Leaf proline and chlorophyll content
The content of proline and chlorophyll in the leaf of T. orientailis, L. articulata, E. dulcis
and S. littoralis grown at the different salinity concentrations was presented in the Fig. 3. The
results showed that salinity levels affected the leaf proline content of the four studied plants (p <
0.05; Fig. 3); proline was accumulated in the leaf higher at the higher level of NaCl. The leaf
proline content of T. orientailis, L. articulata, E. dulcis and S. littoralis grown in the control
treatment were 0.69, 3.73, 0.68 and 0.48 µmol/g FW, respectively, and it was increased at 6.13,
13.99, 2.42 and 15.76 µmol/g FW of the respective plant species grown in the salinity level of
20‰ (equivalent to an increase of 8.9, 3.7, 3.6 and 32.9 times). According to Chiang and
Dandekar [19] and Turan et al. [20] proline accumulation is believed to play adaptive roles in
plant stress tolerance. S. littoralis had the highest amount of proline accumulated in the leaf in
the salinity level of 20 ‰ among the four studied plants. Trang et al. [9] found that S. littoralis
accumulated the lower concentration of Na+ and Cl- in the shoots and the roots compared to
T. orientalis at all NaCl levels which can be associated a higher salt tolerance capacity of
S. littoralis.
In contrast to proline content accumulation, total leaf chlorophyll content was reduced as
the salinity levels increased; however, only E. dulcis had significant increase in total chlorophyll
content in the plant grown in the treatment of 10 ‰ compared to those grown in the control
treatment (p < 0.05; Fig. 3). Many scientists reported that the total chlorophyll concentration of
plant leaves was reduced by increased level of NaCl treatment [20, 21].
9 trang |
Chia sẻ: hachi492 | Lượt xem: 5 | Lượt tải: 0
Bạn đang xem nội dung tài liệu Effects of salt stress on plant growth and biomass allocation in some wetland grass species in the Mekong delta, để tải tài liệu về máy bạn click vào nút DOWNLOAD ở trên
Vietnam Journal of Science and Technology 58 (3A) (2020) 50-58
doi:10.15625/2525-2518/58/3A/14251
EFFECTS OF SALT STRESS ON PLANT GROWTH AND
BIOMASS ALLOCATION IN SOME WETLAND GRASS SPECIES
IN THE MEKONG DELTA
Pham Thi Han
1
, Vo Hoang Viet
1
, Dang Thi Thu Trang
1
,
Nguyen Chau Thanh Tung
2
, Nguyen Minh Dong
2
, Taku Nishimura
3
,
Pham Van Toan
1
, Ngo Thuy Diem Trang
1, *
1
College of the Environment & Natural Resources, Can Tho University, 3/2 Street,
Can Tho City, Viet Nam
2
College of Agriculture & Applied Biology, Can Tho University, 3/2 Street,
Can Tho City, Viet Nam
3
Graduate School of Agricultural and Life Sciences, the University of Tokyo,
1 Chome-1-1, Bunkyo City, Japan
*
Email: ntdtrang@ctu.edu.vn
Received: 19 August 2019; Accepted for publication: 13 February 2020
Abstract. Salt stress causes serious damage to many cellular and physiological processes that
leads to yield reduction. The study induced salt stress using Hoagland solution added NaCl to
evaluate its effects on plant growth and biomass allocation of some wetland grass species in
order to identify salt-tolerant species for replacing and/or supplementing rice/grass in rice-
shrimp model and salt-affected area in the Mekong Delta. The study also seeks to evaluate the
response of leaf chlorophyll (SPAD unit) and proline content in salt-treated plants to varying
application of salinity. Typha orientalis, Lepironia articulata, Eleocharis dulcis and Scirpus
littoralis were studied in hydroponics condition with four levels of NaCl of 5, 10, 15, 20 ‰ and
the control treatment (without adding NaCl). The study was performed with completely
randomized factorial design having in triplicate. The experiment was carried out at the College
of Environment and Natural Resources of Can Tho University from July to November 2018.
