Our chemical study of the acidic methanol extract of the D. metel whole plants led to the
isolation and identification of five compounds, namely: kaempferol 3-O-β-D-glucosyl(1→2)-β-
D-galactoside 7-O-β-D-glucoside (1), kaempferol 3-O-β-D-glucopyranosyl(1→2)-β-Dglucopyranoside-7-O-α-L-rhamnopyranoside (2), pinoresinol O-β-D-glucopyranoside (3),
(7R,8S,7′S,8′R)-4,9,4′,7′-tetrahydroxy-3,3′-dimethoxy-7,9′-epoxylignan-4-O-β-D-glucopyranoside
(4), and (7S,8R,7′S,8′S)-4,9,4′,7′-tetrahydroxy-3,3′-dimethoxy-7,9′-epoxylignan-4-O-β-Dglucopyranoside (5). Among the isolates, (7R,8S,7′S,8′R)-4,9,4′,7′-tetrahydroxy-3,3′-dimethoxy-
7,9′-epoxylignan-4-O-β-D-glucopyranoside and (7S,8R,7′S,8′S)-4,9,4′,7′-tetrahydroxy-3,3′-
dimethoxy-7,9′-epoxylignan-4-O-β-D-glucopyranoside were reported for the first time from the
Datura genus.
                
              
                                            
                                
            
 
            
                
8 trang | 
Chia sẻ: honghp95 | Lượt xem: 663 | Lượt tải: 0
              
            Bạn đang xem nội dung tài liệu Flavonol and lignan glycosides from datura metel l - Nguyen Thi Mai, để tải tài liệu về máy bạn click vào nút DOWNLOAD ở trên
Vietnam Journal of Science and Technology 55 (3) (2017) 263-270 
DOI: 10.15625/2525-2518/55/3/8811 
FLAVONOL AND LIGNAN GLYCOSIDES FROM Datura metel L. 
Nguyen Thi Mai1, Nguyen Thi Kim Cuc2, Tran Hong Quang2, Phan Van Kiem2, * 
1University of Transport and Communications, 3 Cau Giay, Dong Da, Ha Noi, Viet Nam 
2Institute of Marine Biochemistry, Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology (VAST), 
18 Hoang Quoc Viet, Cau Giay, Ha Noi, Viet Nam 
*Email: phankiem@yahoo.com 
Received 26 October 2015; Accepted for publication: 21 February 2017 
ABSTRACT 
Chemical investigation of an acidic methanol extract of the whole plants of D. metel resulted 
in the isolation of five compounds, including kaempferol 3-O-β-D-glucosyl(1→2)-β-D-
galactoside 7-O-β-D-glucoside (1), kaempferol 3-O-β-glucopyranosyl(1→2)-β-glucopyranoside-
7-O-α-rhamnopyranoside (2), pinoresinol O-β-D-glucopyranoside (3), (7R,8S,7′S,8′R)-4,9,4′,7′-
tetrahydroxy-3,3′-dimethoxy-7,9′-epoxylignan-4-O-β-D-glucopyranoside (4), and (7S,8R,7′S,8′S)-
4,9,4′,7′-tetrahydroxy-3,3′-dimethoxy-7,9′-epoxylignan-4-O-β-D-glucopyranoside (5). Their 
structures were elucidated by 1D and 2D NMR and MS spectroscopic analyses as well as 
comparing with the data reported in the literature. The absolute configurations of compounds 4 
and 5 were determined by CD spectra. It is noted that (7R,8S,7′S,8′R)-4,9,4′,7′-tetrahydroxy-
3,3′-dimethoxy-7,9′-epoxylignan-4-O-β-D-glucopyranoside and (7S,8R,7′S,8′S)-4,9,4′,7′-
tetrahydroxy-3,3′-dimethoxy-7,9′-epoxylignan-4-O-β-D-glucopyranoside were isolated for the 
first time from the Datura genus. 
Keywords: Datura metel, Solanaceae, Flavonol glycoside, Lignan glycoside. 
1. INTRODUCTION 
 Datura metel L. is an annual herb of the Solanaceae family and is widely cultivated in 
many tropical and temperate regions. In the Vietnamese traditional medicine, D. metel has been 
used for the treatment of coughs, bronchial asthma, and rheumatism [1]. Its leaves have been 
used as anesthetics in surgery, a fumigant in bronchial asthma, and anti-contractive agents in the 
stomach ulcers [1]. The flowers of D. metel have been used widely in the Chinese traditional 
medicine for the treatment of asthma, convulsions, pain, and rheumatism for centuries [2]. 
