v;ithout pause until they reach the proper pronunciation. Vietnamese /w/ might be claimed to be iden• tical with the English /w/ because their articulation and distribution are relatively similar. 93 The dentals and alveolars Vietnamese -t- th- d- t- English -t- -0- -^- -d- s- -n- 1- z- •n- The first group • . , .. Vietnamese .'-t- th- d- t- /).. English -t- -0- -i- -d- Phonetic, allophonic, and distribution problems. Eliminating the Vietnamese retroflex alveolar stop /t/, which is exclusively Vietnamese, the three others /t, th, d/ are comparable to English /t, d, 0,^ 8 / in some pho• netic respects. The Vietnamese stop /t/ is an unaspirated dental in the initial position, an unreleased or neutralized con• sonant the final position, while the English equivalent /t/ is an aspirated alveolar stop in the initial posi• tion and has two more allophones than the Vietnamese /t/. It is aspirated in the initial position, unaspirated after certain consonants, optionally unreleased or neu• tralized in the final position, and becomes a flap inter- vocalically (see English consonant section, the distri• bution) . The Vietnamese stop /d/ is an unaspirated dental which occurs only in the initial position; it is very close to the English alveolar stop /d/ but not quite the same. English /d/ is articulated further back at the tooth ridge and is slightly aspirated in the initial 94 position. English /d/ has the same allophone in all positions; optionally it is neutralized in the final position. Vietnamese students therefore should be warned about the difference in the point of articula• tion between Vietnamese and English pairs /t, d/. The aspiration of the English initial (ti) can be demon• strated by a burning match which, when held close in front of the mouth, is blown out as the English aspi• rated [t'] is released. The distribution as well as the characteristics of the two sound systems should be clearly studied. Vietnamese students thus should learn the English medial (-t-J and the English medial and final Cd]. It is hard for us Vietnamese to hear the contrast between the following pairs: bat / bad bet / bed cat / cad One more paragraph is needed to discuss the medial (-t-] . This is the most troublesome problem for us: We are confused with many allophones of the English /t/-- unaspirated intervocalically or a special flapf t). This American single flap (t} sometimes sounds exactly like /d/ in:^ coated / coded 9 These examples are extracted from. William G, Moulton, The Sounds of English and German (Chicago, 1?62), p. 43. 95 hearty / hardy filter / filled 'er W. G. Moulton observes that "Probably all Americans distinguish these pairs of words in careful speech, and in a pronunciation exercise.... In ordinary talk however, most Americans use the special flap allophone (t) for /t/."-*- [t} is observed to follow a vowel and /l/ or /r/. Another problem arises when it follows an /n/, as in the almost universal pronunciation wanna ("I wanna go") for want 'to. "This pronunciation is often called 'sloppy.' Perhaps it is. The important point here is that everyone—or nearly everyone--uses 11 it in normal speech." Students should therefore be made aware of this phenomenon if they want to be under• stood and understand the native speakers. The dif• ference between lattercand ladder, writing and riding is clear when each appears in context: /ai won^ go raidivj ^ n hjrs b^k "Sis aft'ernun/ The word /raidi^j/ is written riding and not writing of course'. The production of this peculiar sound is more difficult than its recognition. Students cannot suc• cessfully watch whether /t/ follows a vowel, /l/, /r/, lOjvioulton, p. 43. Moulton, p. 43. 96 or /n/ to achieve the special flap instead of the den• tal /t/ as it exists in their native tongue. If they master the English alveolar /t/, they still fail to use all its four allophones at the proper slot in its segmental structure. Listening to a tape recorder or imitating a genuine informant will help students to recognize and produce these allophones, especially the flap ft), which is sometimes phonetically similar to the flap [r]. The English interdental fricative pair /0,2/ are among the most troublesome sounds for Vietnamese stu• dents. We do have the voiceless alveolar aspirated stop /th/, which is phonetically in partial compari• son to the English voiceless interdental fricative /O/. Consequently, Vietnamese /th/ is commonly substituted for English /O/ which sometimes renders the utterance incomprehensible. My teaching experiences.prove this point. For the production of the English /O/, the stu• dents put the tip of their tongue between the teeth as they were told, then unconsciously withdrew the apex backward before blowing out the sound; thus, the tip of the tongue touches the tooth ridge exactly as in the articulation of the Vietnamese /th/. In the same way the English /^/ is mixed with the Vietnamese retroflex alveopalatal fricative /z/ or al• veolar fricative /z/ which exists in the Hanoi dialect, 97 of which most of the educated people are fully aware and can successfully imitate. The English contrastive pair then /^an/ Zen /ze.n/ (Zen Buddhism) sound the same to the Vietnamese. The second group Vietnamese s- -n- 1- English -s- -n- -1- Distributional problems. The Vietnamese /s, n, 1/ are phonetically similar to the English approximates /s, n, l/. These sounds consequently appear similar to our students; however, their distribution in the English phonemic structure is not the same as in Vietnamese, and our students will have phonetic problems, i.e., they have to learn how to link elements of English polysyl• labic words to make them sound natural and understandable The Vietnamese /s, 1/ occur initially only; /n/ occurs at both ends of a morpheme or word because of the Vietnamese structure CVC. Therefore, the English medial and final /-s-i -1/ and medial /-n-/ are foreign to Vietnamese lin• guistic habits. The medial /s, 1, n/ nevertheless do not cause critical problems because there are many partially reduplicative forms in Vietnamese which appear with these phonemes: xa - xoi /sa + soy/ : 'remote' 9^ la - liTng /la + lui^V • ^strange' nan - ni /na-r^ -^ ni/ : 'to beseech' To enable the students to get at an acceptably approxi• mate pronunciation of an English polysyllabic word, the teacher needs only to tell his students to link the syl• lables together without holding their breath at any syl• lable. The English word sensational, for example, will will normally be pronounced by a Vietnamese beginner as four separate syllables: san +se -»-san tn^n The final C-lj is reproduced by his native final (-n] . This trouble can be surmounted rather easily by drilling the student into linking all the syllables together in one breath. Syllable-linking is characteristic of all the non-monosyllabic languages. It does not happen at morpheme boundaries only, but at the word boundaries as well. A native speaker of English would not say an officer separately as /an/ofis3r/, but he will say it in one word /anofissr/; when I will become /wh^nai/, and the like. The speaker of a monosyllabic language will fail to make such a liaison if he is not well trained. To help the student achieve a new habit of connecting many elements of a word, the teacher might resort to the written form, i,e., rewrite the English phrase using the Vietnamese segmental structure as a basis in such a way that the needed word-linking can be pronounced without a 99 big effort, e.g., when I is rewritten whe - nai: is he well is rewritten i - zi - well: and an officer is re• written a - nofficer. The English final (-1) is more critical. The Viet• namese learner would say /san + se-f san-i-ndn/ or /san -^-se + san'fna +la/ because in Vietnam /l/ is always followed by a vowel. To correct this error, the student should be told to keep the apex of his tongue against the gum- ridge as if he were going to say a word beginning with /l/ but not to release it. After the distributional analysis is made, drill is the only effective method to help the student achieve an approximate pronunciation because to speak a foreign language with a "perfect ac• cent" is too ambitious for any foreigner who learns a language different from his own. "It is not reasonable as a rule to expect a foreign teacher [even a teacher) to speak just like an Englishman or an American, any more than it is to expect an Englishman or an American to speak just like a foreigner when using the foreigner's language,"i^ The third group Vietnamese English -z- -r- Phonemic problems. The English /z, r/ are unmatched •'•^ J. 0, Gauntlett, Teaching English as a Foreign Language (New York, 19ol], p. 63 ' ' ^ ^^ 100 by anything in Vietnamese. Consequently, they may cause positive conflict for the Vietnamese learners. In actual fact, we do not have a really hard time in mastering these because even though /z/ does not exist in the Hue dialect (see the Vietnamese consonant chart), it does exist in Hanoi and other northern dialects"^^ as a phoneme, and all students are aware of the fact and can produce this sound with adequate accuracy. In fact, many Hue people can speak the northern dialect without any "accent" at all. The English /r/ is not too difficult either because a similar sound, the flap (r), does exist in the southern dialect as a sporadic allophone of /y/; in the Hue dia• lect, it is a sporadic allophone of /z/. Therefore it is not too difficult for the Vietnamese learner. However, as with other English final consonants which are not similar to one of the eight Vietnamese final consonants, we still have trouble with the English /z, r/ when they occur in the medial and final positions. To remedy this error, the teacher can apply the same method as suggested for other English final consonants mentioned previously. The palatals Vietnamese English C- Y •J V S- S = z- o V -z- -n= »y- ^^A contrastive analysis of the three main dialects-- North, Central, and South-^^will be presented in comparison with English in the next chapter of this study. 