Morphological toxic symptoms and growth inhibition were clearly observed in salt-treated
treatments. Among the four studied species, T. orientalis produced the highest dry shoot
biomass (15.5 g DW/plant), while E. dulcis had the lowest value (2.8 g DW/plant). However,
only T. orientalis showed significantly decreased in biomass as salinity increased with 9.3 and
4.6 times lower of fresh and dry biomass in plants grown at the salinity level of 20 ‰ compared
to those grown in the control treatment. The other three plant species did not affect by salinity
levels. The results indicated that S. littoralis, L. articulata and E. dulcis could tolerate at high
salinity of 20 ‰ (eq. to the EC value in the nutrient solution of 38.0 dS/m) and could be
potential candidate to grow in the rice-shrimp model or in the salt-affected soils.
Keywords: growth, salt stress, salt-tolerance, wetland plant.
Classification numbers: 3.1.1, 3.5.1, 3.7.2.
Effects of salt stress on plant growth and biomass allocation .
51
1. INTRODUCTION
The Mekong River Delta (MRD) in Viet Nam is the largest agriculture and aquaculture
production region of the nation. However, the MD has been described as one of three 'extreme'
world hot-spots in terms of probable population displacement resulting from rising sea level by
the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) [1]. According to Duc et al. the MD has
0.88 mil ha of saline soil accounted for 36.6 % of the total area which was in the second soil
type after alluvium soil [2]. Salt water intrusion into the mainland causes a shortage of
freshwater for irrigation [3] that is the most concerned problem in the coastal areas of the MD
[4]. Salt stress causes serious damage to many cellular and physiological processes, including
photosynthesis, nutrient uptake, water absorption, plant growth, and cellular metabolism, all of
which lead to yield reduction [5]. Maximum tolerable salinity with no yield penalty comparing
to respective control treatment and the percentage reduction in yield per unit of salinity greater
than the limit are two key criteria for salt-tolerant crops [6]. In addition, the survival and growth
rate, difference of percent biomass yield between saline and control conditions over
experimental time-course are typical measurements in salt tolerant experiments. Moreover,
plants under salinity stress produce more proline but reduce in chlorophyll in leaves [7, 8] which
are considered as indicator for plant response to salinity stress and those plants were classified as
salt-sensitive species. In the present study, Sedge (Scirpus littoralis Schrab), Cattail (Typha
orientalis C. Presl), Bulrushes (Lepironia articulata (Retz.) Domin) and Water chestnut
(Eleocharis dulcis (Burm.f.) Trin. ex Hensch.) were chosen to study salt-stress. In fact, the four
plants are cultivated in the paddy field and/or in the fish and/or shrimp ponds in the MD for
human food and providing habitat for fish and shrimp growth [9]. Among them, S. littoralis had
higher salt-tolerant capacity than that of T. orientalis with salinity NaCl levels of 20 - 30 ‰,
while T. orientalis had salinity tolerant threshold at 10 ‰ [9], thus S. littoralis was considered as
the reference plant in the present study. However, there are limited information on salt-tolerant
capacity of L. articulata and E. dulcis. Consequently, the research was conducted to find out the
potential salt tolerant species among four wetland plants to grow/replace rice in the rice-shrimp
model to adapt with climate change.
2. MATERIALS AND METHODS
2.1. Experimental setup
A completely randomized design consisting of four wetland plant species (Scirpus
littoralis, Typha orientalis, Lepironia articulata and Eleocharis dulcis) and five concentrations
of NaCl solutions (0, 5, 10, 15, 20 ‰) was arranged in the net house in triplicate. The
experiment was performed at the College of Environment and Natural Resources of Can Tho
University, Viet Nam (10.03° N latitude and 105.76° E longitude) from July to November 2018.
2.2. Plant materials and salinization
Rhizomes and young plants of the four studied species were collected from the fields in
Phuoc Long district, Bac Lieu province and Phu My district, Kien Giang province on July 2018.