Previous pharmacological studies have showed that the D. metel seeds have hypoglycemic 
activity in normal and alloxan-induced diabetic rats [3], the chloroform extract of D. metel 
exhibits an antifungal effect toward several pathogenic species of Aspergillus [4], and the seeds 
and fruit pulps of D. metel show high antioxidant activity [5]. Previous chemical studies have 
demonstrated that the major chemical components of D. metel are with anolide-type steroids [6 – 
12], which have been shown to suppress NO production in lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-stimulated 
RAW264.7 cells [11, 12] and exhibit cytotoxicity against HCT-116, A549, DLD-1, BGC-823, 
Nguyen Thi Mai, Nguyen Thi Kim Cuc, Tran Hong Quang, Phan Van Kiem 
264 
and K562 cancer cell lines [6, 7, 10]. In addition, some megastigmane sesquiterpenes and amide 
alkaloids from D. metel were also reported [13, 14]. In the present study, we report the isolation 
and structural elucidation of two flavonol glycosides (1 and 2) and three lignan glycosides (3-5) 
from the acidic methanol extract of the whole plants of D. metel. 
2. MATERIAL AND METHODS 
2.1. General experimental procedures 
All NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker AM500 FT-NMR spectrometer (500 MHz for 
1H and 125 MHz for 13C-NMR), chemical shifts are reported in ppm using TMS as an internal 
standard. ESIMS spectra were recorded on Agilent 1100 spectrometer. Circular dichroism (CD) 
spectra were measured on a Chirascan CD spectrometer (Applied Photophysics Ltd., Surrey, 
UK). Column chromatography (CC) was performed on silica gel 230 - 400 mesh or reversed 
phase (RP) C18 resins (150 µm, Fuji Silysia Chemical Ltd.). Compounds were visualized by 
spraying with aqueous 10 % H2SO4 and heating for 5 minutes. 
2.2. Plant material 
The whole plants of D. metel were collected in Thai Binh province, Vietnam during May 
2015, and identified by Dr. Bui Van Thanh, Institute of Ecology and Biological Resources. A 
voucher specimen (NCCT-CDM-5.2015) was deposited at the Herbarium of the Institute of 
Marine Biochemistry, VAST. 
2.3. Extraction and isolation 
The dried whole plants of D. metel (5 kg) were ground and extracted with MeOH/acetic 
acid (pH = 5.0) under sonication at room temperature. After concentration under reduced 
pressure, the MeOH extract (300 g) was suspended in water and partitioned with CHCl3 to give 
CHCl3- and water-soluble fractions. The water-soluble fraction was alkalinized by adding 
NH4OH until pH = 9.0, and then partitioned successively with CH2Cl2 and EtOAc to provide 
CH2Cl2-, EtOAc-, and water-soluble fractions, respectively. The water-soluble fraction was 
neutralized and subjected to fractionation through a Diaion HP-20 column, eluted with a 
gradient of MeOH in water (25–100 %) to give four fractions (DMW1–DMW4). Fraction 
DMW2 was separated using RP C18 column chromatography (CC), eluting with MeOH-H2O 
(1:3, v/v) to yield subfractions DMW21–DMW25. Subfraction DMW22 was then separated by 
silica gel CC, eluting with CH2Cl2-MeOH-H2O (5:1:0.05, v/v/v) to give 1 (25 mg) and 4 (6 mg). 
Subfraction DMW23 was separated by silica gel CC, eluting with CH2Cl2-MeOH-H2O (6:1:0.05, 
v/v/v) and further purified by a RP C18 CC, eluting with MeOH-H2O (1:3, v/v) to yield 5 (6 mg). 
Subfraction DMW25 was separated using silica gel CC, eluting with CH2Cl2-MeOH-H2O 
(6:1:0.05, v/v/v) and subsequently purified by RP C18 CC, eluting with MeOH-H2O (1:2, v/v) to 
release 2 (20 mg). Fraction DMW42 was separated by silica gel CC, eluting with CH2Cl2-
MeOH-H2O (6:1:0.05, v/v/v) to provide four subfractions (DMW421–DMW424). Subfraction 
DMW424 was separated by RP C18 CC, eluting with acetone-H2O (1:3, v/v) to obtain 3 (5 mg). 