101 The first group Vietnamese -c- English -c- -j' Phonemic problem. The palatals /c, n/ which exist exclusively in Vietnamese are not our concern for the pres• ent purpose, to teach English to the Vietnamese, On the contrary, the exclusively English existing sounds /^, 5/ are our major problems since they are unmatched in the Vietnamese sound system. The teacher should spend enough time to acquaint the student with their phonetic nature and their distribution in the English segmental structure. To avoid negative substitution for the English /c', 37 by the nearest Vietnamese sounds /s, z/, the student needs to be drilled daily after a full discussion of the physio• logical factors involved in producing these sounds foreign to Vietnamese is made, until one day the learner real• izes that the strange sounds are in contrast V7ith his na• tive ones, until he can pronounce Gnine_§^ . as /cainiz/ in• stead of /sainiz/j /j^ orja/ instead of /zorz'^/, and so forth. The second group V V Vietnamese s- z- -y- English - s - -z- -y- Phonetic and d i s t r i bu t i ona l problems. Two sets of the voice less and voiced f r i ca t ives in both systems are phonet ica l ly comparable. In fac t , the Vietnamese and 102 English /s7 are identical, while their voiced counter• parts are different because of the fact that the Viet• namese sibilant /f/ is retracted or retroflexed, while the English equivalent is a plain alveopalatal sibilant. Yet the phonetic difference is not great and does not hinder communication. The real problem is the distribu• tional one. The Vietnamese sibilants occur only in the initial position, whereas the English equivalents occur more freely, /s/ in all positions and /z/ in the medial and final positions. The distributional problem here is similar to that of other consonants discussed in several previous paragraphs. The same suggested teaching tech• niques can be applied with the distributional problem here as well. The semivowel or palatal glide /y/ in Vietnamese is approximately identical with its equivalent in English, In Vietnamese it occurs initially as a consonant and fi• nally as the on-glide of the diphthong; in English it is a consonant in the initial and medial positions between stressed vowels and an on-glide in the final position. The English /y/ does not cause real conflict, yet the phonotactic difference should be pointed out, and the drilling lessons are still needed until the student mas• ters the distributional problem. 103 The velars Vietnamese kh- k- g- -^- English -k- -g- -^ Allophonic and distribution problems. The Vietnam• ese velars are comparable to the English as far as the articulation is concerned. Vietnamese has one extra pho• neme which is significant uniquely to Vietnamese, the voiceless palatovelar spirant /kh/, that would cause positive trouble to Americans who learn Vietnamese. The Vietnamese student, in turn, is inclined to substitute his native /kh/ for the English initial aspirated (k'J or simply to pronounce it without the "puff of air" like his Vietnamese initial unaspirated (k-), Among the velars, this English /k/ with its three allophonic variants--as- pirated in the initial position, unaspirated in the medial position after certain consonants, and optionally unre• leased in the final position—might be looked upon as the cause of a serious problem--phonetic, allophonic, and dis-- tributional—for the Vietnamese, The distribution along with the phonetic difference of the allophones of the Eng• lish /k/ should be clearly taught before any attempt at drilling can be thought of. The other velars /^,'^/ existing in both languages are phonetically similar. The teacher should call the student's attention to the phonotactic difference which might cause trouble. This type of trouble is not too 104 d i f f i c u l t t o overcome, however. The g l o t t a l R Vietnamese h- English -h- Distributional problem. The glottal fricative /h/ is relatively identical in both languages. The English /h/ occurs initially and intervocalically, and sometimes it serves as a central glide (see the English consonant section), while the Vietnamese /h/ occurs initially only. But this phonotactic difference is not a problem to the Vietnamese students since the English /h/ is always fol• lowed by a vowel like the Vietnamese /h/. General Remarks The English consonants which are completely foreign to Vietnamese students are not many in number. They are restricted to affricates /c, ^/ and fricatives /0,i/. Vietnamese consonants which are phonetically comparable to their English approximates are normally more tense than the English, And finally, because of the Vietnam• ese segmental structure (CVC), we have distributional problems with almost all the English consonants v.rhich occur freely in all positions. Analysis of the Consonant Clusters Properly speaking, Vietnamese does not have any con• sonant clusters if the combination (C^w) is not counted. 