Đề tài Statnamic testing of piles in clay
CONTENTS
CHAPTER 1 - INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background 1
1.2 Research objectives 2
1.3 Outline of thesis . 2
CHAPTER 2 - LITERATURE REVIEW
2.1 Introduction 4
2.2 Static load testing methods .5
2.2.1 Maintained load test .5
2.2.2 Constant rate of penetration test .6
2.2.3 Osterberg load cell test .7
2.3 Rate effects .8
2.3.1 Rate effect studies using triaxial tests and torsion tests .9
2.3.2 Rate effect studies using direct shear tests .11
2.3.3 Rate effect studies using penetrometer and shear vane tests .13
2.3.4 Rate effect using a model instrumented pile in a clay bed .15
2.3.5 Results from field studies .16
2.4 Dynamic pile load tests .18
2.4.1 The stress wave propagation equation .19
2.4.2 Pile dynamic resistance 20
2.4.3 Static pile capacity .22
2.4.3.1 Case method of analysis 23
2.4.3.2 Signal matching method 23
2.4.4 Dynamic load test advantages and disadvantages 26
2.5 Statnamic load test 26
2.6 Statnamic data interpretation 28
2.7 Quake values for shaft and toe resistances and the softening effect .32
2.8 The changes of pore water pressure during pile installation and the subsequent
loading stages . .37
2.9 Summary .40
CHAPTER 3 - TESTING EQUIPMENT AND PROCEDURES
3.1 Introduction 56
3.2 The calibration chamber .57
3.3 Boundary effects .58
3.4 Bed preparation .60
3.4.1 Clay slurry preparation .60
3.4.2 Consolidometer 61
3.4.3 Clay bed instrumentation .62
3.4.4 1-D consolidation .63
3.4.5 Triaxial consolidation 65
3.4.6 Pile installation .68
3.5 Instrumented model pile .69
3.5.1 Pile tip component .69
3.5.2 Pile shaft sleeve component . 71
3.5.3 Actuator - Pile connection 72
3.5.4 Pile shaft load cell performance . 73
3.6 Servo-hydraulic loading system .73
3.7 Logging and control system .75
3.8 Instrumentation calibration .76
3.9 Testing procedure .78
3.9.1 Constant rate of penetration tests .78
3.9.2 Statnamic tests .79
3.9.3 Maintained load tests .80
3.10 Bed dismantling 80
CHAPTER 4 - TESTING PROGRAMME
4.1 Introduction 101
4.2 Clay bed preparation and transducer locations 102
4.3 Constant rate of penetration tests (CRP tests) 103
4.4 Statnamic tests (STN tests) .104
4.5 Maintained load tests (ML tests) . 105
CHAPTER 5 - BED PROPERTIES
5.1 Introduction 114
5.2 Clay bed 1-D consolidation 114
5.3 Clay bed isotropic triaxial consolidation 117
5.4 Performance of the calibration chamber during the pile load tests 117
5.5 Bed properties after the testing programme 119
CHAPTER 6 – PILE TEST DATA AND DISCUSSION
6.1 Introduction 139
6.2 Typical results of the pile load tests 139
6.3 Pile shaft resistance results and models for the pile shaft resistance 140
6.3.1 Non-linear models 141
6.3.2 A new non-linear model for pile shaft rate effects .145
6.3.3 Pile shaft softening effect .150
6.3.4 Repeatability of the static pile shaft resistances .152
6.4 Pile tip resistance results .153
6.5 Application of the proportional exponent model to the pile total load .157
6.6 A simple theoretical approach for the load transfer mechanism 158
6.6.1 Available models for load transfer .158
6.6.2 Modifications to the existing models for load transfer for static
pile load tests and a new model for rapid load pile tests . .160
6.6.3 Application of the models to static pile load tests. 167
6.6.4 Application of the models to rapid load pile tests 168
6.6.5 Quake value for the pile shaft resistance of a rapid load test .170
6.7 A comparison between maintained load tests and CRP tests .172
6.8 Pore water pressures around the pile during pile load tests 173
6.8.1 Pore water pressures during CRP tests at a rate of 0.01mm/s 174
6.8.1.1 Pore water pressures at the pile shaft 174
6.8.1.2 Pore water pressures around the pile shaft 175
6.8.1.3 Pore water pressures at the pile tip 176
6.8.1.4 Pore water pressures below the pile tip .176
6.8.2 Pore water pressures during maintained pile load tests .177
6.8.3 Pore water pressure regime during rapid load pile tests 178
6.8.3.1 Pore water pressures at the pile shaft 178
6.8.3.2 Pore water pressures around the pile shaft 178
6.8.3.3 Pore water pressures at the pile tip 179
6.8.3.4 Pore water pressures below of the pile tip .179
6.9 Clay bed inertial behavior .179
CHAPTER 7 - FIELD LOAD TESTS
7.1 Introduction 254
7.2 Ground conditions 254
7.3 Pile tests . 255
7.4 Prediction of the pile static capacity using the Unloading Point Method 255
7.5 Application of the analyses to field tests . . 257
CHAPTER 8 - CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FURTHER WORK
8.1 Introduction 269
8.2 Main conclusions 269
8.3 Recommendations for further studies .273
REFERENCES .275
164 trang |
Chia sẻ: maiphuongtl | Lượt xem: 1968 | Lượt tải: 0
Bạn đang xem trước 20 trang tài liệu Đề tài Statnamic testing of piles in clay, để xem tài liệu hoàn chỉnh bạn click vào nút DOWNLOAD ở trên
istances from the chamber centre line. For each
bed the accelerometers were positioned at different heights and radial locations from
the pile with the main aim of monitoring the soil accelerations during rapid load pile
tests.
The locations of pore water pressure transducers and accelerometers for Bed 1 to Bed
5 are shown in Figure (4.1) to Figure (4.5). In these figures, a pore water pressure
transducer is denoted by PW and an accelerometer by AC. In these figures, the
reference position of a transducer is also given and denoted by the letter C with a
number such as C12, C3 etc.
4.3 Constant rate of penetration tests (CRP tests)
To get a better understanding of response of clay at different shearing velocities, a
wide range of rates for CRP tests was used. The details of CRP tests from Bed 1 to
Bed 5 are shown in Table 4.1 to Table 4.5. The tests carried out at the rate of 0.01
mm/s were considered as the static tests which provided the pile static capacity
Chapter 4 Testing Programme
104
benchmark. Due to the local consolidation developed in the vicinity of the pile from
test to test the CRP test with the rate of 0.01 mm/s was repeated after several quick
load tests.
In the testing programme of Bed 1 to Bed 5 (Tables 4.1 to 4.5), the target penetration
rates such as 100 mm/s or 200 mm/s were the input values for the computer which
controlled the driving actuator system. However, the actual velocities were slightly
different from the target values. In reality, the pile velocity under a CRP test
developed from zero to a value near the target velocity and the real velocities were
used in the data analyses.
4.4 Statnamic tests (STN tests)
In order to replicate a real field statnamic test, a loading pulse with a period of 200
ms was applied to the pile top. Additionally, in order to investigate the effect of a long
pulse load during STN tests on the pile's dynamic capacity some STN tests with a
longer loading period were also used.
Similar to the target velocities for CRP tests, the target peak loads of STN tests in
Table 4.1 to Table 4.5 were the input values for the computer which controlled the
actuator. The real peak loads were smaller than the target peak loads and the
differences between them depended on the clay stiffness. In data analyses, the real
values which were measured directly by the actuator load cell were used.
A range of peak loads for STN tests was used which depended on the pile dynamic
capacity. If the peak load of a STN test was too low compared with the pile's dynamic
capacity, pile settlements were small or zero. On the other hand, if the peak load was
too high a large pile settlement occurred which reduced the number of tests which
could be carried out in a clay bed. For that reason, the peak loads were generally
chosen in a range such that settlement under one test was from about 3 mm to 7 mm.