Two individual young and similar size plants for each species were placed in each 9.0 L
container. The height of initial young plants of Typha orientalis, Lepironia articulata,
Eleocharis dulcis and Scirpus littoralis were 100 - 120 cm; 60 - 90 cm; 50 - 80 and 80 - 110 cm.
Eight point five liters of an incremental concentration from a quarter-strength to half-strength
Ngo Thuy Diem Trang. et al.
52
Hoagland’s solution [10] was used for the first three days and the next four days, respectively.
The full-strength Hoagland’s solution was applied as nutrient supplement from the second week
to the experimental completion.On the day 14
th
after transplant, salt was added to hydroponic
solution. A weekly and stepwise increment of 5 ‰ NaCl until reaching the salt concentration of
20 ‰ was applied for Hoagland’s solution [9]. A refractometer (Alla, France) was used for
measurement of salinity. In addition, nutrient solutions were weekly renewed to make sure
sufficient nutrients for plant growth. The control treatment was 0 ‰ NaCl. The electric
conductivity (EC) values in the prepared Hoagland solution of the treatments 0, 5, 10, 15 and 20
‰ were 2.2, 6.6, 19.4, 29.5 and 38 dS/m, respectively.
2.3. Plant growth and biomass allocation determination
The height of shoots was measured weekly at the root base to the highest leaves, while the
length of root (from the root base to the longest root) was measured at the beginning and the end
of the study with a ruler [9]. A total of 49 days was the whole study period in which 14 days was
without salinization and 35 days was salinization. At harvest, the plants were carefully removed
from the growth solution and the roots were washed in distilled water before separated into roots
and shoots. The shoots term we used in this study was comprised of stems and leaves. The root
and shoot fractions were weighed for fresh biomass and dried at 60 °C until constant weight to
determine for dry weight [9].
2.4. Leaf chlorophyll and proline content
In addition, before harvest plants we measured chlorophyll in the third leaf from top using
SPAD Konica Minolta meter (Model SPAD-502 Plus, Tokyo, Japan). SPAD reflects chlorophyll
in the leaf [11]. After measure SPAD, the leaves at the third, fourth and the fifth position [12,
13] were collected to determine proline content [14].
2.5 Statistical analysis
Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the Tukey Honestly Significant Differences (HSD)
post hoc test were performed using Statgraphics Centurion XV (StatPoint, Inc., Warrenton, VA,
USA). The assumptions of normality, homogeneity of variance and logarithmically transformed
(if necessary) were fulfilled prior to ANOVA analysis. Two-way ANOVA (species x salinity
levels) of plant growth, biomass and mineral content in plant fractions was performed to
examine differences of means. One-way ANOVA was used to determine salinity effects within
species and species effects within salinity. Significant differences among plant species and
salinity levels ( = 0.05) were detected using Tukey HSD.
3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
3.1. Salt-stress effects on plant growth
After 35 days salinization, salinity did not affect survival rate of the four plant species (Fig.
1) with no mortality was observed in all salinity levels (p > 0.05; Fig. 2A). However, among the
four studied plants, salt-stress symptom of leaf rolling and wilting starting at the salinity levels
of 10 ‰ occurred strongly in T. orientalis (Fig. 1A). In the other study, Trang et al. [9] reported
that T. orientalis had 65 % of plant survived at the salinity levels of 10 and 15 ‰, while only
Effects of salt stress on plant growth and biomass allocation .
53
0‰ 5‰ 10‰ 15‰ 20‰ 0‰ 5‰ 10‰ 15‰ 20‰
0‰ 5‰ 10‰ 15‰ 20‰ 0‰ 5‰ 10‰ 15‰ 20‰
(A) (B)
(C) (D)
Figure 1. Phenotypes of Typha orientalis (A), Lepironia articulata (B), Eleocharis dulcis (C) and
Scirpus littoralis (D) grown at different salt concentrations.
