Effect of alumina particle size on properties of electrolessly deposited composite Ni-P/Al2O3
Hardness of composite layers with different
sizes of co-depsosited alumina particles was
measured and sumarized on Tab. 2. Results
show that hardness increases with increasing
alumina particle size. Since the composition of
the matrix Ni-P does not change much as
alumina particle size changes (Tab. 1), this
result can be explained by the two effects
occuring during the deposition process. The first
effect is the decrease of the Al2O3 content in
composite layers as particle size increases. The
second reason is that as particles become
smaller, the distribution of alumina particle will
be more evently in the composite layers
5 trang |
Chia sẻ: honghp95 | Lượt xem: 600 | Lượt tải: 0
Bạn đang xem nội dung tài liệu Effect of alumina particle size on properties of electrolessly deposited composite Ni-P/Al2O3, để tải tài liệu về máy bạn click vào nút DOWNLOAD ở trên
608
Journal of Chemistry, Vol. 47 (5), P. 608 - 612, 2009
Effect of alumina particle size on properties of
electrolessly deposited composite Ni-P/Al2O3
Received 5 January 2009
HA MANH CHIEN1, MAI THANH TUNG1, DANG VIET ANH DUNG1, HOANG VAN HUNG2
1Dep. of Electrochemistry and Corrosion Protection, Hanoi University of Technology
2LILAMA Hot Deep Galvanizing Company
Abstract
In this study, effect of particle size on morphology, alumina content and hardness of
electrolessly deposited composite Ni-P/Al2O3 layers was examined with diffrent sizes of
codeposited alumina particles. Results on Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM), Energy
Dispersed Spectroscopy (EDS), X-ray Diffraction (XRD) and hardness measurements showed that
as particles size increased composition of NiP matrix did not change remarkbly e.g the
composition of the obtaiend matrix ranged from Ni90P10 to Ni91P9. Meanwhile, Al2O3 content in
the composites increased as particle size decreased. As a result, hardness of the obtained layers
increased with decreasing particle size and maximum hardness was achieved with particle size of
0.6μm.
I - INTRODUCTION
Autocatalytically deposited Ni-P amorphous
alloys have many industrial applications
because of their paramagnetic properties,
excellent resistance to wear and corrosion, and
high hardness [1 - 4]. Codepositing another
metallic or non-metallic elements or
abrasive/lubricative particles or combination of
in binary Ni-P matrix can futher enhance these
properties. Recently, electroless nickel
composite coatings have gained more attention
in reseach community due to their ability to
produce coatings that posses improved wear,
abrasion and lubrication properties than Ni-P
deposits [3-5]. Several particles have been
incoporated in the nickel matrix, and among
them, the combinations that have received
considerable attention are electroless nickel with
SiC, B4C, Si3N4, Al2O3 and PTFE and the
particles used are of micron size. Codeposition
of the paricles depends on the size shape,
density, concentration and method of
suspension in the bath. In addition, it is very
much dependent on the charge present on the
particle [6, 7].
Aim of the present investigation is to study
the particle size effect on properties of the
deposits. Hence, in this study Ni-P/Al2O3
composites were prepared using alumina
powders of sizes 0.6 μm, 8 μm and 15μm and
their surface morphology, structure and
hardness were investigated.
II - EXPERIMENTAL
Mild steel specimens (2.5 cm × 2.5 cm ×
0.08cm) were used for plating electroless NiP
and nanocomposite coatings containing alumina
particles. Specimens were ultrasonically cleaned
in acetone, cathodically cleaned in 10% sodium
hydroxide solution at 1.5 A/dm2 for 5 min. then
specimens were thoroughly rinsed with
deionized water and immersed in 50 vol.%
sulphuric acid solution for deoxidization for 30
s. After deionized water rinse, specimens were
transferred immediately to the plating solution.
609
Electroless nickel bath was used for
preparing the Ni-P and composite coatings. Bath
contains nickel sulphate 21 g/l, propionic acid 3
g/l and small amounts of lead nitrate and
operated at pH 4.0 - 4.5 and temperature 90±2
oC. Alumina powders used were of the size 0.8
μm, 6 μm and 15 μm (Acola) and the alumina
concentration in solution was kept at 30 g/l. The
plating time is 2 hours and the obtained layers
have thickness of about 50 μm (thickness
determined by electrochemical stripping
techniques). After plating, the specimens were
taken out then thoroughly rinsed with deionized
water and air dried at room temperature. Then
these specimens were used for further
characterization.
Surface morphology of the obtained
electrolessly deposited layers was investigated
using scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM).
The composition of the alloys was determined
by Energy Dispersion Spectroscopy (EDS).
Texture and phase formation of the films were
analyzed by X-ray Diffractometer (XRD).
III - RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Figs. 1 and 2 show SEM images and
corresponding EDS analyses of the electrolessly
deposited composite Ni-P/Al2O3 with different
particle sizes of 0.6 μm, 8 μm and 15μm. It can
be seen that in all cases, the sedimentation of
Al2O3 on the deposited layers due to high
interaction energy between freshly formed Ni-P
layer and Al2O3 particles in the solution do not
occur. Since Al signals appear in EDS spectra
(Fig. 2), it can be concluded that the Al2O3
particles are already trapped in the deposited
layers.
Composition of the deposited Ni-P alloys
and content of dispersed Al2O3 particles in the
layers obtained from EDS analyses are
summarized in Tab. 1. Results show that the
alumina particle size does not influence on
composition of the Ni-P matrix e.g the
composition of the Ni-P is in the range of
Ni90P10 to Ni89P11. Meanwhile, Al2O3 content
decreases with increasing alumina particle sizes.