However, in order to extend the available data, a number of STN tests were carried
out with settlements outside of this range.
Chapter 4 Testing Programme
105
4.5 Maintained load (ML) tests
Tests on the first bed revealed that the servo control system was not sufficiently stable
for maintained load testing. For that reason, from the Bed 2 onwards the actuator
which supplied load for 1-D consolidation was used for the ML tests. It was found
that there was hysteresis under long term loads of the strain gauge bonds on the
aluminium making up the pile skin load cell and as a result a new skin load cell was
manufactured after Bed 3. ML tests were not conducted for Bed 4 as it was felt that
this might cause degradation of the strain gauges again.
The ML tests were carried out, as described in Section 3.9.3, with the aim of
providing further information about the static pile capacity in conjunction with CRP
tests .
Chapter 4 Testing Programme
106
Table 4.1 Testing programme for Bed 1
Table 4.2 Testing programme for Bed 2
Testing Test Type 3-D Target Comment/ Date of
number reference consolidation penetration peak Time pulse purpose test
pressure (kPa) rate (mm/s) load (kN) (ms)
1 B1/1/CRP-0.01 CRP 280 0.01 Static benchmark 10h-2/12/03
2 B1/2/CRP-100 CRP 280 100 4h-3/12/03
3 B1/3/STN-10 STN 280 10 200 4h-4/12/03
4 B1/4/STN-15 STN 280 15 200 4h-5/12/03
5 B1/5/CRP-0.01 CRP 280 0.01 Static benchmark 11h-8/12/03
6 B1/6/STN-16 STN 280 16 200 4h-8/12/03
7 B1/7/CRP-25 CRP 280 25 11h-9/12/03
8 B1/8/CRP-200 CRP 280 200 4h-9/12/03
9 B1/9/CRP-10 CRP 280 10 11h-10/12/03
10 B1/10/STN-17 STN 280 17 200 3h-10/12/04
11 B1/11/MLT MLT 280 Not finished 11/12/2003
12 B1/12/CRP-0.01 CRP 280 0.01 Static benchmark 12h-12/12/03
STN tests
Testing Test Type 3-D Target Comment/ Date of
number reference consolidation penetration peak Time pulse purpose test
pressure (kPa) rate (mm/s) load (kN) (ms)
1 B2/1/CRP-0.01 CRP 280 0.01 Static benchmark 4h-1/4/04
2 B2/2/CRP-10 CRP 280 10 5h-2/4/04
3 B2/3/CRP-50 CRP 280 50 5h-5/4/04
4 B2/4/CRP-100 CRP 280 100 4h-6/4/04
5 B2/5/CRP-150 CRP 280 150 3h-7/4/04
6 B2/6/CRP-200 CRP 280 200 11h-8/4/04
7 B2/7/CRP-0.01 CRP 280 0.01 Static benchmark 3h-8/4/04
8 B2/8/STN-30 STN 280 30 200 3h-14/4/04
9 B2/9/STN-35 STN 280 35 200 3h-15/4/04
10 B2/10/STN-38 STN 280 38 200 3h-16/4/04
11 B2/11/CRP-300 CRP 280 300 3h-19/4/04
12 B2/12/CRP-0.01 CRP 280 0.01 Static benchmark 12h-20/4/04
13 B2/13/MLT MLT 280 Static benchmark 26/04/2004
14 B2/14/MLT MLT 280 Static benchmark 27,28/4/04
15 B2/15/MLT MLT 280 Static benchmark 29/04/2004
16 B2/16/CRP-0.01 CRP 280 0.01 Static benchmark 2h-30/4/04
17 B2/17/STN-38 STN 280 38 200 3h-4/5/04
18 B2/18/CRP-400 CRP 280 400 3h-5/5/04
19 B2/19/CRP-150 CRP 280 150 3h-6/5/04
20 B2/20/CRP-0.01 CRP 280 0.01 Static benchmark 2h-7/5/04
STN tests
Chapter 4 Testing Programme
107
Table 4.3 Testing programme for Bed 3
Testing Test Type 3-D Target Comment/ Date of
number reference consolidation penetration peak Time pulse purpose test
pressure (kPa) rate (mm/s) load (kN) (ms)
1 B3/1/CRP-0.01 CRP 280 0.01 Static benchmark 3h-26/7/04
2 B3/2/CRP-10 CRP 280 10 3h-27/7/04
3 B3/3/CRP-25 CRP 280 25 3h-28/7/04
4 B3/4/CRP-50 CRP 280 50 3h-29/7/04
5 B3/5/CRP-100 CRP 280 100 3h-30/7/04
6 B3/6/CRP-0.01 CRP 280 0.01 Static benchmark 3h-2/8/04
7 B3/7/CRP-150 CRP 280 150 3h-3/8/04
8 B3/8/STN-30 STN 280 30 200 3h-4/8/04
9 B3/9/CRP-200 CRP 280 200 3h-5/8/04
10 B3/10/STN-35 STN 280 35 200 3h-6/8/04
11 B3/11/CRP-10 CRP 280 10 3h-9/8/04
12 B3/12/CRP-250 CRP 280 250 3h-10/8/04
13 B3/13/STN-38 STN 280 38 200 3h-11/8/04
14 B3/14/CRP-5 CRP 280 5 3h-12/8/04
15 B3/15/CRP-0.01 CRP 280 0.01 Static benchmark 3h-13/8/04
16 B3/16/CRP-300 CRP 280 300 3h-16/8/04
17 B3/17/CRP-200 CRP 280 200 3h-17/8/04
18 B3/18/CRP-100 CRP 280 100 3h-18/8/04
19 B3/19/CRP-1 CRP 280 1 3h-19/8/04
20 B3/20/CRP-0.5 CRP 280 0.5 3h-20/8/04
21 B3/21/CRP-0.01 CRP 280 0.01 Static benchmark 3h-23/8/04
22 B3/22/MLT MLT 280 Static benchmark 25,26/8/04
23 B3/23/MLT MLT 280 Static benchmark 27/12/8/04
STN tests
Chapter 4 Testing Programme
108
Table 4.4 Testing programme for Bed 4
Testing Test Type 3-D Target Comment/ Date of
number reference consolidation penetration peak Time pulse purpose test
pressure (kPa) rate (mm/s) load (kN) (ms)
1 B4/1/CRP-0.01 CRP 280 0.01 Static benchmark 3h-18/11/04
2 B4/2/CRP-100 CRP 280 100 3h-19/11/04
3 B4/3/CRP-150 CRP 280 150 3h-22/11/04
4 B4/4/CRP-200 CRP 280 200 2h-23/11/04
5 B4/5/CRP-0.01 CRP 280 0.01 Static benchmark 1h-24/11/04
6 B4/6/STN-30 STN 280 30 200 3h-25/11/04
7 B4/7/STN-30 STN 280 30 200 10h-26/11/04
8 B4/8/CRP-0.01 CRP 280 0.01 Static benchmark 3h-26/11/04
9 B4/9/CRP-300 CRP 280 300 1h-29/11/04
10 B4/10/CRP-0.01 CRP 280 0.01 Static benchmark 10h-30/11/04
11 B4/11/STN-35 STN 280 35 200 3h-30/11/04
12 B4/12/CRP-400 CRP 280 400 11h-1/12/04
13 B4/13/CRP-0.01 CRP 280 0.01 Static benchmark 3h-2/12/04
14 B4/14/CRP-50 CRP 280 50 2h-3/12/04
15 B4/15/CRP-25 CRP 280 25 12h-6/12/04
16 B4/16/CRP-125 CRP 280 125 10h-7/12/04
17 B4/17/CRP-0.01 CRP 280 0.01 Static benchmark 3h-7/12/04
18 B4/18/CRP-100 CRP 400 100 10h-10/12/04
19 B4/19/CRP-0.01 CRP 400 0.01 Static benchmark 3h-10/12/04
20 B4/20/CRP-150 CRP 400 150 10h-13/12/04
21 B4/21/STN-35 STN 400 35 200 2h-13/12/04
22 B4/22/CRP-0.01 CRP 400 0.01 3h-14/12/04
23 B4/23/STN-38 STN 400 38 200 11h-14/12/04
24 B4/24/STN-40 STN 400 40 200 10h-15/12/04
25 B4/25/CRP-75 CRP 400 75 12h-16/12/04
26 B4/26/CRP-50 CRP 400 50 3h-16/12/04
27 B4/27/CRP-0.01 CRP 400 0.01 Static benchmark 10h-17/12/04
28 B4/28/CRP-25 CRP 400 25 3h-17/12/04
29 B4/29/STN-28 STN 400 38 400 12h-20/12/04
STN tests
Chapter 4 Testing Programme
