CONCLUSIONS
The 2D-QSAR modeling has been successfully
developed from 2D-descriptors of 60 (R)-3-
amidinophenylalanine inhibitors associated with
their inhibition constants, Ki. The established QSAR
modeling was internally, externally, and totally
validated, demonstrating satisfactory statistical parameters. Hydrophobicity is an important descriptor
in the modelling of binding affinity. The 2D-QSAR
equation was applied to predict Ki values of all
inhibitors. The results revealed a good predictability
of the modeling. Based on the developed 2D-QSAR
modeling, the design of the new inhibitors derived
from (R)-3-amidinophenylalanine should focus on
the hydrophobicity of derivatives by theoretical
calculations to obtain the numerical values of hydrophobic descriptors. The chemical structures of
inhibitors possessing lower values of SlogP_VSA1,
SlogP_VSA3 descriptors and higher SlogP_VSA0
descriptor should be further studied in synthetic
experiments.
5 trang |
Chia sẻ: hachi492 | Lượt xem: 2 | Lượt tải: 0
Bạn đang xem nội dung tài liệu Hydrophobic property of (R)-3 amidinophenylalanine inhibitors contributes to their inhibition constants with thrombin enzyme, để tải tài liệu về máy bạn click vào nút DOWNLOAD ở trên
Science & Technology Development Journal, 22(3):348- 352
Open Access Full Text Article Research Article
1Department of Chemistry, Faculty of
Sciences, Nong Lam University, Vietnam
2Department of Chemical Technology,
Faculty of Chemical and Food
Technology, Ho Chi Minh City
University of Technology and Education,
Vietnam
Correspondence
HoangMinh Hao, Department of
Chemical Technology, Faculty of
Chemical and Food Technology, Ho Chi
Minh City University of Technology and
Education, Vietnam
Email: haohm@hcmute.edu.vn
History
Received: 2019-05-31
Accepted: 2019-09-18
Published: 2019-09-30
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.32508/stdj.v22i3.1684
Copyright
© VNU-HCM Press. This is an open-
access article distributed under the
terms of the Creative Commons
Attribution 4.0 International license.
Hydrophobic Property of (R)-3 Amidinophenylalanine Inhibitors
Contributes to their Inhibition Constants with Thrombin Enzyme
Nguyen Van Hien1, Pham Thi Bich Van1, HoangMinh Hao2,*
Use your smartphone to scan this
QR code and download this article
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Thrombin is the key enzyme of fibrin formation in the blood coagulation cas-
cade. Thrombin is released by the hydrolysis of prothrombinase which is generated from factor
Xa and factor Va in the presence of calcium ion and phospholipid. The inhibition of thrombin
is of therapeutic interest in blood clot treatment. Currently, potent thrombin inhibitors of (R)-3-
amidinophenylalanine, derived from benzamidine-containing amino acid, have been developed
so far. In order to quantitatively express a relationship between chemical structures and inhibition
constants (Ki with thrombin enzyme in a data set of (R)-3-amidinophenylalanine inhibitors), we
developed a quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) modeling from a group of 60 (R)-3-
amidinophenylalanine inhibitors. Methods: A database containing chemical structures of 60 in-
hibitors and their Ki values was put intomolecular operating environment (MOE) 2008.10 software,
and the two-dimensional (2D) physicochemical descriptors were numerically calculated. After re-
moving the irrelevant descriptors, a QSAR modeling was developed from the 2D-descriptors and
Ki values by using the partial least squares (PLS) regression method. Results: The results showed
that the hydrophobic property, reflected through n-octanol/water partition coefficient (P) of a drug
molecule, contributes mainly to Ki values with thrombin. The statistic parameters that give the in-
formation about the goodness of fit of a 2D-QSARmodel (such as squared correlation coefficient of
R2 = 0.791, rootmean square error (RMSE) = 0.443, cross-validated Q2cv = 0.762, and cross-validated
RMSEcv = 0.473) were statistically obtained for a training set (60 inhibitors). The R2 and RMSE values
were obtained by using a developed model for the testing set (9 inhibitors) ; the total set has sta-
tistically significant parameters. Furthermore, the 2D-QSAR modeling was also applied to predict
the Ki values of the 69 inhibitors. A linear relationship was found between the experimental and
predicted pKi values of the inhibitors. Conclusion: The results support the promising application
of established 2D-QSARmodeling in the prediction and design of new (R)-3-amidinophenylalanine
candidates in the pharmaceutical industry.
