TABLE OF CONTENTS
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT .i
ABSTRACT ii
TABLE OF CONTENTS iii
LIST OF FIGURES .v
LIST OF TABLES vi
ABBREVIATIONS . vii
CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION 1
1.1 BACKGROUND 1
1.2 RESEARCH PROBLEMS . 3
1.3 RESEARCH OBJECTIVES . 4
1.4 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY AND SCOPE 5
1.5 STRUCTURE OF THE STUDY 5
CHAPTER 2: LITERATURE REVIEW 7
2.1 INTRODUCTION 7
2.2 CAPITAL STRUCTURE . 7
2.3 FIRM PERFORMANCE 11
2.4 HYPOTHESIS AND EMPIRICAL MODEL 12
2.4.1. Model 1: The Leverage Model . 12
2.4.2. Model 2: The Firm Value Model . 15
CHAPTER 3: RESEARCH DESIGN 18
3.1 INTRODUCTION 18
3.2 DATA . 18
3.3 RESEARCH DESIGN 18
3.3.1. Research Sample 19
3.3.2. Data Analysis Method 20
3.4 VARIABLES MEASUREMENT FOR MODEL 1 . 20
3.4.1. Dependent Variables 20
3.4.2. Independent Variables 21
3.5 VARIABLES MEASUREMENT FOR MODEL 2 . 21
3.5.1. Dependent Variables 21
3.5.2. Independent Variables 22
3.6 FRAMEWORK OF THE STUDY . 23
3.7 SUMMARY 24
CHAPTER 4: EMPIRICAL RESULTS OF THE RESEARCH . 25
4.1 INTRODUCTION 25
4.2 CHARACTERISTICS OF RESEARCH SAMPLES . 25
4.3 DESCRIPTIVE STATISTICS . 26
4.4 REGRESSION ANALYSIS . 29
4.4.1. Model 1: The Leverage Model . 29
4.4.2. Model 2: The Firm Value Model . 32
CHAPTER 5: CONCLUSIONS, RECOMMENDATIONS AND LIMITATIONS 38
5.1 INTRODUCTION 38
5.2 CONCLUSIONS 38
iii
5.3 RECOMMENDATIONS 39
5.4 LIMITATIONS 40
REFERENCES 41
APPENDIX A . 44
APPENDIX B . 45
APPENDIX C . 51
67 trang |
Chia sẻ: maiphuongtl | Lượt xem: 2624 | Lượt tải: 3
Bạn đang xem trước 20 trang tài liệu Luận văn Capital structure and firm performance: case study: listed companies in hochiminh stock exchange, để xem tài liệu hoàn chỉnh bạn click vào nút DOWNLOAD ở trên
used in the study. Another reason could be that most investors still
depended on the accounting measure of performance rather than the PE measure
due to the investor favored payment of dividends or the inactivity of the stock
market. Furthermore, including some firms in our sample that had negative PE
affects the validity of the PE as a measure of performance.
The results of the estimation of the model 2 made the Tobin’s Q the most powerful
measures of performance in Vietnamese firm case, because the R-squared value of
model 2 using TDTA, TDTE, LTDTA, STDTA to test the relationship between
capital structure and Tobin’s Q were 99.93%, 91.1%, 77.73%, 85.10%,
respectively. Therefore, my discussion would concentrate on this measure of
market performance.
Hypothesis 5 predicted that a firm capital structure does influence its market
performance. From the regression results in Table 9, Table 10, Table 11, and Table
12, as expected the coefficient of TDTA, TDTE, LTDTA, STDTA, were
significantly and negatively related to the market performance measure Tobin’s Q.
For example, the LTDTA was significantly and negatively related to Tobin’s Q.
This result showed that higher long-term debt lead to lower Tobin’s Q.
Furthermore, it might provide support for the proposition that due to agency
conflicts, companies over-leveraged themselves, thus affecting their performance
negatively. My results were consistent with the findings of previous study such as
Krishnan and Moyer (1997), Tian & Zeitun (2007). The negative and significant
coefficient of LTDTA did not support Brick and Ravid’s (1985) argument that
long-term debt increased a firm value, which could be due to the low ratio of long-
term debt in the capital structure of Vietnamese companies. According to the
results, I accepted the Hypothesis 5: A firm capital structure does influence its
market performance.
From Hypothesis 6, growth opportunities increase firm market performance. From
the regression results from Table 9 to Table 12, Growth was found to have a
positive and significant effect on the market performance measure Tobin’s Q. The
high growth rates were associated with the lower cost of capital and high firm
value Tobin’s Q. This finding was not consistent with Myers (1977), but supports
the pecking order theory that high growth firms had a greater need for funds and
therefore could be expected to borrow more. According to the result, I accepted the
Capital Structure and Firm Performance
Page 37
hypotheses that growth opportunities increase firm market performance (Tobin’s
Q).
Hypothesis 7 predicted that a firm size is expected to have a positive influence on a
firm market performance. From the regression results from Table 9 to Table 12,
the coefficient of firm size was significantly and negatively related with Tobin’s Q
for model 2 using TDTE and LTDTA. The significant of firm size indicated that
large firm had lower market value compared to smaller firm. This result was
inconsistent with previous findings of Gleason, Mathur, and Mathur (2000) and
Tian & Zeitun (2007). However, the coefficient of firm size was insignificantly
and negatively related with Tobin’s Q for model 2 using TDTA and STDTA. The
insignificant effect of firm size on firm market value was consistent with previous
studies of many researchers such as Mudambi and Nicosia (1998), Lauterbach and
Vaninsky (1999), Durand and Coeuderoy (2001), and Tzelepis and Skuras (2004).
Based on the regression results, I rejected the Hypotheses that a firm size is
expected to have a positive influence on a firm market performance.
To summarize, the firm capital structure was a significant determinant of firm
market performance. A firm leverage had negative and significant effect on firm
value Tobin’s Q. The insignificance of the market performance measure PE
indicated that the Vietnamese equity market was not efficient, so the best market
performance measure was Tobin’s Q. Firm growth opportunities had a positive and
significant impact on the firm value Tobin’s Q. Furthermore, firm size had a
negative impact on firm value. This finding was not support the argument that
bankruptcy costs decreased with size, as well as economies of scale in transactions
costs associated with long-term debt that were not available to smaller firms.
Capital Structure and Firm Performance
Page 38
CHAPTER 5: CONCLUSIONS, RECOMMENDATIONS
AND LIMITATIONS
5.1 INTRODUCTION
Chapter 4 particularly discussed about the results of the research. Chapter 5
presents main conclusions and recommendations based on the results of the
previous chapters, as well as the limitations of this study.
5.2 CONCLUSIONS
This paper examines the impact which firm performance has had on corporate
capital structure combined with others variables such as firm size, growth
opportunities and asset tangibility, and the impact which firm capital structure has
had on corporate firm value.
There is no single study formulated in Vietnam that investigates the impact of
capital structure on a firm market performance and lack of study formulated in
Vietnam that investigate the impact of profitability, growth opportunities, size,
asset tangibility on a firm capital structure. This study tries to fill the gap in this
field by investigating the effect of firm performance on capital structure, as well as
the effect of capital structure on firm market performance by taking listed firm on
Hochiminh Stock Exchange as a case study. Furthermore, this paper employ
different measures of capital structure such as short-term debt to total assets, long-
term debt to total assets, total debt to total assets, and total debt to total equity in
order to investigate the effect of the debt structure on corporate market
performance. Investigating the effect of capital structure on corporate performance
using market measures can be valuable as it provides evidence about whether the
stock market is efficient or not.