109
Table 4.5 Testing programme for Bed 5
Testing Test Type 3-D Target Comment/ Date of
number reference consolidation penetration peak Time pulse purpose test
pressure (kPa) rate (mm/s) load (kN) (ms)
1 B5/1/CRP-0.01 CRP 240 0.01 Static benchmark 10h-14/3/05
2 B5/2/CRP-100 CRP 240 100 3h-14/3/05
3 B5/3/STN-15 STN 240 15 200 10h-15/3/05
4 B5/4/CRP-75 CRP 240 75 12h-15/3/05
5 B5/5/CRP-0.01 CRP 240 0.01 Static benchmark 5h-15/3/05
6 B5/6/STN-15 STN 240 15 200 10h-16/3/05
7 B5/7/STN-20 STN 240 20 200 11h-16/3/05
8 B5/8/CRP-150 CRP 240 150 2h-16/3/05
9 B5/9/CRP-0.01 CRP 240 0.01 Static benchmark 5h-16/3/05
10 B5/10/CRP-100 CRP 240 100 10h-17/3/05
11 B5/11/CRP-0.01 CRP 240 0.01 Static benchmark 10h-18/3/05
12 B5/12/CRP-0.01 CRP 280 0.01 Static benchmark 10h30-18/3/05
13 B5/13/CRP-0.01 CRP 280 0.01 Static benchmark 10h-21/3/05
14 B5/14/CRP-100 CRP 280 100 4h-21/3/05
15 B5/15/CRP-0.01 CRP 280 0.01 Static benchmark 10h-22/3/05
16 B5/16/CRP-200 CRP 280 200 4h-22/3/05
17 B5/17/STN-25 STN 280 25 200 4h-23/3/05
18 B5/18/CRP-0.01 CRP 280 0.01 Static benchmark 4h-23/3/05
19 B5/19/CRP-500 CRP 280 500 10h-24/3/05
20 B5/20/CRP-0.01 CRP 340 0.01 Static benchmark 10h-29/3/05
21 B5/21/CRP-100 CRP 340 100 3h30-29/3/05
22 B5/22/CRP-300 CRP 340 300 10h-30/3/05
23 B5/23/CRP-200 CRP 340 200 3h-30/3/05
24 B5/24/CRP-0.01 CRP 340 0.01 Static benchmark 10h-31/3/05
25 B5/25/CRP-150 CRP 340 150 3h-31/3/05
26 B5/26/STN-30 STN 340 30 200 10h-1/4/05
27 B5/27/STN-32 STN 340 32 200 3h-1/4/05
28 B5/28/STN-35 STN 340 35 200 10h-4/4/05
29 B5/29/STN-34 STN 340 34 400 3h-4/4/05
30 B5/30/CRP-0.01 CRP 340 0.01 Static benchmark 10h-5/4/05
31 B5/31/CRP-125 CRP 340 125 3h-5/4/05
32 B5/32/CRP-50 CRP 340 50 11h-6/4/05
33 B5/33/CRP-10 CRP 340 10 3h-6/4/05
34 B5/34/CRP-0.01 CRP 340 0.01 Static benchmark 12h-7/4/05
35 B5/35/MLT MLT 340 Static benchmark 10h-11/4/05
36 B5/36/MLT MLT 340 Static benchmark 10h-12/4/05
STN tests
Chapter 4 Testing Programme
110
Figure 4.1 Transducer arrangement for Bed 1
(All dimensions in mm) (PW – Pore water pressure; AC – Accelerometer)
(The number next to the transducer is height above the base)
Figure 4.2 Transducer arrangement for Bed 2
(All dimensions in mm) (PW – Pore water pressure; AC – Accelerometer)
(The number next to the transducer is height above the base)
W 185350 295 240 130 75 13075 185 240 295 350 E
druck
druck
Final boundary
final
level
14
0
70
12
0
initial
level
450
Ac
Ac
490
200
PW
of sample
790
1,0
60 500
PW
S295N 185 75 130 240 350
of sample
Final boundary
druck
70
12
0
level
initial
druck
final
level
14
0
750
PW
350
PW
390
PW
410
PW
in pile
Ac
730
PWmo
ve
me
nt
ra
ng
e
C17
C18
C5
C1
C2
C3
C4
C7
C6
PW
C8
770
W 185350 295 240 130 75 13075 185 240 295 350 E
kulite
Kulite
Final boundary
final
level
1 5
0
70
12
0
initial
level
750
PW
743
PW
of sample
790
1,0
6 0
470
PW
S295N 185 75 130 240 350
1 ,0
60
790
of sample
Final boundary
kulite
70
12
0
level
initial
kulite
final
level
15
0
250
PW
475
PW
in pile
Ac
485
PW
mo
ve
me
nt
ra
ng
e
C1
C2
C4 C5
C7
C6
PW
C8
640
PW
743
C3
AC
455
C17
AC
485
C18
Height above the base
Radial
distance
from the
centre
Chapter 4 Testing Programme
111
Figure 4.3 Transducer arrangement for Bed 3
(All dimensions in mm) (PW – Pore water pressure; AC – Accelerometer)
(The number next to the transducer is height above the base)
NW
170 120 75 12075 170 SE
druck
druck
Final boundary
final
level
17
0
70
12
0
initial
level
100
Ac
Ac
150
of sample
790
1,0
60
in pile
Ac
1,0
60
17
0 EW 240240350 295 185 130 7575 130 185 295 350
PW
410
500
Ac
450
Ac
450
12
0
druck
level
final
PW
350
in pile
level
initial
Ac
390
PW
PW
druck
70
790
of sample
Final boundary
17
0
1 ,0
60
35024013075185N 295 S
level
final
druck
initial
level
70
druck
750
PW
12
0
mo
ve
me
nt
ra
ng
e
PW
730PW
770
790
Final boundary
of sample
Ac
490
450
Ac
Ac
150
150
PW
Ac
in pile
c4
c5
c1
c7
c2
c3
c6
c8
c17
c24
c25 c23
c18
c21
c22
Chapter 4 Testing Programme
112
Figure 4.4 Transducer arrangement for Bed 4
(All dimensions in mm) (PW – Pore water pressure; AC – Accelerometer)
(The number next to the transducer is height above the base)
NW
170 120 12075 170 SE
druck
druck
Final boundary
final
level
17
0
70
18
5
initial
level
of sample
790
1,0
60
in pile
Ac
1,0
60
17
0 EW 240240350 295 185 130 7575 130 185 295 350
ac
400
495
pw
403
pw
384
478
Ac
18
5
druck
level
final
PW
85
in pile
level
initial
Ac 445
ac
PW
druck
70
790
of sample
Final boundary
17
0
1,0
60
35024013075185N 295 S
level
final
druck
initial
level
70
druck668
ac
18
5
mo
ve
me
nt
ra
n g
e
PW
638
790
Final boundary
of sample
Ac
484
442
Ac
745
PW
Ac
in pile
C1
C7
c6
C8
C4
c3
75
C21
C17
C22
C23
C18
C24
Chapter 4 Testing Programme
113
Figure 4.5 Transducer arrangement for Bed 5
(All dimensions in mm) (PW – Pore water pressure; AC – Accelerometer)
(The number next to the transducer is height above the base)
1,0
60
17
5
EW 240240350 295 185 130 7575 130 185 295 350
ac
400
495
pw
384
300
Ac
18
5
druck
level
final
PW
85
in pile
level
initial
Ac PW
druck
70
790
of sample
Final boundary
17
5
1,0
60
35024013075185N 295 S
level
final
druck
initial
level
70
druck668
ac
18
5
mo
ve
me
nt
ra
ng
e
790
Final boundary
of sample
Ac
484
442
Ac
Ac
in pile
C1
C7
C2
C18
C17
C24
C21
C22
620
pw
C4
Chapter 5 Bed properties
114
CHAPTER 5
BED PROPERTIES
5.1 Introduction
It was desirable to produce consistent soil properties from bed to bed. However,
differences were inevitable and attempts have been made to minimise these. Three
aspects of bed consolidation were monitored which were:
- consolidation time period;
- settlements and equivalent volume changes of the bed;
- pore water pressures at different locations in the beds.