Kaempferol 3-O-β-D-glucosyl(1→2)-β-D-galactoside 7-O-β-D-glucoside (1): yellow, amorphous 
powder; C33H40O21, M = 772; ESI-MS m/z: 795 [M+Na]+; 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 500 MHz) δH: 
6.43 (d, J = 2.0 Hz, H-6), 6.80 (d, J = 2.0 Hz, H-8), 8.11 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, H-2′ and H-6′), 6.90 (d, 
J = 8.5 Hz, H-3′ and H-5′), 5.68 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, H-1′′), 4.58 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, H-1′′′), 5.07 (d, J = 
7.0 Hz, H-1′′′′); 13C NMR (DMSO-d6, 125 MHz): see Table 1. 
Flavonol and lignan glycosides from Datura metel L. 
265 
Table 1. 13C NMR data (500 MHz) for compounds 1−5. 
C 1 2 3 4 5 
δC#1 δCa δC#2 δCb δC#3 δCb δC#4 δCa,b δC#5 δCa,b 
1 53.7 55.5 133.5 138.5 133.8 137.8 
2 156.2 156.2 159.5 159.4 85.1 87.5 110.6 111.7 110.9 111.8 
3 133.2 133.2 135.2 135.1 147.4 150.8 147.4 150.9 
4 177.7 177.7 180.0 179.7 71.0 72.6 145.8 147.1 145.6 147.6 
5 160.9 160.9 163.0 163.0 53.5 55.3 115.1 117.8 115.1 117.8 
6 99.4 99.4 100.7 100.5 84.9 87.0 118.9 120.0 118.9 120.4 
7 162.8 162.8 163.6 163.4 83.4 84.6 82.8 85.4 
8 94.5 94.5 95.6 95.5 71.0 72.6 53.9 53.7 51.9 55.9 
9 156.0 156.0 158.2 158.0 61.6 62.4 60.4 63.3 
10 105.6 105.6 107.6 107.5 
1′ 120.8 120.8 122.7 122.5 132.3 133.7 138.4 136.0 138.3 136.2 
2′ 131.2 131.2 132.5 132.4 110.6 110.9 111.1 111.5 110.4 111.4 
3′ 115.4 115.4 116.4 116.3 146.0 147.0 148.7 148.9 148.7 149.0 
4′ 160.2 160.2 161.7 161.8 147.5 149.1 145.8 147.3 145.8 148.5 
5′ 115.4 115.4 116.4 116.3 115.2 116.0 114.9 115.9 114.7 115.9 
6′ 131.2 131.2 132.5 132.4 118.6 119.7 119.4 120.7 118.7 120.8 
7′ 74.8 76.6 73.7 77.4 
8′ 50.6 50.8 49.3 52.7 
9′ 69.5 71.6 69.5 71.3 
1′′ 98.3 98.4 100.9 100.8 135.4 136.0 100.7 102.9 100.2 102.8 
2′′ 80.5 80.5 82.8 82.6 110.8 111.5 73.3 74.9 73.3 74.9 
3′′ 73.4 73.4 78.0 77.8 146.0 147.4 77.1 77.8 77.0 77.8 
4′′ 67.7 67.7 71.3 71.2 149.1 150.9 69.7 71.3 69.7 71.3 
5′′ 75.9 75.9 78.4 78.1 115.6 117.9 76.9 78.2 76.9 78.2 
6′′ 60.0 60.0 62.6 62.4 118.2 120.0 60.7 62.5 60.7 62.5 
1′′′ 104.3 104.3 104.8 104.7 100.4 102.8 
2′′′ 74.5 74.4 75.7 75.5 73.3 74.8 
3′′′ 76.5 76.5 78.0 77.8 76.8 77.8 
4′′′ 69.7 69.7 71.4 71.2 70.0 71.3 
5′′′ 77.0 77.0 78.3 78.2 77.0 78.2 
6′′′ 60.7 60.7 62.7 62.5 60.7 62.4 
1′′′′ 99.8 99.8 99.9 99.7 
2′′′′ 73.1 73.1 71.8 71.6 
3′′′′ 76.6 76.6 72.2 72.0 
4′′′′ 69.7 69.7 73.7 73.5 
5′′′′ 77.2 77.2 71.3 71.1 
6′′′′ 60.8 60.9 18.1 18.0 
OCH3 55.7 
55.9 
56.3 
56.7 
55.7 
55.8 
56.7 
56.4 
55.6 
55.7 
56.7 
56.4 
a Recorded in DMSO-d6, b in CD3OD; #1 δC of 3-O-β-D-glucosyl(1→2)-β-D-galactoside 7-O-β-D-glucoside 
in DMSO-d6 [16]; #2 δC of kaempferol 3-O-β-D-glucopyranosyl(1→2)-β-D-glucopyranoside-7-O-α-L-
rhamnopyranoside in CD3OD [17]; #3 δC of pinoresinol O-β-D-glucopyranoside in DMSO-d6 [1]; #4 δC of 
(7R,8S,7′S,8′R)-4,9,4′,7′-tetrahydroxy-3,3′-dimethoxy-7,9′-epoxylignan-4-O-β-D-glucopyranoside in 
DMSO-d6 [15]; 
#5 δC of (7S,8R,7′S,8′S)-4,9,4′,7′-tetrahydroxy-3,3′-dimethoxy-7,9′-epoxylignan-4-O-β-D-glucopyranoside 
in DMSO-d6 [15]. 