Key words: (R)-3-Amidinophenylalanine inhibitors, blood clot, thrombin, 2D-QSAR
INTRODUCTION
Fibrin clot formation is an important process that
heals a wound and stops any unwanted bleeding.
However, an abnormal clot in the bloodstream leads
to pain and swelling because the blood gathers be-
hind the clot. As a result, a heart attack can occur.
There are pathways (mechanisms) which lead to fib-
rin formation. The intrinsic pathway was proposed in
which fibrin formation resulted from a series of step-
wise reactions involving only proteins circulating in
blood as precursors or inactive forms1–3. Proteins
were activated by proteolytic reactions and converted
to thrombin. The intrinsic mechanism can be trig-
gered when thrombin is generated, leading to the ac-
tivation of factor XI2. The extrinsic pathway requires
tissue factor VII in blood 2–5. Initially, a complex in-
cluding factor VII was formed via calcium ion depen-
dent reaction and then converted factor VII to factor
VIIa (a: activated). The activation of many factors,
including factor V, VIII, IX and X, in sequence re-
sults in the generation and release of thrombin. When
thrombin is formed, it converts fibrinogen to fibrin by
proteolysis. Finally, the cross-linking reactions were
catalyzed by an activated factor XIIIa to form a very
strong fibrin clot2.
As discussed above, thrombin is a key enzyme in fib-
rin formation. Therefore, inhibitors selective toward
thrombin have been developed; these include pep-
tide aldehydes6 and boronic acid derivatives7. The
anticoagulants derived from 3-amidinophenylalanine
that are associated with their inhibition constants
(Ki values) toward thrombin enzyme have been re-
ported8,9. The inhibition constant is an equilibrium
constant of the reversible combination of the en-
zyme with a competitive inhibitor, I + E IE (Ki =
[IE]/[I][E] ([I], [E] and [IE] are the equilibrium con-
Cite this article : Van Hien N, Bich Van P T, Hao H M. Hydrophobic Property of (R)-3 Amidinopheny-
lalanine Inhibitors Contributes to their Inhibition Constants with Thrombin Enzyme. Sci. Tech. Dev.
J.; 22(3):348-352.
348
Science & Technology Development Journal, 22(3):348-352
centrations of inhibitor (I), enzyme (E), and enzyme-
inhibitor complex (IE)) 10. The Ki value reflects the
binding affinity of drug to target. Thegreater the bind-
ing affinity, the larger the Ki value is, i.e., the less
amount of medication needed to inhibit the enzyme.
The design and synthesis of thrombin inhibitors
could be improved in several ways. The two
dimensional-quantitative structure-activity relation-
ship (2D-QSAR) is one of the in silico drug discov-
ery approaches due to its reliability and interpretabil-
ity. In principle, the 2D-QSAR can be used to ex-
tract physicochemical properties (descriptors) which
mainly contribute to the bioactivity of drug candi-
dates11. In the present work, in order to express the
2D-descriptors playing a crucial role on Ki of a se-
ries of (R)-3-amidinophenylalanine inhibitors, we ap-
plied 2D-QSAR method to develop a mathematical
QSAR equation from 60 inhibitors as a training set.
The modeling was then used to predict Ki values of
69 inhibitors toward thrombin enzyme.
METHODS
A data set of 69 inhibitors derived from (R)- 3-
amidinophenylalanine and their logarithm of in-
hibition constants, pKi = - logKi; toward throm-
bin enzyme was selected for the 2D-QSAR study8
(Figure 1). Chemical structures of inhibitors were
drawn in molecular operating environment (MOE)
2008.10 software and then optimized energetically
prior to doing calculations. In order to develop a
mathematical 2D-QSAR model, a training set con-
taining 60 inhibitors was randomly selected in MOE.