A cross-sectional data of 162 companies is studied in this paper. A firm
profitability is found to have a significant and negative impact on all firm capital
structure measures TDTA, TDTE, LTDTA, STDTA. These findings could to some
extent support pecking order theory of Myers and Majluf (1984). They argue that
internal funds are used first, and when that is depleted, debt is issued, and when it
is not sensible to issue any more debt, equity is issued. An interesting finding is
that firm size has a positive and significant impact on the leverage measures
TDTA, TDTE, STDTA. This finding is consistent with a previous study of Rajan
and Zingales (1995), and indicating that a firm size is an important determinant of
corporate capital structure. Firm asset tangibility is found to have positive and
significant impact on TDTA and LTDTA, while have insignificant impact on
Capital Structure and Firm Performance
Page 39
TDTE. This finding supports the argument of previous researchers such as Rajan
and Zingales (1995), Margaritis and Psillaki (2007). They argue that the greater the
proportion of tangible assets on the balance sheet, the more willing should lenders
be to supply loans, and leverage should be higher. Firm growth opportunities have
significant impact only on Vietnamese firm TDTE, which is inconsistent with
Myers (1977).
For the model testing the relationship between firm capital structure and firm
value, the result from this paper shows that firm capital structure is a significant
determinant of firm value, Tobin’s Q, in Vietnam. The insignificance of the market
performance measure PE indicates that the Vietnamese equity market is not
efficient. Firm growth opportunities have a positive and significant impact on the
firm value Tobin’s Q. This finding supports the pecking order theory of Myers and
Majluf (1984) that high growth firms can be expected to have high leverage level.
Firm size, which is measured by log of sales, is negatively related to firm value
Tobin’s Q. This result is not support the argument that bankruptcy costs decrease
with size, as well as economies of scale in transactions costs associate with long-
term debt that are not available to smaller firms.
5.3 RECOMMENDATIONS
From the regression results of model 1, exploring the relationship between firm
leverage and four factors; profitability, growth opportunities, size and asset
tangibility, a firm total debt to total assets is affected strongly by firm size,
measured by log of sales (Beta is 0.049). Hence, if a manager wants to decrease a
company’s ratio of debt, he should pay attention to sales volume. For example, if a
manager is planning to increase the sales volume in the next month budgeting, he
should be prepared for an increasing in debt of a company. Focus on the detail,
asset tangibility impact strongest on long-term debt to total assets (Beta is 0.363)
and short-term debt to total assets (Beta is -0.184). Therefore, if a manager invests
more in tangible assets, he should notice on the increasing in long-term debt, but
decreasing in short-term debt. In reality, this results seem to be reasonable in
Vietnam, for a reason that Vietnam stock markets, bond markets and mutual funds
markets is undeveloped, so commercial banking systems play an important role in
providing lending to Vietnamese firms. From the regression results, firm’s
profitability plays an important determinant of firm leverage. So, manager also
should notice that if in the short run, dividends and investments are fixed, and if
debt financing is the dominant mode of external financing, then changes in
profitability will be negatively correlated with changes in leverage.
From the regression results from the model 2, exploring the relationship between
firm value and three factors: firm leverage, growth opportunities and size, firm
leverage affect strongly on firm’s value, which is measured by Tobin’s Q (Beta is -
Capital Structure and Firm Performance
Page 40
2.01, -0.27, -1.49, -1.66 respectively for four models using four proxies of firm
capital structure: total debt to total assets, total debt to total equity, long-term debt
to total assets, short-term debt to total assets). Thus, a manager can increase the
firm value by decreasing the ratio of using debt financing.
5.4 LIMITATIONS
The limitations of this study are restrictions in the research scope. There are only
162 companies in HOSE are used as cross-sectional data in the study.
The research measures the effect of firm performance on firm capital structure
combine with firm size, growth and asset tangibility on firm leverage, but it seems
not to be enough variables. From the regression results, the adjusted R-Squared of
the leverage model using 4 leverage proxies (TDTA, TDTE, LTDTA, STDTA) are
respectively 0.14, 0.11, 0.23, 0.13. These results prove that there are others factors;
besides profitability, size, growth opportunities, asset tangibility; have an impact
on the firm leverage variables in Vietnam. For example, Abdel Shahid, S. (2003)
find that firm ownership structure have a significant impact on firm accounting
performance measures, but insignificant relate to firm market performance
measures. If this factor has an impact on firm performance, then it may have an
impact on firm capital structure.
The study also has limitations that the author does not test the correlation between
the distribution of debt ratio and corporate performance to each type of companies,
as well as each industry. And the author has not explored the optimal capital
structure to maximize the market value of a firm. Hence, more research should be
implemented to explore these above limitations.
This study is only stopped as an academic research. It shows us a relationship
between firm capital structure and firm performance, and a generally initial
assessment about the effect of firm performance on firm capital structure, as well
as the effect of firm capital structure on firm market performance. Based on this
research, researchers and corporate managers can be continue to implement more
research, in order to evaluate more precisely about the relationship between firm
capital structure and firm performance in Vietnam.
Capital Structure and Firm Performance
Page 41
REFERENCES
Abdel Shahid, S. (2003). Does Ownership Structure Affect Firm Value? Evidence
from The Egyptian Stock Market. Working paper, (www.ssrn.com).
Barclay, M. J., and Smith, C. W. (1995). The Maturity Structure of Corporate Debt.
Journal of Finance 50, 609-32.
Berger, A. N. and E. Bonaccorsi di Patti (2006). Capital Structure and Firm
Performance: A New Approach to Testing Agency Theory and an Application to
the Banking Industry. Journal of Banking and Finance 30, 1065–102.
Bradley, M., Jarrell, G., & Kim, E.H. (1984). On the existence of an optimal capital
structure: Theory and evidence. Journal of Finance 39, 857-878.
Chakravarthy, B. S., (1986). Measuring Strategic Performance. Strategic
Management Journal 7, 437-58.
DeAngelo, H., & Masulis, R. W. (1980). Optimal Capital Structure under
Corporate and Personal Taxation. Journal of Financial Economics, 35(1), 453–
464.
Frank, M. and V. Goyal (2003). Testing the Pecking Order Theory of Capital
Structure. Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 67, pp. 217–48.
Gleason, K. C., L. K Mathur, and I. Mathur, (2000). The Interrelationship between
Culture, Capital Structure, and Performance: Evidence from European Retailers.
Journal of Business Research, 50, 185-191.
Hall, G.C., P.J. Hutchinson and N. Michaelas (2004). Determinants of the Capital
Structures of European SMEs. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting , Vol.
31, No. 5, pp. 711–28.
Harris, M., & Raviv, A. (1991). The theory of capital structure. Journal of
Finance, 46(1), 297-355.
Hovakimian, A., Opler, T., & Titman, S. (2001). The debt-equity choice. Journal
of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 36(1), 1-24.
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial
behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics,
3(4), 303-360.
Jensen, M. C. (1986). Agency Costs of Free Cash Flow, Corporate Finance, and
Takeovers. The American Economic Review, 76(2), 323-329.
Capital Structure and Firm Performance
Page 42
Kim, H. (1978). A mean variance theory of optimal capital structure and corporate
debt capacity. Journal of Finance 33, 45-64.
Kraus, A., and R. Litzenberger (1973). A State-Preference Model of Optimal
Financial Leverage. Journal of Finance 28, 923-931.
Krishnan, V. S., and R. C. Moyer, (1997). Performance, Capital Structure and
Home Country: An Analysis of Asian Corporations. Global Finance Journal 8,
129-143.
Leland, H. E. (1994). Corporate Debt Value, Bond Covenants, and Optimal Capital
Structure. Journal of Finance, 49 (4), 1213-1252.
Margaritis, D. and Psillaki, M. (2007). Capital structure and firm efficiency.
Journal of Business Finance & Accounting 34 (9) & (10), 1447-1469.
Modigliani, F., & Miller, M. H. (1958). The cost of capital, corporation finance,
and the theory of investment. American Economic Review, 48(3), 261-97.