The maximum Al2O3 content 12%) was
Fig. 1: SEM images of electrolessly deposited composite NiP-Al2O3 with different size of Al2O3
particles (a) without Al2O3;(b) d = 15 μm; (c) d = 6 μm; (d) d = 0.8 μm
610
obtained with particle size of 0.8 μm. This result
can be explained based on the formation
mechanism of composites. According to Hajdu,
the formation of composite coatings consist of 3
steps: (i) transportation of Al2O3 particles from
electrolyte to the surface through convection or
diffusion (ii) adsorption of the particles on the
surface and (iii) deposited Ni-P buries the
particles [1, 2]. Thus smaller Al2O3 particles,
which have higher specific surface energy
compared to that of coarser ones, will tend to
adsorb more on the surface. As a result, the
amount of Al2O3 particles in the obtained Ni-
P/Al2O3 composites will increase.
Fig. 2: EDS spectra of electrolessly deposited composite Ni-P/Al2O3 with different size of Al2O3
particles (a) without Al2O3; (b) d = 15 μm; (c) d = 6 μm; (d) d = 0,8 μm
Tab. 1: Composition of as-plated electroless Ni-P and composite coatings determined by
EDS analysis
Type of coatings Ni (wt.%) P (wt.%) Al2O3 (wt.%) Ni-P matrix
Ni – P
Ni – P – Al2O3 (0.8 μm)
Ni – P – Al2O3 (6 μm)
Ni – P – Al2O3 (15 μm)
89,0
79,2
71,9
82,8
11,0
8,8
8,1
8,2
0
12,0
10,0
9,0
Ni89P11
Ni90P10
Ni90P10 Ni91P9
Fig. 3 displays XRD patterns of the
composite with alumina particle sizes of 0.8 μm,
6 μm and 15μm. It can be observed that the
obtained Ni-P matrix has semi-amorphous
structure, indicated by very low intensity of
Ni(111) and Ni(111) signals. This result also
agrees with the EDS analyses, which show that
the phosphorus content in Ni-P layer is around 9
- 10%. According to the phase diagram, this
composition corresponds to a partly amorphous
structure of Ni-P and dispersed Ni crisstalline
inside the amorphous matrix [1, 2]. This
611
structure also promotes a high corrosion
resistant and high hardness of the Ni-P layer [1,
7]. It is also interresting to note that the Al2O3
peak intensities in XRD spectra also decrease
with increasing particle size due to the increase
of Al2O3 content in the composite layers.
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60
Cu {111}
Ni {111}Al2O3 Al2O3 Ni {200}
Cu
15μm
8μm
0.6μm
Fig. 3: XRD patterns of electrolessly deposited composite Ni-P/Al2O3 with different size (d) of
Al2O3 particles (a) without Al2O3; (b) d = 15 μm; (c) d = 8 μm; (d) d = 0.6 μm
Table 2: Hardness of composite coatings
Type of coatings HV hardness HB hardness
Bare steel 216 216
Ni – P 238 226
Ni – P – Al2O3 (0.8 nm) 266 253
Ni – P – Al2O3 (6 μm) 272 258
Ni – P – Al2O3 (15 μm) 294 279
Hardness of composite layers with different
sizes of co-depsosited alumina particles was
measured and sumarized on Tab. 2. Results
show that hardness increases with increasing
alumina particle size. Since the composition of
the matrix Ni-P does not change much as
alumina particle size changes (Tab. 1), this
result can be explained by the two effects
occuring during the deposition process. The first
effect is the decrease of the Al2O3 content in
composite layers as particle size increases. The
second reason is that as particles become
smaller, the distribution of alumina particle will
be more evently in the composite layers.
IV - CONCLUSION
Effect of alumina particle size on
612
morphology, particle content and hardness of
electrolessly deposited composite Ni-P/Al2O3
layers was examined using alumina particles
with sizes of 0.8μm, 6μm and 15μm. Results
showed that as particles size increased, the
composition of Ni-P matrix did not change
remarkbly e.g the composition of the obtained
matrix ranged from Ni90P10 to Ni91P9.
Meanwhile, Al2O3 content in the composite
increased as particle size decreased. As a result,
hardness of the obtained layer increased with
decreasing particle size and maximum hardness
was achieved with particle size of 0.6m.
Acknowledgement: The authors thank Ministry
of Science and Technology for financial support
of this work (project KHCB. 5.028.06).
REFERENCES
1. Gllen Mallory. Electroless deposition
technology, Surface Finishing Publisher,
NewYork (2005).
2. Gugau. Funktionerelle Oberflaechen durch
chemische Nickel, Eugen G Leuzer Verlag,
Wurtt, (2006).
3. C. Sambucetti. Electroless Deposition,
Society Publishers, Florida (1990).
4. Y. Okinaka, T. Osaka. Electroless
Deposition Processes: Fundamentals and
Applications, in Advances in
Electrochemical Science and Engineering,
VHC Publisher,Vol. 2, 55 - 116 (1994).
5. Sh. Alirezaei, S. M. Monirvaghefi, M.
Salehi, A. Saatchi. Sur. Coat. Tech., 184,
170 - 175 (2004).
6. A. Grosjean, M. Rezrazi, P. Bercot. Surf.
Coat. Technol., 130, 250 (2000).
7. I. Apachitei, J. Duszczyk, L. Katgerman, P.
J. B. Overkamp. Scr. Mater., 38 (9), 1347
(1998).
Corresponding author: Mai Thanh Tung
Dep. of Electrochemistry and Corrosion Protection,
Hanoi University of Technology.
Các file đính kèm theo tài liệu này:
- 4654_16693_1_pb_8915_2086764.pdf