Table of content
CHAPTER 1. OVERVIEW OF PROBIOTICS
I.History and definition of probiotics
1. History of probiotics
2. Definition of probiotic
II.Microbes used as probioticS
III. Charateristics of probiotics
1. Properties of trains of probiotics
Lactobacillus
Bifidobacterium
Streptococcus
Enterococcus
Lactococcus lactis
2. Technologiacal properties
IV. Effects probiotics on human health
1. Disorders associated with the gastrointestinal tract
1.1. Prevention of diarrhea caused by certain pathogenic bacteria and viruses
1.2. Helicobacter pylori infection and complications
1.3. Inflammatory diseases and bowel syndromes
1.4. Cancer
1.5. Constipation
2. Mucosal immunity
3. Allergy
4. Cardiovascular disease
5. Hypocholesterolemic effect
6. Urogenital tract disorder
6.1. Bacterial vaginosis
6.2. Yeast vaginitis
6.3. Urinary tract infections
7. Use of probiotics in otherwise healthy people
8. Lactose intolerance
9. Reduction of the risk associated with mutagenicity and carcinogenicity
CHAPTER 2: DRYING PROBIOTICS
I. GENERAL MECHANISM
1. Introduction
2.1. Freeze drying 1
2.2. Spray Drying
2.3. Fluidized Bed Drying
2.4. Vacuum Drying
2.5. Foam formation
2.6. Mixed Drying Systems
II. CURRENT DRYING METHODS
1. Freeze drying
1.1. Mechanism and procedure
Purpose
Mechanism
Procedure
1.2. Equipments and technological parameters
1.2.1. Equipments
1.2.2.Processing parameters
1.3. Factors influence freeze drying process
1.3.1. Depth of product in container
1.3.2. Vapor pressure diferential
1.3.3. Amount of solid in the product, their particle size and their thermal conductance
1.4. The influence of processing factors on quality of product
2.Spray drying
2.1. Mechanism and material changes
2.2.Equipment and technology parameters
2.3. Factors influencing the spray drying
2.3.1. Kind of equipment and papameters
2.3.3. Air temperature
2.3.4.Other factors
2.4. Products
III. COMPARISION
IV. ACHIEVEMENTS IMPROVE SPRAY DRYING AND QUALITY OF PRODUCT
1. Cell physiology
1.1. Application of mild stress prior to dehydration
1.2. Growth phase
1.3. Growth media
1.3.1. Carbohydrates
1.3.2.Compatible solutes: polyols, NaCl, amino acids andamino derivatives
1.3.3. pH
1.4. Genetic-modification of probiotic strains
2. Protective agents
2.2. Eutectic crystallizing salts
3. Rehydration
4. Storage and packaging
5. Microencapsulation
V. PRODUCTS CONTAINED PROBIOTICS
1. Forms of probiotic powder
VI. Storage the products contained probiotics
83 trang |
Chia sẻ: maiphuongtl | Lượt xem: 2317 | Lượt tải: 1
Bạn đang xem trước 20 trang tài liệu Đồ án Kỹ thuật sấy probiotics (drying probiotics), để xem tài liệu hoàn chỉnh bạn click vào nút DOWNLOAD ở trên
perhaps 50 m/s but quickly decelerate to thermal
velocity (0.2 to 2 m/s).
The drying chamber may be arranged either horizontally or vertically, with
vertical orientation being the most common. Typically, the food droplets are
sprayed at the top of the chamber and fall down to the bottom by gravity. In spray
drying of foods, air is fed in the same direction as the food droplets in a concurrent
operation. Thus, both air and food droplets enter the drying chamber at the top and
gradually fall to the bottom of the chamber, where air is separated from dry power
and the product is removed from the dryer.
Co-current operation, with air and drying droplets moving in the same direction, is
desired in most foods include probiotics due to the thermal sensitivity. Food
droplets with the highest moisture content come into contact with air at the highest
temperature. Since water being removed from the droplet provides an evaporative
cooling effect, the product generally does not heat above the wet-bulb temperature
for the air, typically below 50oC. When the product reaches its driest state, the air
has also cooled, and chances of thermal degradation are reduced. Nevertheless,
some products are heated with low temperature process to minimize protein
destabilization.
50
Figure 4.11 Dryer chamber
Fan
In a spray drying process, high flow rates of drying air are generally obtained be
the use of centrifugal fans. Usually a two-fan system is used, the main fan situated
after the powder recovery equipment and the supply fan located in the inlet duct to
the drying chamber. Two fans enable better control of the pressure in the chamber.
With the single fan after the cyclone, the whole drying system operates under a
high negative pressure. The operating pressure in the drying chamber determines
the amount of power in the exhaust air and hence the capacity of the cyclones and
their collection of efficiency. In special cases, more fans may be used in a drying
process, for example, a centrifugal fan for blowing cool air to potential hot spots
in the drying chamber and atomizer.
The pressure developed by a fan depends upon the blade design. The most
common type of fan in spray drying has backward-curving blades. Such blades are
also used for the supply fan. If the powder-air ratio is high, the backward-curving
blades may cause problems with deposit formation on the backside of the blades.
In such cases, the use of the blade profile intermediate between the backward
curving and the radial is recommended.
51
Figure 4.12 Typical centrifugal fan
Powder Separation
Once air and dried powder reach the bottom of the dryer, they are separated and
the powdered product removed for either further processing or packaging. Primary
separation of powder is accomplished by gravitational settling of the heavier
powder particles. Separation of air and finer powder particles is usually
accomplished in a cyclone device. The air containing fine powdered particles is
circulated tangentially into the cyclone separator. Centrifugal force causes the
particles to segregate from the air and settle to the bottom of the conical separator.
Air flows back out the top of the cyclone, while powdered product is removed
from the bottom, where it rejoins the main powdered product from the dryer.
Since the cyclone does not remove all of the fine particles, in some cases an
additional separation step is needed. This is often accomplished using a textile or
bag filter. Here, air passes through a fabric filter before being exhausted into the
atmosphere. Fine particles are trapped by the filter and eventually recovered by
reverse air flow through the filters. This device is often used as the final separation
prior to exhausting air at the atmosphere.