Modigliani, F., & Miller, M.H. (1963). Corporate Income Taxes and the Cost of
Capital: A Correction. American Economic Review, 53(3), 433-443.
Murphy, G. B., J. W. Trailer, and R. C. Hill, (1996). Measuring Performance in
Entrepreneurship Research. Journal of Business Research, 36, 15-23.
Myers, S. C., (1977). Determinants of Corporate Borrowing. Journal of Financial
Economics 25, 25–43.
Rajan, R.G. and L. Zingales (1995). What Do We Know About Capital Structure?
Some Evidence from International Data. Journal of Finance, Vol. L, No. 5, pp.
1421–60.
Ratha, D., Mohapatra, S. and Suttle, P. (2003). Capital structure and performance
in Developing countries. Global Development Finance, 109-122.
Robichek, A. A., & Myers, S. C. (1966). Problems in the Theory of Optimal
Capital Structure. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 1(2), 1-35.
Scott, J. (1977). Bankruptcy, Secured Debt, and Optimal Capital Structure. Journal
of Finance, Vol. 32 (March), pp. 1–19.
Schiantarelli, F., and A. Sembenelli, (1999). The Maturity Structure of Debt:
Determinants and Effects on Firm’s Performance? Evidence from the United
Kingdom and Italy. Policy Research Working Paper Series, The World Bank.
Stohs, M. H., and D. C. Mauer, (1996). The Determinants of Corporate Debt
Maturity Structure. Journal of Business 69, 279-312.
Capital Structure and Firm Performance
Page 43
Titman, S. (1984). The Effect of Capital Structure on a Firm’s Liquidation
Decision. Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 13, pp. 137–51.
Trần Hùng Sơn and Trần Viết Hoàng (2008). Cơ cấu vốn và hiệu quả hoạt động
của doanh nghiệp của các công ty niêm yết trên sở giao dịch chứng khoán
TP.HCM. Economic Development Review, Vol. 218 (Dec 2008).
Wei Xu, Xiangzhen Xu, Shoufeng Zhang (2005). An Empirical Study on
Relationship between Corporation Performance and Capital Structure. China-USA
Business Review 4(4), 49-53.
Zeitun, R. and Tian, G.G (2007). Capital structure and corporate performance:
evidence from Jordan. The Australasian Accounting Business & Finance Journal
1(4), 40-61.
Zhou, X., (2001). Understanding the Determinants of Managerial Ownership and
the Link Between Ownership and Performance: Comment. Journal of Financial
Economics 62, 559-571.
Capital Structure and Firm Performance
Page 44
APPENDIX A
Variable definitions
The Variables are defined as the following formulas:
Price-to-Earnings
Ratio (PE) =
Market Price of Common Stock
Earnings Per Share
Tobin’s Q =
( Equity Market Value + Liabilities Book Value )
( Equity Book Value + Liabilities Book Value )
Profitability
(PROF) =
EBIT + Depreciation
Total Assets
Total Debt to Total Assets
(TDTA) =
Total Debt
Total Assets
Total Debt to Total Equity
(TDTE) =
Total Debt
Total Equity
Long-term Debt to Total
Assets (LTDTA) =
Long-term Debt
Total Assets
Short-term Debt to Total
Equity (STDTA) =
Short-term Debt
Total Assets
Growth opportunities
(GROWTH) =
Total Assets – Book value of Equity + Market value of Equity
Total Assets
Size (SIZE) = ln (Sales)
Asset Tangibility (TA) =
Fixed Tangible Assets
Total Assets
Capital Structure and Firm Performance
Page 45
APPENDIX B
Multiple Regression Results
Dependent Variable: TDTA
Method: Least Squares
Date: 11/03/09 Time: 10:25
Sample: 1 162
Included observations: 162
Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.
C -0.873102 0.379030 -2.303516 0.0226
PROF -0.005438 0.001494 -3.640823 0.0004
GROWTH 0.022092 0.030388 0.726986 0.4683
SIZE 0.048965 0.013938 3.512934 0.0006
TA 0.178830 0.080815 2.212831 0.0284
R-squared 0.162133 Mean dependent var 0.432888
Adjusted R-squared 0.140786 S.D. dependent var 0.224362
S.E. of regression 0.207970 Akaike info criterion -0.272472
Sum squared resid 6.790464 Schwarz criterion -0.177175
Log likelihood 27.07020 Hannan-Quinn criter. -0.233780
F-statistic 7.595122 Durbin-Watson stat 1.964366
Prob(F-statistic) 0.000013
Dependent Variable: TDTE
Method: Least Squares
Date: 11/03/09 Time: 10:26
Sample: 1 162
Included observations: 162
Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.
C -4.622503 2.340928 -1.974646 0.0501
PROF -0.036765 0.009225 -3.985310 0.0001
GROWTH 0.421161 0.187682 2.244020 0.0262
SIZE 0.213809 0.086085 2.483681 0.0141
TA 0.779893 0.499122 1.562532 0.1202
R-squared 0.135869 Mean dependent var 1.246424
Adjusted R-squared 0.113853 S.D. dependent var 1.364461
S.E. of regression 1.284441 Akaike info criterion 3.368901
Sum squared resid 259.0166 Schwarz criterion 3.464198
Log likelihood -267.8810 Hannan-Quinn criter. 3.407593
F-statistic 6.171335 Durbin-Watson stat 1.876261
Prob(F-statistic) 0.000123
Capital Structure and Firm Performance
Page 46
Dependent Variable: LTDTA
Method: Least Squares
Date: 11/03/09 Time: 10:27
Sample: 1 162
Included observations: 162
Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.
C -0.241070 0.245542 -0.981789 0.3277
PROF -0.002539 0.000968 -2.623803 0.0096
GROWTH 0.026783 0.019686 1.360481 0.1756
SIZE 0.009991 0.009030 1.106431 0.2702
TA 0.362726 0.052353 6.928428 0.0000
R-squared 0.252491 Mean dependent var 0.104263
Adjusted R-squared 0.233446 S.D. dependent var 0.153879
S.E. of regression 0.134726 Akaike info criterion -1.140770
Sum squared resid 2.849721 Schwarz criterion -1.045474
Log likelihood 97.40235 Hannan-Quinn criter. -1.102078
F-statistic 13.25770 Durbin-Watson stat 1.955806
Prob(F-statistic) 0.000000
Dependent Variable: STDTA
Method: Least Squares
Date: 11/03/09 Time: 10:27
Sample: 1 162
Included observations: 162
Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.
C -0.632159 0.333272 -1.896825 0.0597
PROF -0.002899 0.001313 -2.207294 0.0287
GROWTH -0.004691 0.026720 -0.175562 0.8609
SIZE 0.038979 0.012256 3.180438 0.0018
TA -0.183887 0.071059 -2.587811 0.0106
R-squared 0.155863 Mean dependent var 0.328623
Adjusted R-squared 0.134356 S.D. dependent var 0.196542
S.E. of regression 0.182863 Akaike info criterion -0.529784
Sum squared resid 5.249888 Schwarz criterion -0.434488
Log likelihood 47.91251 Hannan-Quinn criter. -0.491092
F-statistic 7.247170 Durbin-Watson stat 2.203875
Prob(F-statistic) 0.000022
Capital Structure and Firm Performance
Page 47
Dependent Variable: PE
Method: Least Squares
Date: 11/03/09 Time: 10:35
Sample: 1 162
Included observations: 162
Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.
C 136.8876 206.2340 0.663749 0.5078
TDTA 26.45088 41.26309 0.641030 0.5224
GROWTH 4.676144 14.66740 0.318812 0.7503
SIZE -4.796432 7.786767 -0.615972 0.5388
R-squared 0.004436 Mean dependent var 24.30095
Adjusted R-squared -0.014467 S.D. dependent var 112.3259
S.E. of regression 113.1355 Akaike info criterion 12.31943
Sum squared resid 2022342. Schwarz criterion 12.39567
Log likelihood -993.8739 Hannan-Quinn criter. 12.35038
F-statistic 0.234694 Durbin-Watson stat 2.063560
Prob(F-statistic) 0.872090
Dependent Variable: PE
Method: Least Squares
Date: 11/03/09 Time: 10:36
Sample: 1 162
Included observations: 162
Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.