105 The glide /w/ which follows any consonant except /f/ signals the labialization of the preceding consonant before it is released to form a syllabic peak with the vocal nucleus immediately following. This type of "con• sonant cluster" occurs initially only and never consists of more than two elements (C-»-w). There is only one case in which we see a reduplicative formation with four syllables: Bu - lu - bu loa /bu tlu + bu +Iwa/ It is an adverbial phrase which occurs exclusively with the verb khoc, 'to cry,' or sometimes the verb is simply dropped out and the adverb alone is used vividly to de• scribe the manner of the action. This peculiar redupli• cation makes us think that at one time Vietnamese might have had the cluster /bl/. The consonant cluster phenomenon is new to the Viet• namese as well as to speakers of other monosyllabic lan• guages. The student therefore faces an extreme diffi• culty in his attempt to master all English consonant clusters which may consist of four elements. These occur finally and medially, but in the initial position the cluster never exceeds three elements. The English consonant combinations consisting of a consonant and the glide /w/ such as /dw, kw, tw, sw, hw, sw ,../ are not difficult for the Vietnamese student at all because such clusters do exist in his mother tongue. 106 With all other types of clusters, the student tends to insert a vowel (normally /(?/, which is approximately identical to the English unstressed vowel /a/) between the consonants of the cluster to match his segmental pho• neme structure (CV). Thus the insertion of /a/ in be• tween two elements will create an extra syllable: square will become /sakw^/ or /sakwtr^/. With the three-conso• nant clusters, the insertion of /«/ in between the first and the second element with a syllable division after the second consonant will create two extra syllables in words like: street /satarit/ splash /sapal^s/ ... Time and space do not allow this study to include a full discussion of problems concerning the English con• sonant cluster system. A separate research of this type of teaching problem is needed. Other Problems Besides the phoneme, allophone, distribution, and sequence problems discussed along with the contrastive analysis of the two sound systems, the Vietnamese learner has another problem in learning to master spoken English because of the English inconsistency in its spelling. The English alphabet is similar to his. If a Vietnamese mis• pronounces the word hiccough, this does not mean that he is ignorant of the pronunciation of all the segmental pho- 107 nemes involved, but he i s unfor tuna te ly puzzled by the Engl ish w r i t t e n form -ough which r ep re sen t s a v a r i e t y of p ronunc ia t ion : /-^f/ in cough /-Ap/ in hiccough /-uw/ in through /-Af/ in rough etc. Vietnamese is exempt from such ridiculous symbols which stand for several sounds. Each written form in Vietnam• ese represents uniquely one sound. This fact does save time and effort for children as well as for foreign learners who master Vietnamese spelling. They need not bother to learn the spelling of every word. But the Vietnamese learner does have a crucial problem in learn• ing English spelling. He has to memorize, for example, four English words: honest, honor, hour, and heir, the /h/ of which is silent. Quite often he has to look up the pronunciation of each word in the dictionary or check with an informant available. The native speaker himself has to look up the right pronunciation also'. Another problem arises when the same symbol might represent two different sounds in the two languages. The Vietnamese are frequently deceived by the English sequence /tr/ which does exist in Vietnamese orthog• raphy, but the written form in our language represents only one sound, the retroflex alveolar stop /t/. In the 10^ same way, (ch) in English usually symbolizes'the affri• cate /c/, while in Vietnamese it is a digraph for the palatal stop /c/, the production of which is made by the blade of the tongue against the hard palate. Other spelling problems trouble those Vietnamese students who have had French as their first foreign language.-'-^ These students usually get confused by two systems of writing, or even three: French, English, and Vietnamese. The Vietnamese student generally does not have a hard time facing the French sound system. The quality and quantity of most French vowels is similar to Vietnamese, and the same is true of the consonants. But this cate• gory of students, i.e., those who have had French, does face a double difficulty: They have to forget their own linguistic habits and their learned French habits when they study English, My brother, who had spoken fluent French before he learned English, one day came home and asked me the meaning of the following utterance: /i am tir©d ut/ I asked him "Are you speaking Indian?" (we use this term for all dialects spoken in India and Pakistan). He ^^In secondary school in Vietnam, two foreign lan• guages, French and English, are required, but they are not taken at the same time. The student has a choice to take either English or French as the first foreign language at the Junior level (which is equivalent to the sixth grade in the American school system) with six hours per week. At the Senior level (tenth grade in the United States), the student will have the second foreign language with a four-hour load along with his first foreign language. 