Evaluating the outcome for distal metaphyseal tibia fractures treated with metaizeau nail
CONCLUSION
Through the study of the application of
Metaizeau technique to treat the distal
tibia fractures under C-arm controlling,
we had some conclusions:
- Treatment outcomes: Excellent: 8.3%;
good: 80.6%; fair: 8.3%; bad: 2.8%; there
was no osteitis, pseudarthrosis.
- Indications, techniques, advantages
and disadvantages:
+ Indication: Metaizeau nail is a good
indication for the distal tibia fractures,
especially those with metaphyseal fractures
when the intramedullary nail is difficult
to work.
+ Technique: The majority of patients
had surgery under C-arm, after the anatomical
reduction on the orthopedic table.
+ Advantages: Not having to open
tibial fracture, it preserved elements of the
healing bone process, reduced the risk of
bacterial infections, osteoarthritis.
+ Disadvantages: Patients with 2 nails
fixation were not allowed partial weightbearing until the sixth week.
6 trang |
Chia sẻ: hachi492 | Lượt xem: 4 | Lượt tải: 0
Bạn đang xem nội dung tài liệu Evaluating the outcome for distal metaphyseal tibia fractures treated with metaizeau nail, để tải tài liệu về máy bạn click vào nút DOWNLOAD ở trên
Journal of military pharmaco-medicine n
0
1-2020
201
EVALUATING THE OUTCOME FOR DISTAL METAPHYSEAL
TIBIA FRACTURES TREATED WITH METAIZEAU NAIL
Nguyen Duc Binh1; Nguyen Hanh Quang1; Nguyen Tien Binh2
SUMMARY
Objectives: To determine the radiographic and clinical outcomes for distal metaphyseal tibia
fractures treated with Metaizeau nail, indication, advantages and disadvantages of this method.
Subjects and methods: Prospective study on a total of 51 patients with distal tibia fractures
treated with Metaizeau nail at the Trauma-Orthopedic Department, St. Paul Hospital, Hanoi
from 01 - 2014 to 12 - 2018. Results: Exellent: 8.3%, good: 80.6%, fair: 8.3%, bad: 2.8%. There
were no osteitis, pseudarthrosis. Conclusion: Metaizeau nail could be reasonable indication for
unstable distal metaphyseal tibia fractures.
* Keywords: Distal tibia fracture; Metaizeau nail.
INTRODUCTION
Distal tibial fractures have historically
been treated with open reduction and
internal fixation using plates. Although this
technique provides predictable reduction
quality, it increases the risk of additional
soft tissue injury [1]. Operation site
infection rate of up to 50% has been
reported as the main disadvantage
associated with this technique [2]. Olerud
and Karlstrom [3] reported that delayed
healing, infection and implant problems are
often associated with plate osteosynthesis
of the distal tibia. To lessen these risks,
alternative treatment methods including
external fixation, staged fixation and
minimally invasive surgery have arisen.
Intramedullary nailing (IMN) is considered
the ideal choice for treatment of diaphyseal
tibial fractures [4] and has been expanded
to distal metaphyseal tibial fractures to
provide indirect reduction (minimally
invasive), stable fixation (load sharing)
and multiple fixation points [5]. However,
because of metaphyseal widening, short
segment fixation and intra-articular extension,
IMN can be complicated by malunion,
nonunion or implant failure [6].
To overcome these problems, we used
Metaizeau nail which combines narrow
flexible nails and have curved distal tips
[7]. These nails are bent by the surgeon
before insertion, so that distal locking can
be achieved when they spread out and
obtain a hold in the distal part of the bone.
The combination of two nails is the basic
requirement, but insufficient if using alone,
one or two additional flexible nails are
also inserted into the medullary canal.
Therefore, the purpose of this study
was: To determine the radiographic and
clinical outcomes of distal metaphyseal
tibia fractures treated with Metaizeau nail
and indication, advantages and disadvantages
of this method.
1. St. Paul Hospital
2. Vietnam Military Medical University
Corresponding author: Nguyen Duc Binh (binhstpaul@gmail.com)
Date received: 18/12/2019
Date accepted: 26/12/2019
Jourrnal of military pharmaco-medicine n
0
1-2020
SUBJECTS AND METHODS
1. Subjects.
51 patients, age from 30 to 87 years old,
32 males and 19 females.
* Selection criteria:
- Patients ≥ 18 years old.
- Closed fractures of distal tibia 43A
and 43C1 (the OTA/AO classification of
the fractures) with grade of closed
injuries 0, 1, 2 (Tschern classification)
and open fractures grade 1, 2, 3a
(Gustilo classification).
* Exclusion criteria:
- Pathological fractures.
- The patients did not accept to participate
into study.
2. Methods.
* Design: Prospective analysis.
* Research content:
- Clinical and radiological evaluation.
- Equipements: C-arm, fracture reduction
table.
- Local or total anaesthesia.