35 % of S. littoralis plant survived at the salinity levels of 20 and 30 ‰. It could be explained
that T. orientalis in the present study exposed to salinity stress with shorter duration in total of
35 days, whereas in Trang et al. [9] T. orientalis was salinazed in 38 days. Typha species are
well known to be moderately salt tolerant. Crain et al. [15] reported that narrowleaf cattail
(T. angustifolia) had a reduction of 22% biomass as grown at 20 - 30 ‰ salinity as compared to
that at 0 ‰ level while Konisky and Burdick [16] documented only 50 % survival of transplants
at a salinity of 10 ‰ in the field experiment. S. littoralis had 100 % plant survived which was
similarly reported by Trang et al. [9]. L. articulata and E. dulcis are well known as acid sulfate
soil indicators; however, they also were recognized as salt-tolerant potential candidate at the
high salinity level of 20 ‰ with 100 % plant survived (Fig. 1B, 1C & 2A) in the present study.
In addition, there were no reduction in number of new shoots, height of shoot, and root length of
the four plant species (p > 0.05; Figs. 2B, 2C & 2D), except for shoot height of T. orientalis (p <
0.05; Fig. 2C). Doan et al. [17] reported that T. orientalis could survive in the constructed
wetland system treated recirculated intensive whiteleg shrimp tank culture at salinity level of
10‰. In the other study, Thanh et al. [18] also recorded from the shrimp farmers’ experiences
about salinity tolerant capacity of T. orientalis was 5 - 10 ‰. Therefore, only consider to grow
T. orientalis in the rice-shrimp model during the rainy season or in the location where salinity
was at 5 - 10 ‰ (eq. to the EC value of 6.6 - 19.4 dS/m in the nutrient solution).
3.2. Salt-stress effects on plant biomass allocation
Ngo Thuy Diem Trang. et al.
54
Similar to height of plants and length of roots, salinity did not affect fresh weight (FW) and
dry weight (DW) of the shoot and the root systems of the four studied plants (p > 0.05; Table 1),
except for fresh weight and dry weight of the shoot and the root of T. orientalis (p < 0.05; Table
1). The results showed that all the four studied plants had the same trend in reduction of FW and
DW of the shoot and the root systems as salinity concentrations increased in the nutrient solution
(Table 1).
Table 1. shoot and root fresh weight (FW) and dry weight (DW) of the plants treated with salinity levels
of 5, 10, 15, 20 ‰ and the change (%) as compared to the plants in the control treatment (0 ‰).
Species Salinity
levels
Shoot FW
(g/plant)
Change
(%)
Root FW
(g/plant)
Change
(%)
Shoot DW
(g/plant)
Change
(%)
Root DW
(g/plant)
Change
(%)
Typha
orientalis
0 166.1
a
100 15.4 100 15.5
a
100 1.5 100
5 70.5
ab
42.4 18.0 116.9 7.2
ab
46.4 1.5 100.6
10 46.7
b
28.1 14.1 91.7 5.0
b
32.5 1.1 72.4
15 27.3
bc
16.4 13.5 88.0 4.4
b
28.1 1.2 80.4
20 17.8
c
10.7 11.6 75.0 3.4
b
21.8 0.8 54.3
P-values 0.0002
***
0.669
ns
0.0018
**
0.272
ns
Lepironia
articulate
0 12.7 100 8.6 100 3.8 100 1.8 100
5 10.9 85.4 6.6 76.3 3.3 87.8 1.0 58.4
10 8.2 64.6 4.7 55.0 2.6 69.9 0.8 44.3
15 8.8 69.1 4.8 56.3 3.3 87.1 0.9 49.2
20 6.3 49.7 4.2 48.2 2.6 67.4 0.6 33.0
P-values 0.104
ns
0.324
ns
0.199
ns
0.093
ns
Eleocharis
dulcis
0 33.6 100 9.0 100 2.8 100 0.6 100
5 23.4 69.6 13.1 144.7 1.1 39.5 1.7 285.9
10 14.0 41.6 5.7 63.4 1.3 46.2 0.5 78.5
15 6.5 19.5 4.9 53.9 0.7 24.5 0.6 99.6
20 5.4 16.1 5.6 61.9 0.6 20.7 0.7 123.5
P-values 0.117
ns
0.663
ns
0.544
ns
0.712
ns
Scirpus
littoralis
0 43.6 100 9.9 100 5.1 100 1.6 100
5 47.2 108.2 21.0 212.8 5.5 107.2 3.5 216.2
10 31.0 71.2 17.1 173.3 4.9 95.7 2.1 132.2
15 21.1 48.3 18.2 184.2 2.8 53.9 2.4 147.8
20 25.0 57.4 18.6 188.8 3.6 69.5 2.7 170.8
P-values 0.212
ns
0.346
ns
0.187
ns
0.523
ns
Notes: Values are the means of 3 replicates. Different letter
a,b,c
within the column indicates significant
difference between salinity levels within plant species.