When the tests were completed, moisture contents and shear strengths were
determined at different locations in the beds. The shear strengths were determined by
conventional unconsolidated undrained triaxial tests on undisturbed thin wall tube
samples and hand vane tests in the clay beds. It was interesting to note from visual
observation and moisture content data that considerable local consolidation developed
in the thin zone around the pile shaft and at the pile tip.
This chapter will provide details of the soil properties of Beds 1 to 5 to not only
provide information for data analyses but also to give information, to some extent,
about the mechanism of the load transfer during tests which led to local consolidation
around pile shaft and pile tip.
5.2 Clay bed 1-D consolidation
1-D consolidation for Beds 1 to 4 went through three stages:
- Vertical stress 65 kPa for about 3 hours;
- Vertical stress 105 kPa for about 3 days;
- finally, vertical stress of 280 kPa until completion of 1-D consolidation
Bed 5, went through the same consolidation procedure except that the bed was
subjected to only 240 kPa for the final step. The purpose of the two first steps was to
Chapter 5 Bed properties
115
create an initial strength for the clay bed before being subjected to a relatively large
pressure increase. Therefore, the soft clay slurry did not get squeezed out with the
expelled water under a large pressure increase. Additionally, the three stage loading
allowed the monitoring of the volume of expelled water which was collected by two
volume change tanks which needed to be emptied regularly.
1-D consolidation was terminated when the degree of consolidation at the mid height
of the bed was greater than about 40% or 47% (Brown 2004) for 1-D consolidation
pressures of 280kPa and 240kPa respectively and when the bed height was reduced to
about 1100 mm which was suitable for the triaxial chamber. This ensured that:
- subsequent isotropic triaxial consolidation only generated small volume changes
which could be accommodated by the top membrane. As mentioned in Section 3.4.5
the membrane could only accommodate a vertical movement of 100 mm.
- clay beds had enough strength to stand alone when changing from 1-D to isotropic
triaxial consolidation.
The settlements of the clay beds under 1-D consolidation are shown in Figure 5.1 in
which the initial settlements shown at zero time were the settlements during the 65
and 105 kPa pressure stages, and after that settlements were for 280 kPa for Beds 1 to
4 and 240 kPa for Bed 5.
Although the same 1-D consolidation procedure was used for Beds 1 to 4, the
settlement – time lines were not identical. Beds 1, 2 and 4 achieved settlements of
about 453 mm. However, only Beds 1 and 4 attained this settlement at the same time
(about 340 hours of consolidation under 280 kPa) whereas Bed 2 reached a value of
453 mm after a much longer time, 570 hours. For Bed 3 a much lower settlement of
413 mm was achieved even though the settlement curve had reached the asymptotical
trend. These differences could be due to the following reasons:
♦ There was a power cut for about 2 days during the consolidation of Bed 2 making
the consolidation time much longer than the others;
♦ The top drainage conditions were slightly different from bed to bed. It was
desirable that water passed through a de-aired filter placed between the clay bed and
the top plate and then out to the volume change tank through two hoses which were
Chapter 5 Bed properties
116
connected to the plate. Two o-rings were used to prevent water passing in between the
top plate and the consolidometer (Figure 3.10). However, leakage occurred between
the top plate and the consolidometer for Bed 1 and it altered the drainage conditions.
A large volume of 81.00dm3 water leaked between the plate and the consolidometer
compared with the total water of 94.02dm3 expelled from the top. It can be seen from
Table 5.1 that only slightly more water was expelled from the bottom than from the
top except for Bed 1 and Bed 2. As already mentioned there was a leak for Bed 1 and
there was more water expelled from the top than from the bottom. On the other hand,
for Bed 2 more water came from the bottom than from the top. This could be due to
the top filter not being deaired thoroughly for Bed 2, thus hindering drainage.
♦ The initial clay bed heights were different. Although the same amount of material
was used to mix slurry for Beds 1 to 5 it was inevitable that the final amount of slurry
which was pumped into the consolidometer was different due to the loss of material
during the mixing and pumping processes.
♦ The use of materials was not consistent from bed to bed. Only materials of Bed 1
and 2 were consistent. From Bed 3 onwards a mixture of two kaolins, which were
supplied by EEC international Ltd and left after Bed 2, and a new one which was
supplied by Imerys Mineral Ltd was used. It was thought that the kaolins would be
identical since no differences of the kaolins were claimed by the two companies, so
the mixtures of kaolin were not controlled during the preparation of the slurry. During
mixing it was found that the two kaolins were not identical and the old slurry was
slightly more ‘sticky’ than the new one. However, liquid and plastic limits are not
available to confirm this conclusion. In addition, a grade 4 silt was used for Beds 1 to
2, but the company discontinued the supply of this silt and from Bed 3 onwards grade
3 silt was mixed with grade 5 silt as a replacement for the grade 4 silt.
The 1-D consolidation was monitored by buried pore water transducers at different
locations in the clay beds. The data from these transducers for Beds 1 to 5 are plotted
in Figures 5.2 to 5.6 assuming that the variation between values measured at two
adjacent transducers is linear. The measured pore water pressure dissipations at the
mid height of the clay beds indicated that Beds 1 to 5 finished 1-D consolidation at
89.9%, 52.1%, 86.7%, 68.6%, and 87.7% respectively. No clear explanation can be
forward for the low degree of consolidation of Bed 2 and 4 even though their
Chapter 5 Bed properties
117
settlement curves had reached the asymptotical trend. Fortunately, the following stage
of consolidation, isotropic triaxial consolidation, was more consistent for Beds 1 to 5.
5.3 Clay bed isotropic triaxial consolidation
Once the 1-D consolidation stage finished, the pressure was reduced gradually to zero.
The consolidometer was then removed to leave the clay sample self-supporting for a
short period before initiating isotropic triaxial consolidation. The pile was installed in
the clay bed before the triaxial consolidation for Beds 2 to 5. With Bed 1, due to the
pile not being ready at the time of the change over, it was installed in the clay bed
after 3 weeks of isotropic triaxial consolidation.
Prior to applying the isotropic triaxial consolidation pressure, the rods which were
used to position buried transducers were removed leaving the transducers to move
freely during isotropic triaxial consolidation. For this reason, the final positions of
transducers were measured when dissecting the clay beds. These are shown in Figures
5.7 to 5.11.
Tests were carried out after a substantial degree of isotropic triaxial consolidation,
defined as the ratio of effective stress to the total applied stress at the mid height, was
achieved. The degrees of consolidation for the first tests of Beds 1 to 5 were 86.2%,
88.6%, 81.6%, 90.5%, and 94.8% respectively. During the testing programme, the
consolidation continued and the degrees of consolidation for the final tests for the 5
beds were 88.4%, 92.1%, 88.3%, 90.3%, and 96.8% (Table 5.2) respectively. It
should be noted that a number of levels of isotropic triaxial consolidation were used
for Bed 4 and Bed 5. In general, it can be seen that the final degrees of consolidation
for triaxial conditions were more consistent than for the 1-D consolidation.