109 laughed and said, "No it is English: I am tired out spoken with French spelling'." The student should keep in mind that French /r/ is a uvular and that English /r/ is a flap /r/, although both are written with graph (r). The French digraph (th) is an unaspirated /t/ in a word like Othello /otalo/, while the English (th) is aspirated interdental fricative /O/, and Othello will be /oocOfloo./. French (ch) represents the sibilant /s/, while in English it represents the affricate /c/ except in the words Michi• gan and Chicago /mis'igen/ and /sikago / and other loan words. The teacher who must work with such a category of students should be aware of this situation. It is recom• mended that he make a contrastive analysis of French and English after the same work has been done between Viet• namese and English to point out the similarities and dis• crepancies in the English, French, and Vietnamese sound systems as well as the difference in the official spelling of each language in relation to its respective sounds. Analysis of Vietnamese and English Prosodic Features The analysis of Vietnamese phonology reveals that besides the tonal pattern which is inherent in the syllabic nucleus, Vietnamese does have other prosodic features-- juncture, intonation, and stress. However it is probably impossible or too soon to attempt a satisfactory compari• son of the prosodic features of Vietnamese with those of 110 English because the nature and quality of intonation and stress is not unanimously agreed upon yet. As stated in the introduction, the present study does not have the ambition to venture into such a diffi• cult area in detail, and it should not be expected to contain a full analysis of the prosodic elements of Vietnamese in comparison with those of English. Further research and investigation is necessary before any state• ment concerning such a comparison can be made. It is known, however, that juncture in Vietnamese is comparable to that in English; consequently, it does not present a difficult problem to the Vietnamese learner. It is also known that above the tonal pattern which is part of the phonemic system, the intonation and stress in Vietnam• ese are not phonemically significant as they are in English. These areas are counted among the greatest problems for our student. He can recognize the English sentence pitch but can hardly imitate the proper intona• tion distributed over the words and sentences, conditioned sometimes by the degree of word stress or emotional ex• pression. Pitch in English is a part of the sentence and phrase, while in Vietnamese it is an inherent part of the individual word. The English intonation is foreign to Vietnamese linguistic habits. The most critical trouble, however, is not intonation but the stress pattern. It is not unreasonable to state that it is beyond human ability Ill for an adult speaker of a language like Vietnamese to put the right degree of stress on English words and sentences. The safest way to achieve a proper pronun• ciation is to look up the stress pattern of a new word in the dictionary'. This is done sometimes by the native speakers of English as well. CHAPTER V AN ANALYSIS OF ENGLISH AND THREE MAIN DIALECTS SPOKEN IN VIETNAM It is generally acknowledged that Vietnamese has three main dialects, spoken in three main regions: the North, the Central, and the South. The difference lies in the pronunciation of words and the tone pattern, not in morph- j ology or syntax. In other words, there is only one Ian- / guage, but spoken with different "accents." It is not ne- // ) • ' cessary to make a complete analysis of these dialects and English, yet it helps the teacher considerably if he knows the difference between these dialects so that he can better understand the particular problems of his stu-Zl dents from different parts of the country. For example,' /z/ exists in the Hanoi dialect as a phoneme but does not exist in the Hue or Saigon dialects. Robert Lado sees this situation in his statement: "When we need to know the problems facing speakers of more than one dialect, separate solutions must be worked out for each problem. If the differences are minor, it may be possible to com• bine the presentation of the problems, but the statements must remain quite specific."-'' A brief phonemic analysis of the differences among the main dialects spoken in Vietnam is presented in this ^Robert Lado, Linguistics across Cultures (Ann Arbor, Mich., 1961), p. 23. 