C 98.07088 205.8325 0.476460 0.6344
TDTE -3.183458 6.675112 -0.476915 0.6341
GROWTH 4.387799 14.66050 0.299294 0.7651
SIZE -2.769519 7.668298 -0.361165 0.7185
R-squared 0.003282 Mean dependent var 24.30095
Adjusted R-squared -0.015643 S.D. dependent var 112.3259
S.E. of regression 113.2010 Akaike info criterion 12.32059
Sum squared resid 2024687. Schwarz criterion 12.39683
Log likelihood -993.9677 Hannan-Quinn criter. 12.35154
F-statistic 0.173423 Durbin-Watson stat 2.062094
Prob(F-statistic) 0.914242
.
Capital Structure and Firm Performance
Page 48
Dependent Variable: PE
Method: Least Squares
Date: 11/03/09 Time: 10:38
Sample: 1 162
Included observations: 162
Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.
C 113.9763 203.3320 0.560542 0.5759
LTDTA 4.967570 58.16361 0.085407 0.9320
GROWTH 3.989722 14.68251 0.271733 0.7862
SIZE -3.511319 7.529029 -0.466371 0.6416
R-squared 0.001893 Mean dependent var 24.30095
Adjusted R-squared -0.017058 S.D. dependent var 112.3259
S.E. of regression 113.2799 Akaike info criterion 12.32198
Sum squared resid 2027508. Schwarz criterion 12.39822
Log likelihood -994.0805 Hannan-Quinn criter. 12.35293
F-statistic 0.099903 Durbin-Watson stat 2.058518
Prob(F-statistic) 0.959959
Dependent Variable: PE
Method: Least Squares
Date: 11/03/09 Time: 10:38
Sample: 1 162
Included observations: 162
Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.
C 140.2637 206.8730 0.678019 0.4988
STDTA 31.71192 47.48387 0.667846 0.5052
GROWTH 5.285529 14.74833 0.358382 0.7205
SIZE -4.908051 7.808725 -0.628534 0.5306
R-squared 0.004657 Mean dependent var 24.30095
Adjusted R-squared -0.014242 S.D. dependent var 112.3259
S.E. of regression 113.1229 Akaike info criterion 12.31921
Sum squared resid 2021894. Schwarz criterion 12.39545
Log likelihood -993.8559 Hannan-Quinn criter. 12.35016
F-statistic 0.246415 Durbin-Watson stat 2.073206
Prob(F-statistic) 0.863794
Capital Structure and Firm Performance
Page 49
Dependent Variable: TOBIN
Method: Least Squares
Date: 11/03/09 Time: 10:30
Sample: 1 162
Included observations: 162
Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.
C 1.020104 0.035688 28.58391 0.0000
TDTA -2.011764 0.007140 -281.7428 0.0000
GROWTH 1.005241 0.002538 396.0540 0.0000
SIZE -0.000993 0.001347 -0.737274 0.4620
R-squared 0.999388 Mean dependent var 1.205579
Adjusted R-squared 0.999376 S.D. dependent var 0.783774
S.E. of regression 0.019578 Akaike info criterion -5.004471
Sum squared resid 0.060559 Schwarz criterion -4.928234
Log likelihood 409.3622 Hannan-Quinn criter. -4.973518
F-statistic 85960.14 Durbin-Watson stat 2.209864
Prob(F-statistic) 0.000000
Dependent Variable: TOBIN
Method: Least Squares
Date: 11/03/09 Time: 10:33
Sample: 1 162
Included observations: 162
Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.
C 1.421871 0.429173 3.313047 0.0011
TDTE -0.274580 0.013918 -19.72840 0.0000
GROWTH 1.079370 0.030568 35.31043 0.0000
SIZE -0.038535 0.015989 -2.410103 0.0171
R-squared 0.911000 Mean dependent var 1.205579
Adjusted R-squared 0.909311 S.D. dependent var 0.783774
S.E. of regression 0.236031 Akaike info criterion -0.025326
Sum squared resid 8.802281 Schwarz criterion 0.050911
Log likelihood 6.051375 Hannan-Quinn criter. 0.005628
F-statistic 539.0962 Durbin-Watson stat 1.977042
Prob(F-statistic) 0.000000
Capital Structure and Firm Performance
Page 50
Dependent Variable: TOBIN
Method: Least Squares
Date: 11/03/09 Time: 10:34
Sample: 1 162
Included observations: 162
Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.
C 2.719633 0.670071 4.058726 0.0001
LTDTA -1.494015 0.191675 -7.794511 0.0000
GROWTH 1.074631 0.048385 22.20977 0.0000
SIZE -0.093499 0.024812 -3.768377 0.0002
R-squared 0.777369 Mean dependent var 1.205579
Adjusted R-squared 0.773142 S.D. dependent var 0.783774
S.E. of regression 0.373308 Akaike info criterion 0.891557
Sum squared resid 22.01873 Schwarz criterion 0.967794
Log likelihood -68.21609 Hannan-Quinn criter. 0.922510
F-statistic 183.8985 Durbin-Watson stat 2.157704
Prob(F-statistic) 0.000000
Dependent Variable: TOBIN
Method: Least Squares
Date: 11/03/09 Time: 10:34
Sample: 1 162
Included observations: 162
Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.