**
: p < 0.01;
***
: p < 0.001;
ns
: p > 0.05.
However, there was no significant difference in FW and DW between the salt-treated
plants and the control plants (without adding NaCl in the growth solution). The shoot FW and
Effects of salt stress on plant growth and biomass allocation .
55
DW of T. orientalis (70.5 and 7.2 g/plant) in the salinity concentration of 5 ‰ (eq. to the EC
value of 6.6 dS/m) were reduced 54 – 57 % compared to the plant grown in the control treatment
of 0 ‰ (Table 1); however, there was no significant difference was detected (p > 0.05; Table 1).
The salinity concentration increased at the level of 10 ‰ (eq. to the EC value of 19.4 dS/m) the
shoot FW and DW of T. orientalis (46.7 and 5.0 g/plant), which were significant lower than
those grown in the control treatment (p < 0.05; Table 1). The results showed that high NaCl
levels only inhibited shoot FW and DW of T. orientalis and salinity level of 10 ‰ was the
threshold NaCl for T. orientalis.
In sum, S. littoralis, L. articulata and E. dulcis could tolerate the high salinity concentration
of 20 ‰ (eq. to the EC value of 38.0 dS/m). Our previous study on native and/or cultivated plant
species showed that the presence of S. littoralis in brackish shrimp pond helped to improve the
pond ecosystem and to enrich sources of organic feed materials and density of natural food in
the pond [18]. Importantly, S. littoralis, a high salt-tolerant candidate, appeared to be the plant of
choice in the semi-intensive farming with one shrimp crop and one sedge crop. In addition, they
also said that S. littoralis tolerated at the salinity concentration of 12 - 15 ‰, while E. dulcis
could tolerate at the higher salinity concentration of 16 - 20 ‰ [18].
3.3. Leaf proline and chlorophyll content
The content of proline and chlorophyll in the leaf of T. orientailis, L. articulata, E. dulcis
and S. littoralis grown at the different salinity concentrations was presented in the Fig. 3. The
Figure 2. Survival rate, % (A); number of new shoot (B), shoot height (C) and root length (D) of Typha
orientalis, Lepironia articulata, Eleocharis dulcis and Scirpus littoralis grown at different salt
concentrations. Values are the means of 3 replicates ± S.D. Asterisk (
*
) indicates significant difference
between four plant species within salinity level. Different letter
a,b,c
indicates significant difference
between salinity levels within plant species.
Ngo Thuy Diem Trang. et al.
56
results showed that salinity levels affected the leaf proline content of the four studied plants (p <
0.05; Fig. 3); proline was accumulated in the leaf higher at the higher level of NaCl. The leaf
proline content of T. orientailis, L. articulata, E. dulcis and S. littoralis grown in the control
treatment were 0.69, 3.73, 0.68 and 0.48 µmol/g FW, respectively, and it was increased at 6.13,
13.99, 2.42 and 15.76 µmol/g FW of the respective plant species grown in the salinity level of
20‰ (equivalent to an increase of 8.9, 3.7, 3.6 and 32.9 times). According to Chiang and
Dandekar [19] and Turan et al. [20] proline accumulation is believed to play adaptive roles in
plant stress tolerance. S. littoralis had the highest amount of proline accumulated in the leaf in
the salinity level of 20 ‰ among the four studied plants. Trang et al. [9] found that S. littoralis