52
Figure 4.13 Drying cyclone designs with different types of air inlet.
Spray Dryer Type
Probiotics are heat-sensitive food products so they usually dried in co-current
dryers. In a co-current dryer, the spray is directed into the hot air entering the
dryer and both pass through the chamber in the same direction. Co-current dryers
are the preferred design for heat-sensitive products because the hottest drying air
contacts the droplets at their maximum moisture content. Spray evaporation is
rapid, and the temperature of the drying air is quickly reduced by the vaporization
of water. The product does not suffer from heat degradation because the droplet
temperature is low during most of the evaporation time. Once the moisture content
reaches the target level, the temperature of the particle does not increase greatly
because the surrounding air is now much cooler.
53
Figure 4.14 Open Cycle Co-current Flow Layout
2.3. Factors influencing the spray drying
2.3.1. Kind of equipment and papameters
Dispersion of the feed solution in small droplets
The dispersion can be achieved with a pressure nozzle, a two fluid nozzle, a rotary
disk atomizer or an ultrasonic nozzle. So different kinds of energy can be used to
disperse the liquid body into fine particles. The selection upon the atomizer type
depends upon the nature and amount of feed and the desired characteristics of the
dried product. The higher the energy for the dispersion, the smaller are the
generated droplets.
54
Figure 4.15 Nozzle and product
Mixing of spray and drying medium (air) with heat and mass transfer
The manner in which spray contacts the drying air is an important factor in spray
dryer design, as this has great bearing on dried product properties by influencing
droplet behavior during drying.
This mixing is an important aspect and defines the method of spray drying:
Co-Current flow
Figure 4.16 Co-Current flow
The material is sprayed in the same direction as the flow of hot air through the
apparatus. The droplets come into contact with the hot drying air when they are
the most moist. The product is treated with care due to the sudden vaporization.
Counter-Current flow
55
Figure 4.17 Counter-Current flow
The material is sprayed in the opposite direction of the flow of hot air. The hot air
flows upwards and the product falls through increasingly hot air into the collection
tray. The residual moisture is eliminated, and the product becomes very hot. This
method is suitable only for thermally stabile products.
Combined
Figure 4.18 Combined
The advantages of both spraying methods are combined. The product is sprayed
upwards and only remains in the hot zone for a short time to eliminate the residual
moisture. Gravity then pulls the product into the cooler zone. Due to the fact that
the product is only in the hot zone for a short time, the product is treated with care.
Disk atomizer (rotary wheel)
56
Figure 4.19 Disk atomizer
The material to be sprayed flows onto a rapidly rotating atomizing disk and is
converted to a fine mist. The drying air flows in the same direction. The product is
treated with care, just as in the co-current flow method.
2.3.2. Dry matter content in the feed
To obtain a high-quality powder, constant dry matter content in the concentrate
produced in the evaporator preceding the drying process is necessary. The
occurrence of changes in dry matter content in the feed to the dryer is one of the
major sources of disturbance in the drying process. It is also advantageous to
remove as much water as possible at the evaporation stage from an energy-saving
point of view. In practice however, due to variations that occur in dry matter
content of the concentrate as a consequence of variations in feed and process
variables, the set point for this dry matter content is often lower than theoretically
possible. This is in order to reduce the risk too high a viscosity of the concentrate.
Less variation in dry matter content of the
Concentrate enables a higher set-point and thus also improves the energy
efficiency of the powder production process. When using conventional control
technology, such as single-loop proportional-integral-derivative (PID) controllers,
the long time delay from input (e.g. flow or dry matter content of food fed to the
evaporator) to output (e.g. total solids content of concentrate by controlling the
steam supply) will result in a relatively long period of off-spec concentrate.
Modern design methods for multivariable control make it possible to design
compensators that reduce or eliminate the off-spec period. For the design of such a
multivariable control system one should determine the dynamic behavior of the
evaporator involved. This can be done either by using a physical model simulating
the dynamic behavior or by carrying out step-response measurements on the actual
evaporator and using system identification techniques to draw up a black-box
57
model. The first approach is more flexible and robust for handling changes in the
design and process operation. The advantage of the latter approach is that it
requires less detailed knowledge about the design of the evaporator. Also in drying
processes there is a trend to use more and more predictive models in the control
strategy. The main issue for the automatic control of spray dryers is to achieve a
reduced variation in the moisture content of the powder, enabling a higher set
point for the moisture content, which strongly reduces the operating costs.
2.3.3. Air temperature
Drying is enhanced by operation at elevated air temperature. Drying rate increases
due to the grater rate of heat transfer, which results in higher vaporization rate.
Also, for air at given moisture content, relative humidity goes down as
temperature goes up. This results in a higher driving force for removing moisture
from the product surface. In addition, higher temperatures mean faster internal
diffusion process. That is, water molecules migrate more rapidly at higher
temperatures, and internal drying is also enhanced. Thus, increased air temperature
improves drying by effecting both internal (falling rate period) and external
processes (constant rate period). However, extreme high temperatures may cause
unwanted chemical or physical reactions to take place in the product.
Barberan, 1976 explain, indeed, that a temperature of 180oC to 300oC, at inlet of a
spraying device, is capable of killing all the live organisms. These observations
are also confirmed in EP298605 (Unilever: page 2, lines 43-48), and EP63438
(Scottish Milk Marke: page 1, line 14-21).
Some species of lactic acid bacteria are, however, naturally heat-resistant, that is
to say they are capable of with-standing relatively high temperatures. Chopin et al.
have thus shown that it is possible to spray-dry, at 215oC, a sporulating culture of
Microbacterium lacticum andnto obtain slightly more than 10% survival after
drying (Canadian J. Microb, 23, 755-762, 1977). Unfortunately, these species
generally form part of the appearance of bad taste. These heat-resistant lactic acid
bacteria are therefore not suitable for human consumption (“Fundamentals of
Food Microbiology”, Marion L. Field, AVI Publishing Comp, Westport, 1979).