C 1.386044 0.558382 2.482251 0.0141
STDTA -1.666116 0.128166 -12.99965 0.0000
GROWTH 0.987569 0.039808 24.80830 0.0000
SIZE -0.025900 0.021077 -1.228819 0.2210
R-squared 0.851062 Mean dependent var 1.205579
Adjusted R-squared 0.848234 S.D. dependent var 0.783774
S.E. of regression 0.305336 Akaike info criterion 0.489574
Sum squared resid 14.73036 Schwarz criterion 0.565811
Log likelihood -35.65551 Hannan-Quinn criter. 0.520527
F-statistic 300.9475 Durbin-Watson stat 1.967021
Prob(F-statistic) 0.000000
Capital Structure and Firm Performance
Page 51
APPENDIX C
Research Data Set
No. Ticker Company name Sector PROF (%)
TOBIN'S
Q PE TDTA TDTE LTDTA STDTA GROWTH
SIZE
(Sales) TA
1 ABT BenTre Aquaproduct Import & Export JSC. Food Producers 8,7353 1,3479 7,8541 0,1115 0,1254 0,0000 0,1115 0,5708 26,8833 0,1035
2 ACL Cuulong Fish JSC. Food Producers 25,6759 0,8650 2,6019 0,6266 1,6780 0,1073 0,5193 1,1182 27,2021 0,1085
3 AGF An Giang Fisheries Import & Export JSC. Food Producers 6,9761 0,6114 15,5980 0,5260 1,1458 0,0349 0,4911 0,6841 28,3736 0,2903
4 ALP Alphanam JSC Industrial Engineering 5,9434 1,1639 17,2308 0,2564 0,3682 0,0059 0,2506 0,7162 27,9005 0,0816
5 ALT ALTA Company Household Goods 5,7385 1,1674 8,6802 0,2089 0,2641 0,0000 0,2089 0,5853 25,9619 0,3654
6 ANV Nam Viet Corporation Food Producers 13,0363 1,0686 12,6941 0,3979 0,6609 0,0287 0,3692 0,8644 28,8358 0,1835
7 ASP AN PHA S.G PETROL JSC. Gas, Water & Multiutilities 13,1285 0,6420 6,7131 0,5454 1,3422 0,1040 0,4414 0,7983 27,9921 0,1306
8 BAS BASACO Food Producers 10,2066 0,8561 559,25 0,5573 1,2591 0,0576 0,4997 0,9708 26,2193 0,1916
9 BBC Bien Hoa Confectionery Corp. Food Producers 7,7031 1,1769 10,5017 0,1843 0,2260 0,0175 0,1668 0,5456 27,0244 0,2301
10 BHS Bien Hoa Sugar JSC. Food Producers 3,3041 1,0705 (7,1512) 0,4466 0,8070 0,2613 0,1853 0,9637 27,3981 0,2962
11 BMC Binh Dinh Minerals JSC Mining 42,9825 5,2734 12,2302 0,0579 0,0614 0,0016 0,0563 4,3892 25,5921 0,1480
12 BMP Binh Minh Plastics JSC Household Goods 28,2367 1,7735 5,3737 0,1372 0,1590 0,0013 0,1359 1,0479 27,4466 0,3297
13 BPC Bim Son Packaging JSC. General Industrials 18,3364 1,3007 4,1709 0,1685 0,2026 0,0077 0,1608 0,6376 25,9485 0,3239
14 BT6 Chau Thoi Concrete Corporation No.620 Construction & Materials 10,7989 1,5036 17,9650 0,4943 0,9773 0,1282 0,3660 1,4921 27,4617 0,0936
15 CAN Canfoco Halong Canned Food Corporation Food Producers 14,9065 0,8258 4,1484 0,4934 0,9771 0,0888 0,4045 0,8146 26,7611 0,1730
16 CLC Cat Loi JSC Tobacco 24,2976 0,9551 4,0000 0,5742 1,3483 0,0004 0,5737 1,1035 27,5516 0,1594
17 COM Materials - Petroleum JSC Gas, Water & Multiutilities 9,0315 1,7965 15,5361 0,1193 0,1355 0,0196 0,0997 1,0351 28,7532 0,0546
18 CYC Chang Yih Ceramic JSC Construction & Materials 11,7921 0,6296 5,7070 0,6304 1,7056 0,3191 0,3113 0,8903 26,3333 0,3218
Capital Structure and Firm Performance
Page 52
No. Ticker Company name Sector PROF (%)
TOBIN'S
Q PE TDTA TDTE LTDTA STDTA GROWTH
SIZE
(Sales) TA
19 DCC DESCON Construction Corp. Construction & Materials 5,1190 0,7877 7,9478 0,4690 0,8833 0,0552 0,4138 0,7257 26,8796 0,0159
20 DCL Cuu Long Pharmaceutical Corp. Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology 14,7503 1,0536 6,6813 0,5051 1,0185 0,1959 0,3091 1,0629 26,9057 0,3894
21 DCT Dongnai Roofsheet & Construction Material JSC
Construction &
Materials 14,4630 1,2662 3,9001 0,1495 0,1758 0,0415 0,1080 0,5620 26,0065 0,0820
22 DDM Dong Do Marine JSC. Industrial Transportation 10,1197 0,2419 9,7379 0,8665 6,4898 0,6184 0,2480 0,9749 26,3215 0,6706
23 DHA Hoa An JSC Construction & Materials 17,1894 1,5612 5,0456 0,0711 0,0766 0,0057 0,0654 0,7034 25,7905 0,0424
24 DHG Hau Giang Pharmaceutial JSC. Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology 16,4223 2,8513 18,4649 0,3537 0,5498 0,0140 0,3397 2,5562 28,0487 0,9870
25 DIC DIC Investment & Trading JSC Construction & Materials 11,0404 0,5498 5,2808 0,6705 2,2703 0,0322 0,6383 0,9403 27,2268 0,2122
26 DMC Domesco Medical Import & Export JSC. Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology 15,5193 1,8944 10,9113 0,2237 0,2881 0,0027 0,2210 1,3417 27,5704 0,1605
27 DNP DongNai Plastic Construction JSC. Construction & Materials 13,5955 0,7011 4,2489 0,5276 1,1167 0,0799 0,4477 0,7562 25,9850 0,2262
28 DPC Da Nang Plastic JSC Household Goods 16,2710 1,4782 6,2715 0,1182 0,1340 0,0055 0,1127 0,7146 24,9881 0,2137
29 DPM Petrovietnam Fertilizer and Chemical JSC. Chemicals 103,09 3,4436 9,4554 0,0868 0,0956 0,0024 0,0845 2,6111 29,5018 0,3241
30 DPR DONG PHU RUBBER JSC. Chemicals 25,1025 1,8204 5,1956 0,3456 0,5305 0,0383 0,3072 1,5121 27,3147 0,3983
31 DQC Dien Quang JSC. Household Goods 4,6601 0,6168 235,19 0,5671 1,3265 0,1170 0,4501 0,7584 26,6894 0,0741
32 DRC DaNang Rubber JSC Automobiles & Parts 20,3363 0,7721 4,9907 0,6485 1,8446 0,1551 0,4933 1,0691 27,9064 0,2546
33 DTT DoThanh Technology Corporation General Industrials 8,6368 1,4395 8,8707 0,0494 0,0519 0,0002 0,0492 0,5383 25,4444 0,1689
34 DXV Da Nang Construction Building Materials And Cement
Construction &
Materials 7,3180 0,4750 9,1269 0,7207 2,5804 0,4926 0,2281 0,9164 27,4807 0,1564
35 FBT Ben Tre Forestry And Aquaproduct Import - Export Food Producers 5,3329 0,7724 27,1831 0,5386 1,1675 0,0299 0,5087 0,8497 27,4313 0,2263
