Luận văn Ứng dụng bao màng chitosan nhằm giảm sự hao hụt khối lượng và tổng vi khuẩn hiếu khí trong quá trình cấp đông và trữ đông cá tra fillet

- 5p-1 *1.94263 1.51705 0p-1 - 5p-5 1.13996 1.51705 0p-5 - 10p-1 0.200838 1.51705 0p-5 - 10p-5 -0.520421 1.51705 0p-5 - 1p-1 *3.0749 1.51705 0p-5 - 1p-5 *2.34613 1.51705 0p-5 - 5p-1 *2.73146 1.51705 0p-5 - 5p-5 *1.92879 1.51705 10p-1 - 10p-5 -0.721259 1.51705 10p-1 - 1p-1 *2.87406 1.51705 10p-1 - 1p-5 *2.14529 1.51705 10p-1 - 5p-1 *2.53062 1.51705 10p-1 - 5p-5 *1.72795 1.51705 10p-5 - 1p-1 *3.59532 1.51705 10p-5 - 1p-5 *2.86655 1.51705 10p-5 - 5p-1 *3.25188 1.51705 10p-5 - 5p-5 *2.44921 1.51705 1p-1 - 1p-5 -0.728772 1.51705 1p-1 - 5p-1 -0.343445 1.51705 1p-1 - 5p-5 -1.14611 1.51705 1p-5 - 5p-1 0.385327 1.51705 1p-5 - 5p-5 -0.417341 1.51705 5p-1 - 5p-5 -0.802668 1.51705 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- * denotes a statistically significant difference. Analysis Summary Dependent variable: Vi sinh vat tong so Factors: Thoi gian nhung Thoi gian tru dong Luận văn tốt nghiệp khóa 29 – 2008 Phụ chương Chuyên ngành Công nghệ Thực phẩm - xxvii - Trường Đại học Cần Thơ Number of complete cases: 24 Analysis of Variance for Vi sinh vat tong so - Type III Sums of Squares -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Source Sum of Squares Df Mean Square F-Ratio P-Value -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- MAIN EFFECTS A:Thoi gian nhung 1,60592E10 3 5,35307E9 6,90 0,0025 B:Thoi gian tru dong 4,33983E9 1 4,33983E9 5,59 0,0289 RESIDUAL 1,47483E10 19 7,76229E8 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- TOTAL (CORRECTED) 3,51474E10 23 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- All F-ratios are based on the residual mean square error. Table of Least Squares Means for Vi sinh vat tong so with 95,0 Percent Confidence Intervals -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Stnd. Lower Upper Level Count Mean Error Limit Limit -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- GRAND MEAN 24 22727,0 Thoi gian nhung 0 phut 6 67341,0 11374,2 43534,6 91147,4 1 phut 6 11116,5 11374,2 -12689,9 34922,9 10 phut 6 4393,83 11374,2 -19412,6 28200,3 5 phut 6 8056,67 11374,2 -15749,8 31863,1 Thoi gian tru dong 1 ngay 12 36174,2 8042,74 19340,5 53007,9 5 ngay 12 9279,83 8042,74 -7553,86 26113,5 Multiple Range Tests for Vi sinh vat tong so by Thoi gian nhung -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Method: 95,0 percent LSD Thoi gian nhungCount LS Mean Homogeneous Groups -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 10 phut 6 4393,83 X 5 phut 6 8056,67 X 1 phut 6 11116,5 X 0 phut 6 67341,0 X -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Contrast Difference +/- Limits -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 0 phut - 1 phut *56224,5 33667,4 0 phut - 10 phut *62947,2 33667,4 0 phut - 5 phut *59284,3 33667,4 1 phut - 10 phut 6722,67 33667,4 1 phut - 5 phut 3059,83 33667,4 10 phut - 5 phut -3662,83 33667,4 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- * denotes a statistically significant difference. Multiple Range Tests for Vi sinh vat tong so by Thoi gian tru dong -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Method: 95,0 percent LSD Level Count LS Mean Homogeneous Groups -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 5 ngay 12 9279,83 X 1 ngay 12 36174,2 X -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Contrast Difference +/- Limits -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 ngay - 5 ngay *26894,3 23806,4 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- * denotes a statistically significant difference. ANOVA Table for VSV tong so by Mau thi nghiem Analysis of Variance ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Source Sum of Squares Df Mean Square F-Ratio P-Value ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Between groups 2.59877E10 7 3.71253E9 6.48 0.0010 Within groups 9.15969E9 16 5.72481E8 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Luận văn tốt nghiệp khóa 29 – 2008 Phụ chương Chuyên ngành Công nghệ Thực phẩm - xxviii - Trường Đại học Cần Thơ Total (Corr.) 3.51474E10 23 Multiple Range Tests for VSV tong so by Mau thi nghiem -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Method: 95.0 percent LSD Mau thi nghiem Count Mean Homogeneous Groups -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 10p-5 3 2742.33 X 5p-5 3 3098.33 X 1p-5 3 3566.33 X 