accumulated the lower concentration of Na
+
and Cl
-
in the shoots and the roots compared to
T. orientalis at all NaCl levels which can be associated a higher salt tolerance capacity of
S. littoralis.
In contrast to proline content accumulation, total leaf chlorophyll content was reduced as
the salinity levels increased; however, only E. dulcis had significant increase in total chlorophyll
content in the plant grown in the treatment of 10 ‰ compared to those grown in the control
treatment (p < 0.05; Fig. 3). Many scientists reported that the total chlorophyll concentration of
plant leaves was reduced by increased level of NaCl treatment [20, 21].
4. CONCLUSION
After 35 days salinization, salinity did not affect survival rate of the four plant species with
100 % survival rate was observed in all salinity levels. However, only T. orientalis showed the
lower salt-tolerant capacity among the four studied species with a reduction of the shoot FW and
DW in the salinity levels of 5 ‰ and 10 ‰, which were 54 – 57 % and 68 – 72 % compared to
the control plant (0 ‰). The leaf proline content of T. orientailis, L. articulata, E. dulcis and S.
littoralis grown in the control treatment were 0.69, 3.73, 0.68 and 0.48 µmol/g FW, respectively,
and it was increased 8.9, 3.7, 3.6 and 32.9 times in the respective plant species grown in the
salinity level of 20 ‰. Taken together, S. littoralis, L. articulata and E. dulcis could tolerate the
Figure 3. Leaf proline (μmol/gFW) and chlorophyll content (SPAD) of T. orientalis, L. articulata,
E. dulcis and S. littoralis grown at different salt concentrations. Values are the means of 3 replicates ±
S.D. Asterisk (
*
) indicates significant difference between four plant species within salinity level.
Different letter
a,b,c
indicates significant difference between salinity levels within plant species.
Effects of salt stress on plant growth and biomass allocation .
57
high salinity concentration of 20 ‰ (eq. to the EC value in the nutrient solution of 38.0 dS/m),
while T. orientalis had salinity tolerant threshold at 10‰.
Acknowledgement. This study is funded in part by the Can Tho University Improvement Project VN14-
P6, supported by a Japanese ODA loan (E6-10 subproject).
REFERENCES
1. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) - Climate Change 2007: Synthesis
Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fourth Assessment Report of
the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Core Writing Team, Pachauri, R. K. and
Reisinger, A. (eds.)]. IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland, 2007, 104 pages.
2. Ho Quang Duc, Nguyen Van Dao, Truong Xuan Cuong, Le Thi My Hao, Hoang Trong
Quy, Luong Duc Quoc, Nguyen Quang Hai, Bui Tan Yen - Saline soil and acid sulphate
soil in Vietnam (In Vietnamese), Agriculture Publishing Company, Ha Noi, 2010, 164
pages.
3. Nguyen Van Bo, Kieu Tan Nhut, Le Van Be, Ngo Ngoc Hung - Effects of saline water
irrigation during different growth stages of rice on yield and growth of four different rice
varieties under nethouse conditions, Can Tho University Journal of Science (in
Vietnamese), Special Issue: Agriculture 4 (2016) 54-60. DOI:10.22144/ctu.jsi.2016.103.
4. Tuan L. A., Hoanh C. T., Miller F., and Sinh B. T. - Flood and salinity management in the
Mekong Delta, Vietnam. In: Be, T. T.; Sinh, B. T.; Miller, F. (Eds.), Challenges to
sustainable development in the Mekong Delta: regional and national policy issues and
research needs: Literature Analysis. Bangkok, Thailand: The Sustainable Mekong
Research Network, 2007, pp. 15-68.
5. Pardo J. M. - Biotechnology of water and salinity stress tolerance, Curr. Opin. Biotechnol.
21 (2010) 185-196. doi:10.1016/j.copbio.2010.02.005.