The selection of a training set was done when all pa-
rameters such as squared correlation coefficient (R2),
cross-validated correlation coefficient of Q2cv; and
root-mean-square error (RMSE) of internal and ex-
ternal validations were statistically significant. In our
study, this was repeated 8 times to obtain a satisfied
training set. The remaining 9 inhibitors were used as a
testing set to evaluate the reliability of the model. The
input data were chemical structures and pKi values of
inhibitors. The 2D-molecular physicochemical prop-
erties (descriptors) are numerical values and calcu-
lated by using MOE.The inhibition constants, Ki, de-
pended on 184 2D-molecular descriptors. However,
the irrelevant descriptors which showed a zero value,
a low correlation (< 0.07) with Ki,and high intercor-
relation (> 0.7) between themselves were discarded.
These descriptors were screened out using the Rapid-
miner 5 software. In addition, QuaSAR-Contigency
and Principle Components inMOE 2008.10 were also
used to screen the most relevant descriptors. The par-
tial least squares (PLS) regression method was used
to develop a 2D-QSAR model. This model was used
to predict the Ki values of 69 inhibitors and were pre-
dicted via the QuaSAR Fit validation panel in MOE.
RESULTS
2D-QSARmodeling
The first goal of this work is to develop a 2D-
QSAR modeling which presents molecular descrip-
tors of (R)-3-amidinophenylalanine inhibitors which
predominantly contribute to the inhibition constant,
Ki. The selected 2D-QSAR equation is given below:
pKi = 5:774 2:458SlogP_VSA0+1:318
SlogP_VSA1+1:559SlogP VSA3 (1)
Here, SlogP_VSA0, SlogP_VSA1, SlogP_VSA3 are
molecular descriptors associated with coefficients.
The training set was randomly selected, we have ana-
lyzed to develop significant models by using different
training set with additional descriptors. The goal was
to explain and search for other descriptors that relate
to the inhibition constant. Unfortunately, other de-
veloped models possessed poor R2, Q2cv and RMSE
parameters. Therefore, those models could not be
used for further analysis and discussion.
Statistical parameters
The statistical parameters (such as R2, Q2cv and
RMSE) give information about the goodness of fit of
a model. The best model is selected when it pos-
sesses highest R2 values, Q2cv (> 0.5) values, and low-
est RMSE (< 0.5)11. Table 1 shows the significantly
statistical parameters of the internal, external (testing
set), and total validations.
Predicted pKi values using a developed 2D-
QSARmodel
Lastly, the pKi values of 69 inhibitors were predicted
using the established 2D-QSAR modeling. The pKi
values of all molecules are listed in Figure 1. A plot of
experimental vs. predicted pKi is shown in Figure 2.
Table 1: Statistically significant parameters of the
established 2D-QSARmodel
Training
set
Cross-
validation
Testing
set
No 60 60 9 69
R2 0.791 0.962 0.771
Q2cv 0.762
RMSE 0.443 0.473 0.161 0.460
349
Science & Technology Development Journal, 22(3):348-352
Figure 1: Chemical structures, experimental (Exp) pKi 8,9 and predicted (Pred) pKi values toward
thrombin of (R)-3-amidinophenylalanine inhibitors. R1 and R2 are the substituted groups in (R)-3-
amidinophenylalanine skeleton
350
Science & Technology Development Journal, 22(3):348-352
Figure 2: The plot of correlations representing
the experimental vs. predicted pKi values for 69
(R)-3-amidinophenylalanine inhibitors.
DISCUSSION
Molecular descriptors
By using the partial least squares regression method,
a 2D-QSAR modeling was established from a data
composing of numerically relevant descriptors and
pKi values of 60 inhibitors with thrombin. The de-
veloped modeling expressed the dependence of pKi
on the hydrophobic descriptor. The logP refers to
logarithm of the n-octanol/water partition coefficient
(P). This property is an atomic contribution model
that calculates logP from the given structure12. This
descriptor was used as a measure of cell permeabil-
ity of the drug molecule. The partition coefficient
is a ratio between the concentrations of a solute in
lipid phase (n-octanol) and in aqueous phase (P =
Cn octanol/Caqueous). Compounds possessing P > 1
are lipophilic or hydrophobic while compounds for
which P < 1 are hydrophilic. LogP of a molecule
was calculated from fragmental or atomic contribu-
tions (surface area, molecular properties, and solva-
tochromic parameters) and various correction factors
(electronic, steric, or hydrogen-bonding effects)11,13.