Nguyen Thi Mai, Nguyen Thi Kim Cuc, Tran Hong Quang, Phan Van Kiem 
266 
Kaempferol 3-O-β-D-glucopyranosyl(1→2)-β-D-glucopyranoside-7-O-α-L-rhamnopyranoside 
(2): yellow, amorphous powder; C33H40O20, M = 756; ESI-MS m/z: 779 [M+Na]+; 1H NMR 
(CD3OD, 500 MHz) δH: 6.47 (s, H-6), 6.76 (s, H-8), 8.08 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, H-2′ and H-6′), 6.93 (d, 
J = 8.5 Hz, H-3′ and H-5′), 5.50 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, H-1′′), 4.79 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, H-1′′′), 5.59 (br s, H-
1′′′′), 1.27 (d, J = 6.5 Hz, H3-6′′′′); 13C NMR (CD3OD, 125 MHz): see Table 1. 
Pinoresinol O-β-D-glucopyranoside (3): white, amorphous powder; C26H32O11, M = 520; ESI-
MS m/z: 543 [M+Na]+; 1H NMR (CD3OD, 500 MHz) δH: 4.57 (H-2), 4.73 (H-6), 6.97 (s, H-2′), 
6.95 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, H-5′), 6.79 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, H-6′), 7.05 (s, H-2′′), 7.17 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, H-5′′), 
6.84 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, H-6′′), 4.85 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, H-1′′′), 3.87 and 3.89 (each s, OCH3); 13C NMR 
(CD3OD, 125 MHz): see Table 1. 
(7R,8S,7'S,8'R)-4,9,4',7'-Tetrahydroxy-3,3'-dimethoxy-7,9'-epoxylignan-4-O-β-D-
glucopyranoside (4): white, amorphous powder; C26H34O12, M = 538; ESI-MS m/z: 561 
[M+Na]+; CD (MeOH) λmax (∆ε) 279 (−7.23) and 231 (−16.11) nm [15]: λmax (∆ε) 277 (−1.84) 
and 231 (−5.34) nm]; 1H NMR (CD3OD, 500 MHz) δH: 7.03 (d, J = 2.0 Hz, H-2), 7.16 (d, J = 
8.0 Hz, H-5), 6.94 (dd, J = 2.0, 8.0 Hz, H-6), 4.70 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, H-7), 1.91 (m, H-8), 3.33 (m, 
H-9a), 3.88 (m, H-9b), 6.88 (d, J = 2.0 Hz, H-2′), 6.76 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, H-5′), 6.74 (dd, J = 2.0, 8.0 
Hz, H-6′), 4.49 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, H-7′), 2.55 (m, H-8′), 3.98 (m, H-9′a), 4.28 (dd, J = 4.5, 8.0 Hz, 
H-9′b), 4.91 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, H-1′′), 3.88 (s, 3-OCH3), 3.83 (s, 3′-OCH3); 13C NMR (CD3OD, 125 
MHz): see Table 1. 