6. Maas E. V. and Hoffman G. J. - Crop salt tolerance - Current assessment, J. Irrig. Drain
Div. ASCE 103 (1977) 115-34.
7. Parida A. K., Das A. B. - Salt tolerance and salinity effects on plants: A review,
Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 60 (2005) 324-349.
8. Turan M. L., Katkat V., and Taban S. - Variations in proline, chlorophyll and mineral
elements contents of wheat plants grown under salinity stress, J. of Agronomy 6 (1)
(2007) 137-141.
9. Trang N. T. D., Linh V. C., Huu N. H. M., Tung N. C. T., Loc N. X., and Brix H. -
Screening salt-tolerant plants for phytoremediation: effect of salinity on growth and
mineral nutrient composition, Vietnam Journal of Science and Technology 56 (2C) (2018)
9-15.
10. Epstein E. - Mineral Nutrition of Plants: Principles and Perspectives, John Wiley and
Sons, Inc., New York, London, Sydney, Toronto, 1972, 412 pages.
11. Richardson A. D., Duigan S. P., and Berlyn G. P. - An evaluation of noninvasive methods
to estimate foliar chlorophyll content, New Phytologist 153 (2002) 185-194.
12. Madan S. Nainawatee H. S., Jain S., Jain R. K., Malik M. S., and Chowdhury J. B. - Leaf
position-dependent changes in proline, pyrroline-5-carboxylate reductase activity and
Ngo Thuy Diem Trang. et al.
58
water relations under salt-stress in genetically stable salt-tolerant somaclones of Brassica
juncea L. Plant and Soil 163 (1994) 151-156.
13. Yuan Z., Cao Q., Zhang K., Ata-Ul-Karim S. T., Tian Y., Zhu Y., Cao W., and Liu X. -
Optimal leaf positions for SPAD meter measurement in rice, Front. Plant Sci. 7 (2016)
719. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.00719.
14. Bates L.S., Waldren R. P., Teare I. D. - Rapid determination of free proline for water-
stress studies, Plant and soil 39 (1973) 205-207.
15. Crain C. M., Silliman B. R., Bertness S. L., and Bertness M. D. - Physical and biotic
drivers of plant distribution across estuarine salinity gradients, Ecology 85 (2004) 2539-
2549.
16. Konisky R. A. and Burdick D. M. - Effects of stressors on invasive and halophytic plants
of New England salt marshes: A framework for predicting response to tidal restoration,
Wetlands 24 (2004) 434-447.
17. Doan N. P. N., Mo L. T. N., and Trang N. T. D. - Dynamics of nitrogen in intensive
whiteleg shrimp (Litppenaeus vannamei) tank culture integrated with hybrid constructed
wetlands, Can Tho University Journal of Science 2 (2016) 77-83.
18. Thanh N. H., Dong N. M., Giang N. D. C., Nishimura T., Toan P. V., Trang N.T.D. -
Economic and technical efficiency of rice-shrimp model in the context of climate change
and increasing saline intrusion in bac lieu province, Journal of Agriculture & Rural
Development (in Vietnamese) 8 (2019) 37-46.
19. Chiang H. H., and Dandekar A. M. - Regulation of proline accumulation in Arabidopsis
thaliana (L.) Heynh during development and in response to desiccation, Plant, Cell and
Environment 18 (1995)1280-1290.
20. Turan M. L., Katkat V., and Taban S. - Variations in proline, chlorophyll and mineral
elements contents of wheat plants grown under salinity stress. Journal of Agronomy 6 (1)
(2007) 137-141.
21. Cha-um S., and Kirdmanee C. - Effect of salt stress on proline accumulation,
photosynthetic ability and growth characters in two maize cultivars, Pak. J. Bot. 41 (2009)
87-98.
Các file đính kèm theo tài liệu này:
effects_of_salt_stress_on_plant_growth_and_biomass_allocatio.pdf