10p-1 3 6045.33 X 5p-1 3 13015.0 X 1p-1 3 18666.7 X 0p-5 3 27712.3 X 0p-1 3 106970.0 X -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Contrast Difference +/- Limits -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 0p-1 - 0p-5 *79257.3 41414.5 0p-1 - 10p-1 *100924.0 41414.5 0p-1 - 10p-5 *104227.0 41414.5 0p-1 - 1p-1 *88303.0 41414.5 0p-1 - 1p-5 *103403.0 41414.5 0p-1 - 5p-1 *93954.7 41414.5 0p-1 - 5p-5 *103871.0 41414.5 0p-5 - 10p-1 21667.0 41414.5 0p-5 - 10p-5 24970.0 41414.5 0p-5 - 1p-1 9045.67 41414.5 0p-5 - 1p-5 24146.0 41414.5 0p-5 - 5p-1 14697.3 41414.5 0p-5 - 5p-5 24614.0 41414.5 10p-1 - 10p-5 3303.0 41414.5 10p-1 - 1p-1 -12621.3 41414.5 10p-1 - 1p-5 2479.0 41414.5 10p-1 - 5p-1 -6969.67 41414.5 10p-1 - 5p-5 2947.0 41414.5 10p-5 - 1p-1 -15924.3 41414.5 10p-5 - 1p-5 -824.0 41414.5 10p-5 - 5p-1 -10272.7 41414.5 10p-5 - 5p-5 -356.0 41414.5 1p-1 - 1p-5 15100.3 41414.5 1p-1 - 5p-1 5651.67 41414.5 1p-1 - 5p-5 15568.3 41414.5 1p-5 - 5p-1 -9448.67 41414.5 1p-5 - 5p-5 468.0 41414.5 5p-1 - 5p-5 9916.67 41414.5 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- * denotes a statistically significant difference. ANOVA Table for LogVSV tong so by Mau TN Analysis of Variance ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Source Sum of Squares Df Mean Square F-Ratio P-Value ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Between groups 6.17106 7 0.88158 74.66 0.0000 Within groups 0.188933 16 0.0118083 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total (Corr.) 6.36 23 Multiple Range Tests for LogVSV tong so by Mau TN -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Method: 95.0 percent LSD Mau TN Count Mean Homogeneous Groups -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 10p-5 3 3.43667 X 5p-5 3 3.49 X 1p-5 3 3.55333 X 10p-1 3 3.77333 X 5p-1 3 4.11 X 1p-1 3 4.26333 XX 0p-5 3 4.44 X 0p-1 3 4.97667 X -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Contrast Difference +/- Limits -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 0p-1 - 0p-5 *0.536667 0.18809 Luận văn tốt nghiệp khóa 29 – 2008 Phụ chương Chuyên ngành Công nghệ Thực phẩm - xxix - Trường Đại học Cần Thơ 0p-1 - 10p-1 *1.20333 0.18809 0p-1 - 10p-5 *1.54 0.18809 0p-1 - 1p-1 *0.713333 0.18809 0p-1 - 1p-5 *1.42333 0.18809 0p-1 - 5p-1 *0.866667 0.18809 0p-1 - 5p-5 *1.48667 0.18809 0p-5 - 10p-1 *0.666667 0.18809 0p-5 - 10p-5 *1.00333 0.18809 0p-5 - 1p-1 0.176667 0.18809 0p-5 - 1p-5 *0.886667 0.18809 0p-5 - 5p-1 *0.33 0.18809 0p-5 - 5p-5 *0.95 0.18809 10p-1 - 10p-5 *0.336667 0.18809 10p-1 - 1p-1 *-0.49 0.18809 10p-1 - 1p-5 *0.22 0.18809 10p-1 - 5p-1 *-0.336667 0.18809 10p-1 - 5p-5 *0.283333 0.18809 10p-5 - 1p-1 *-0.826667 0.18809 10p-5 - 1p-5 -0.116667 0.18809 10p-5 - 5p-1 *-0.673333 0.18809 10p-5 - 5p-5 -0.0533333 0.18809 1p-1 - 1p-5 *0.71 0.18809 1p-1 - 5p-1 0.153333 0.18809 1p-1 - 5p-5 *0.773333 0.18809 1p-5 - 5p-1 *-0.556667 0.18809 1p-5 - 5p-5 0.0633333 0.18809 5p-1 - 5p-5 *0.62 0.18809 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- * denotes a statistically significant difference. Analysis Summary Dependent variable: Mau sac Factors: Thoi gian nhung Thoi gian tru dong Number of complete cases: 24 Analysis of Variance for Mau sac - Type III Sums of Squares -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Source Sum of Squares Df Mean Square F-Ratio P-Value -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- MAIN EFFECTS A:Thoi gian nhung 17,0066 3 5,66888 3,53 0,0348 B:Thoi gian tru dong 0,840004 1 0,840004 0,52 0,4784 RESIDUAL 30,5264 19 1,60665 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- TOTAL (CORRECTED) 48,3731 23 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- All F-ratios are based on the residual mean square error. Table of Least Squares Means for Mau sac with 95,0 Percent Confidence Intervals -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Stnd. Lower Upper Level Count Mean Error Limit Limit -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- GRAND MEAN 24 58,0913 Thoi gian nhung 0 phut 6 56,68 0,51747 55,5969 57,7631 1 phut 6 58,8067 0,51747 57,7236 59,8897 10 phut 6 58,2283 0,51747 57,1453 59,3114 5 phut 6 58,65 0,51747 57,5669 59,7331 Thoi gian tru dong 1 ngay 12 58,2783 0,365907 57,5125 59,0442 5 ngay 12 57,9042 0,365907 57,1383 58,67 Multiple Range Tests for Mau sac by Thoi gian nhung -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Method: 95,0 percent LSD Thoi gian nhungCount LS Mean Homogeneous