Outlet air temperature is a major processing parameter affecting the number of
survivors during spray-drying. Silva et al. (2002) found relatively small changes in
the outlet temperature appear to have significant effects on the survival of
Lactobacillus strains, indicating that spray drying temperatures need to be
58
optimized individually for every new application. Kim and Bhowmik (1990)
reported that numbers of Streptococcus salivarius subsp. thermophilus and L.
debrueckii subsp. Bulgaricus decreased with increasing outlet or inlet air
temperatures and atomizing air pressure, while similar findings were reported by
Gardiner et al., 2000 for both L. paracasei NFBC 338 and L. salivarius UCC 118.
Consequently, improved viability can be achieved by reducing the outlet
temperature during spray-drying (Fig. 4.20), but beyond probiotic viability,
powder quality is also influenced by these parameters, with moisture content of
≈3.5% being preferred for shelf-stable products (Zayed & Roos, 2004).
Figure 4.20. Survival of Lactobacillus paracasei NFBC 338 during spray drying in
20% (wt/vol) RSM supplemented with 0.5% (wt/vol) yeast extract at different air
outlet temperatures (bar graph). The line shows the moisture contents of the
resulting powders. The air inlet temperature was maintained at 170oC. The results
are means based on data from duplicate spray-drying trials, and standard
deviations are indicated by vertical bars (Gardiner et al., 2000).
2.3.4.Other factors
Air Velocity
The speed at which drying air blows across the product surface impacts the rate of
moisture migration from the surface to the drying air. Evaporation from the
59
surface is enhanced by improved convective mass transfer rates as a result of
increase air velocity. Thus, increasing air velocity (or wind speed) shortens the
constant rate period. However, since drying in the falling rate period generally is
not limited by external conditions, increasing air velocity normally has little effect
on the falling rate period.
Relative Humidity
The amount of moisture in the air, as measured by the vapor pressure or relative
humidity, affects the driving force for external mass transfer. The difference in
moisture vapor pressure between the food surface and the drying air represents the
driving force for external mass transfer. For a given food product (with a known
surface vapor pressure or water activity of the food), increased relative humidity
of air enhances drying in the constant rate period. However, relative humidity
generally has little influence on drying in the falling rate period, where internal
mass transfer limits the drying rate.
2.4. Products
Certain characteristics of spray-dried powders are desirable. These include the
ability to be wetted by water during reconstitution, dispersability of the powder
into water and solubility in water. Changes in product attributes, particularly at the
case-hardened surface of the droplets decreases the ability of a powder to be
wetted and dispersed into water. Agglomeration of particles may also influence
the amount of surface available for wetting. The rate of dissolution, and final
solubility of the powder in water, also depends on the nature of the particle surface
III. COMPARISON
Freeze dry :
- The most widespread technique for dehydration of probiotics,use for all strains
- At low temperature, milder condition
- Higher probiotic survival rate
- High cost
- Small scale
Spray dry :
- Apply to the hydration of limited number of probiotic culture.
- High outlet temperature
- Lower probiotic survival rate
- Lower cost
- Large scale
60
IV. ACHIEVEMENTS IMPROVE SPRAY DRYING AND QUALITY OF
PRODUCT
1. Cell physiology
The importance of cell physiology to the successful drying of probiotics has been
demonstrated in a number of studies, and in this respect, several factors have been
proposed which have an influence on the survival of probiotic bacteria during
dehydration, e.g. stress treatment, growth phase of the probiotic culture prior to
dehydration, growth media and genetic modification.
1.1. Application of mild stress prior to dehydration
The application of sublethal stress to enhance the stress responses prior to
dehydration has been demonstrated as one feasible approach, ensuring high
viability of bacterial cultures and retention of physiological activity during
dehydration (de Urraza & de Antoni, 1997; Desmond et al., 2002; Kim,
Khunajakr, & Dunn, 1998; Lorca & de Valdez, 1998; Teixeira et al., 1995). It has
been demonstrated that bacteria respond to changes in their immediate
surroundings by a metabolic reprogramming which leads to a cellular state of
enhanced resistance (Pichereau, Hartke, & Auffray, 2000). Resistance encoded by
defence systems can be divided into two classes. The first comprises a specific
system induced by a sublethal dose of a chemical or physical stress (e.g. heat
shock), that permits survival against a challenge dose of the same agent
(Desmond, Stanton, Fitzgerald, Collins, & Ross, 2001; Gouesbet, Jan, & Boyaval,
2001; Pichereau et al., 2000). The second class of resistance comprises more
general systems which prepare cells to survive against very different
environmental stresses, without the need for cultures to have had prior exposure to
that stress (Desmond et al., 2001; Gouesbet et al., 2001; Pichereau et al., 2000).
This mechanism is known as cross-protection (Kim, Perl, Park, Tandianus, &
Dunn, 2001). Indeed, pre-adaptation with heat or salt led to improved heat
tolerance of probiotics during spray-drying. For example, L. paracasei NFBC 338,
pre-adapted by exposure to 0.3 M NaCl, was significantly more resistant to heat
stress associated with spray-drying (outlet temperatures between 95oC and 100oC)
than non-adapted control cells (33.46 ± 2.3% versus 8.27 ± 4.42% survival,
61
respectively) (Desmond et al., 2001). Although not as efficient as the homologous
stress, the levels of cross-protection were in the order heat ≈ salt > hydrogen
peroxide > bile (Stanton et al., 2002).
In the case of the first type of resistance mentioned, mild heat treatments can lead
to adaptation of the cell membrane by increasing the saturation and the length of
the fatty acids in order to maintain optimal fluidity of the membrane and activity
of intrinsic proteins (Russell & Fukanaga, 1990). The beneficial effect of heat
stress in the conservation of probiotics can also be explained by the production of
heat shock proteins (HSPs) which promote the correct folding of nascent
polypeptides, assembly of protein complexes, degradation and translocation of
proteins (Bukau & Horwich, 1998; De Angelis & Gobbetti, 2004). The two major
groups of chaperone proteins are the 70-kDa DnaK family and the 60-kDa GroE
family which function as chaperone machines (Georgopoulos & Welch, 1993).