(7S,8R,7'S,8'S)-4,9,4',7'-Tetrahydroxy-3,3'-dimethoxy-7,9'-epoxylignan-4-O-β-D-
glucopyranoside (5): white, amorphous powder; C26H34O12, M = 538; ESI-MS m/z: 561 
[M+Na]+; CD (MeOH) λmax (∆ε) 284 (+0.52), 233 (+17.45) nm [15]: λmax (∆ε) 281 (+0.88) and 
234 (+1.19) nm]; 1H NMR (CD3OD, 500 MHz) δH: 7.03 (br s, H-2), 7.16 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, H-5), 
6.93 (br d, J = 8.5 Hz, H-6), 4.60 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, H-7), 2.29 (m, H-8), 3.67 (m, H2-9), 7.01 (br s, 
H-2′), 6.80 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, H-5′), 6.85 (dd, J = 1.5, 8.0 Hz, H-6′), 4.50 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, H-7′), 2.64 
(m, H-8′), 3.67 (m, H-9′a), 3.77 (dd, J = 6.5, 9.0 Hz, H-9′b), 4.86 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, H-1′′), 3.89 (s, 
3-OCH3 and 3′-OCH3); 13C NMR (CD3OD, 125 MHz): see Table 1. 
3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 
 Compound 1 was obtained as a yellow, amorphous powder. Its molecular formula was 
established as C33H40O21 by an ion peak [M+Na]+ at m/z 795 in the ESIMS and the 13C NMR 
spectroscopic analysis. The 1H NMR of 1 showed signals for two meta coupled aromatic protons 
at δH 6.43 (d, J = 2.0 Hz, H-6) and 6.80 (d, J = 2.0 Hz, H-8) and a para-substituted aromatic ring 
at δH 8.11 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, H-2′ and H-6′) and 6.90 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, H-3′ and H-5′). The 1H NMR 
spectrum further showed signals for three anomeric protons at δH 5.68 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, H-1′′), 
4.58 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, H-1′′′), and 5.07 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, H-1′′′′), revealing that 1 has three sugar 
units. Analysis of 13C NMR and HSQC spectra indicated the presence of 33 carbons, including 
one carbonyl carbon at δC 177.7 (C-4), eight non-protonated aromatic carbons (of which five 
were oxygenated), and six aromatic methine carbons, suggesting that 1 possesses the flavonol 
skeleton (Table 1). The 18 remaining carbons were assigned to three sugar units, which were 
identified as two glucopyranoses and one galactopyranose by comparison with those reported in 
the literature [16]. The relatively large spin couplings of the three anomeric protons (J ≥ 7.0 Hz) 
are characteristic features of the β-configurations for the glucose and galactose units. In the 
HMBC spectrum, the HMBC correlations from δH 4.58 (H-1′′′) to δC 80.5 (C-2′′) and from δH 
Flavonol and lignan glycosides from Datura metel L. 
267 
5.68 (H-1′′) to δC 98.4 (C-3) suggested that the β-glucopyranosyl-(1→2)]-β-D-galactopyranoside 
sugar chain was located at C-3 position (Figure 2). The remaining β-glucopyranose was attached 
to C-7 by the HMBC correlation observed from δH 5.07 (H-1′′′′) to δC 162.8 (C-7). On the basis 
of the above analysis, along with comparison with those of the reported flavonol glycoside [16], 
the structure of 1 was established as kaempferol 3-O-β-D-glucosyl(1→2)-β-D-galactoside 7-O-β-
D-glucoside. 
Figure 1. Chemical structures of compounds 1−5 from D. metel. 
The molecular formula of compound 2 was determined to be C33H40O20 by the presence of 
an ion [M+Na]+ at m/z 779 in the ESIMS. The 1H NMR spectrum contained signals for an AX 
spin system [δH 6.47 (s, H-6) and 6.76 (s, H-8)] and an AA′BB′ pattern at δH 8.08 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 
H-2′ and H-6′) and 6.93 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, H-3′ and H-5′). The signals for three anomeric protons at 
δH 5.50 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, H-1′′), 4.79 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, H-1′′′), and 5.59 (br s, H-1′′′′) observed in the 
1H NMR spectrum indicated the presence of three sugars in the structure. The 13C NMR 
spectrum comprised 33 carbon signals, including 15 carbons of the aglycone and 18 carbons 
belonging to the sugar moiety (Table 1). Comparison of the 1H and 13C NMR data of 2 with 
those of 1 revealed that these compounds have the same aglycone but different sugar moieties. 
The sugar moiety of 2 was found to consist of two glucose units and one rhamnose by detailed 
analysis of 13C NMR and HSQC spectra in comparison with the previously reported values [17]. 