5.4 Performance of the calibration chamber during the pile load tests
The loading frame was connected to the top of the chamber body via connections at
the centre and at the rim of the top plate of Bed 1 and 2. However, it was found that
these connections caused a deflection for the pile top plate and as a result the top cell
Chapter 5 Bed properties
118
pressure fluctuated considerably during rapid pile load tests. For that reason, from
Bed 3 onwards the connections between the loading frame and the top plate were
strengthened by two angle section beams and the connection at the centre of the top
plate was removed. The new connections reduced significantly the fluctuations of the
top cell and side cell pressures (Figure 5.12). The results in Figure 5.12 show that
before the modification the top cell pressure dropped from 280kPa to 225kPa during a
CRP test at the rate of 200mm/s whereas after the modification it only dropped from
280kPa to 255kPa. Although the fluctuations of the top and side cell chamber body
pressures were improved it was still thought that these fluctuations could have an
effect on the pore water pressures in the clay beds.
To examine the influence of the changes of the top cell chamber body pressure on the
pore water pressures in the clay beds a simple test was carried out for Bed 4 when the
pile load test programme had finished. During that test the pore water pressures in the
clay bed were measured while the top cell pressure was suddenly reduced from
400kPa to 200kPa. The results are shown in Figure 5.13. It can be seen that only the
pore pressure of channel 6 which was located about 350mm below the top surface of
the clay bed was influenced and it dropped from 3.4kPa to –18.9kPa. However, the
changes took place over a period of about 4500ms (from 2500ms to 7000ms) whereas
a rapid pile load test normally occurred from 140ms with the shearing velocity of
50mm/s to 35ms with the shearing velocity of 200mm/s. For that reason, the changes
occurring over a period of 200ms are considered and hence Figure 5.13 becomes
Figure 5.14. If the changes over a period of 200ms are considered the influence of the
drop of the top cell pressure on the pore pressures in the clay bed reduced
significantly. Figure 5.14 shows that over a period of 200ms the top cell pressure
dropped from 400kPa to 298kPa and this change was more significant than that
during a rapid pile load test, but the changes of pore pressures in the clay bed were
negligible.
Chapter 5 Bed properties
119
5.5 Bed properties after the testing programme
After completing the testing programme, the isotropic triaxial consolidation pressure
was reduced gradually to zero and the calibration chamber was dismantled. The clay
bed properties were determined at different locations, as described in Section 3.10 by:
- hand vane tests
- thin wall tube sampling for unconsolidated undrained triaxial tests
- sampling for moisture contents.
The results from the hand vane tests in Beds 1 to 5 are shown in Tables 5.3 to 5.7. It
can be seen from the results that in the vertical direction the lowest shear strength was
at the top of the clay beds and the strength increased gradually over a distance of
about 400 mm towards the middle of the clay beds. This could be due to the use of
two steel rings for the top plate of the chamber (Figure 3.15). The vertical pressure
during isotropic triaxial consolidation was not uniformly distributed on the surface of
the clay beds due to the use of these two relatively bulky rings. Owing to the high
isotropic triaxial consolidation pressures of up to 400 kPa, leaks could easily occur
between the top plate and its attached membrane. Thus, no modification was made to
the dimensions of these rings.
In the radial direction, there were no apparent differences in shear strength except for
a narrow zone of about one and a half pile diameters from the pile shaft where the soil
was heavily overconsolidated and its strength was much higher. Due to a visible
difference between a thin zone around the pile shaft and the rest, hand vane tests were
carried out for this zone for Beds 4 and 5 (Tables 5.6 and 5.7). These tests were
conducted in the horizontal direction since the thin zone and the dimension of the
hand vane did not allow tests in the vertical direction with the pile still being in place.
To carry out horizontal direction hand vane tests soil around the pile was trimmed to a
radial distance of about 100mm which allowed the vane blades to get into the soil
zone near the pile shaft. Due to the concern about soil anisotropy both horizontal and
vertical hand vane tests were carried out at a number of locations and the results were
found to be identical.
Chapter 5 Bed properties
120
Beds 1 to 3 had the same history of consolidation. However, Bed 3 was softer than the
others and there was no clear explanation for this. Bed 4 was strongest as it was
subjected to isotropic triaxial consolidation at 400 kPa. Comparison of the shear
strength distribution of Bed 4 with that of Beds 1 and 2 indicated that isotropic triaxial
consolidation did not influence the top zone of about 300 mm as shear strengths in
these zones were similar for the 3 clay beds (1, 2, and 4). The same phenomenon was
observed for Bed 5. This bed underwent 1-D consolidation at 240 kPa and isotropic
triaxial consolidation at 340 kPa. The shear strengths in Bed 5 were larger than those
of Beds 1 and 2 in the central zone of the clay bed but were smaller at the top of the
bed. This suggests that triaxial consolidation may have been hampered near the top
resulting in lower effective stress, and hence strength.
When dissecting the beds, samples were taken for moisture content determinations
(Tables 5.8 to 5.12). The thin zone below the pile tip was better quantified by the
moisture contents as it was impossible to determine shear strengths at different
distances from the pile tip (Tables 5.11 & 5.12). It was inferred from the moisture
contents in the pile tip zone that the soil strength here was much higher than in the
surrounding areas. The moisture contents increased from the pile tip to a more
average value over a distance of about two and a half pile radii (105 mm). Similarly,
the stronger zone around the pile shaft was about two to three pile radii.
Samples were also taken for conventional unconsolidated undrained triaxial tests and
their results are shown in Table 5.13. Three to four samples were taken for each bed at
a level of about 550 mm from the bottom plate. The shear strengths determined from
the triaxial tests were relatively consistent with those from the hand vane tests. The
shear strengths of Bed 4 from the triaxial tests were slightly lower than those of Beds
1 and 2. This was thought that its samples were taken at a higher level in the bed. On
the other hand the shear strengths of Bed 3 from the triaxial tests were higher than the
other beds. This was thought that these samples were taken at a lower level in the bed
or technical mistakes would occur during the triaxial tests being carried out.