112 113 chapter. For the purpose of comparison, four charts of the significant sound segments of English and the Hanoi, Hue, and Saigon dialects will show the characteristics of each dialect. The four phonemic charts will show the common difficulties Vietnamese speakers of all dialects will have (see the contrastive analysis of the Hue dia• lect and English, chapter III, in comparison with the phonemes in the Hanoi and Saigon dialects). On the other hand, there are a few phonemes which are unique to each of the three dialects, e.g., /s/ is not included in the Hanoi dialect, and therefore the English /s/ presents a real difficulty for the student speaking this dialect. .| The teacher can help him achieve the pronunciation of this sound if he is aware of the fact that this sound is \ nonexistent in the Hanoi dialect. It needs special at• tention. Hue and Saigon students have no difficulty with^ this English /s/ simply because it does exist in these sound systems. The Hanoi palatal stop /c/ is pronounced with a strong friction, while the same phoneme in Saigon and Hue is not. Consequently, the speaker of Hanoi tends to substitute his aspirated /c/ for the English affricate /c/, while the speaker of the other two dialects tends to substitute his native /s/ for the English /c7. The English /z/ is identical with the Hanoi /z/. The transfer made 114 TABLE VI: ENGLISH (AMERICAN) Bilabial Labio- Inter- Al- Pala- Ve- Glot- dental dental veolar tal lar tal vl^ :^ Stops vd- vl Fricatives vd Nasals Lateral Semivowels Vowels high higher mid mid lower mid low P b m f V G h t d s z n 1, r C V 3 V V Z Front y i I e f. 3^ k g h '5 Gen- Back tral r h v/ u u a 0 A 0 a '!*vl signifies voiceless, and vd indicates voiced. 115 TABLE VII: HANOI DIALECT^ :^ Bilabial Labio- Inter- Al- Pala- dental dental veolar tal Stops Fricatives Nasals Lateral v l vd v l vd Semivowels Vowels '^^ '^ 'high h i g h e r mid mid lower mid low Ve- Glot. l a r t a l -P b - f- V - - m - - t - t h - d- s_ z~ - n - 1- c- rJ n- Front y • 1 k - kh - h - g - -V- Cen- Back t r a l w if u 6 o ^The consonant cha r t i s t aken from. Nguyen Dinh Hoa, Ngu Hoc Nhap Mon (Saigon, 1962) , p . 66 . >io;cThe number of vox^rels and semivowels i s t he same i n a l l d i a l e c t s . Thei r q u a l i t y and q u a n t i t y a re pho• n e m i c a l l y s i m i l a r . Stops vd vl Fricatives vd Nasals Lateral Semivowel -P b- -m- 116 TABLE VIII : HUE DIALECT- Bilabial Labio- Inter- Al- Pala- Ve- Clot, dental dental veolar tal lar tal t- -c- -k- th- t- (L g- f- V- s- s- kh- • z- n- -n- 1- -n- -5- -y>>:c q.-;o.o!'^ !?^ %^ !^'^ '^'''^ ^ '^ '^^ ^ ^^^^ initially in the Hue and baigon dialects as a voiced palatal TABLE IX: SAIGON DIALECT>;= Bilabial Labio- Inter- Al- Pala- Ve- Glot^ dental dental veolar tal lar tal c., ^1 -P -t- -c- -k- Stops th- t-vd vl Fricatives vd Nasals Lateral Semivowel b- by- -m O V ^- s- s- kh- h- r\J •n- -n - -19. 1- -y- *l'These phonemes are taken from R. B. Jones and Huynh Sanh Thong. Introduction to Spoken Vietnamese (Washin."-ton D.C., i960), pp. 2-3. 117 by the speaker of Hanoi into English is therefore a posi• tive one, while this phoneme is not found in the Hue and Saigon dialects. The teacher should spend more time and practice this foreign sound with the students from Hue and Saigon. /v/ is replaced by /by/ in the Saigon dialect. The teacher should call the student's attention to this fact when he teaches this English sound to the speaker from Saigon. Once they are aware of these minor differences, the teacher can better help his students from various regions of Vietnam. CHAPTER VI CONCLUSION It has been stated in the Introduction that the pri• mary aim of this study is to point out the similarities and discrepancies of the English and Vietnamese sound systems in order to help Vietnamese and Americans, both teachers and learners alike, to better teach or learn English as a foreign language. This contrastive analysis gives a clear view of the phonemic and structural differ• ences between the two languages. It is intended first of all as a contribution to linguistics, and second, it is hoped that it will be a basis for improved and practical methods of teaching English and Vietnamese. The results of this study should primarily be used for the prepara• tion of lessons and exercises for Vietnamese learners of English. Such exercises are the first steps in the aural- oral method of learning a new language since "language is "I primarily an auditory system of symbols." This analysis can furthermore provide a basis for the comparative study of other languages and of geographic affinities of lan• guages; for example, it shows the similarity in some as• pects of Vietnamese with Chinese (monosyllabic and tonal), with Thai (tonal, final voiceless stops and nasals). ^Edward Sapir, Language (New York, 1949), p. 17. 