The components of the DnaK chaperone typically consist of DnaK, DnaJ and
GrpE, while that of GroE is composed of GroEL and GroES (De Angelis &
Gobbetti, 2004). Desmond, Fitzgerald, Stanton, and Ross (2004) reported that
chaperone protein GroEL was among the most strongly expressed proteins in the
cell under heat adaptation conditions. Viability of the heat-adapted L. paracasei
NFBC 338 in RSM was enhanced 18-fold during spray-drying at outlet
temperatures of 95–105oC (Desmond et al., 2001). Heat shock induction of the
groESL chaperone in L. johnsonii also provided protection agains freezing
(Walker, Girgis, & Klaenhammer, 1999). The increased cytoplasmic
contentrations of GroES and GroEL favored cell viability and metabolic activity
during and after starter preparation using freezing, lyophilisation or spray-drying
(De Angelis & Gobbetti, 2004). Furthermore, pressure pre-treatment has also been
shown to increase heat resistance of probiotics. For example, it has been
demonstrated that incubation of L. rhamnosus GG at elevated pressure of 100 MPa
for 5–10 min prior to exposure to lethal heat at 60oC led to increased heat
resistance as compared to untreated controls (Ananta & Knorr, 2003). Jaya Prasad,
Paul McJarrow, and Pramod Gopal, 2002 observed that when prestressed with
either heat (50°C) or salt (0.6 M NaCl), Lactobacillus rhamnosus HN001 (also
known as DR20) showed significant (P < 0.05) improvement in viability compared
with the nonstressed control culture after storage at 30°C in the dried form.
62
1.2. Growth phase
When grown in batch culture, the growth of bacterial cultures occurs during four
distinct phases, i.e. log, lag, stationary and death phases. It is known that the
stress responses of bacterial cultures vary depending on the growth phase.
Indeed, bacteria that enter into stationary phase develop a general stress
resistance and are thus more resistant to various types of stresses (including
subsequent down-stream processing and storage) than bacteria in the log-phase,
due to carbon starvation and exhaustion of available food sources that trigger
stress responses to allow survival of the cell population (Brashears & Gilliland,
1995; Lorca & de Valdez, 1999; Morgan et al., 2006; van de Guchte et al.,
2002). Therefore, the optimal growth phase for dehydration survival is the
stationary phase. For example, it was reported that stationary phase cells of L.
rhamnosus yielded the highest recovery rates after drying (31–50% survival),
whereas early log-phase cells exhibited only 14% survival, and lag phase cells
showed the highest susceptibility, with only a 2% cell survival under similar
conditions of drying (Corcoran et al., 2004).
1.3. Growth media
1.3.1. Carbohydrates
The composition of the growth media is a contributing factor to the survival rate
of probiotic cultures during drying, and in this respect, the importance of the
presence of carbohydrates has been demonstrated.
The survival of L. sakei following spray-drying was enhanced when cells were
grown in the presence of sucrose (Ferreira et al., 2005).
Other sugars, such as fructose and sorbitol also provided better protection than
glucose, the standard growth media carbohydrate (Carvalho et al., 2004). The
mechanism for the protection of sugars in the growth media is likely that growth
in the presence of various sugar substrates produces cells with distinct
morphological and physiological traits, thus reflecting distinct resistances to the
various stress treatments tested (Carvalho et al., 2004).
Studies have shown that metabolites such as mannitol, sorbitol and glutamate
which in most cases remain inside the cell may be responsible for the distinct
survival behaviour during dehydration (Wisselink, Weusthuis, Eggink,
Hugenholtz, & Grobben, 2002), and the formation of these metabolites depends on
the carbon sources in the growth media (Kets, Galinski, de Wit, de Bont, &
Heipieper, 1996).
Adding trehalose to the growth media, enables cells to increase the amount of
trehalose within the cytoplasm, which in turn stabilizes the cytoplasmic membrane
during desiccation (Streeter, 2003). This accumulation of intracellular trehalose or
63
any carbohydrate is only possible however, if the microorganism cannot use the
chosen carbohydrate as a carbon source (Streeter, 2003), or if the cell has the
capacity to localize carbohydrate enzymes in vacuoles (Jules et al., 2004).
1.3.2. Compatible solutes: polyols, NaCl, amino acids and amino
derivatives
Another form of additives used in growth media are compatible solutes such as
polyols, amino acids and amino derivatives. Micro-organisms undergoing drying
are faced with an increasing osmotic stress as the water activity decreases. One
way organisms counteract the osmotic stress is to accumulate compatible solutes
to maintain the osmotic balance between the highly concentrated extracellular
environment and the more dilute intracellular environment. These solutes can also
help to stabilize proteins and the cell membrane during osmotic stress conditions
brought on by low water activity during drying processes.
One solute which is present in several groups of bacteria and has shown various
halotolerant properties is the amino derivative betaine. Kets and de Bont (1994)
found that Lactobacillus plantarum grew significantly better in the presence of
betaine under osmotically stressful conditions (0.6 M sodium chloride). However,
the increased growth rate and apparent salt tolerance did not produce high cell
recoveries, with a maximum of 11% of viable cells surviving drying. This
indicates that possible protectant (betaine) uptake by cells and stress induced
tolerance from growth conditions, does not necessarily guarantee tolerance to
desiccation.
The presence of sodium chloride in the growth media and medium concentration
also have effects on the survival of probiotic cultures following dehydration.
Linders et al. (1997) demonstrated that the presence of 1 mol l-1 or 1.25 mol l-1
NaCl during growth of L. plantarum resulted in a decreased residual activity after
drying in the fluidized bed.
1.3.3. pH
The final pH of the growth media of the probiotic culture also influences the
survival during desiccation. The cells obtained under non-controlled pH (4.5)
conditions were more resistant to heat stress, spray-drying and storage in the dried
state than those from culture under controlled pH (6.5) (Silva et al., 2005). This
phenomenon may be related to acid shock/adaptation, which can alter the
physiological state of bacterial cells leading to enhanced synthesis of heat shock
64
proteins, and hence improvement of resistance to drying. Silva et al. (2005)
confirmed that the higher resistance of L. delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus grown
under non-controlled pH correlated with the enhanced production of heat shock
proteins.