Chapter 5 Bed properties
121
Table 5.1 Volume of water expelled during 1-D
consolidation
Table 5.2 Isotropic triaxial consolidation degrees of Beds
1 to 5
Bed number
Top Bottom Top Bottom Top Bottom Top Bottom Top Bottom
The water expelled
during 65 kPa 1-D 3.34 1.50 2.81 5.95 2.64 4.51 11.59 0.00 19.30 28.75
consolidation (dm3)
The water expelled
during 105 kPa 1-D 36.87 29.19 5.69 30.26 10.30 16.84 12.08 24.12 15.91 17.15
consolidation (dm3)
The water expelled
during 280 (240) kPa 53.80 57.35 49.66 105.80 64.44 58.55 43.78 44.30 60.50 66.83
1-D consolidation (dm3)
water of 3 stages (dm3) 94.02 88.04 58.15 142.01 77.38 79.90 67.46 68.42 95.71 112.73
Total top & bottom (dm3)
From From From From From
5
182.06 200.16 157.28 135.87 208.44
1 2 3 4
Bed number
1th Final 1th Final 1th Final 1th Final 1th Final
Degree of isotropic
consolidation at the 86.2 88.4 88.6 92.1 81.6 88.3 90.5 90.3 94.8 96.8
middle of the sample
Total horizontal
consolidation 280 280 280 280 280 280 280 400 240 340
stress
Horizontal effective
stress at the middle 241.3 247.6 248.0 258.0 228.5 247.2 253.4 361.1 227.6 329.0
of the sample
TestsTests Tests Tests Tests
51 2 3 4
Chapter 5 Bed properties
122
Table 5.3 Undrained shear strengths of Bed 1
determined by hand vane tests
Distance Distance
from the centre from the base North West South East Average
of the chamber of the chamber
mm mm kPa kPa kPa kPa kPa
100 900 43.7 43.1 41.7 41.7
200 900 45.8 45.8 41.1 43.1 43.3
300 900 43.1 48.5 41.7 40.4
100 800 44.4 43.1 45.8 44.4
200 800 45.8 49.1 43.1 45.8 45.4
300 800 45.8 45.8 44.4 47.1
100 700 45.8 48.5 49.1 47.1
200 700 48.5 48.5 45.8 51.1 48.4
300 700 49.8 51.1 47.1 48.5
100 600 53.8 51.1 49.8 51.1
200 600 48.5 47.1 45.8 49.8 49.7
300 600 51.1 47.1 52.5 48.5
100 500 52.5 52.5 52.5 59.2
200 500 52.5 53.8 54.5 53.8 52.6
300 500 48.5 49.8 51.1 49.8
100 400 53.2 51.1 53.8 51.1
200 400 53.8 51.1 51.1 51.1 51.4
300 400 48.5 50.5 49.8 51.8
100 300 53.2 51.1 53.8 52.5
200 300 54.5 49.8 47.1 51.1 51.4
300 300 51.1 49.8 51.1 51.1
100 200 55.2 56.5 56.5 59.2
200 200 48.5 51.1 48.5 49.8 51.9
300 200 49.8 49.8 49.8 48.5
100 100 47.1 47.1 48.5 52.5
200 100 43.1 47.1 45.8 47.1 46.8
300 100 47.1 45.8 43.1 47.1
Locations of the samples
Direction
Chapter 5 Bed properties
123
Table 5.4 Undrained shear strengths of Bed 2
determined by hand vane tests
Distance Distance
from the centre from the base North West South East Average
of the chamber of the chamber
mm mm kPa kPa kPa kPa kPa
100 900 36.3 40.4 35.0 33.7
200 900 37.4 41.7 33.1 34.3 37.5
300 900 39.7 40.4 37.7 39.7
100 800 43.1 41.7 40.4 45.8
200 800 40.4 41.7 43.1 44.4 43.1
300 800 43.1 44.4 43.1 45.8
100 700 48.5 48.5 47.1 56.5
200 700 48.5 45.8 45.8 45.8 47.4
300 700 44.4 47.1 44.4 47.1
100 600 53.8 52.5 51.1 51.1
200 600 51.1 55.2 48.5 51.1 51.1
300 600 49.8 49.8 48.5 51.1
100 500 52.5 51.1 49.8 53.8
200 500 51.1 48.5 52.5 51.1 51.1
300 500 51.1 51.1 51.1 49.8
100 400 53.8 55.2 56.5 56.5
200 400 52.5 51.1 55.2 55.2 53.7
300 400 52.5 49.8 55.2 51.1
100 300 51.1 51.1 52.5 51.1
200 300 52.5 53.8 51.1 51.1 51.3
300 300 49.8 51.1 51.1 48.5
100 200 55.2 53.8 52.5 55.2
200 200 49.8 52.5 52.5 51.1 51.9
300 200 48.5 48.5 52.5 51.1
100 100 56.5 55.2 64.6 56.5
200 100 48.5 51.1 49.8 51.1 52.2
300 100 45.8 49.8 44.4 52.5
Direction
Locations of the samples
Chapter 5 Bed properties
124
Table 5.5 Undrained shear strengths of Bed 3
determined by hand vane tests
Distance Distance
from the centre from the top North West South East
of the chamber of the chamber Average
mm mm kPa kPa kPa kPa kPa
100 100 39.0 40.4 43.1 44.4
200 100 41.7 40.4 41.7 41.7 42.7
300 100 45.8 41.7 45.8 47.1
100 200 41.7 36.3 40.4 40.4
200 200 41.7 40.4 40.4 37.7 41.2
300 200 41.7 43.1 48.5 41.7
100 300 45.8 40.4 40.4 40.4
200 300 41.7 40.4 40.4 39.0 41.7
300 300 41.7 43.1 44.4 43.1
100 400 43.1 43.1 40.4 39.0
200 400 41.7 40.4 40.4 40.4 41.7
300 400 43.1 43.1 43.1 43.1
100 500 41.7 43.1 40.4 40.4
200 500 37.7 45.8 40.4 39.0 42.0
300 500 41.7 45.8 43.1 44.4
100 600 45.8 37.7 41.7 43.1
200 600 40.4 44.4 40.4 40.4 42.2
300 600 44.4 43.1 40.4 44.4
100 700 43.1 44.4 43.1 44.4
200 700 43.1 51.1 43.1 47.1 44.2
300 700 41.7 43.1 43.1 43.1
100 800 47.1 48.5 51.1 49.8
200 800 48.5 44.4 48.5 45.8 47.9
300 800 47.1 47.1 48.5 48.5
100 900 63.3 64.6 66.0 56.5
200 900 48.5 51.1 51.1 56.5 55.2
300 900 48.5 48.5 51.1 56.5
Direction
Locations of the samples
Chapter 5 Bed properties
125
Table 5.6 Undrained shear strengths of Bed 4
determined by hand vane tests. (Test adjacent to the
pile shaft, i.e. 35mm, were horizontal vane tests)
Distance Distance
from the centre from the top North West South East Mean
of the chamber of the chamber value
mm mm kPa kPa kPa kPa kPa
100 100 41.7 41.7 39.0 40.4
200 100 40.4 43.1 40.4 40.4 42.0
300 100 45.8 47.1 43.1 40.4
100 200 36.3 35.0 44.4 40.4
200 200 37.7 39.0 40.4 36.3 40.2
300 200 43.1 44.4 40.4 44.4
100 300 52.5 47.1 45.8 53.8
200 300 48.5 49.8 40.4 44.4 47.8
300 300 48.5 53.8 43.1 45.8
100 400 56.5 53.8 51.1 51.1
200 400 51.1 49.8 51.1 53.8 52.4
300 400 56.5 53.8 45.8 53.8
100 500 59.2 53.8 55.2 55.2
200 500 53.8 56.5 53.8 55.2 55.6
300 500 53.8 56.5 59.2 55.2
100 600 56.5 56.5 61.9 56.5
200 600 53.8 57.9 56.5 56.5 57.3
300 600 56.5 60.6 57.9 56.5
100 700 56.5 63.3 60.6 60.6
200 700 56.5 53.8 53.8 55.2 56.6
300 700 56.5 53.8 53.8 55.2
35 (pile shaft) 700
100 800 59.2 60.6 56.5 57.9
200 800 59.2 64.6 61.9 59.2 58.8
300 800 53.8 59.2 59.2 53.8
35 (pile shaft) 800
100 900 56.5 59.2 63.3 56.5
200 900 53.8 56.5 56.5 53.8 57.3
300 900 56.5 56.5 60.6 57.9
35 (pile shaft) 900 96.9
Direction
Locations of the samples
107.7
99.6
Chapter 5 Bed properties
126
Table 5.7 Undrained shear strengths of Bed 5
determined by hand vane tests. (Test adjacent to the
pile shaft, i.e. 35mm, were horizontal vane tests)
Distance Distance
from the centre from the top North West South East Mean
of the chamber of the chamber value
mm mm kPa kPa kPa kPa kPa
100 100 29.6 26.9 26.9 26.9
200 100 29.6 26.9 24.2 26.9 28.2
300 100 31.0 31.0 28.3 29.6
100 200 33.7 35.0 32.3 33.7
200 200 32.3 32.3 29.6 32.3 33.1
300 200 35.0 35.0 33.7 32.3
100 300 37.7 36.3 37.7 37.7