36 FMC Sao Ta Foods JSC. Food Producers 13,5105 0,7310 7,5031 0,5411 1,1791 0,0016 0,5395 0,8131 27,6482 0,1858
37 FPT FPT Corp.
Software &
Computer
Services 23,1101 1,6830 8,3578 0,5168 1,3009 0,0008 0,5160 1,7439 30,4301 0,1134
Capital Structure and Firm Performance
Page 53
No. Ticker Company name Sector PROF (%)
TOBIN'S
Q PE TDTA TDTE LTDTA STDTA GROWTH
SIZE
(Sales) TA
38 GIL Binh Thanh Im-export, production & trade JSC Personal Goods 11,9409 1,2244 4,6905 0,1605 0,1912 0,0035 0,1570 0,5454 26,8489 0,0556
39 GMC Garmex Saigon JSC. Personal Goods 15,9135 0,9625 3,8699 0,3938 0,6497 0,0023 0,3915 0,7501 26,7746 0,3012
40 GMD General Forwarding & Agency Corporation Industrial Transportation 0,8532 0,9829 (8,5338) 0,4191 0,7294 0,2247 0,1944 0,8276 28,2797 0,3701
41 HAP Hapaco Hai Phong Paper JSC Forest & Paper (3,8609) 0,9737 (3,2230) 0,3547 0,5797 0,1120 0,2427 0,7174 26,4947 0,3313
42 HAX Hangxanh Motors Service JSC. General Retailers 13,6694 0,9002 4,1692 0,4114 0,6990 0,0034 0,4080 0,7230 27,0597 0,1679
43 HBC Hoa Binh Construction& Real Easte Corp. Construction & Materials 3,4664 0,7040 30,9616 0,4927 1,0702 0,0948 0,3978 0,7502 27,2686 0,1108
44 HBD Binh Duong PP Pack Marking JSC General Industrials 24,8223 1,2545 4,4369 0,3303 0,4933 0,0000 0,3303 0,9152 24,7730 0,2153
45 HDC Ba Ria – Vung Tau House Development JSC. Real Estate 9,3617 0,5236 5,0517 0,7795 3,5342 0,1905 0,5890 1,0825 26,4304 0,0324
46 HLA Asia Huu Lien Industrial Metals 8,5718 0,4991 (12,0312) 0,7423 3,0604 0,0316 0,7107 1,0064 28,2425 0,1131
47 HMC Hochiminh City Metal Corporation General Retailers 11,4129 0,6630 5,8401 0,6466 1,8294 0,0008 0,6457 0,9561 29,0866 0,0485
48 HPG Hoa Phat Group JSC. Industrial Metals 22,4451 1,9049 7,2413 0,2295 0,3148 0,0067 0,2228 1,3678 29,7713 0,1556
49 HRC HoaBinh Rubber JSC. Chemicals 24,9673 1,9171 4,7847 0,1693 0,2038 0,0093 0,1600 1,2558 26,3932 0,1333
50 HSI General Materials Biochemistry Fertilizer JSC. Chemicals 10,6282 0,2787 5,8858 0,8559 5,9393 0,0006 0,8553 0,9905 27,1753 0,0701
51 HT1 Ha Tien 1 Cement JSC. Construction & Materials 2,7380 0,4498 20,1700 0,8273 4,7902 0,5308 0,2965 1,1044 28,5700 0,0626
52 ICF Investment Commerce Fisheries Corporation Food Producers 7,5911 0,6349 6,6443 0,5900 1,4390 0,0284 0,5616 0,8149 26,8526 0,1591
53 IFS Interfood Shareholding Co. Food Producers (14,572) 0,3235 (1,0172) 0,8419 6,2416 0,0243 0,8176 1,0462 27,5444 0,3498
54 IMP Imexpharm Pharmaceutical JSC. Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology 13,8812 2,3311 15,0086 0,1351 0,1562 0,0032 0,1319 1,6014 27,0672 0,0757
55 ITA Tan Tao Investment Industry Corp. Real Estate 6,6436 1,3392 220,83 0,2391 0,3138 0,0634 0,1757 0,8166 27,9376 0,0082
56 KDC Kinh Do JSC Food Producers 2,1341 1,3033 (20,1506) 0,2802 0,4027 0,0577 0,2225 0,8804 28,0137 0,1169
57 KHA Khahomex Khanh Hoi Import Export JSC General Retailers 15,6238 1,0797 3,9139 0,3540 0,5480 0,0123 0,3417 0,7877 26,1568 0,0356
58 KHP Khanh Hoa Power JSC Electricity 35,7012 0,5239 4,0884 0,7051 2,3911 0,5346 0,1706 0,9341 27,4598 0,6142
59 L10 LILAMA 10 JSC. Industrial Engineering 13,2668 0,6205 4,7751 0,6775 2,1009 0,0392 0,6384 0,9755 26,5158 0,0706
60 LAF Lafooco Long An Food Processing Export JSC Food Producers 9,3893 0,6741 14,0570 0,5850 1,4095 0,0016 0,5834 0,8440 27,0639 0,0852
Capital Structure and Firm Performance
Page 54
No. Ticker Company name Sector PROF (%)
TOBIN'S
Q PE TDTA TDTE LTDTA STDTA GROWTH
SIZE
(Sales) TA
61 LBM LamDong Buiding Materials JSC. Construction & Materials 27,6272 0,7711 6,2997 0,5565 1,3870 0,2627 0,2938 0,9360 25,6013 0,3098
62 LCG LICOGI 16 Construction & Materials 16,7756 0,9580 4,1504 0,5428 1,1872 0,1057 0,4371 1,0436 26,8204 0,0136
63 LSS Lam Son Sugar JSC. Food Producers 17,7897 1,2280 6,6855 0,3183 0,4838 0,0877 0,2306 0,8830 27,7548 0,2524
64 MCP My Chau Printing& Packing Holdings Co. General Industrials 18,2576 0,9870 4,2786 0,3969 0,6581 0,2240 0,1729 0,7809 26,0611 0,4313
65 MPC MINH PHU SEADFOOD CORP. Food Producers 7,5059 0,7865 (19,297) 0,5641 1,3600 0,0945 0,4696 0,9403 28,6969 0,1094
66 NKD North Kinhdo Food JSC Food Producers 8,9960 0,9096 330,68 0,6282 1,6910 0,0429 0,5853 1,1663 27,2625 0,3226
67 NSC National Seed JSC. Food Producers 14,2132 1,3505 4,5769 0,2878 0,4041 0,0031 0,2847 0,9260 26,1324 0,0594
68 NTL TU LIEM URBAN DEVELOPMENT Real Estate 8,3444 0,8328 8,8166 0,7314 2,7234 0,0003 0,7311 1,2956 26,6403 0,0061
69 OPC OPC Pharmaceutial JSC. Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology 15,7124 1,7997 7,1545 0,0716 0,0772 0,0032 0,0684 0,9429 26,1124 0,2551
70 PAC Dry Cell and Storage Battery JSC. Household Goods 22,0431 1,6988 7,0603 0,3865 0,6299 0,0029 0,3836 1,4718 27,8476 0,1153
71 PET PetroVietnam General Services Js Corporation General Retailers 6,0428 0,7984 7,8641 0,6364 1,7504 0,0066 0,6298 1,0712 29,3175 0,0614
72 PGC Petrolimex Gas JSC. Gas, Water & Multiutilities 3,9007 1,0180 183,64 0,3162 0,4732 0,1240 0,1922 0,6657 28,1557 0,1823
73 PIT Petrolimex International Trading JSC. General Retailers 12,2134 0,8832 8,1074 0,4341 0,7672 0,0000 0,4341 0,7515 28,1658 0,0280
74 PJT Petrolimex Joint Stock Tanker Com. Industrial Transportation 11,6147 0,8843 11,5417 0,5021 1,0086 0,0014 0,5008 0,8885 27,4087 0,3839
75 PMS Petroleum Mechanical JSC. Gas, Water & Multiutilities 5,5942 1,1625 21,4496 0,4599 0,8515 0,0018 0,4581 1,0823 26,3210 0,0487
76 PNC Phuong Nam Cultural JSC Media 4,3622 0,6215 16,3408 0,5822 1,3938 0,0450 0,5372 0,7860 26,3438 0,1209
77 PPC PhaLai Thermal Power JSC Electricity 4,1365 0,8815 (28,5800) 0,6817 2,1421 0,5886 0,0932 1,2450 28,9873 0,4737
78 PVD PetroVietnam Drilling and well services JSC.
Oil Equipment,
Services &
Distribution 12,8764 1,5366 11,2523 0,6960 2,8163 0,2452 0,4508 1,9550 28,9471 0,2331
79 PVT PETROVIETNAM TRANSPORTATION CORP.
Industrial
Transportation 6,4536 2,5355 173,95 0,7300 5,7308 0,3210 0,4090 2,9192 27,7345 0,4315