1.4. Genetic-modification of probiotic strains
Advances in genomics and proteomics have led to the identification of genes
involved in Lactobacillus stress responses, such as the molecular chaperone
groESL and dnaK (heat stress) (Prasad, McJarrow, & Gopal, 2003; Schmidt,
Hertel, & Hammes, 1999; Walker et al., 1999), and enhanced viability of probiotic
cultures during dehydration has been obtained by over-expression of the genes
encoding various stress inducible proteins. Walker et al. (1999) revealed that
features of the groESL operon are shared between various lactic acid bacteria,
notably other Lactobacillus species and Lactococcus lactis. Two-dimensional
polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis also revealed that GroEL expression in
probiotic L. paracasei NFBC 338 was increased under heat adaptation conditions
(52oC for 15 min) (Desmond et al., 2004).. Furthermore, using transmission
electron microscopy (TEM), it was apparent that the probiotic lactobacilli present
in both spray-dried and freeze-dried powders were in close contact (Fig. 6.1)
(Corcoran et al., 2006). Because an increased ability to accumulate betaine via
BetL can improve the ability of an organism to prevail in diverse, stressful
environments, the nisin-controlled expression system was used to direct the
heterologous expression of the listerial betaine uptake system BetL in the probiotic
strain L. salivarius UCC118 (Sheehan, Sleator, Fitzgerald, & Hill, 2006)..
65
Figure 6.1. (a) TEM image of spray-dried log-phase L. paracasei NFBC 338,
overproducing GroESL (60,000×). (b) TEM image of spray-dried log-phase L.
paracasei NFBC 338, control (60,000×). (c) TEM image of freeze-dried log-phase L.
paracasei NFBC 338, control (60,000×) (Corcoran et al., 2006).
2. Protective agents
Protective agents can be added during growth of the micro-organism, or prior to
freezing or drying. The type of protectant largely depends on the micro-organism;
however, there are a few that appear to work well with many species. These
include skim milk powder, whey protein, trehalose, glycerol, betaine, adonitol,
sucrose, glucose, lactose and polymers such as dextran and polyethylene glycol
(Hubalek, 2003; Morgan, Herman, White, & Vesey, 2006). Protective additives
can be generally classed into two categories: amorphous glass forming, and
eutectic crystallizing salts.
2.1. Amorphous glass forming
The former matrix includes substances such as carbohydrates, proteins and
polymers. A glass is a supersaturated thermodynamically unstable liquid with a
very high viscosity.
2.2. Eutectic crystallizing salts
A eutectic salt is a crystallizing salt that will leave solution and form crystal
structures as the freezing point is reached. Each solute will crystallize at a
different temperature. The formation of harmful crystals (either salt or ice) could
potentially damage the cell membrane, thereby compromising the integrity of the
cell and allowing valuable cell contents to leak out of the cell after thawing. As the
freezing point for water is reached, ice crystals will form, and the remaining salts
left in solution will be concentrated around the ice crystals. This highly
66
concentrated salt solution mixed with any substances released by the cells prior to
freezing can also be detrimental to a cell by causing irreversible damage to the cell
membrane (Orndorff and MacKenzie, 1973). Eutectic salts appear to only exert
detrimental effects instead of protecting qualities.
Used in spray drying
In spray drying, amorphous glass forming is used. The use of gum acacia in the
spray-drying medium resulted in enhanced probiotic survival of L. paracasei
NFBC 338, which displayed 10-fold greater survival than control cells (20%
RSM) when grown in a mixture of RSM (10% w/v) and gum acacia (10% w/v)
prior to spray-drying at air outlet temperature of 100–105 oC (Desmond, Ross,
O’Callaghan, Fitzgerald, & Stanton, 2002). RSM appears to be a very suitable
media for efficacious spray-drying of probiotic cultures (Ananta, Volkert, &
Knorr, 2005; Corcoran, Ross, Fitzgerald, & Stanton, 2004; Desmond et al., 2002)
as skim milk protein can prevent cellular injury by stabilizing cell membrane
constituents (Castro, Teixeira, & Kirby, 1995).
3. Rehydration
Rehydration of probiotic powders is the final critical step for the revival of cells
after dehydration. The reconstitution process in water can be divided into four steps:
wetting, submersion, dispersion and dissolving (Freudig, Hogekamp, & Schubert,
1999). Among these steps, wetting of the particles is very often the reconstitution
controlling step (Vega & Roos, 2006). The rehydration solution itself (in terms of
osmolarity, pH and nutritional energy source), as well as the rehydration conditions
(in terms of rehydration temperature and volume) may significantly affect the rate of
recovery to the viable state, and thus influence survival rates (Carvalho et al., 2004).
For optimum results, it is recommended to dry the cells at the stationary phase of
growth and to use slow rehydration procedures (Teixeira et al., 1995). Studies have
shown that the rehydration media also can influence probiotic recovery significantly.
For example, complex media such as 10% (w/v) RSM and PTM media (1.5% (w/v)
peptone), 1% (w/v) tryptone and 0.5% (w/v) meat extract as well as a 10% (w/v)
sucrose solutions were found to produce significantly higher bacterial cell recovery
67
than media such as phosphate buffer, sodium glutamate and water (Costa, Usall,
Teixido, Garcia, & Vinas, 2000). Some studies have indicated that the same
rehydration solution as used for cryopreservation results in increased viability
(Abadias, Teixido, Usall, Benabarre, & Vinas, 2001; Ray, Jezeski, & Busta, 1971).
The reason for this is that such a solution provides a high osmotic pressure
environment which could control the rate of hydration, and thus avoid osmotic
shock. The temperature of rehydration of freeze dried and spray-dried probiotics
also influences cell recovery.
4. Storage and packaging
The method of storage and the packaging it is stored within will influence the
shelf life of any dried product.
Storage
Following spray drying, Desmond et al. (2002) found 100% survival of
Lactobacillus paracasei was achievable after one week storage at 4 °C and 15 °C.