200 300 37.7 37.7 35.0 37.7 37.1
300 300 36.3 37.7 36.3 37.7
35 300
100 400 41.7 39.0 37.7 39.0
200 400 40.4 39.0 37.7 43.1 39.7
300 400 40.4 40.4 37.7 40.4
35 400
100 500 43.1 43.1 39.0 43.1
200 500 43.1 39.0 40.4 43.1 41.8
300 500 43.1 40.4 40.4 44.4
35 (pile shaft) 500
100 600 52.5 51.1 51.1 55.2
200 600 52.5 56.5 52.5 55.2 53.6
300 600 53.8 53.8 52.5 56.5
35 (pile shaft) 600
100 700 56.5 59.2 59.2 60.6
200 700 56.5 53.8 59.2 52.5 55.9
300 700 53.8 51.1 55.2 52.5
35 (pile shaft) 700
100 800 61.9 68.6 57.9 68.6
200 800 52.5 51.1 52.5 53.8 56.3
300 800 51.1 51.1 52.5 53.8
35 (pile shaft) 800
100 900 56.5 55.2 53.8 57.9
200 900 49.8 48.5 45.8 45.8 50.0
300 900 48.5 45.8 47.1 45.8
86.1
148.1
94.2
91.5
60.6
80.8
Direction
Locations of the samples
Chapter 5 Bed properties
127
Table 5.8 Moisture contents of Bed 1
Sample Distance Distance
number from the centre from the base
of the chamber of the chamber North West South East
mm mm % % % %
1 0 900
2 100 900 25.3
3 100 900 25.3
4 100 900 24.9
5 100 900 25.4
6 200 900 24.8
7 200 900 25.4
8 200 900 25.1
9 200 900 24.9
10 200 900 24.8
11 300 900 25.1
12 300 900 25.0
13 300 900 24.6
14 35 (pile shaft) 700
15 100 700 24.6
16 100 700 24.7
17 100 700 24.7
18 100 700 24.1
19 200 700 24.7
20 200 700 25.6
21 200 700 24.5
22 200 700 24.9
23 300 700 25.6
24 300 700 24.8
25 300 700 24.2
26 35 (pile shaft) 500
27 100 500 24.5
28 100 500 24.1
29 200 500 25.4
30 200 500 23.8
31 200 500 25.2
32 300 500 25.2
33 300 500 24.9
34 300 500 24.9
35 100 300 24.4
36 200 300 24.4
37 300 300 25.2
38 100 Tip 25.1
39 200 Tip 25.6
40 300 Tip 25.1
Moisture content
25.5
24.3
23.6
Directions
Chapter 5 Bed properties
128
Table 5.9 Moisture contents of Bed 2
Table 5.10 Moisture contents of Bed 3
Sample Distance Moisture Note
number from the bottom content
of the sample
mm %
1 800 20.2 Sample at the pile shaft
2 800 24.9
3 600 22.6
4 600 24.5
5 400 23.7
6 400 20.3
7 200 25.7
8 200 22.9
Sample Distance Moisture Note
number from the bottom content
of the sample
mm %
1 200 24.9
2 200 25.8
3 200 20.1 Sample at the pile shaft
4 300 24.9
5 300 24.4 Sample at the pile shaft
6 300 25.6
7 400 25.1
8 500 24.0 Sample at the pile shaft
9 500 25.3
10 500 25.0
11 600 25.5
12 600 22.4 Sample at the pile shaft
13 700 26.1
14 700 22.0 Sample at the pile shaft
15 900 25.3
17 900 27.8
18 Pile tip 19.5 Sample at the pile tip
Chapter 5 Bed properties
129
Table 5.11 Moisture contents of Bed 4
Sample Distance Moisture Note
number from the bottom content
of the sample
mm %
1 900 21.2
2 900 20.6
3 900 21.2 Sample at the pile shaft
4 700 20.8
5 700 20.6
6 700 17.1 Sample at the pile shaft
7 600 17.4 Sample at 20mm from the pile shaft
8 600 16.9 Sample at the pile shaft
9 600 17.7 Sample at the pile shaft
10 500 21.0
11 500 20.1
12 500 18.9 Sample at 15mm from the pile shaft
13 500 19.3 Sample at the pile shaft
14 500 18.6 Sample at the pile shaft
15 400 18.0 Sample at 25mm from the pile shaft
16 400 17.3 Sample at the pile shaft
17 300 20.3
18 300 17.3 Sample at the pile shaft
19 200 20.0
20 200 20.3
21 200 16.1 Sample at the pile shaft
22 Pile base 16.1 Sample at the pile tip
24 20 mm from pile tip 16.0 Distances to
25 40 mm from pile tip 18.8 the pile tip
26 60 mm from pile tip 19.3 in vertical
27 100 mm from pile tip 20.5 direction
Chapter 5 Bed properties
130
Table 5.12 Moisture contents of Bed 5
Table 5.13 Shear strengths from undrained triaxial tests
Sample Distance Moisture Note
number from the bottom content
of the sample
mm %
1 900 20.4
2 900 20.6
3 900 20.7
4 800 17.5 Sample at the pile shaft
5 700 20.5
6 700 20.2
7 700 20.3
8 700 18.9 Sample at the pile shaft
9 500 20.2
10 500 20.5
11 500 20.1
12 500 19.6 Sample at 35mm from the pile shaft
13 300 19.8
14 300 19.1 Sample at 85mm from the pile shaft
15 300 17.6 Sample at 35mm from the pile shaft
16 300 16.5 Sample at the pile shaft
17 Pile base 15.1 Sample at the pile tip
19 30 mm from pile tip 14.9 Distances to
20 50 mm from pile tip 16.1 the pile tip
21 100 mm from pile tip 18.1 in vertical
22 120 mm from pile tip 19.1 direction
Sample Confining Shear Mean Bed
number pressure strength values
kPa kPa kPa
1 100 51.5
2 250 49.0
3 300 52.1 50.6 1
4 400 49.6
1 200 49.9
2 250 51.0
3 300 51.7 51.3 2
4 400 52.7
1 200 55.1
2 300 64.9 62.8 3
3 400 68.5
1 250 49.6
2 300 50.1 49.5 4
3 400 48.9
1 150 52.6
2 200 55.2
3 300 52.0 53.1 5
4 350 52.5
Chapter 5 Bed properties
131
Figure 5.1 Bed settlements during 1-D consolidation
Figure 5.2 Pore water pressure distribution during
280 kPa 1-D consolidation of Bed 1
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 280 300
Pore water pressure (kPa)
H
ei
gh
t (
m
m
)
t = 0 hour
t = 12 hours
t = 84 hours
t = 120 hours
t = 156 hours
t = 192 hours
t = 228 hours
t = 264 hours
t = 300 hours
t = 356 hours
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600
Time (Hours)
Se
ttl
em
en
t (
m
m
)
Bed 1
Bed 2
Bed 3
Bed 4
Bed 5
Chapter 5 Bed properties
132
Figure 5.3 Pore water pressure distribution during
280 kPa 1-D consolidation of Bed 2
Figure 5.4 Pore water pressure distribution during
280 kPa 1-D consolidation of Bed 3
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 280 300
Pore water pressure (kPa)
H
ei
gh
t (
m
m
)
t = 0 hour
t = 84 hours
t = 156 hours
t = 228 hours
t = 336 hours
t = 408 hours
t = 456 hours
t = 504 hours
t = 552 hours
t = 570 hours
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 280 300
Pore water pressure (kPa)
H
ei
gh
t (
m
m
)
t = 0 hour
t = 36 hours
t = 60 hours
t = 120 hours
t = 156 hours
t = 192 hours
t = 228 hours
t = 255 hours
t = 293 hours
t = 336 hours
t = 360 hours
t = 408 hours
Chapter 5 Bed properties
133
Figure 5.5 Pore water pressure distribution during
280 kPa 1-D consolidation of Bed 4
Figure 5.6 Pore water pressure distribution during
240 kPa 1-D consolidation of Bed 5
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 280 300
Pore water pressure (kPa)
H
ei
gh
t (
m
m
)
t = 0 hour
t = 12 hours
t = 36 hours
t = 60 hours
t = 84 hours
t = 156 hours
t = 192 hours
t = 264 hours
t = 300 hours
t = 338
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260
Pore water pressure (kPa)
H
ei
gh