Each atom has an accessible van der Waals surface
area (VSA), ai, along with an atomic property, pi. This
property is in a specified range (a, b) and contributes
to the descriptor. Slog P_VSA is the sum of ai of
all atoms, such that pi value of each atom i is in a
range of (a, b) (Table 2) ; pi contributes to descriptor
logP13. The sign andmagnitude of the descriptors co-
efficients re present the contribution of each descrip-
tor to pKi. Positive coefficients imply that pKi values
of molecules increase with increasing SlogP_VSA val-
ues, while negative values demonstrate an increase in
pKi (i.e., Ki -binding affinity decreases) with decreas-
ing values of the descriptors. The higher the abso-
lute coefficient value is, the more crucial the contri-
bution of the descriptor on the binding affinity. The
modeling indicates that inhibitors possessing higher
SlogP_VSA1 and SlogP_VSA3propertieswill result in
a decrease in Ki values, i.e., binding affinities decrease
while an increase in SlogP_VSA0 property would in-
duce a better binding affinity.
Table 2: Molecular descriptors in 2D-QSARmodeling
Descriptor
Code
Description
SlogP_VSA0 Sum of ai such that pi <= -0.4
SlogP_VSA1 Sum of ai such that pi is in (-0.4,
-0.2]
SlogP_VSA3 Sum of ai such that pi is in (0.0, 0.1]
2D-QSARmodeling and its validation
The selected 2D-QSAR modeling is a model pos-
sessing statistically significant parameters of inter-
nal and external validations. The developed model
(Equation (1)) from the training set has showed R2
value of 0.791 and RMSE value of 0.443. These
values confirmed the reliability of the model. As
mentioned, the reliability and statistical relevance of
the 2D-QSAR modeling was examined by internal
and external validation procedures. Internal valida-
tion was applied by Leave One Out (LOO) cross-
validation (CV)11,14. The values of Q2cv > 0.5 and
RMSE< 0.5 (Table 1) further supported the reliabil-
ity and interpretability of the modeling. The pKi val-
ues of inhibitors were predicted by applying an estab-
lished 2D-QSAR modeling on a total set. By plotting
the predicted pKi values vs. the experimental ones
(Figure 2), there is a linear relationship between the
predicted and experimental pKi values of inhibitors,
i.e., both pKi values are high (a low inhibitory activ-
ity) or low (a good inhibitory activity). These results
show that the modeling is reliable to predict the pKi
values of the inhibitors.
CONCLUSIONS
The 2D-QSAR modeling has been successfully
developed from 2D-descriptors of 60 (R)-3-
amidinophenylalanine inhibitors associated with
their inhibition constants, Ki. The established QSAR
modeling was internally, externally, and totally
validated, demonstrating satisfactory statistical pa-
rameters. Hydrophobicity is an important descriptor
351
Science & Technology Development Journal, 22(3):348-352
in the modelling of binding affinity. The 2D-QSAR
equation was applied to predict Ki values of all
inhibitors. The results revealed a good predictability
of the modeling. Based on the developed 2D-QSAR
modeling, the design of the new inhibitors derived
from (R)-3-amidinophenylalanine should focus on
the hydrophobicity of derivatives by theoretical
calculations to obtain the numerical values of hy-
drophobic descriptors. The chemical structures of
inhibitors possessing lower values of SlogP_VSA1,
SlogP_VSA3 descriptors and higher SlogP_VSA0
descriptor should be further studied in synthetic
experiments.
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
2D-QSAR: two dimensional-quantitative structure-
activity relationship
CV: cross-validation
LOO: leave one out
MOE: molecular operating environment
RMSE: root-mean-square error
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
The contributions of all authors are equal in selecting
a data, calculating descriptors, analyzing results and
writing a manuscript.
COMPETING INTERESTS
The authors declare that they have no competing in-
terests.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The authors are thankful to Ho Chi Minh City Uni-
versity of Technology and Education for supporting
websites to download the scientific articles.