Groups -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 0 phut 6 56,68 X 10 phut 6 58,2283 X 5 phut 6 58,65 X Luận văn tốt nghiệp khóa 29 – 2008 Phụ chương Chuyên ngành Công nghệ Thực phẩm - xxx - Trường Đại học Cần Thơ 1 phut 6 58,8067 X -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Contrast Difference +/- Limits -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 0 phut - 1 phut *-2,12667 1,53171 0 phut - 10 phut *-1,54833 1,53171 0 phut - 5 phut *-1,97 1,53171 1 phut - 10 phut 0,578333 1,53171 1 phut - 5 phut 0,156667 1,53171 10 phut - 5 phut -0,421667 1,53171 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- * denotes a statistically significant difference. Multiple Range Tests for Mau sac by Thoi gian tru dong -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Method: 95,0 percent LSD Level Count LS Mean Homogeneous Groups -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 5 ngay 12 57,9042 X 1 ngay 12 58,2783 X -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Contrast Difference +/- Limits -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 ngay - 5 ngay 0,374167 1,08308 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- * denotes a statistically significant difference. ANOVA Table for Mau sac by Mau thi nghiem Analysis of Variance ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Source Sum of Squares Df Mean Square F-Ratio P-Value ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Between groups 23.048 7 3.29257 2.08 0.1066 Within groups 25.3251 16 1.58282 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total (Corr.) 48.3731 23 Multiple Range Tests for Mau sac by Mau thi nghiem -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Method: 95.0 percent LSD Mau thi nghiem Count Mean Homogeneous Groups -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 0p-1 3 56.2067 X 0p-5 3 57.1533 XX 10p-5 3 57.7333 XXX 1p-5 3 58.0733 XXX 5p-1 3 58.6433 XX 5p-5 3 58.6567 XX 10p-1 3 58.7233 XX 1p-1 3 59.54 X -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Contrast Difference +/- Limits -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 0p-1 - 0p-5 -0.946667 2.17764 0p-1 - 10p-1 *-2.51667 2.17764 0p-1 - 10p-5 -1.52667 2.17764 0p-1 - 1p-1 *-3.33333 2.17764 0p-1 - 1p-5 -1.86667 2.17764 0p-1 - 5p-1 *-2.43667 2.17764 0p-1 - 5p-5 *-2.45 2.17764 0p-5 - 10p-1 -1.57 2.17764 0p-5 - 10p-5 -0.58 2.17764 0p-5 - 1p-1 *-2.38667 2.17764 0p-5 - 1p-5 -0.92 2.17764 0p-5 - 5p-1 -1.49 2.17764 0p-5 - 5p-5 -1.50333 2.17764 10p-1 - 10p-5 0.99 2.17764 10p-1 - 1p-1 -0.816667 2.17764 10p-1 - 1p-5 0.65 2.17764 10p-1 - 5p-1 0.08 2.17764 10p-1 - 5p-5 0.0666667 2.17764 10p-5 - 1p-1 -1.80667 2.17764 10p-5 - 1p-5 -0.34 2.17764 10p-5 - 5p-1 -0.91 2.17764 10p-5 - 5p-5 -0.923333 2.17764 1p-1 - 1p-5 1.46667 2.17764 Luận văn tốt nghiệp khóa 29 – 2008 Phụ chương Chuyên ngành Công nghệ Thực phẩm - xxxi - Trường Đại học Cần Thơ 1p-1 - 5p-1 0.896667 2.17764 1p-1 - 5p-5 0.883333 2.17764 1p-5 - 5p-1 -0.57 2.17764 1p-5 - 5p-5 -0.583333 2.17764 5p-1 - 5p-5 -0.0133333 2.17764 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- * denotes a statistically significant difference. Analysis Summary Dependent variable: Cau truc Factors: Thoi gian nhung Thoi gian tru dong Number of complete cases: 24 Analysis of Variance for Cau truc - Type III Sums of Squares -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Source Sum of Squares Df Mean Square F-Ratio P-Value -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- MAIN EFFECTS A:Thoi gian nhung 2422,12 3 807,375 0,21 0,8899 B:Thoi gian tru dong 187,042 1 187,042 0,05 0,8288 RESIDUAL 73932,8 19 3891,2 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- TOTAL (CORRECTED) 76542,0 23 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- All F-ratios are based on the residual mean square error. Table of Least Squares Means for Cau truc with 95,0 Percent Confidence Intervals -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Stnd. Lower Upper Level Count Mean Error Limit Limit -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- GRAND MEAN 24 391,208 Thoi gian nhung 0 phut 6 407,167 25,4663 353,865 460,468 1 phut 6 392,167 25,4663 338,865 445,468 10 phut 6 381,167 25,4663 327,865 434,468 5 phut 6 384,333 25,4663 331,032 437,635 Thoi gian tru dong 1 ngay 12 394,0 18,0074 356,31 431,69 5 ngay 12 388,417 18,0074 350,727 426,107 Multiple Range Tests for Cau truc by Thoi gian nhung -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Method: 95,0 percent LSD Thoi gian nhungCount LS Mean Homogeneous Groups -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 10 phut 6 381,167 X 5 phut 6 384,333 X 1 phut 6 392,167 X 0 phut 6 407,167 X -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Contrast Difference +/- Limits -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 0 phut - 1 phut 15,0 75,38 0 phut - 10 phut 26,0 75,38 0 phut - 5 phut 22,8333 75,38 1 phut - 10 phut 11,0 75,38 1 phut - 5 phut 7,83333 75,38 10 phut - 5 phut -3,16667 75,38 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- * denotes a statistically significant difference. Multiple Range Tests for Cau truc by Thoi gian tru dong -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Method: 95,0 percent LSD Level Count LS Mean Homogeneous Groups -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 5 ngay 12 388,417 X 1 ngay 12 394,0 X -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Contrast Difference +/- Limits Luận văn tốt nghiệp khóa 29 – 2008 Phụ chương Chuyên ngành Công nghệ Thực phẩm - xxxii - Trường Đại học Cần Thơ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 ngay - 5 ngay 5,58333 53,3017 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- * denotes a statistically significant difference. ANOVA Table for Cau truc by Mau thi nghiem Analysis of Variance ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Source Sum of Squares Df Mean Square F-Ratio P-Value ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Between groups 22777.3 7 3253.9 0.97 0.4858 Within groups 53764.7 16 3360.29 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total (Corr.) 76542.0 23 Multiple Range Tests for Cau truc by Mau thi nghiem -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Method: 95.0 percent LSD Mau thi nghiem Count Mean Homogeneous Groups -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 0p-5 3 354.667 X 10p-1 3 362.667 XX 1p-1 3 376.667 XX 5p-1 3 377.0 XX 5p-5 3 391.667 XX 10p-5 3 399.667 XX 1p-5 3 407.667 XX 0p-1 3 459.667 X -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Contrast Difference +/- Limits -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 0p-1 - 0p-5 *105.0 100.337 0p-1 - 10p-1 97.0 100.337 0p-1 - 10p-5 60.0 100.337 0p-1 - 1p-1 83.0 100.337 0p-1 - 1p-5 52.0 100.337 0p-1 - 5p-1 82.6667 100.337 0p-1 - 5p-5 68.0 100.337 0p-5 - 10p-1 -8.0 100.337 0p-5 - 10p-5 -45.0 100.337 0p-5 - 1p-1 -22.0 100.337 0p-5 - 1p-5 -53.0 100.337 0p-5 - 5p-1 -22.3333 100.337 0p-5 - 5p-5 -37.0 100.337 10p-1 - 10p-5 -37.0 100.337 10p-1 - 1p-1 -14.0 100.337 10p-1 - 1p-5 -45.0 100.337 10p-1 - 5p-1 -14.3333 100.337 10p-1 - 5p-5 -29.0 100.337 10p-5 - 1p-1 23.0 100.337 10p-5 - 1p-5 -8.0 100.337 10p-5 - 5p-1 22.6667 100.337 10p-5 - 5p-5 8.0 100.337 1p-1 - 1p-5 -31.0 100.337 1p-1 - 5p-1 -0.333333 100.337 1p-1 - 5p-5 -15.0 100.337 1p-5 - 5p-1 30.6667 100.337 1p-5 - 5p-5 16.0 100.337 5p-1 - 5p-5 -14.6667 100.337 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- * denotes a statistically significant difference. Kết quả thí nghiệm 4 Khảo sát ảnh hưởng của phương pháp nhúng chitosan và thời gian trữ đông đến sự tổn thất khối lượng, vi khuẩn hiếu khí, màu sắc và cấu trúc trong quá trình cấp đông. Analysis Summary Dependent variable: Ton that khoi luong Factors: Phuong phap nhung Thoi gian tru dong Number of complete cases: 30 Analysis of Variance for Ton that khoi luong - Type III Sums of Squares Luận văn tốt nghiệp khóa 29 – 2008 Phụ chương Chuyên ngành Công nghệ Thực phẩm - xxxiii - Trường Đại học Cần Thơ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Source Sum of Squares Df Mean Square F-Ratio P-Value -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- MAIN EFFECTS A:Phuong phap nhung 585,656 4 146,414 84,24 0,0000 B:Thoi gian tru dong 11,7976 1 11,7976 6,79 0,0155 RESIDUAL 41,7139 24 1,73808 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- TOTAL (CORRECTED) 639,168 29 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- All F-ratios are based on the residual mean square error. Table of Least Squares Means for Ton that khoi luong with 95,0 Percent Confidence Intervals -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Stnd. Lower Upper Level Count Mean Error Limit Limit -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- GRAND MEAN 30 -5,10282 Phuong phap nhung Doi chung 6 2,4603 0,538219 1,34946 3,57113 Non-P 6 -4,13708 0,538219 -5,24791 -3,02625 Non-P =>chitosan 6 -5,06001 0,538219 -6,17084 -3,94918 STPP 6 -8,21877 0,538219 -9,3296 -7,10794 STPP =>chitosan 6 -10,5586 0,538219 -11,6694 -9,44772 Thoi gian tru dong 1 ngay 15 -5,72992 0,3404 -6,43247 -5,02737 5 ngay 15 -4,47573 0,3404 -5,17828 -3,77317 Multiple Range Tests for Ton that khoi luong by Phuong phap nhung -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Method: 95,0 percent LSD Level Count LS Mean Homogeneous Groups -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- STPP =>chitosan 6 -10,5586 X STPP 6 -8,21877 X Non-P=>chitosan 6 -5,06001 X Non-P 6 -4,13708 X Doi chung 6 2,4603 X -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Contrast Difference +/- Limits -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Doi chung - Non-P *6,59738 1,57095 Doi chung - Non-P =>chitosan *7,52031 1,57095 Doi chung - STPP *10,6791 1,57095 Doi chung - STPP =>chitosan *13,0188 1,57095 Non-P - Non-P =>chitosan 0,922932 1,57095 Non-P - STPP *4,08169 1,57095 Non-P - STPP =>chitosan *6,42147 1,57095 Non-P =>chitosan - STPP *3,15876 1,57095 Non-P =>chitosan - STPP =>chitosan *5,49854 1,57095 STPP - STPP =>chitosan *2,33979 1,57095 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- * denotes a statistically significant difference. Multiple Range Tests for Ton that khoi luong by Thoi gian tru dong -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Method: 95,0 percent LSD Level Count LS Mean Homogeneous Groups -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 ngay 15 -5,72992 X 5 ngay 15 -4,47573 X -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Contrast Difference +/- Limits -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 ngay - 5 ngay *-1,2542 0,993559 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- * denotes a statistically significant difference. ANOVA Table for Ton that KL by Mau thi nghiem Analysis of Variance ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Source Sum of Squares Df Mean Square F-Ratio P-Value ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Between groups 598.294 9 66.4771 32.38 0.0000 Luận văn tốt nghiệp khóa 29 – 2008 Phụ chương Chuyên ngành Công nghệ Thực phẩm - xxxiv - Trường Đại học Cần Thơ Within groups 41.0662 20 2.05331 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total (Corr.) 639.36 29 Multiple Range Tests for Ton that KL by Mau thi nghiem -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Method: 95.0 percent LSD Mau thi nghiem Count Mean Homogeneous Groups -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- STPPChitosan1 3 -11.28 X STPPChitosan5 3 -9.83667 XX STPP-1 3 -8.99333 XX STPP-5 3 -7.44667 XX NonPChitosan1 3 -5.71333 XX NonP-1 3 -4.78 X NonPChitosan5 3 -4.40667 X NonP-5 3 -3.49 X DC-1 3 2.12333 X DC-5 3 2.8 X -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Contrast Difference +/- Limits -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- DC-1 - DC-5 -0.676667 2.44056 DC-1 - NonP-1 *6.90333 2.44056 DC-1 - NonP-5 *5.61333 2.44056 DC-1 - NonPChitosan1 *7.83667 2.44056 DC-1 - NonPChitosan5 *6.53 2.44056 DC-1 - STPP-1 *11.1167 2.44056 DC-1 - STPP-5 *9.57 2.44056 DC-1 - STPPChitosan1 *13.4033 2.44056 DC-1 - STPPChitosan5 *11.96 2.44056 DC-5 - NonP-1 *7.58 2.44056 DC-5 - NonP-5 *6.29 2.44056 DC-5 - NonPChitosan1 *8.51333 2.44056 DC-5 - NonPChitosan5 *7.20667 2.44056 DC-5 - STPP-1 *11.7933 2.44056 DC-5 - STPP-5 *10.2467 2.44056 DC-5 - STPPChitosan1 *14.08 2.44056 DC-5 - STPPChitosan5 *12.6367 2.44056 NonP-1 - NonP-5 -1.29 2.44056 NonP-1 - NonPChitosan1 0.933333 2.44056 NonP-1 - NonPChitosan5 -0.373333 2.44056 NonP-1 - STPP-1 *4.21333 2.44056 NonP-1 - STPP-5 *2.66667 2.44056 NonP-1 - STPPChitosan1 *6.5 2.44056 NonP-1 - STPPChitosan5 *5.05667 2.44056 NonP-5 - NonPChitosan1 2.22333 2.44056 NonP-5 - NonPChitosan5 0.916667 2.44056 NonP-5 - STPP-1 *5.50333 2.44056 NonP-5 - STPP-5 *3.95667 2.44056 NonP-5 - STPPChitosan1 *7.79 2.44056 NonP-5 - STPPChitosan5 *6.34667 2.44056 NonPChitosan1 - NonPChitosan5 -1.30667 2.44056 NonPChitosan1 - STPP-1 *3.28 2.44056 NonPChitosan1 - STPP-5 1.73333 2.44056 NonPChitosan1 - STPPChitosan1 *5.56667 2.44056 NonPChitosan1 - STPPChitosan5 *4.12333 2.44056 NonPChitosan5 - STPP-1 *4.58667 2.44056 NonPChitosan5 - STPP-5 *3.04 2.44056 NonPChitosan5 - STPPChitosan1 *6.87333 2.44056 NonPChitosan5 - STPPChitosan5 *5.43 2.44056 STPP-1 - STPP-5 -1.54667 2.44056 STPP-1 - STPPChitosan1 2.28667 2.44056 STPP-1 - STPPChitosan5 0.843333 