Electrochemical DNA sensor for Herpes virus detection - Phuong Dinh Tam
This paper reports the potential ability of
DNA sensor HSV-1 virus detection. The optimal
temperature range found for such kind of DNA
was from 60 to 650C. The DNA sensor can
determine the DNA target of HSV-1 in the
sample at the concentration as low as 0.5 nM.
Such concentration is very important in enzyme
based biosensors application for detection of
toxic compound in water but it is still a quite big
one in DNA application for virus detection.
Such characteristic was believed to be improved
by increasing the resolution of the fingers of
sensor and needs further work
6 trang |
Chia sẻ: honghp95 | Lượt xem: 558 | Lượt tải: 0
Bạn đang xem nội dung tài liệu Electrochemical DNA sensor for Herpes virus detection - Phuong Dinh Tam, để tải tài liệu về máy bạn click vào nút DOWNLOAD ở trên
Journal of Chemistry, Vol. 46 (1), P. 127 - 132, 2008
Electrochemical DNA sensor for Herpes virus
detection
Received 23 July 2007
Phuong Dinh Tam1,2, Mai Anh Tuan1,2, Tran Quang Huy4, Nguyen Duc Chien2,3
1Hanoi Advanced School of Science and Technology
2International Training Institute for Materials Science (ITIMS)
3Institute of Engineering Physics, Hanoi University of Technology
4National Institute of Hygiene and Epidemiology
summary
This paper reports the development of electrochemical DNA sensor for biomedical
application. The micro-sensor was fabricated at Hanoi University of Technology clean room by
microelectronic technology. Two pairs of electrodes of which optimized dimension is 70 μm x 30
μm (the width of electrode x inter-distance between fingers), were created on a chip for
differential measurements. The DNA of herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV-1) with the DNA probe
sequence is 5AT CAC CGA CCC GGA GAG GGA C3 was immobilized onto the surface of
the sensors by means of 3-aminopropyltriethoxysilance (APTS). The results showed that the DNA
sensor can determine the DNA target of HSV-1 in the sample at the concentration as low as 0.5
nM. The response time of the DNA sensor is less than a minute. Temperature effect was also
investigated in this work.
Keywords: DNA sensor, electrochemical detection, APTS, virus, hybridization.
I - Introduction
In recent years, many works have been
devoted to DNA sensor development thanks to
simplicity, specificity, exceptional sensitivity
and selectivity for the detection of specific
genes [1 - 3]. This technology has opened a
perspective to overcome most of disadvantages
of the conventional methods for applications in
food, agriculture, environment, clinic and drug
etc [3 - 12]. The detection of specific sequences
in clinical samples collected from patients
diseases is very important in DNA pre-
diagnostics which allows us a time long enough
to find out the solution for that [8 - 12]. With
the ability of amplification from tiny amounts of
DNA into readable quantities, the conventional
methods such as polymerase chain reaction
(PCR) and Real-time PCR have been applied
mostly in the fields of biomedicine. However,
these techniques require time, sample
preparation, well-equipped apparatus and well-
educated operators [3, 9].
DNA sensor is considered as a promising
tool in pre-diagnostics, and prevention and
control of the infectious diseases which
supposed to be able for real-time and on site
analysis [2, 3, 9].
High sensitive and selective DNA sensors
are of great importance in the diagnosis of
genetic diseases, the detection of infectious
agents, and identification in forensic and
environmental cases [1 - 12]. There are various
127
types of DNA sensors which developed over the
years. Methods used for DNA detection in those
sensors have been reported to be based on
radiochemical, enzymatic, fluorescent,
electrochemical, optical, and acoustic wave
techniques [13]. These days, optical DNA
sensors are used predominantly and promising
results have been reported. The disadvantage of
these optical sensors, however, is the
requirement of a separate labeling process,
equipment to stimulate the transducer, high
complexity, and thus, a higher cost in order to
conduct an analysis [14].
Electrochemical methods of hybridization
detection present a good alternative in
comparison with well-developed fluorescent
detection. Over the past decade, a large progress
has been made towards the development of
electrochemical DNA sensors. Considerable
advantage has been described these devices due
to their promise for obtaining specific
information in a faster, simpler and less
expensive way. In addition, they have a high
potential for automation and miniaturization
since only basic electrochemical equipment is
required [2, 12, 15 - 17].
We report in this paper the development of
DNA sensor for detection of herpes simplex
viruses 1 (HSV-1). The herpes simplex virus
(HSV) is an enveloped double-stranded DNA
virus. There are two distinct forms of HSV,
serotype 1 and serotype 2 (HSV-1 and HSV-2).
HSV-2 is the most common cause of genital
herpes, whereas HSV-1 is the most common
cause of facial herpes or cold scores. HSV-1 is
transmitted through contact with oral secretions.