However, there was a 20 – 80% drop in cell viability at four weeks for both
temperatures. This recovery relied on a high 7×107 cfu ml –1 initial bacterial load,
and the enumeration of the high cell concentrations gave results with up to 20%
variation. The variable survival rate indicates that cell injury can also occur during
storage. To achieve long term storage of the spray dried powder, possible changes
in the storage conditions should also be investigated.
The storage conditions i.e. storage temperature, moisture content of powders,
relative humidity, powder composition, oxygen content, exposure to light and
storage materials, have significant influences on the survival of probiotics in dried
powders, and the correct storage conditions are essential to maintain viable
populations of freeze and spray-dried probiotic bacteria.
Viability of probiotic bacteria during powder storage is inversely related to storage
temperature (Gardiner et al., 2000; Mary, Moschetto, & Tailliez, 1993; Silva,
Carvalho, Teixeira, & Gibbs, 2002; Teixeira et al., 1995b). Simpson et al. (2005)
reported that there was a significant decline in viability of a number of
bifidobacteria species when spray-dried in a skimmed milk-based carrier and
stored at 15oC and 25oC.
.
68
The carrier used during the spray-drying of probiotics is known to have an
influence on storage stability. Ananta et al. (2005) evaluated the effect of a spray-
dried carrier on protection of L. rhamnosus GG at 25oC and 37oC storage
conditions, and found that the protection capacity decreased in the order RSM >
RSM/Polydextrose > RSM/Raftilose ®P95. Moreover, stability of L. rhamnosus
GG during long-term storage was impaired by partial substitution of skim milk
with either of the prebiotic substances evaluated. Similar findings were previously
reported by Corcoran et al. (2004) for spray-dried probiotic lactobacilli. These
data justify the suitability of skim milk as a medium for the large-scale production
of shelf-stable spray-dried probiotic bacteria.
The impairment of viability during storage is related to oxidation of membrane
lipids (Teixeira, Castro, & Kirby, 1996). Unsaturated acyl lipids such as oleic acid
cannot be considered as stable food constituents during food storage, as the
presence of one or more allyl groups within the fatty acid molecule are readily
oxidized to hydroperoxides. Moreover, products of lipid peroxidation have been
shown to induce DNA damage in a model system (Akasaka, 1986; Inouye, 1984)
and in bacteria (Marnett et al., 1985). Therefore, to minimize oxidation and
thereby optimize probiotic viability during storage, the presence of antioxidants
(Teixeira et al., 1995b), in combination with storage under vacuum with controlled
water activity should be effective.
Packaging
There are very few studies on packaging and viability, as the shelf life of products
is generally assessed by private industry and therefore regarded as a commercial
secret (Costa et al., 2002). Costa et al. (2002) compared glass vials and high and
low barrier plastic bags for the storage of Pantoea agglomerans. The findings
showed the high barrier bags provide a more consistent storage environment
compared to the low barrier bags, which allowed higher levels of oxygen and
moisture to ingress. Bozoglu et al. (1987) compared viability of Lactobacillus
bulgaricus and Streptococcus thermophilus following storage in air compared to
nitrogen and under vacuum. Storage within glass vials sealed under vacuum or
nitrogen gas were found to be superior compared to storage in air. They concluded
the poor cell recovery was due to oxygen diffusion into the dry cells through the
69
interfacial area of the cell, possibly because the cells remain permeable throughout
storage. The accumulation of free radicals such as oxygen species within a cell
that cannot metabolize them, or actively transport them out of the cell, can result
in irreversible damaging processes occurring within the cell (Bozoglu et al., 1987).
Teixeira et al. (1995) found evidence of damage to the cell wall, cell membrane
and DNA during storage of L.delbrueckii ssp. bulgaricus. They attempted to use
an antioxidant to prolong cell viability during storage. The results showed an
increase in the death rate at –20 °C storage, but an increase in survival at 4 °C.
They believed the antioxidant ascorbic acid, could have pro-oxidant properties as
well and possibly produce hydroxyl radicals which can oxidize biological
molecules.
5. Microencapsulation
Microencapsulation helps to separate a core material from its environment until it
is released. It protects the unstable core from its environment, thereby improving
its stability, extends the core’s shelf life and provides a sustained and controlled
release (Figure 6.2). The structure formed by the micro-encapsulation agent
around the core substance is known as the wall. The properties of the wall system
are designed to protect the core and to release it at controlled rates under specific
conditions while allowing small molecules to pass in and out of the membrane
(Franjione and Vasishtha, 1995; Gibbs et al., 1999). The capsules may range from
submicron to several millimeters in size and can be of different shapes (Shahidi
and Han, 1993; Franjione and Vasishtha, 1995).
Compared to immobilisation/entrapment techniques, micro-encapsulation has
many advantages. The microcapsule is composed of a semipermeable, spherical,
thin and strong membranous wall. Therefore the bacterial cells are retained within
the microcapsules (Jankowski et al., 1997). Moreover, compared to an entrapment
matrix, here is no solid or gelled core in the microcapsule and its small diameter
helps to reduce mass transfer limitations. The nutrients and metabolites can diffuse
through the semipermeable membrane easily. The membrane serves as a barrier to
cell release and minimises contamination. The encapsulated core material is
released by several mechanisms such as mechanical rupture of the cell wall,
dissolution of the wall, melting of the wall and diffusion through the wall
(Franjione and Vasishtha, 1995).
70
Figure 6.2. Principle of Encapsulation: Membrane barrier isolates cells from the
host immune system while allowing transport of metabolites and extracellular
nutrients. Membrane with size selective pores (30-70 kDa). Source: INOTECH
Encapsulation.
Microencapsulation of various bacterial cultures including probiotics has also been
used for extending their storage life (Krasaekoopt, Bhandari, & Deeth, 2003).