- Operative technique:
+ Patients were placed on a fracture
reduction table using radioscopic control.
Picture 1: Patient position.
+ When the fibula fracture was located on its peripheral third (up to 10 cm from the
edge of the lateral malleolus), the fibular was fixated with the use of neurtralisation
plate or Kirschner pin.
+ The nails with angle distal ends were introduced through a hole drilled in the
centre of the medial-anterior and lateral-anterior aspect of the proximal epiphysis.
The procedure was radioscopically controlled, the distal beaks were driven to the distal
end of the bone and directed to splay from the midline into the lateral cortex as seen in
the frontal plane, to ensure effective distal locking.
202
Journal of military pharmaco-medicine n
0
1-2020
203
Picture 2: Post oteosynthesis.
+ Under C-arm, if there was syndesmosis
injury, one syndesmosis screw was placed.
- Follow-up:
+ In all cases, immediately after surgery,
short leg plaster cast was applied until the
six week.
+ After 48 hours drain was removed.
+ Antibiotics.
+ Analgesia, anti-edematous.
+ X-ray post-operation to evaluate the
outcome of osteosynthesis.
+ Active knee and ankle exercises
were started after 48 hours.
+ Suture was removed on the 12th
post-operation day and the patient was
discharged.
+ Weight-bearing: Patients with 3 or
4 nails fixation were allowed partial
weight-bearing of about 20 kg until the
sixth week. On the contrary, patients with
2 nails fixation were not allowed partial
weight-bearing until the sixth week.
+ Follow-up radiological and clinical
examination were done at 6, 12, 24 weeks
and after 1 year.
+ Removal implants after one year.
* Result evaluation:
Make a patient follow-up sheet and
schedule an appointment for the patient
to be examined every 6 weeks (short
outcomes), 3, 6 months and after 1 year
(long-term results).
All patients were evaluated on the
following results: wound healing, bone
healing time, anatomical axis, functional
outcome of ankle and complications recorded.
RESULTS
1. Statistical characteristics.
* General characteristics:
- Age: 30 - 87 (mean 56.1 years).
- Gender: Males: 33 patients (64.7%);
females: 18 patients (35.3%).
Journal of military pharmaco-medicine n
0
1-2020
204
- Mode of injury: Traffic accident:
35 patients (68.6%), domestic accident:
15 patients (29.4%), sport accident:
1 patient (2%).
* Injury characteristics:
- Tibia:
+ Closed fracture: 37 patients (72.5%),
open fractures: 14 patients (27.5%).
+ Open fractures classification (Gustilo):
Grade 1: 5 patients; grade 2: 7 patients;
grade 3a: 2 patients.
+ Closed injuries classification: Grade 0:
16 patients (43.2%); grade 1: 15 patients
(40.5%); grade 2: 6 patients (16.3%).
+ Pattern fracture classification (Muller-
AO): A1: 16 patients (31.4%); A2: 23 patients
(45.1%); A3: 9 patients (17.6%); C1:
3 patients (5.9%).
+ The distal tibial joint line to the fractures:
Below 3 cm: 32 patients (62.7%); above
3 cm: 19 patients (37.3%).
- Fibular:
+ Fibular fracture: 42 patients.
+ Syndesmosis injury: 6 patients (11.8%).
+ Fibular fixation: Plate: 33 patients
(64.7%); Kirschner pin: 4 patients (7.8%).
+ The number of Metaizeau nails to
use for fixation: 2 nails: 8 patients (15.7%);
3 nails: 27 patients (52.9%); 4 nails:
16 patients (31.4%).
2. Short results.
- Wound: Primary wound heal: 48 patients
(94.1%); superficial wound infection:
3 patients (5.9%).
- Tibial alignment (n = 51): Excellent:
10 patients (19.6%); good: 38 patients
(74.5%); fair: 2 patients (3.9%); bad:
1 patient (2%).
2. Long-term results (n = 36).
Of the 51 distal metaphyseal tibia
fractures, 15 cases were lost to follow-up.
Mean follow-up was 30.25 months (range
12 - 59 months).
- Scar: good (100%).
- Union: 36/36 patients.
- Tibial alignment (n = 36): Excellent:
5 patients (13.9%); good: 26 patients
(72.2%); fair: 4 patients (11.1%); bad:
1 patient (2.8%).
- Functional outcomes (n = 36): Excellent:
5 patients (13.9%); good: 28 patients
(77.8%); fair: 3 patients (8.3%); there was
no case of bad outcome.
- Final results (n = 36): Excellent:
3 patients (8.3%); good: 29 patients (80.6);
fair: 3 patients (8.3%); bad: 1 patient (2.8%).
DISSCUSION
* Correlation between open fracture
and mode injury:
We found that traffic accidents with
strong trauma (11/35 patients = 31.4%)
often caused a higher fracture rate than
domestic accidents (3/15 patients = 20%).
* Correlation between soft tissue injury
in closed fractures and mode injury:
Soft tissue injuries of grade 0 and
1 were the majority (83.7%), only 6 patients
with grade 2 (16.3%).