80 RAL Rangdong Light source and Vacuum flash JSC.
Household
Goods 12,4438 0,7178 4,6089 0,5340 1,1457 0,0493 0,4846 0,7858 27,4544 0,1974
81 REE Refrigeration Electrical Engineering Corporation Real Estate (4,6172) 1,4530 (10,9638) 0,1951 0,2437 0,0404 0,1547 0,8456 27,7917 0,0076
Capital Structure and Firm Performance
Page 55
No. Ticker Company name Sector PROF (%)
TOBIN'S
Q PE TDTA TDTE LTDTA STDTA GROWTH
SIZE
(Sales) TA
82 SAF SAFOCO Foodstuff JSC Food Producers 21,7201 1,4487 4,2592 0,3216 0,4742 0,0052 0,3164 1,0920 26,7423 0,2826
83 SAM Sacom Cables & Telecom Materials JSC
Electronic &
Electrical
Equipment (1,8504) 1,3679 (11,9774) 0,0309 0,0319 0,0002 0,0308 0,4298 27,8906 0,0497
84 SAV Im-Export & Economic Co-Operation JSC Household Goods 6,5588 0,7508 9,9433 0,4953 0,9801 0,0215 0,4738 0,7406 27,0561 0,1048
85 SC5 Construction Join Stock Company No.5 Construction & Materials 4,1233 0,3365 6,2375 0,8410 5,3746 0,2138 0,6272 1,0227 27,4479 0,0407
86 SCD Chuong Duong Beverages Co. Beverages 21,8353 1,5340 5,3097 0,2592 0,3499 0,0023 0,2569 1,0525 26,3380 0,0503
87 SDN Dongnai Paint Corporation Construction & Materials 17,4671 1,1719 6,7847 0,5132 1,0541 0,0646 0,4486 1,1982 24,8385 0,0996
88 SFC Saigon Fuel JSC Gas, Water & Multiutilities 20,7005 1,8263 9,6787 0,3717 0,5916 0,0013 0,3704 1,5696 27,8171 0,1672
89 SFN Saigon Fishing Net JSC General Industrials 27,7094 1,5063 3,5293 0,0924 0,1019 0,0644 0,0281 0,6912 25,5451 0,2881
90 SGC Sagiang Import Export Corporation Food Producers 21,5815 1,6191 4,0097 0,0857 0,0938 0,0091 0,0766 0,7906 25,4186 0,2180
91 SGH Saigon Hotel Corporation Travel & Leisure 38,1243 5,3814 17,6978 0,0840 0,0918 0,0063 0,0778 4,5495 24,1191 0,4721
92 SGT Saigon Telecommunication & Technologies Corp.
Technology
Hardware &
Equipment 6,2735 1,8921 22,1498 0,4446 0,8045 0,1074 0,3372 1,7817 27,7119 0,0394
93 SJD CanDon Hydro Power JSC. Electricity 17,5475 0,7012 12,0656 0,6738 2,0660 0,4519 0,2219 1,0488 26,2058 0,9381
94 SJS Song Da Urban & IZ Investment & Development JSC Real Estate 11,2123 2,0708 18,0555 0,2782 0,3854 0,0819 0,1963 1,6272 26,4731 0,0116
95 SMC SMC Investment- Trading JSC General Retailers 16,4834 0,6464 3,1271 0,6523 1,8899 0,0383 0,6140 0,9545 29,0697 0,0626
96 SSC Southern Seed JSC Food Producers 22,5885 1,8717 5,8766 0,1790 0,2181 0,0279 0,1511 1,2298 26,0813 0,1250
97 ST8 Sieu Thanh Joint Stock Corp. General Retailers 29,8995 1,3772 3,8407 0,3246 0,5595 0,0004 0,3242 1,0857 27,4379 0,0841
98 TAC Tuong An Oil JSC. Food Producers 22,9291 1,1022 37,8383 0,5498 1,2213 0,1142 0,4356 1,2019 28,7273 0,1969
99 TCM THANH CONG TEXTILE GARMENT Personal Goods 7,5007 0,4359 72,5796 0,7112 2,6904 0,2308 0,4804 0,8965 27,6582 0,2935
100 TDH Thu Duc House JSC. Real Estate 20,0574 1,1948 3,4627 0,2873 0,4113 0,1471 0,1402 0,7808 27,1339 0,0407
101 TMC Thu Duc Trading and Import Export JSC. General Retailers 16,7974 0,8659 4,2096 0,5834 1,4005 0,0020 0,5814 1,0327 27,9234 0,0934
102 TMS Trans-Forwarding & Warehousing Corp. Industrial Transportation 23,2176 1,9808 9,2287 0,1357 0,1571 0,0287 0,1070 1,2523 25,8875 0,4032
103 TNA Thien Nam Trading Im-Export Corp. General Retailers 19,8729 0,7383 3,7201 0,5240 1,1008 0,0141 0,5099 0,7862 27,2859 0,0100
104 TNC Thong Nhat Rubber JSC. Chemicals 6,0029 1,4265 18,8083 0,1669 0,2003 0,0012 0,1657 0,7602 25,9261 0,3390
Capital Structure and Firm Performance
Page 56
No. Ticker Company name Sector PROF (%)
TOBIN'S
Q PE TDTA TDTE LTDTA STDTA GROWTH
SIZE
(Sales) TA
105 TPC TAN DAI HUNG PLASTIC JSC. General Industrials (14,9823) 1,2504 (2,4111) 0,2015 0,2523 0,0076 0,1939 0,6533 26,8437 0,1710
106 TRA TRAPHACO Pharmaceuticals & Biotechnology 19,3840 1,4906 6,0430 0,2836 0,3960 0,0102 0,2735 1,0579 27,3894 0,0980
107 TRC Tay Ninh Rubber JSC. Chemicals 32,8792 1,8670 3,6777 0,2364 0,3096 0,0441 0,1924 1,3399 27,0316 0,3881
108 TSC Techno – Agricultural Supplying JSC. General Retailers 20,0334 0,5075 4,0012 0,8004 4,0247 0,0001 0,8003 1,1094 28,6370 0,0347
109 TTC Thanh Thanh JSC Construction & Materials 15,5834 0,6142 5,9526 0,6290 1,6953 0,0278 0,6012 0,8721 26,3739 0,3687
110 TTF Truong Thanh Furniture Corporation Household Goods 7,1791 0,5046 10,1157 0,6053 1,5818 0,0134 0,5919 0,7332 27,2646 0,0529
111 TTP Tan Tien Plastic Packaging JSC. General Industrials 22,7404 1,3928 3,8216 0,1368 0,1584 0,0004 0,1364 0,6663 27,6813 0,2130
112 TYA Taya Electric Wire and Cable JSC
Electronic &
Electrical
Equipment (12,6401) 0,7481 (2,7374) 0,6994 2,3271 0,0315 0,6680 1,1470 27,8018 0,3472
113 UIC Idico Urban and House Development JSC. Construction & Materials 7,8150 0,4518 4,5304 0,7233 2,6144 0,0428 0,6806 0,8985 27,2473 0,1200
114 VFC VINAFCO JSC Industrial Transportation 6,8069 1,2327 12,0704 0,1921 0,2378 0,0431 0,1490 0,6169 26,8277 0,1583
115 VGP The Vegetexco Port JSC. Industrial Transportation 18,2242 1,6786 5,9480 0,1247 0,1425 0,0005 0,1242 0,9281 25,6844 0,0890
116 VHC Vinh Hoan Corp. Food Producers 13,2318 0,8071 7,1212 0,6583 2,0411 0,1753 0,4830 1,1466 28,5240 0,3713
117 VHG Viet-Han Corporation
Electronic &
Electrical
Equipment 2,2556 1,2358 (9,3290) 0,0979 0,1085 0,0000 0,0979 0,4316 26,3901 0,2439
118 VIC VINCOM JSC. Real Estate 7,3046 1,8716 76,4775 0,7306 2,9368 0,5475 0,1830 2,3353 26,2005 0,0045
119 VID Viendong Paper JSC. Forest & Paper 10,8140 0,9381 7,9055 0,4593 0,8493 0,1023 0,3570 0,8566 27,0431 0,0755
120 VIP Vietnam Petroleum Transport JSC. Industrial Transportation 13,9978 0,9547 7,9084 0,4547 0,8340 0,4060 0,0488 0,8642 27,8543 0,5927
121 VIS Vietnam - Italy Steel JSC. Industrial Metals 22,9475 0,6745 2,7437 0,6493 2,4634 0,3145 0,3347 1,0886 28,1713 0,1453