2F. Kruatrachue, "Thai and English: A Comparative udy of Phonology for Pedagogical Applications," a doc-S toral dissertation, Indiana^University, June, I960, p. 50. lis WjJi."v.,V-'~ 119 From the merely pedagogical point of view, the analysis of the Vietnamese and English sound systems (Chapters II and III), their comparison (Chapter IV), along with the illustrations of the areas of difficulties will, according to C. C. Fries, "be of little practical aid to ordinary students unless they are built into lessons to furnish the exercises through which the necessary habits can be formed."^ Bloomfield firmly believes that "it is always best to have an informant who is a native speaker of the language one wishes to learn. "^ This is 100 percent true, yet it is not feasible to have native speakers of English as teachers in Vietnam except in higher education. The task of teaching English thus falls on the Vietnamese teachers. They cannot speak with the perfection of native informants, of course, but with a thorough knowledge of the phonological system of Vietnamese and English, they can do a better job than native informants who lack training in linguistics and teaching methods. They can arrive at pretty satisfactory results in teaching pronunciation. Materials based on findings of a comparison of the two languages prove to be scientific and more efficient, A systematic comparison ^C. C. Fries, Teaching and Learning English as a Foreign Language (Ann Arbor, Mich., 1963)7 P- 37. ^Leonard Bloomfield, Outline Guide for the Practi• cal Studv of Foreign Languages (Baltimore, Md., 1942), p. 2. 120 will save the teacher from selecting (or using) vari• ous textbooks which merely list disparate items from here and there and neglect the fact that every language constitutes a whole structural system or a totality. The teacher will have seen by now that the English vowel system is not too hard for the Vietnamese learner, but that the consonant system causes positive troubles. / The teacher should drill the student into new habits of producing those sounds that are completely or partiallyj I foreign to the speakers of Vietnamese, Finally, among ' the prosodic features, the English stress pattern is extremely difficult for the Vietnamese. Nevertheless, if the student wants to arrive at an approximately cor• rect pronunciation, he should cooperate with his teacher in trying to acquire a new set of habits, and he should be patient and alert in practicing and mimicking until he can speak the new language with the least "accent," He should realize that learning a language is to "prac- tice everything until it becomes a second nature. ""^ But practice is effective only when the student is fully aware of the major differences between his own sound sys• tem and that of the target language. It is hoped that this short study will be useful for improving the teach• ing of spoken English in Vietnam. ^Bloomfield, Outline, p. l6. BIBLIOGRAPHY Anthony, Ann, "Tools for Teaching Pronunciation," Language Learning, II (April-June 1949), 36-40. Baugh, Albert C. A Historv of the English Language, New York: Appleton-Uentury-Crofts, Inc., 19577 506 pp, Bloch,^Bernard, and George L. Trager, Outline of Linguis• tic Analvsis. Baltimore, Md.: Waverly Press, Inc, 1942, 82 pp. J y , Bloomfield, Leonard, Introduction to the Studv of Language. New York: Henry Holt and Company, 1914, 335 pp. , Language, New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc, 1963/ 564 ppe • Outling Guide for the Practical Study of Foreign Languages. Baltimore, Md.: The Linguistic Society of America, 1942. I6 pp, Bumpass, Faye L. Teaching Young Students English as a Foreign Language. New York: American Book Company, 1963 7 198 pp. Chatman, Seymour. "Some Problems in Teaching English Pro• nunciation to Speakers of Persian," Language Learning. I and II (1951-52), 36-41. Cochran, Anne. Modern Methods of Teaching English as a Foreign Language (A Guide to Modern Materials with Particular Reference to the Far East). Washington. D.C: Educational Services, 1958, 95 pp. Dykstra, Gerald, "Perspective on the Teacher's Use of Contrast," Language Learning, Nos. 3 and 4 (1956), 1-60 Emeneau, M, B. Studies in Vietnamese (Annamese) Grammar, Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1951. 235 pp. Emmons, Patricia Sommerlad. "Junior Linguistics," Language Learning, XII (1962), 129-132, Fries, C C. "As We See It," Language Learning, I (January 194^), 12-16. ^ . Tftflf^ hing and Learning English as a Foreign Language. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press, 1963. 153 PP- 121 122 Francis, W. Nelson. The Structure of American English, New York: The Ronald Press, 1958. 614 pp. Gauntlett, J, 0. Teaching English as a Foreign Language. London: Macmillan and Co,, Ltd., 1961. 128 pp7 Gleason, H. A, An Introduction to Descriptive Linguis- tics. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc, I9SI. 503 pp. • Workbook in Descriptive Linguistics, New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc., 1963. SS pp, Gouzien, Paul. Manuel franco-tonkinois de conversation. Paris, 1897. 