2.44056 STPP-5 - STPPChitosan1 *3.83333 2.44056 STPP-5 - STPPChitosan5 2.39 2.44056 STPPChitosan1 - STPPChitosan5 -1.44333 2.44056 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- * denotes a statistically significant difference. Analysis Summary Dependent variable: Vi sinh vat tong so Factors: Phuong phap nhung Thoi gian tru dong Luận văn tốt nghiệp khóa 29 – 2008 Phụ chương Chuyên ngành Công nghệ Thực phẩm - xxxv - Trường Đại học Cần Thơ Number of complete cases: 30 Analysis of Variance for Vi sinh vat tong so - Type III Sums of Squares -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Source Sum of Squares Df Mean Square F-Ratio P-Value -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- MAIN EFFECTS A:Phuong phap nhung 1,30876E11 4 3,27191E10 95,13 0,0000 B:Thoi gian tru dong 1,54083E9 1 1,54083E9 4,48 0,0449 RESIDUAL 8,25498E9 24 3,43957E8 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- TOTAL (CORRECTED) 1,40672E11 29 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- All F-ratios are based on the residual mean square error. Table of Least Squares Means for Vi sinh vat tong so with 95,0 Percent Confidence Intervals -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Stnd. Lower Upper Level Count Mean Error Limit Limit -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- GRAND MEAN 30 47121,3 Phuong phap nhung Doi chung 6 179091,0 7571,41 163465,0 194718,0 Non-P 6 17106,2 7571,41 1479,52 32732,8 Non-P =>chitosan 6 16977,2 7571,41 1350,52 32603,8 STPP 6 13303,0 7571,41 -2323,65 28929,7 STPP =>chitosan 6 9128,83 7571,41 -6497,82 24755,5 Thoi gian tru dong 1 ngay 15 54287,9 4788,58 44404,8 64171,1 5 ngay 15 39954,6 4788,58 30071,4 49837,8 Multiple Range Tests for Vi sinh vat tong so by Phuong phap nhung -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Method: 95,0 percent LSD Level Count LS Mean Homogeneous Groups -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- STPP =>chitosan6 9128,83 X STPP 6 13303,0 X Non-P=>chitosan6 16977,2 X Non-P 6 17106,2 X Doi chung 6 179091,0 X -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Contrast Difference +/- Limits -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Doi chung - Non-P *161985,0 22099,4 Doi chung - Non-P =>chitosan *162114,0 22099,4 Doi chung - STPP *165788,0 22099,4 Doi chung - STPP =>chitosan *169962,0 22099,4 Non-P - Non-P =>chitosan 129,0 22099,4 Non-P - STPP 3803,17 22099,4 Non-P - STPP =>chitosan 7977,33 22099,4 Non-P =>chitosan - STPP 3674,17 22099,4 Non-P =>chitosan - STPP =>chitosan 7848,33 22099,4 STPP - STPP =>chitosan 4174,17 22099,4 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- * denotes a statistically significant difference. Multiple Range Tests for Vi sinh vat tong so by Thoi gian tru dong -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Method: 95,0 percent LSD Level Count LS Mean Homogeneous Groups -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 5 ngay 15 39954,6 X 1 ngay 15 54287,9 X -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Contrast Difference +/- Limits -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 ngay - 5 ngay *14333,3 13976,9 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- * denotes a statistically significant difference. ANOVA Table for VSV tong so by Mau thi nghiem Analysis of Variance ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Luận văn tốt nghiệp khóa 29 – 2008 Phụ chương Chuyên ngành Công nghệ Thực phẩm - xxxvi - Trường Đại học Cần Thơ Source Sum of Squares Df Mean Square F-Ratio P-Value ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Between groups 1.35366E11 9 1.50407E10 56.69 0.0000 Within groups 5.30611E9 20 2.65306E8 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total (Corr.) 1.40672E11 29 Multiple Range Tests for VSV tong so by Mau thi nghiem -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Method: 95.0 percent LSD Mau thi nghiem Count Mean Homogeneous Groups -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- STPPChitosan5 3 7000.0 X STPPChitosan1 3 11257.7 X STPP-5 3 11394.0 X NonP-5 3 13954.7 X STPP-1 3 15212.0 X NonPChitosan5 3 15303.0 X NonPChitosan1 3 18651.3 X NonP-1 3 20257.7 X DC-5 3 152121.0 X DC-1 3 206061.0 X -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Contrast Difference +/- Limits -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- DC-1 - DC-5 *53939.7 27741.8 DC-1 - NonP-1 *185803.0 27741.8 DC-1 - NonP-5 *192106.0 27741.8 