Several methods of micro encapsulation of probiotic bacteria have been reported
and include extrusion technique, emulsion technique, cross-linking with cationic
polymers, coating with other polymers, mixing with starch and incorporation of
additives (Krasaekoopt et al., 2003). Song, Cho, and Park (2003), Kim, Kamara,
Good, and Enders (1988) Koo, Cho, Huh, Baek, and Park (2001) observed that
both non-encapsulated and encapsulated cells stored at 4oC had comparable
stability, while encapsulation provided a greater degree of protection against
increased storage temperature. O’Riordan, Andrews, Buckle, and Conway (2001)
prepared microencapsulated Bifidobacterium PL-1 with starch by spray-drying,
however the starch-coated cells did not display any enhanced viability compared
with free PL1 cells when exposed to acid conditions for 6 h or in two dry food
preparations over 20 days storage at ambient temperature (19–24 oC). Hence, the
efficiency of microencapsulation of probiotics depends on the encapsulating
materials and techniques of micro-encapsulation.
71
V. PRODUCTS CONTAINED PROBIOTICS
1. Forms of probiotic powder
Lyophilization (freeze drying)
Figure 7.1: Forms of probiotic powder by freeze drying
The concentrated of bacteria is first frozen at 40° C then, by sublimation, the ice
is transformed into steam. One thus obtains a crust lasts ready to be crushed.
Crushing
Figure 7.2: Forms of probiotic powder - crushing
The crust is crushed to obtain a powder with the concentration of bacteria is very
high. It is the pure culture.
Mixture
Figure 7.3: Forms of probiotic powder by freeze drying - mixture
Mix the pure culture is mixed with of the excipients (inert ingredients which serve
as vehicle to the pure culture) to permit a standardized packaging.
72
VI. Storage the products contained probiotics
Table 6.1: Stability of probiotics during the storehouse
73
74
Table 6.1 (continue)
75
Table 6.2: Ameloiration of the viable probiotics during the storehouse
76
Table 6.3: Effect of the probiotics addition in the milk products according to
sensories
77
VII. Examples for product of probiotic powder
Figure 7.4 : Mixture of probiotics in tablets
Table 6.4: Informations of product
Mixture for children 5 – 15
years old.
Mixture for adults
Strains: 8 Bacterial strains that is specific
to children, appropriate dosage;
formulated to reflect the healthy
microflora of a child.
8 Bacterial strains specific to
adults, appropriate dosage;
formulated to reflect the healthy
microflora of an adult.
Quality 4 Billion of viable cells/active
per capsule availability : Each
vegetable capsule contains : a
total of 4 billion of viable cells
during the manufacturing (2,4
billion guaranteed until the
expiry date)
12 Billion of viable cells/active
per capsule availability: Each
vegetable capsule contains : 12
billion of viable cells in the
manufacture (8,3 billion
guaranteed up to the expiry
date).
Availability : 60 vegetational capsules. 60 and 12 vegetational capsules
Usage guide The intestinal flora sound of a
child is similar to that of an
Adults require the larger
quantities of the same bacteria
78
adult. The major difference lies
in the dosage because of their
small size, children require
smaller quantities of the same
probiotics. The strains used for
the mixture for children have
been specifically selected by
reason of their benefits for the
health of children. If the child
cannot swallow the capsules, if
the child cannot swallow the
capsules, the middle more easy
to him to take this product of
basic support is to mix the
contents of the dish with its food.
that children. The strains used
for the mixture for adults have
an appropriate dosage for adults
in good health who wish to
support their immune system.
In the framework of food
choices and of a lifestyle, the
mixture for adults optimizes the
digestion and intestinal health,
which represent the foundations
of the health of all the body
systems.
Medicinal
ingredients:
- Lactobacillus casei: 25%
- Lactobacillus rhamnosus: 25%
- Lactobacillus acidophilus:
20%
- Lactobacillus plantarum
- Streptococcus thermophilus:
7%
- Bifidobacterium bifidum: 5%
- Bifidobacterium breve: 5%
- Lactobacillus bulgaricus: 3%
- Lactobacillus casei: 25%
- Lactobacillus rhamnosus:
25%
- Lactobacillus acidophilus:
20%
- Lactobacillus plantarum:
10%
- Streptococcus thermophilus:
7%
- Bifidobacterium bifidum: 5%
- Bifidobacterium breve: 5%
- Lactobacillus bulgaricus: 3%
NON-
MEDICINAL
INGREDIENTS:
microcrystalline cellulose,
magnesium stearate, ascorbic
acid. May contain traces of
powdered milk, whey and soy
lecithin
Microcrystalline cellulose,
magnesium stearate, ascorbic
acid. May contain traces of
powdered milk, whey and soy
lecithin.
Recommended
Dosage :
to restore the health of the
intestinal flora, take three
capsules per day after
To restore the health of the
intestinal flora, take three
capsules per day after eating.
To maintain the health of the
intestinal flora, take a capsule
per day after eating.
79
References
[1] Chalat Santivarangkna, Alternative Drying Processes for the Industrial Preservation
of Lactic Acid Starter Cultures, 2007, Biotechnol.Prog, 23, 302-315.
[2] X.C.Meng, Anhydrobiotics:The challenges of drying probiotic cultures, 2008, Food
chemistry, 106, 1406-1416.
[3] Song Miao, Effect of disaccharides on survival during storage of freeze dried
probiotics, 2008, Dairy Sci.Technol.,88, 19-30.
[4] C.A.Morgan, Preservation of micro-organisms by drying; A review, 2006, Journal of
Microbiological Methods , 66,183–193.
[5] Kanchi Bhasker Praveen Kumar Reddy, Role of Cryoprotectants on the Viability
and Functional Properties of Probiotic LacticAcid Bacteria during Freeze Drying, 2009,
Food Biotechnology, 23,243–265.
[6] C.A. Morgan, N. Herman, P.A. White, G. Vesey Preservation of micro-organisms
by drying; A review Journal of Microbiological Methods 66 (2006) 183–193
[7] Colette Desmonda, Catherine Stantona, Gerald F. Fitzgeraldb, Kevin Collins, R.