* Correlation between mode injury and
syndesmosis injury:
Patients with indirect trauma mechanism
(4/22 patients = 18.2%) had a higher rate
of syndesmosis injury of grade 3 than
patients with direct trauma mechanism
(2/29 patients = 6.9%).
Journal of military pharmaco-medicine n
0
1-2020
205
* Fibular fixation:
The majority of fibular fractures should
be fixed, in which 33/51 patients were
screwed (64.7%), 4 patients were nailed
(7.8%) and 14 patients (27.5%) did not
need to be fixed.
* Correlation between pattern fractures
and union time:
The rate of patients with torsion
fractures united before 3 months (16/25
patients = 64%) higher than the rate of
traversal and oblique fractures (9/25
patients = 36%).
* Correlation between closed/open
fracture and union time:
The rate of patients with closed fractures
united before 3 months (22/34 patients =
64.7%) was higher than open fractures
(3/14 patients = 21.4%), this result was
statistically significant with p < 0.05.
* Correlation between soft tissue injury
in closed fractures and union time:
The rate union time before 3 months of
soft tissue injuries in closed fractures
grades 0 and 1 (20/28 patients = 71.4%)
were higher than grade 2 (2/6 patients =
33.3%).
* Correlation between tibial alignment
outcome and pattern fractures (Muller/AO),
closed/open fractures:
There was no difference in the
alignment result between the pattern of
fracture as well as the number of nails
used. This indicated that fixation using
Metaizeau nail models ensured anatomical
reduction as well as was adequate strong
to maintain the reduction results. However,
we found that open fractures often had
malalignment results than closed fractures.
* Correlation between functional outcome
and soft tissue injury in closed fractures:
The results showed that 28 patients
with soft tissue injuries in closed fractures
grade 0 and 1, only 1 case had fair
functional outcome. Whereas in soft
tissue injuries in closed fractures grade 2,
up to 2/6 cases of fair outcome. There was
no case for bad outcome.
* Correlation between functional outcome
and alignment outcome:
In 43 patients with good and very good
alignment results, no patients had fair
functional outcome, while 4 patients had
fair alignment outcome, the alignment results
were also fair.
* Correlation between functional outcome
and age, sex, closed/open fracture:
In our study, it was shown that age,
gender, closed/open fractures did not affect
functional outcome.
CONCLUSION
Through the study of the application of
Metaizeau technique to treat the distal
tibia fractures under C-arm controlling,
we had some conclusions:
- Treatment outcomes: Excellent: 8.3%;
good: 80.6%; fair: 8.3%; bad: 2.8%; there
was no osteitis, pseudarthrosis.
- Indications, techniques, advantages
and disadvantages:
+ Indication: Metaizeau nail is a good
indication for the distal tibia fractures,
especially those with metaphyseal fractures
when the intramedullary nail is difficult
to work.
Journal of military pharmaco-medicine n
0
1-2020
206
+ Technique: The majority of patients
had surgery under C-arm, after the anatomical
reduction on the orthopedic table.
+ Advantages: Not having to open
tibial fracture, it preserved elements of the
healing bone process, reduced the risk of
bacterial infections, osteoarthritis.
+ Disadvantages: Patients with 2 nails
fixation were not allowed partial weight-
bearing until the sixth week.
REFERENCES
1. Wyrsch B.M.M, McAndrew M et al.
Operative treatment of fractures of the tibial
plafond: A randomized, prospective study.
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996, 78, pp.1646-1675.
2. McCann P.A.J.M, Mitchell S.T et al.
Complications of definitive open reduction and
internal fixation of pilon fractures of the distal
tibia. Orthop Rev. 2011, 35, pp.413-418.
3. Olerud S.K.G. Tibial fractures treated by
AO compression osteosynthesis. Experiences
from a five year material. Acta Orthop Scand
Suppl. 1972, 140, pp.1-104.
4. Whittle A.P.W.G. Fractures of the lower
extremity. Campbells’s Operative Orthopaedics.
2003, pp.2757-2761.
5. Robinson C.M, G.J McLauchlan,
I.P McLean et al. Distal metaphyseal fractures
of the tibia with minimal involvement of the
ankle. Classification and treatment by locked
intramedullary nailing. J Bone Joint Surg Br.
1995, 77 (5), pp.781-787.
6. Nork S.E, A.K Schwartz, J Agel et al.
Intramedullary nailing of distal metaphyseal
tibial fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005,
87 (6), pp.1213-1221.
7. de la Caffiniere J.Y, F Pelisse, M de la
Caffiniere. Locked intramedullary flexible
osteosynthesis. A mechanical and clinical
study of a new pin fixation device. J Bone
Joint Surg Br. 1994, 76 (5), pp.778-788.
Các file đính kèm theo tài liệu này:
evaluating_the_outcome_for_distal_metaphyseal_tibia_fracture.pdf