122 VKP VIKY PLASTIC Co. General Industrials 3,9356 0,6946 61,6734 0,4813 0,9279 0,1033 0,3780 0,6572 26,6951 0,1175
123 VNA VINASHIP Industrial Transportation 23,3389 0,8576 3,6373 0,5677 1,3131 0,2665 0,3012 0,9930 27,5251 0,7092
Capital Structure and Firm Performance
Page 57
No. Ticker Company name Sector PROF (%)
TOBIN'S
Q PE TDTA TDTE LTDTA STDTA GROWTH
SIZE
(Sales) TA
124 VNE Vietnam Electricity Construction JSC Construction & Materials 5,1092 0,2854 -436,78 0,8111 5,1927 0,4784 0,3327 0,9637 26,6348 0,2554
125 VNM Vietnam Dairy Products JSC Food Producers 25,6423 3,2638 11,6371 0,1935 0,2424 0,0305 0,1630 2,6400 29,7569 0,2563
126 VNS Vietnam Sun Corp Travel & Leisure 17,5754 0,8804 5,2951 0,4326 0,7624 0,3609 0,0717 0,7456 27,4425 0,5594
127 VPK Vegetable Oil Packing JSC. General Industrials 10,5396 0,8048 16,2386 0,5351 1,1509 0,1686 0,3664 0,8749 25,9722 0,5086
128 VPL Vinpearl Tourism and Trading JSC. Travel & Leisure 8,4797 2,5180 158,32 0,6235 1,8478 0,4850 0,1385 2,7446 26,8787 0,3796
129 VSC Vietnam container shipping JSC Industrial Transportation 32,0148 1,6522 4,1728 0,3411 0,5176 0,0411 0,2999 1,3344 26,4687 0,3301
130 VSG Viconship Saigon Industrial Transportation 11,9570 0,4678 18,8290 0,7199 2,5707 0,5918 0,1281 0,9077 25,6252 0,8663
131 VSH Vinh Son Song Hinh Hydro Power JSC Electricity 21,4101 2,4131 10,3785 0,1373 0,1591 0,0906 0,0466 1,6876 26,9047 0,5726
132 VTA VITALY JSC Construction & Materials 8,3646 0,3667 (8,2729) 0,7686 3,3214 0,2335 0,5351 0,9039 25,8395 0,4901
133 VTB Viettronics Tanbinh JSC Leisure Goods 11,2223 1,3742 6,5496 0,2360 0,3089 0,0289 0,2071 0,8462 26,1128 0,0136
134 VTC VTC Telecommunications JSC
Technology
Hardware &
Equipment 10,2042 0,8695 11,3716 0,4057 0,8342 0,0741 0,3316 0,8030 25,2535 0,1849
135 VTO Viet Nam Tanker JSC. Industrial Transportation 8,2139 0,4345 19,5395 0,7716 3,3782 0,6930 0,0786 0,9777 27,3475 0,9356
136 BTC Binh Trieu Construction & Engineering JSC Construction & Materials 8,0921 0,5753 5,3805 0,8339 5,0189 0,0116 0,8223 1,2430 24,8868 0,0107
137 CII HCMC Infrastructure Investment JSC - CII Construction & Materials 12,9519 0,9651 8,1338 0,5705 1,4645 0,4559 0,1146 1,1474 26,1572 0,0011
138 CNT Construction and Materials Trading JSC Construction & Materials 8,8398 0,2131 4,0345 0,8377 6,1404 0,1692 0,6686 0,9347 28,6162 0,0306
139 DXP DoanXa Port JSC Industrial Transportation 40,2218 1,6094 3,8183 0,3243 0,4799 0,1311 0,1932 1,2580 25,3102 0,6676
140 FPC Full Power JSC
Electronic &
Electrical
Equipment (4,4671) 1,1734 (8,1362) 0,3397 0,5106 0,0003 0,3394 0,8487 26,8785 0,0682
141 GTA Thuan An Wood Processing JSC. Household Goods 9,9116 1,3474 13,6726 0,1917 0,2371 0,0001 0,1915 0,7308 25,8206 0,4254
142 HAS Hanoi P&T Construction & Installation JSC Construction & Materials 6,8682 0,8343 4,9967 0,4047 0,6798 0,0034 0,4013 0,6437 25,4520 0,0253
Capital Structure and Firm Performance
Page 58
No. Ticker Company name Sector PROF (%)
TOBIN'S
Q PE TDTA TDTE LTDTA STDTA GROWTH
SIZE
(Sales) TA
143 HTV Hatien Transport JSC Industrial Transportation 5,4960 1,4078 20,3706 0,0402 0,0419 0,0010 0,0392 0,4881 25,1797 0,1366
144 KMR Mirae Personal Goods 9,5966 0,8383 2,6511 0,3077 0,4445 0,0086 0,2991 0,4538 25,8633 0,4962
145 KSH Ha Nam Mineral JSC. Mining 10,5764 1,8561 16,7878 0,2733 0,3760 0,1123 0,1609 1,4026 24,5508 0,5178
146 LGC LuGia Mechanical Electric JSC
Electronic &
Electrical
Equipment 6,4476 0,9165 12,5289 0,5913 1,4471 0,3534 0,2379 1,0992 25,2191 0,0075
147 MCV Cavico Vietnam Mining & Construction JSC Mining 10,7095 0,6109 7,0595 0,5996 1,4977 0,0803 0,5193 0,8102 25,7168 0,2245
148 MHC Hanoi Maritime Holding JSC Industrial Transportation 9,5633 0,6733 1.128,5 0,5614 1,2800 0,2058 0,3556 0,7961 26,1609 0,4930
149 NAV NamViet JSC. Construction & Materials 19,3028 1,1837 4,7600 0,3537 0,5474 0,0000 0,3537 0,8912 25,8989 0,1435
150 NHC Nhi Hiep Brick-Tile JSC Construction & Materials 59,1321 2,1210 3,0910 0,2141 0,2724 0,0023 0,2118 1,5492 24,7393 0,0671
151 PTC Post and Telecommunications Investment and Construction JSC.
Industrial
Transportation 4,9159 0,6638 15,2308 0,4953 0,9812 0,0037 0,4915 0,6543 26,8136 0,1397
152 RHC Ry Ninh II Hydroelectric JSC Electricity 24,5910 1,1096 5,7191 0,4382 0,7801 0,3098 0,1285 0,9861 24,3155 0,7909
153 RIC Royal International Corporation Travel & Leisure 3,4319 1,6425 116,24 0,1821 0,2226 0,0178 0,1642 1,0067 25,8491 0,3277
154 SBT Sucrerie De Bourbon Tay Ninh Food Producers 8,8963 1,5016 14,7977 0,1814 0,2216 0,0179 0,1635 0,8645 27,0571 0,4316
155 SFI Sea & Air Freight International Industrial Transportation 14,8776 0,8238 2,8400 0,5123 1,1089 0,0006 0,5116 0,8786 25,5213 0,2999
156 SHC SaiGon Maritime JS Co.Ltd Industrial Transportation 23,2751 0,6906 4,3314 0,6257 1,6715 0,2855 0,3402 0,9420 25,8873 0,7783
157 SJ1 Seafood JSC No.1 Food Producers 22,6913 1,3014 3,0642 0,1659 0,1988 0,0025 0,1633 0,6331 25,8250 0,0411
158 SZL Sonadezi Long Thanh Construction & Materials 24,8508 1,1092 6,0338 0,6884 2,2092 0,0153 0,6731 1,4860 26,1493 0,2200
159 TCR TAICERA Enterprise LTD Co. Construction & Materials 12,2901 0,7615 7,5221 0,4787 0,9184 0,1517 0,3271 0,7189 27,7148 0,4028
160 TCT Tay Ninh Cable Car Tour Company Travel & Leisure 45,8400 4,7264 11,1613 0,0508 0,0536 0,0090 0,0418 3,8281 24,3286 0,0501
161 TS4 Seapriexco 4 Sea Food JS Company No. 4 Food Producers 6,2775 0,9621 7,6343 0,3564 0,5538 0,1948 0,1616 0,6749 25,9351 0,1298
162 UNI Vien Lien JSC General Retailers 1,4786 1,2863 39,0987 0,2173 0,2777 0,0000 0,2173 0,7210 24,9737 0,0369
Các file đính kèm theo tài liệu này:
- Huynh Anh Kiet Capital structure and Firm Performance.pdf