Paul Ross Environmental adaptation of probiotic lactobacilli towards improvement of
performance during spray drying International Dairy Journal 12 (2002) 183–190
[8] Diamant Conference Centre Brussels, Belgium Powder Research to Promote
Competitive Manufacture of Added-Value Food Ingredients 27th and 28th November
2002
[9] G. E. Gardiner, E. O’sullivan, J. Kelly, M. A. E. Auty Comparative Survival Rates
of Human-Derived Probiotic Lactobacillus paracasei and L. salivarius Strains during
Heat Treatment and Spray Drying Applied And Environmental Microbiology, June
2000, p. 2605–2612
[10] Gillian E. Gardiner, Paul Bouchier, Eilis O’Sullivanb, Jim Kellya, J. Kevin Collins,
Gerald Fitzgeraldb, R. Paul Ross, Catherine Stantona, A spray-dried culture for
probiotic Cheddar cheese manufacture International Dairy Journal 12 (2002) 749–756
[11] Guidelines for the Evaluation of Probiotics in Food Report of a Joint FAO/WHO
Working Group on Drafting Guidelines for the Evaluation of Probiotics in Food London
Ontario, Canada April 30 and May 1, 2002
[12] Health and Nutritional Properties of Probiotics in Food including Powder Milk
with Live Lactic Acid Bacteria Report of a Joint FAO/WHO Expert Consultation on
80
Evaluation of Health and Nutritional Properties of Probiotics in Food Including Powder
Milk with Live Lactic Acid Bacteria Amerian Córdoba Park Hotel, Córdoba, Argentina
1-4 October 2001
[13] Jaya Prasad,Paul McJarrow, and Pramod Gopal Heat and Osmotic Stress
Responses of Probiotic Lactobacillus rhamnosus HN001 (DR20) in Relation to Viability
after Drying Applied And Environmental Microbiology, Feb. 2003, p. 917–925
[14] Johan Palmfeldt , Barbel Hahn-Hagerdal Influence of culture pH on survival of
Lactobacillus reuteri subjected to freeze-drying International Journal of Food
Microbiology 55 (2000) 235–238
[15] J.P. Hecht, A.E. Bayly Atomization for Spray Drying: Unanswered Questions and
Industrial Needs ICLASS 2009, 11th Triennial International Annual Conference on
Liquid Atomization and Spray Systems, Vail, Colorado USA, July 2009
[16] Kaila Kailasapathy Microencapsulation of Probiotic Bacteria: Technology and
Potential Applications Curr. Issues Intest. Microbiol. (2002) 3: 39-48.
[17] N. Menshutina, M. Gordienko, A. Avanesova, A. Voinovskiy Intensification of
probiotics drying. Spray-drying of Bifidobacteria biosuspension Intensification of
probiotics drying. Spray-drying of Bifidobacteria biosuspension Proceedings of
European Congress of Chemical Engineering (ECCE-6) Copenhagen, 16-20 September
2007
[18] T. Vasiljevic, N.P. Shah Probiotics—From Metchnikoff to bioactives T. Vasiljevic,
N.P. Shah International Dairy Journal 18 (2008) 714– 728
[19] X.C. Meng, C. Stanton, G.F. Fitzgerald, C. Daly, R.P. Ross Anhydrobiotics: The
Challenges of drying probiotic cultures Food Chemistry 106 (2008) 1406–1416
[20] Wen-Chian Lian, Hung-Chi Hsiao, Cheng-Chun Chou Survival of bifidobacteria
after spray-drying International Journal of Food Microbiology 74 (2002) 79– 86
[21] RAPPORT Consultation mixte d’experts FAO/OMS sur l’évaluation des
propriétés sanitaires et nutritionnelles des probiotiques dans les aliments, y
compris le lait en poudre contenant des bactéries lactiques vivantes .
Cordoba, Argentine . 1er - 4 octobre 2001
81
[22]Les probiotiques dans l’industrie alimentaire : que conseiller à nos patients ?
G. CORTHIER
(Jouy-en-Josas). Volume 37 - N° spécial CREGG - 2007
[23]
2185BF9DC143/16256/Rodier_Sylvain_ESP_H2008_corrige.pdf
Dissertation critique
Est-ce que cela vaut la peine du point de vue technologique, de rajouter des
probiotiques dans les aliments autres que les laits fermentés ?
Dans le cadre de l’épreuve synthèse de programme. Présentée à l’équipe programme
TTA, Par Sylvain Rodier. Institut de technologie agroalimentaire, campus de Saint-
Hyacinthe. Le 12 mai 2008
[24]
otics_prebiotics_fr.pdf
World Gastroenterology Organisation . Organisation mondiale de Gastroentérologie
Recommandation Pratique: Probiotiques et Prébiotiques
Mai 2008
[25]
LES BACTÉRIES PROBIOTIQUES :INNOVATIONS ET TENDANCES DE
DÉVELOPPEMENT TECHNOLOGIQUE. Membres du Réseau Bio-Innovation® :
GRATUIT. Volume 6, Numéro 4 - Août 2007
[26]
PROBIOTIQUES DOCUMENT DE TRAVAIL Rapport présenté à la Direction des
produits de santé naturels, Santé Canada. Mars 2005. Nutritech Consulting
Winnipeg, Manitoba Préparé par: K.C. Fitzpatrick
82
[27]
Probiotiques - La sélection Udo®
[28]
Le concept de probiotique :DUCLUZEAU R. (1) ; (1) INRA, 46, rue Albert-Calmette,
78350 Jouy-en-Josas, FRANCE. Journal Title : Antibiotiques ISSN 1294-5501
Source / Source: 2002, vol. 4, no4, pp. 234-238 [5 page(s) (article)] (18 ref.)
[29] Lactococcus lactis: nominated as the Wisconsin State Microbe
© 2009 Kenneth Todar, PhD
[30]
LES PROBIOTIQUES, ALLIES D'UNE BONNE SANTÉ INTESTINALE
PROFESSEUR L. DE VUYST .GROUPE DE RECHERCHE EN MICROBIOLOGIE
INDUSTRIELLE ET BIOTECHNOLOGIE ALIMENTAIRE
UNITE DE BIO-INGENIERIE – VRIJE UNIVERSITEIT BRUSSEL
83