The β-configurations for the anomeric protons of the glucopyranoses were deduced based on the 
relatively large coupling constants (J = 7.5 Hz), while the α-oriented anomeric proton of the 
rhamose was determined by its carbon chemical shift values of C-3 and C-5 positions [19]. The 
sugar chain at C-3 of the aglycone was identified as β-D-glucopyranosyl(1→2)-β-D-
glucopyranoside by the HMBC correlations from δH 4.79 (H-1′′′) to δC 82.6 (C-1′′) and from δH 
5.50 (H-1′′) to δC 135.1 (C-3) (Figure 2). The location of the rhamnose at C-7 position was 
deduced by the HMBC cross-peak between δH 5.59 (H-1′′′′) to δC 163.4 (C-7). Thus, the 
Nguyen Thi Mai, Nguyen Thi Kim Cuc, Tran Hong Quang, Phan Van Kiem 
268 
structure of 2 was identified as kaempferol 3-O-β-D-glucopyranosyl(1→2)-β- D-
glucopyranoside-7-O-α-L-rhamnopyranoside. 
 Compound 3 was isolated as a white, amorphous powder. Its molecular formula, C26H32O11 
was deduced by the observation of an ion peak [M+Na]+ at m/z 543 in the ESIMS and 13C NMR 
spectroscopic analysis. The 1H NMR spectrum exhibited signals for two ABX spin systems at δH 
6.97 (s, H-2′), 6.95 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, H-5′), 6.95 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, H-6′), 7.05 (s, H-2′′), 7.17 (d, J = 
8.5 Hz, H-5′′), and 6.84 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, H-6′′) and two methoxy groups at δH 3.87 and 3.89 (each 
s, 4′-OCH3 and 4′′-OCH3). The signal of an anomeric proton at δH 4.85 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, H-1′′′) 
observed in the 1H NMR of 3 implied the presence of a sugar unit. The 13C NMR and DEPT 
spectra displayed 26 carbon signals, of which six nonprotonated aromatic carbons (including 
four were oxygenated), six aromatic methines, two oxymethines at δC 87.5 (C-2) and 87.0 (C-6), 
two oxymethylenes at δC 72.6 (C-4 and C-8), two methines at δC 55.5 (C-1) and 55.3 (C-5), 
suggesting that 3 is a lignan derivative (Table 1). The six remaining carbon signals at δC 102.8, 
74.8, 77.8, 71.3, 78.2, and 62.4 could be assigned to a glucopyranose. Comparison of the 1H and 
13C NMR data of 3 with those of the reported lignan, pinoresinol O-β-D-glucopyranoside, 
revealed that the structures of these compounds are identical [18]. Therefore, the structure of 
compound 3 was identified as shown in Figure 1. 
Figure 2. Selected HMBC correlations of compounds 1, 2, 4, and 5. 
The ESIMS of compound 4 exhibited an ion [M+Na]+ at m/z 561, corresponding with the 
molecular formula C26H34O12. The 1H NMR spectrum showed signals for two ABX spin systems 
at δH 7.03 (d, J = 2.0 Hz, H-2), 7.16 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, H-5), 6.94 (dd, J = 1.5, 8.5 Hz, H-6), 6.88 (d, 
J = 2.0 Hz, H-2′), 6.76 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, H-5′), and 6.74 (dd, J = 2.0, 8.0 Hz, H-6′) and two 
methoxy groups at δH 3.88 (s, 3-OCH3) and 3.83 (3′-OCH3). Compound 4 was found to have one 
sugar unit by the observation of an anomeric proton at δH 4.91 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, H-1′′) in the 1H 
NMR spectrum. Analysis of 13C NMR and HSQC spectra indicated the presence of 26 carbons, 
including six non-protonated aromatic carbons (of which four were oxygenated), six aromatic 
methines, two oxymethines at δH 4.70/δC 84.6 (C-7) and δH 4.49/δC 76.6 (C-7′), two 
oxymethylenes at δH 3.33 and 3.88/δC 62.4 (C-9) and δH 3.98 and 4.28/δC 71.6 (C-9′), suggesting 
that 4 belongs to the lignan skeleton (Table 1). The sugar was suggested to be β-glucopyranose 
by the observation of six carbon signals at δC 102.9, 74.9, 77.8, 71.3, 78.2, and 62.5 and the 
large coupling constant of the anomeric proton (J = 7.5 Hz). Comparison of the 1H and 13C NMR 
data of 4 with those of the reported lignan glycoside, tetrahydroxy-3,3′-dimethoxy-7,9′-
epoxylignan-4-O-β-D-glucopyranoside resulted in the close similarity [15]. In the HMBC 
Flavonol and lignan glycosides from Datura metel L. 