More information about this kind of virus and
diagnostic tests can be found in [18].
II - Experiment
1. Chemical reagents
DNA probe, with a specific sequence to
HSV-1 of 5’–AT CAC CGA CCC GGA GAG
GGA C–3’ and complementary DNA target
sequence for HSV-1 of 3’-TA GTG GCT GGG
CCT CTC CCT G-5’ was supplied by Invitrogen
Life Technologies Company.
Other chemicals including nitric acid;
hydrogen fluoride; hydrochloric acid; acetone;
methanol; alcohol 100%; H2SO4; KCr2O7; 3-
aminopropyl-triethoxy-silance (APTS), 1-ethyl-
3-(dimethyl-aminopropyl)carbodiimide (EDC);
1-methylimidazole (MIA); KCl; NaCl;
Na2HPO4; KH2PO4; nuclease-free water are of
analytical grade.
2. Sensor fabrication
The DNA sensor based on microelectrode
with various configurations were designed and
fabricated at ITIMS, Hanoi University of
Technology. The sensor consists of a pairs of
microelectrodes on the surface of silicon
substrate, one of which acts as working sensor
and the other as a reference electrode. The
optimal dimension was 70 μm × 30 μm. The
detailed fabrication process was discussed in
[19]. A SEM image of the microstructure is
shown in figure 1.
A B
Figure 1: SEM image of an Au micro-electrode
A) The electrode based sensor; B) The electrode sensing area as mixed comb structure
128
3. DNA immobilization
Several methods available are used to label single–stranded DNA probes to sensing surface
of electrodes [20, 21, 22] by using conducting polymer. In this work, the covalent method was used
to attach DNA sequences onto the surface of sensor. This immobilization was based on the reaction
between amino group of the APTS conducting polymer and phosphate group of DNA sequence. The
sensor, after the surface clean process to remove contaminations and activate the hydroxyl groups,
was immersed in APTS: ethanol mixture (3:7 v/v) for an hour (eq. 1):
The oxygen atom in phosphate group of DNA (5’ terminal) was used as interface media to
bind DNA probe with amino group of APTS. These atoms were, first, activated for covalent bonds
with amino group by means of EDC 1.5x10-2 M.
In this step, MIA was added to stabilize the activated EDC molecules which were labile in
solution. The reduction of MIA and EDC activated DNA was described in eq. (3).
The MIA activated DNA probes were
immobilized on electrode surface that was
shown in eq. (4). The DNA sensor was then
annealed in DI water at t = 37oC for 18 hours.
4. Measurements
Differential measurements were realized to
determine the changes in conductance of DNA
membrane. AC reference signal (10 KHz, 100
mV sine wave) generated by the generator of
Lock-in Amplifier SR830, was applied on two
identical micro-electrodes of DNA sensor. The
output signal was acquired by measuring the
voltage drop on two 1 K resistances by the A
and B channels of the Lock-in Amplifier. The
DNA probe concentration of 100 mM was
129
immobilized onto APTS coated-electrode in our
experiments. The different concentrations of
complementary DNA targets varying from 0.5
to 3nM were dropped into DNA sensor
contained solution. All measurements were
performed at room temperature. The results of
output signals were recognized by Lock-in
Amplifier SR830. In this experiment, five DNA
sensors were used to test the hybridization of
DNA sequences.
III - Results and discussion
1. FTIR spectrum measurements
To verify the existence of DNA sequence
onto the microelectrode surface, the infrared
spectrum of the DNA-APTS complexes
performed on Nicolet 6700 FT-IR spectrometer
machine (Thermo USA) in the effective range
4000 - 600 cm-1 was used to evaluate the bonds
between phosphate group of DNA strains and
amine group of APTS. The result shows a good
matching with known data base of the FTIR
library. As seen in Fig. 2, the IR spectra was
illustrated 1750 - 1600 cm-1 vibration plane
implied G-C pairs and A-T base pairs while the
backbone phosphate group at 1085 cm-1 were
perturbed upon APTS interaction (data not
shown). The presence of NH2 group of
conducting polymer (APTS) can be seen by a
strong absorption at 1526 cm-1.
Nicolet 6700 FT-IR Spectrometer
Number of background scans:128
Number of sample scans: 128
Resolution: 2 cm-1
Title M1
67
2.