REFERENCES
1. Davie EW, Ratnoff OD. Waterfall sequence for intrinsic blood
clotting. Science [Internet]. 1964 Sep 18;145(3638):1310–
1312. [cited 2019 May 22]. Available from:
sciencemag.org/cgi/doi/10.1126/science.145.3638.1310.
2. Davie EW, Fujikawa K, Kisiel W. The coagulation cascade: initi-
ation, maintenance, and regulation. Biochemistry (Mosc) [In-
ternet]. 1991Oct;30(43):10363–70. [cited 2019May 22]. Avail-
able from:
3. Maynard JR, Heckman CA, Pitlick FA, Nemerson Y. Association
of tissue factor activity with the surface of cultured cells. J Clin
Invest [Internet]. 1975 Apr 1;55(4):814–838. [cited 2019 May
22]. Available from:
4. Bach R, Nemersonl Y, Konigsber W. Purification and Charac-
terization of Bovine Tissue Factor;256(16):8324–31.
5. Broze GJ. Binding of human factor VII and VIIa to mono-
cytes. J Clin Invest [Internet]. 1982 Sep 1;70(3):526–35. [cited
2019May24]. Available from:
110644.
6. BagdyD, Barabs E, SzabG, Bajusz S, Szll E. In vivoanticoagulant
and antiplatelet effect of D-Phe-Pro-Arg-H and D-MePhe-Pro-
Arg-H. Thromb Haemost. 1992 Mar 2;67(3):357–65.
7. Hussain MA, Knabb R, Aungst BJ, Kettner C. Anticoagu-
lant activity of a peptide boronic acid thrombin inhibitor
by various routes of administration in rats. Peptides. 1991
Oct;12(5):1153–4.
8. Böhm M, Stürzebecher J, Klebe G. Three-Dimensional Quan-
titative StructureActivity Relationship Analyses Using Com-
parative Molecular Field Analysis and Comparative Molecu-
lar Similarity Indices Analysis to Elucidate Selectivity Differ-
ences of Inhibitors Binding to Trypsin, Thrombin, and Factor
Xa. J Med Chem [Internet]. 1999 Feb;42(3):458–77. [cited
2019 May 27]. Available from: https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.
1021/jm981062r.
9. Stürzebecher J, Prasa D, Hauptmann J, Vieweg H, Wikström
P. Synthesis and StructureActivity Relationships of Potent
Thrombin Inhibitors: Piperazides of 3-Amidinophenylalanine.
J Med Chem. 1997 Sep;40(19):3091–9.
10. Dixon M. The determination of enzyme inhibitor constants.
Biochem J [Internet]. 1953 Aug;55(1):170–1. [cited 2019 May
24]. Available from:
bj0550170.
11. Roy K, Kar S, Das RN. Understanding the basics of QSAR for
applications in pharmaceutical sciences and risk assessment;
2015.
12. Wildman SA, Crippen GM. Prediction of Physicochemical
Parameters by Atomic Contributions. J Chem Inf Comput
Sci [Internet]. 1999 Sep 27;39(5):868–73. [cited 2019 May
27]. Available from: Availablefrom:https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.
1021/ci990307l.
13. Martin YC. Exploring QSAR: Hydrophobic, Electronic, and
Steric Constants C. Hansch, A. Leo, and D. Hoekman. Ameri-
can Chemical Society, Washington, DC. 1995. Xix + 348 pp. 22
28.5 cm. ExploringQSAR: Fundamentals andApplications in
Chemistry andBiology. C. Hansch andA. Leo. AmericanChem-
ical Society, Washington, DC. 1995. Xvii + 557 pp. 18.5 26
cm. ISBN 0-8412-2993-7 (set). $99.95 (set). J Med Chem [Inter-
net]. 1996 Jan [cited 2019May 27];39(5):1189–90; 1995. Avail-
able from: https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/jm950902o.
14. GhoseAK, ViswanadhanVN, editors. Combinatorial library de-
sign and evaluation: principles, software tools, and applica-
tions in drug discovery. New York: M. Dekker. New York: M.
Dekker; 2001.
352
Các file đính kèm theo tài liệu này:
hydrophobic_property_of_r_3_amidinophenylalanine_inhibitors.pdf