166 pp. Handchin, Charles H, Methods of Teaching Modern Languages Yonkers-on-Hudson, N,Y,: World Book Company, 1923» 479 pp. Haugen, Finer. "The Phoneme in Bilingual Learning," Language Learning, VII (1956-57), 17-23. . "Problems of Bilingual Description," Language Learning, No. 7 (1954), 9"19o Heffner, R. M. S, General Phonetics. Madison: The Uni• versity of Wisconsin Press, I960. 253 pp. Hill, Archibald A. Introduction to Linguistic Structures, New York: Harcourt ,^race and Company, 195S, 496 pp. Hockett, C. F, A Course in Modern Linguistics. New York: The Macmillan Company, 195S, 621 pp, «„ , "Learning Pronunciation," The Modern Language Journal, XXXIV (April 1950), 261-269= Homberger, Conrad P. "How to Study a Language," Language Learning, VIII (July-December 1950), 117-126, Ilson, Robert. "The Dicto-Comp: A Specialized Technique for Controlling Speech and Writing in Language T.P.'^ir'ninP'/' Language Learning, XII (1962), 299-301, Jakobson, R. "Phonology and Phonetics," in Selected Writings. The Hague: Mouton and Company, 1962, 67B pp7 G, Faut, and H, Halle. PreJJjninarles_jto_j££ech Analvsis: The Distinctive Features _and Their^cir- relates. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1955^ 5^ PP^ -/ 123 Jones Daniel, An Outline of English Phonetics. Cambridge: ^- Heffer Sons, Ltd., 1962. 3^0 pp, Jones R. B., and Huynh Sanh Thong. Introduction to Spoken Vietnamese. Washington, B.C.: American Council of Learned Societies, I96O. Kenyon, J. S American Pronunciation. Ann Arbor, Mich.: George Wahr, 1951. 265 pp. Koutsoudas, Andreas, and Olympia Koutsoudas. "A Contras• tive Analysis of the Segmental Phonemes of Greek and English," Language Learning. XII (I962), 211-230. Kruatrachue, Foongfuang. "Thai and English: A Comparative Study of Phonology for Pedagogical Applications." A doctoral dissertation. Bloomington, Ind.: Indiana University, June I96O. 214 pp. Kruisinga, E. A Handbook of Present-dav English. Amersfoort Kemink en Zoon, Over Den Dom Te Utrecht, 1925. 311 pp. Lado, Robert. Language Teaching. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1964. 239 pp. , Linguistics across Cultures, Ann Arbor: The Univer• sity of Michigan Press, I96I, I4I pp. , "Pattern Practice--Completely Oral," Language Learn• ing, I (January 194^), 24-27. Le van Ly. Le parler vietnamien, sa structure phonologique et morphologique fonctionelle. Revised ed, Saigon, I960. 282 pp. Malmberg, Bertil, Phonetics, New York: Dover Publications, Inc., 1963. 123 pp. Meillet, A, Les langues du monde, Paris: Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, 1952, 1294 pp. Moulton, William G, The Sounds of English and German. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1962. 145 pp Nguyen Dinh Hoa, Ngu Hoc Nhap Mon. Saigon, 1962, I86 pp. Nida, E. A. Morphology: The Descriptive Analysis of Words. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press, 19630 343 pp. 124 Pike, K.L. Phonetics, Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press, 1962. 182 pp. . . "Problems in the Teaching of Practical Phonemics," Language Learning, I (April 194^), 3-^. Piroch, Goldie. "The Importance of Bilingual Description to Foreign Language Learning," Language Learning, VI (1955), 51-61, Reed, D. W., R. Lado, and Yao Shen, "The Importance of the Native Language in Foreign Language Learning," Language Learning. I (194^) 17-28. Sapir, Edward. Language: An Introduction to the Study of Speech, Nev7 York: Harcourt. Brace and Company, 1949. 242 pp. Shen Yao. "Recognition and Production Exercises in Pro• nunciation," Language Learning, VII (1956-57), 18-21. . "Linguistic Experience and Linguistic Habit," Language Learning, XII (1962), 133-150. . English Phonetics. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press, 1962. Sibley, H. G, The Teaching of Speech, Washington, D.C: The Volta Bureau, 1962. 302 pp, Slager, W. "The Foreign Student and the Immigrant: Their Different Problems as Students of English," Language Learning, VI (1956), 24-29. Strain, J. E. "Teaching a Pronunciation Problem," Language Learning, XIII (1962), 231-240, Sturtevant, E. H. An Introduction to Linguistic Science. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1963. 173 pp. Thompson, L. C. "Saigon Phonemics," Language, XXXV (July- September 1959), 454-476. . and Nguyen Due Hiep, A Vietnamese Reader, Seattle: University of Washington Press, 19D2. 368 pp, Upshur, J. Ae "Language Proficiency Testing and^the Con• trastive Analysis Dilemma," Language Learning, XII (1962), 123-127. 125 Ward, Ida C. The Phonetics of English, Cambridge: W, Heffer & Sons, Ltd., 1944o 255 PP» Williams, Ralph M, Phonetic Spelling^for College Stu- dents. New York: Oxford University Press, I960. 180 pp. Wolff, Hans, "Partial Comparison of the Sound Systems of English and Puerto-Rican Spanish," Language Learning, III (January-June 1950), 3^-40. ., "Phonemic Structure and the Teaching of Pronun• ciation," Language Learning, VI (1956), 17-24.