9
10
85
.8
15
26
.116
89
.1
17
44
.6
36
21
.3
37
35
.1
38
36
.0
M1
98.0
98.1
98.2
98.3
98.4
98.5
98.6
98.7
98.8
98.9
99.0
99.1
99.2
99.3
99.4
99.5
99.6
%
Tr
an
sm
itt
an
ce
4000 3500 3000 2500 2000 1500 1000
Wavenumbers (cm-1)
Fig. 2: FTIR spectra (swept range 4000 - 600 cm-1) of the bonds DNA- APTS
130
2. DNA sensor for sequence detection
Figure 3 presents the change in conductance
of the DNA membrane versus concentration by
the DNA target. The probe/target DNA
sequence mismatch in the sample was explained
the dash line where the curve was nearly
unchanged while the hybridization between the
DNA probes and complementary DNA targets
was described as the solid black line in which
the signal was linearly proportional to
concentration of the DNA target. The figure
shows that DNA sensor can detect the
complementary DNA targets as low as 0.5 nM
of in less than 1 minute (data not shown) at
room temperature.
Fig. 3: The hybridization between probes and
targets of HSV-1 at room temperature
Figure 4 illustrates the temperature effect on
coupling ability of the DNA sequence. We
performed several experiments from 37 to 85oC.
As seen in the figure, the matching rate between
probe and target sequence was increased at
elevated temperature.
With specifically designed (5’–AT CAC
CGA CCC GGA GAG GGA C–3’ for probe
and 3’-TA GTG GCT GGG CCT CTC CCT G-
5’for complementary DNA target sequence of
HSV-1) 70oC was considered as melting point at
which the signal was began to decrease which
understood by unfolding the double helix. The
optimal temperature was found at 60 - 65oC
range.
Fig. 4: Temperature effect on hybridization of
the HSV-1 DNA sequence.
The melting temperature was found at 70C
IV - Conclusion
This paper reports the potential ability of
DNA sensor HSV-1 virus detection. The optimal
temperature range found for such kind of DNA
was from 60 to 650C. The DNA sensor can
determine the DNA target of HSV-1 in the
sample at the concentration as low as 0.5 nM.
Such concentration is very important in enzyme
based biosensors application for detection of
toxic compound in water but it is still a quite big
one in DNA application for virus detection.
Such characteristic was believed to be improved
by increasing the resolution of the fingers of
sensor and needs further work.
Acknowledgement: This work is financed by
VLIRHUT program, Project No.
AP07/PRj03/Nr.02.
References
1. Joseph Wang. Analytica Chimica Acta,
469, 63 - 71 (2002).
2. T Gregory Drummond et al. Nature
Biotechnology, Vol. 21 (23) (Oct. 2003),
1192 - 1199.
3. Bansi D. Malhotra et al. Current applied
physics, 5, 92 - 97 (2005).
131
4. A. Lermo, S. Campoy et al. Biosensors and
Bioelectronics, 22, 2010 - 2017 (2007).
5. D. Bystricka, O. Lenz et al. Journal of
Virological Methods, 128, 176 - 182
(2005).
6. Sara Rodriguez-Mozaz et al. Talanta, 65,
291 - 297 (2005).
7. J. Justin Gooding et al. Analytica Chimica
Acta, 559, 137 - 151 (2006).
8. Olivier Lazcka., F. Javier Del Campo et al.
Biosensors and Bioelectronics, 22, 1205 -
1217 (2007).
9. Carla dos Santos Riccardi et al. Talanta, 70,
637 - 643 (2006).
10. Y.K. Ye., J.H. Zhao. Biosensors and
Bioelectronics, 18, 1501 -/1508 (2003).
11. R. Gonzalez, B. Masquelier et al. Journal of
clinical microbiology (July 2004), 2907 -
2912.
12. Pinar Kara a, Burcu Meric et al. Analytica
Chimica Acta, 518, 69 - 76 (2004).
13. J. E. Pearson et al. Ann. Clin. Biochem, 37,
119 - 145 (2000).
14. R.Gabl et al. Biosens. Bioelectron, 19, 615 -
620 (2004).
15. C. Fan, K W. Plaxco, A. J. Heeger. Proc.
Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 100(16), 9134 -
9137 (2003).
16. J. Wang, G. Liu, A. Merkoci. J.Am.Chem.
Soc., 125(11), 3214 - 3215 (2003).
17. J. Wang, R. Polsky, A. Merkoci, K. Turner.
Langmuir 19, 989 - 991 (2003).
18. Michael Costello M.T et al. Clinical
Microbiology Newsletter 28: 24, Vol. 28,
No. 24; 185 - 192 (2006).
19. Thanh P. D, Tuan M. A, Chien N. D,
CHOVELON J-M. The 7th Vietnamese -
German Seminar on Physics and
Engineering, Halong - Vietnam, March 28 -
April 5, 2004, 158.
20. Marie K. Walsh., Xinwen Wang et al. J.
Biochem. Biophys. Methods, 47, 221 - 231
(2001).
21. Tarusshee Ahuja et al. Biomaterials, 28,
791 - 805 (2007).
22. Bansi D. Malhotra. Analytica Chimica
Acta, 578, 59 - 74 (2006).
132
Các file đính kèm theo tài liệu này:
- 4282_15259_1_pb_6158_2085793.pdf