t (
m
m
)
t = 0 hour
t = 12 hours
t = 36 hours
t = 84 hours
t = 156 hours
t = 210 hours
t = 264 hours
t = 295 hours
t = 336 hours
t = 360 hours
t = 435 hours
Chapter 5 Bed properties
134
Figure 5.7 The final transducer locations of Bed 1
(All dimensions in mm) (PW – pore water pressure transducer, AC – Accelerometer)
(The number next to the transducer is height above the base)
Figure 5.8 The final transducer locations of Bed 2
(All dimensions in mm) (PW – pore water pressure transducer, AC – Accelerometer)
(The number next to the transducer is height above the base)
W 185350 295 240 130 75 13075 185 240 295 350 E
Kulite
Kulite
Final boundary
final
level
15
0
70
12
0
initial
level
720
PW
720
PW
of sample
790
1,0
60
470
PW
S295N 185 75 130 240 350
1,0
60
790
of sample
Final boundary
Kulite
70
14
0
level
initial
druck
final
level
15
0
230
PW
475
PW
in pile
AC17
485
PW
mo
ve
me
nt
ra
ng
eC1C2
C4 C5
C7
C6
PW
C8
615
PW
720
C3
AC
455
C18
AC
485
C18
73
188
100
165
325
60
180
339
Radial distance
from centre
the base
Height from
Height
from the base
from centre
Radial distance
W 185350 295 240 130 75 13075 185 240 295 350 E
druck
druck
Final boundary
final
level
14
0
70
12
0
initial
level
450
Ac
Ac
480
200
PW
of sample
790
1,0
60 500
PW
S295N 185 75 130 240 350
1,0
60
790
of sample
Final boundary
druck
70
12
0
level
initial
druck
final
level
14
0
730
PW
350
PW
390
PW
410
PW
in pile
Ac
720
PWm
ov
em
en
t
ra
n g
e
C17
C18
C5
C1
C2
C3
C4
C7
C6
PW
C8
700
185
145
110
65
105
175
200
Radial distance
from centre
above the base
Height
above the base
Height
from centre
Radial distance
Chapter 5 Bed properties
135
Figure 5.9 The final transducer locations of Bed 3
(All dimensions in mm) (PW – pore water pressure transducer, AC – Accelerometer)
(The number next to the transducer is height above the base)
790
295
790
170
1,0
60
NW
c22
170
17
0
120 75 75 120
level
initial
1 2
0
level
final
druckc21
Ac
100
150
Ac PW
150
c2
SE
Ac
in pile
70
druck
of sample
Final boundary
c25
790
450
185
430 Ac
1,0
60
350W 295 240
Ac
Ac
450c17
c24
of sample
450
1 2
0
final
level
75
1 7
0
75 130
Ac
initial
level
in pile
druck
Ac
c4
350
PW
c5
PW
390
350240185 295 E
410
PW
c7
500
druck
c23
70
c1
PW
1,0
60
N
Final boundary
of sample
70
12
0
17
0
185 75
final
level
druck
in pile
Ac
level
initial
130
Ac
240 350
c18
150
mo
ve
me
n t
ra
n g
e
760 740
PW PW
druck
c3 c6
c8
720
PW
S
Final boundary
300
245
130
45
165130
225
Height above
the base
Radial
distance
from centre
Radial
distance
from centre
the base
Height above
the base
Height above
distance
from centre
Radial
Chapter 5 Bed properties
136
Figure 5.10 The final transducer locations of Bed 4
(All dimensions in mm) (PW – pore water pressure transducer, AC – Accelerometer)
(The number next to the transducer is height above the base)
NW
170 120 12075 170 SE
druck
druck
Final boundary
final
level
17
0
70
18
5
initial
level
of sample
790
1,0
60
in pile
Ac
1,0
60
17
0 EW 240240350 295 185 130 7575 130 185 295 350
ac
255
495
pw
380
pw
384
460
Ac
18
5
druck
level
final
PW
85
in pile
level
initial
Ac
410
ac
PW
druck
70
790
of sample
Final boundary
17
0
1,0
60
35024013075185N 295 S
level
final
druck
initial
level
70
druck640
ac
18
5
mo
ve
me
nt
r a
ng
e
PW
638
790
Final boundary
of sample
Ac
460
442
Ac
710
PW
Ac
in pile
C1
C7
c6
C8
C4 c3
75
C21
C17
C22
C23
C18
C24
65
110
165
115
165
260
125
155
250
315
204
Height
above the base
Radial
distance from
centre
Height
above the base
distance from
Radial
centre
distance from
Radial
centre
Height
above the base
Chapter 5 Bed properties
137
Figure 5.11 The final transducer locations of Bed 5
(All dimensions in mm) (PW – pore water pressure transducer, AC – Accelerometer)
(The number next to the transducer is height above the base)
220
230
240
250
260
270
280
290
300
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400
Time (ms)
Pr
es
su
re
(k
Pa
)
Vertical consolidation pressure 1
(Before modifying the connection
between the loading frame and the
top chamber plate)
Vertical consolidation pressure 2
(After modifying the connection
between the loading frame and the
top chamber plate)
Lateral consolidation pressure 2
(After modifying the connection
between the loading frame and the
top chamber plate)
Lateral consolidation pressure 1
(Before modifying the connection
between the loading frame and the
top chamber plate)
Figure 5.12 Fluctuation of top and side cell pressures during a
rapid pile load test
1,0
60
17
5 EW 240240350 295 185 130 7575 130 185 295 350
ac
430440
pw
325
300
Ac
18
5
druck
level
final PW
120
in pile
level
initial
Ac
PW
druck
70
790
of sample
Final boundary
17
5
1,0
60
35024013075185N 295 S
level
final
druck
initial
level
70
druck
668
ac
18
5
mo
v e
me
nt
ra
ng
e
790
Final boundary
of sample
Ac
550
480
Ac Ac
in pile
C1
C7
C2
C18
C17
C24
C21
C22
620
pw
C4
185
80
70
200
110
210
285
Height above
the base
Radial
distance
from centre
Height above
the base
from centre
Radial
distance
Chapter 5 Bed properties
138
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
40
2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000 5500 6000 6500 7000
Time (ms)
Po
re
p
re
ss
ur
e
(k
Pa
)
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
To
p
ce
ll
pr
es
su
re
(k
Pa
)
Top cell pressure
Pile tip pore
pressure
Pile skin pore
pressure
Channel 1
pore pressure
Channel 7
pore pressure
Channel 6
pore pressure
Figure 5.13 Changes of pore pressures in the clay bed due to
the drop of the top cell pressure
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
2485 2505 2525 2545 2565 2585 2605 2625 2645 2665 2685
Time (ms)
Po
re
p
re
ss
ur
e
(k
Pa
)
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
To
p
ce
ll
pr
es
su
re
(k
Pa
)
Top cell pressure Pile tip pore
pressure
Pile skin pore
pressure
Channel 1
pore pressure
Channel 7
pore pressure
Channel 6
pore pressure
Figure 5.14 Changes of pore pressures in the clay bed due to
the drop of the top cell pressure over a period of 200ms
Các file đính kèm theo tài liệu này:
- Nguyen Duc Hanh 2005. Statnamic Testing of Piles in Clay. Chap15.pdf
- Nguyen Duc Hanh 2005. Statnamic Testing of Piles in Clay. Chap68 Th7917 t7843i t297n.pdf