269 
spectrum, the HMBC correlations from δH 4.70 (H-7) to δC 138.5 (C-1), 111.7 (C-2), and 120.0 
(C-6) and from δH 4.49 (H-7′) to δC 136.0 (C-1′), 111.5 (C-2′), and 120.7 (C-6′) allowed to fix 
the location of the two 1,3,4-trisubstituted aromatic rings at C-7 and C-7′, respectively (Figure 
2). The HMBC correlations from δH 3.88 to δC 150.8 (C-3) and from δH 3.83 to δC 148.9 (C-3′) 
indicated that the two methoxyl groups are located at C-3 and C-3′ positions. The position of the 
β-glucopyranose was determined to be at C-4 based on the HMBC correlations observed from 
δH 6.94 (H-2) to δC 147.1 (C-4) and from δH 4.91 (H-1′′) to δC 147.1 (C-4). Based on the above 
analysis, the planar structure of 4 was established. The CD spectrum of 4 showed the negative 
Cotton effects at 279 nm (∆ε -7.23) and 231 nm (∆ε -16.11), which were in good agreement with 
those of the related compound, indicating the absolute configuration of 4 to be 7R,8S,7′S,8′R 
[15]. Thus, the structure of 4 was established as (7R,8S,7′S,8′R)-4,9,4′,7′-tetrahydroxy-3,3′-
dimethoxy-7,9′-epoxylignan-4-O-β-D-glucopyranoside. 
The molecular formula of compound 5, C26H34O12 was deduced by its ESIMS ion at m/z 
561 [M+Na]+ and 1H and 13C NMR spectra. The 1H and 13C NMR data of 5 were found to be 
very similar with those of 4, except for the carbon chemical shift values of C-8 (5: δC 55.9 vs 4: 
δC 53.7) and C-8′ (5: δC 52.7 vs 4: δC 50.8), suggesting that these compounds are stereoisomers 
at C-8 and C-8′ (Table 1). This was supported by comparing the CD spectrum of 5 with that of 
the reported lignan glycoside, (7S,8R,7′S,8′S)-4,9,4′,7′-tetrahydroxy-3,3′-dimethoxy-7,9′-
epoxylignan-4-O-β-D-glucopyranoside [5: λmax (∆ε) 284 (+0.52) and 233 (+17.45) nm vs. λmax 
(∆ε) 281 (+0.88) and 234 (+1.19) nm [15]. Hence, the structure of 5 was identified as shown in 
Figure 1. 
4. CONCLUSION 
 Our chemical study of the acidic methanol extract of the D. metel whole plants led to the 
isolation and identification of five compounds, namely: kaempferol 3-O-β-D-glucosyl(1→2)-β-
D-galactoside 7-O-β-D-glucoside (1), kaempferol 3-O-β-D-glucopyranosyl(1→2)-β-D-
glucopyranoside-7-O-α-L-rhamnopyranoside (2), pinoresinol O-β-D-glucopyranoside (3), 
(7R,8S,7′S,8′R)-4,9,4′,7′-tetrahydroxy-3,3′-dimethoxy-7,9′-epoxylignan-4-O-β-D-glucopyranoside 
(4), and (7S,8R,7′S,8′S)-4,9,4′,7′-tetrahydroxy-3,3′-dimethoxy-7,9′-epoxylignan-4-O-β-D-
glucopyranoside (5). Among the isolates, (7R,8S,7′S,8′R)-4,9,4′,7′-tetrahydroxy-3,3′-dimethoxy-
7,9′-epoxylignan-4-O-β-D-glucopyranoside and (7S,8R,7′S,8′S)-4,9,4′,7′-tetrahydroxy-3,3′-
dimethoxy-7,9′-epoxylignan-4-O-β-D-glucopyranoside were reported for the first time from the 
Datura genus. 
Acknowledgement. This research was supported by NAFOSTED under grant number 104.01-2014.69. 
REFERENCES 
1. Chi V. V. - Dictionary of medicinal plants in Vietnam, Vietnamese Publisher of 
Medicine, Vol. 1, 2012, pp. 284. 
2. Xiao P. G. - Modern Chinese Materia Medica. Chemical Industry Publishing House, 
Beijing, 2002, pp. 757. 
3. Krishna Murthy B., Nammi S., Kota M. K., Krishna Rao R. V., Koteswara Rao N., 
Annapurna A. - Evaluation of hypoglycemic and antihyperglycemic effects of Datura 
Nguyen Thi Mai, Nguyen Thi Kim Cuc, Tran Hong Quang, Phan Van Kiem 
270 
metel (Linn.) seeds in normal and alloxan-induced diabetic rats, J. Ethnopharmacol. 91 
(2004) 95-98. 
4. Rajesh Sharma G. L. - Studies on antimycotic properties of Datura metel, J. 
Ethnopharmacol. 80 (2002) 193-197. 
5. Roy S., Pawar S., Chowdhary A. - Evaluation of In Vitro Cytotoxic and Antioxidant 
Activity of Datura metel Linn. and Cynodon dactylon Linn, Extracts. Pharmacognosy 
Res. 8 (2016) 123-127. 
6. Ma L., Xie C. M., Li J., Lou F. C., Hu L. H. - Daturametelins H, I, and J: three new 
withanolide glycosides from Datura metel L. Chem. Biodivers. 3 (2006) 180-186. 
7. Pan Y., Wang X., Hu X. - Cytotoxic withanolides from the flowers of Datura metel, J. 
Nat. Prod. 70 (2007) 1127-1132. 
8. Yang B. Y., Xia Y. G., Wang Q. H., Dou D. Q., Kuang H. X. - Baimantuoluosides D-G, 
four new withanolide glucosides from the flower of Datura metel L, Arch. Pharm. Res. 33 
(2010) 1143-1148. 
9. Kuang H. X., Yang B. Y., Xia Y. G., Wang Q. H. - Two new withanolide lactones from 
flos daturae, Molecules 16 (2011) 5833-5839. 
10. Bellila A., Tremblay C., Pichette A., Marzouk B., Mshvildadze V., Lavoie S., Legault J. - 
Cytotoxic activity of withanolides isolated from Tunisian Datura metel L, Phytochemistry 
72 (2011) 2031-2036. 
11. Yang B. Y., Guo R., Li T., Liu Y., Wang C. F., Shu Z. P., Wang Z. B., Zhang J., Xia Y. 
G., Jiang H., Wang Q. H., Kuang H. X. - Five withanolides from the leaves of Datura 
metel L. and their inhibitory effects on nitric oxide production, Molecules 19 (2014) 4548-
4559. 
12. Yang B. Y., Guo R., Li T., Wu J. J., Zhang J., Liu Y., Wang Q. H., Kuang H. X. - New anti-
inflammatory withanolides from the leaves of Datura metel L, Steroids 87 (2014) 26-34. 
13. Kuang H. X., Yang B. Y., Xia Y. G., Feng W. S. - Chemical constituents from the flower 
of Datura metel L, Arch. Pharm. Res. 31 (2008) 1094-1097. 
14. Yang B. Y., Xia Y. G., Wang Q. H., Dou D. Q., Kuang H. X. - Two new amide alkaloids 
from the flower of Datura metel L, Fitoterapia 81 (2010) 1003-1005. 
15. Yang Y. N., Huang X. Y., Feng Z. M., Jiang J. S., Zhang P. C. - Hepatoprotective activity 
of twelve novel 7'-hydroxy lignan glucosides from Arctii Fructus, J. Agric. Food Chem. 
62 (2014) 9095-9102. 
16. Han Y., Nishibe S., Noguchi Y., Jin Z. - Flavonol glycosides from the stems of Trigonella 
foenum-graecum, Phytochemistry 58 (2001) 577-580. 
17. Kite G. C., Veitch N. C., Boalch M. E., Lewis G. P., Leon C. J., Simmonds M. S. - 
Flavonol tetraglycosides from fruits of Styphnolobium japonicum (Leguminosae) and the 
authentication of Fructus Sophorae and Flos Sophorae, Phytochemistry, 70 (2009) 785-794. 
18. Deyama T. - The Constituents of Eucommia ulmoides OLIV. I. Isolation of (+)-
Medioresinol Di-O-b-D-glucopyranoside, Chem. Pharm. Bull. 31 (1983) 2993-2997. 
19. Kasai R., Okihara M., Asakawa J., Mizutani K., Tanaka O. - 13C nmr study of alpha- and 
beta-anomeric pairs of d-mannopyranosides and l-rhamnopyranosides, Tetrahedron 35 
(1979) 1427-1432. 
            Các file đính kèm theo tài liệu này:
8811_37430_1_pb_2138_2061748.pdf