DC-1 - NonPChitosan1 *187410.0 27741.8 DC-1 - NonPChitosan5 *190758.0 27741.8 DC-1 - STPP-1 *190849.0 27741.8 DC-1 - STPP-5 *194667.0 27741.8 DC-1 - STPPChitosan1 *194803.0 27741.8 DC-1 - STPPChitosan5 *199061.0 27741.8 DC-5 - NonP-1 *131864.0 27741.8 DC-5 - NonP-5 *138167.0 27741.8 DC-5 - NonPChitosan1 *133470.0 27741.8 DC-5 - NonPChitosan5 *136818.0 27741.8 DC-5 - STPP-1 *136909.0 27741.8 DC-5 - STPP-5 *140727.0 27741.8 DC-5 - STPPChitosan1 *140864.0 27741.8 DC-5 - STPPChitosan5 *145121.0 27741.8 NonP-1 - NonP-5 6303.0 27741.8 NonP-1 - NonPChitosan1 1606.33 27741.8 NonP-1 - NonPChitosan5 4954.67 27741.8 NonP-1 - STPP-1 5045.67 27741.8 NonP-1 - STPP-5 8863.67 27741.8 NonP-1 - STPPChitosan1 9000.0 27741.8 NonP-1 - STPPChitosan5 13257.7 27741.8 NonP-5 - NonPChitosan1 -4696.67 27741.8 NonP-5 - NonPChitosan5 -1348.33 27741.8 NonP-5 - STPP-1 -1257.33 27741.8 NonP-5 - STPP-5 2560.67 27741.8 NonP-5 - STPPChitosan1 2697.0 27741.8 NonP-5 - STPPChitosan5 6954.67 27741.8 NonPChitosan1 - NonPChitosan5 3348.33 27741.8 NonPChitosan1 - STPP-1 3439.33 27741.8 NonPChitosan1 - STPP-5 7257.33 27741.8 NonPChitosan1 - STPPChitosan1 7393.67 27741.8 NonPChitosan1 - STPPChitosan5 11651.3 27741.8 NonPChitosan5 - STPP-1 91.0 27741.8 NonPChitosan5 - STPP-5 3909.0 27741.8 NonPChitosan5 - STPPChitosan1 4045.33 27741.8 NonPChitosan5 - STPPChitosan5 8303.0 27741.8 STPP-1 - STPP-5 3818.0 27741.8 STPP-1 - STPPChitosan1 3954.33 27741.8 STPP-1 - STPPChitosan5 8212.0 27741.8 STPP-5 - STPPChitosan1 136.333 27741.8 STPP-5 - STPPChitosan5 4394.0 27741.8 STPPChitosan1 - STPPChitosan5 4257.67 27741.8 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- * denotes a statistically significant difference. ANOVA Table for Log VSV tong so by Mau thi nghiem Analysis of Variance ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Luận văn tốt nghiệp khóa 29 – 2008 Phụ chương Chuyên ngành Công nghệ Thực phẩm - xxxvii - Trường Đại học Cần Thơ Source Sum of Squares Df Mean Square F-Ratio P-Value ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Between groups 6.53683 9 0.726314 68.37 0.0000 Within groups 0.212467 20 0.0106233 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total (Corr.) 6.7493 29 Multiple Range Tests for Log VSV tong so by Mau thi nghiem -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Method: 95.0 percent LSD Mau thi nghiem Count Mean Homogeneous Groups -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- STPPChitosan5 3 3.84 X STPPChitosan1 3 4.03667 X STPP-5 3 4.04667 X NonP-5 3 4.13667 XX STPP-1 3 4.16667 XX NonPChitosan5 3 4.17667 XX NonPChitosan1 3 4.26667 X NonP-1 3 4.30333 X DC-5 3 5.18 X DC-1 3 5.31 X -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Contrast Difference +/- Limits -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- DC-1 - DC-5 0.13 0.175547 DC-1 - NonP-1 *1.00667 0.175547 DC-1 - NonP-5 *1.17333 0.175547 DC-1 - NonPChitosan1 *1.04333 0.175547 DC-1 - NonPChitosan5 *1.13333 0.175547 DC-1 - STPP-1 *1.14333 0.175547 DC-1 - STPP-5 *1.26333 0.175547 DC-1 - STPPChitosan1 *1.27333 0.175547 DC-1 - STPPChitosan5 *1.47 0.175547 DC-5 - NonP-1 *0.876667 0.175547 DC-5 - NonP-5 *1.04333 0.175547 DC-5 - NonPChitosan1 *0.913333 0.175547 DC-5 - NonPChitosan5 *1.00333 0.175547 DC-5 - STPP-1 *1.01333 0.175547 DC-5 - STPP-5 *1.13333 0.175547 DC-5 - STPPChitosan1 *1.14333 0.175547 DC-5 - STPPChitosan5 *1.34 0.175547 NonP-1 - NonP-5 0.166667 0.175547 NonP-1 - NonPChitosan1 0.0366667 0.175547 NonP-1 - NonPChitosan5 0.126667 0.175547 NonP-1 - STPP-1 0.136667 0.175547 NonP-1 - STPP-5 *0.256667 0.175547 NonP-1 - STPPChitosan1 *0.266667 0.175547 NonP-1 - STPPChitosan5 *0.463333 0.175547 NonP-5 - NonPChitosan1 -0.13 0.175547 NonP-5 - NonPChitosan5 -0.04 0.175547 NonP-5 - STPP-1 -0.03 0.175547 NonP-5 - STPP-5 0.09 0.175547 NonP-5 - STPPChitosan1 0.1 0.175547 NonP-5 - STPPChitosan5 *0.296667 0.175547 NonPChitosan1 - NonPChitosan5 0.09 0.175547 NonPChitosan1 - STPP-1 0.1 0.175547 NonPChitosan1 - STPP-5 *0.22 0.175547 NonPChitosan1 - STPPChitosan1 *0.23 0.175547 NonPChitosan1 - STPPChitosan5 *0.426667 0.175547 NonPChitosan5 - STPP-1 0.01 0.175547 NonPChitosan5 - STPP-5 0.13 0.175547 NonPChitosan5 - STPPChitosan1 0.14 0.175547 NonPChitosan5 - STPPChitosan5 *0.336667 0.175547 STPP-1 - STPP-5 0.12 0.175547 STPP-1 - STPPChitosan1 0.13 0.175547 STPP-1 - STPPChitosan5 *0.326667 0.175547 STPP-5 - STPPChitosan1 0.01 0.175547 STPP-5 - STPPChitosan5 *0.206667 0.175547 STPPChitosan1 - STPPChitosan5 *0.196667 0.175547 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- * denotes a statistically significant difference. Analysis Summary Dependent variable: Mau sac Factors: Luận văn tốt nghiệp khóa 29 – 2008 Phụ chương Chuyên ngành Công nghệ Thực phẩm - xxxviii - Trường Đại học Cần Thơ Phuong phap nhung Thoi gian tru dong Number of complete cases: 30 Analysis of Variance for Mau sac - Type III Sums of Squares -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Source Sum of Squares Df Mean Square F-Ratio P-Value -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- MAIN EFFECTS A:Phuong phap nhung 30,2472 4 7,5618 4,68 0,0062 B:Thoi gian tru dong 21,8966 1 21,8966 13,54 0,0012 RESIDUAL 38,8112 24 1,61713 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- TOTAL (CORRECTED) 90,9549 29 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- All F-ratios are based on the residual mean square error. Table of Least Squares Means for Mau sac with 95,0 Percent Confidence Intervals -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Stnd. Lower Upper Level Count Mean Error Limit Limit -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- GRAND MEAN 30 54,975 Phuong phap nhung Doi chung 6 56,065 0,519155 54,9935 57,1365 Non-P 6 53,7883 0,519155 52,7168 54,8598 Non-P =>chitosan 6 53,7983 0,519155 52,7268 54,8698 STPP 6 55,2583 0,519155 54,1868 56,3298 STPP =>chitosan 6 55,965 0,519155 54,8935 57,0365 Thoi gian tru dong 1 ngay 15 55,8293 0,328343 55,1517 56,507 5 ngay 15 54,1207 0,328343 53,443 54,7983 Multiple Range Tests for Mau sac by Phuong phap nhung -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Method: 95,0 percent LSD Level Count LS Mean Homogeneous Groups -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Non-P 6 53,7883 X Non-P=>chitosan6 53,7983 X STPP 6 55,2583 XX STPP =>chitosan6 55,965 X Doi chung 6 56,065 X -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Contrast Difference +/- Limits -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Doi chung - Non-P *2,27667 1,51531 Doi chung - Non-P =>chitosan *2,26667 1,51531 Doi chung - STPP 0,806667 1,51531 Doi chung - STPP =>chitosan 0,1 1,51531 Non-P - Non-P =>chitosan -0,01 1,51531 Non-P - STPP -1,47 1,51531 Non-P - STPP =>chitosan *-2,17667 1,51531 Non-P =>chitosan - STPP -1,46 1,51531 Non-P =>chitosan - STPP =>chitosan *-2,16667 1,51531 STPP - STPP =>chitosan -0,706667 1,51531 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- * denotes a statistically significant difference. Multiple Range Tests for Mau sac by Thoi gian tru dong -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Method: 95,0 percent LSD Level Count LS Mean Homogeneous Groups -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 5 ngay 15 54,1207 X 1 ngay 15 55,8293 X -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Contrast Difference +/- Limits -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 ngay - 5 ngay *1,70867 0,958366 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- * denotes a statistically significant difference. ANOVA Table for Mau sac by Mau thi nghiem Luận văn tốt nghiệp khóa 29 – 2008 Phụ chương Chuyên ngành Công nghệ Thực phẩm - xxxix - Trường Đại học Cần Thơ Analysis of Variance ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Source Sum of Squares Df Mean Square F-Ratio P-Value ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Between groups 57.4294 9 6.38105 3.81 0.0061 Within groups 33.5255 20 1.67628 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total (Corr.) 90.9549 29 Multiple Range Tests for Mau sac by Mau thi nghiem -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Method: 95.0 percent LSD Mau thi nghiem Count Mean Homogeneous Groups -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- NonP-5 3 52.3233 X NonPChitosan5 3 53.1667 XX NonPChitosan1 3 54.43 XXX STPP-5 3 54.58 XX STPPChitosan5 3 54.7667 XX NonP-1 3 55.2533 XXX DC-5 3 55.7667 XX STPP-1 3 55.9367 XX DC-1 3 56.3633 XX STPPChitosan1 3 57.1633 X -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Contrast Difference +/- Limits -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- DC-1 - DC-5 0.596667 2.20513 DC-1 - NonP-1 1.11 2.20513 DC-1 - NonP-5 *4.04 2.20513 DC-1 - NonPChitosan1 1.93333 2.20513 DC-1 - NonPChitosan5 *3.19667 2.20513 DC-1 - STPP-1 0.426667 2.20513 DC-1 - STPP-5 1.78333 2.20513 DC-1 - STPPChitosan1 -0.8 2.20513 DC-1 - STPPChitosan5 1.59667 2.20513 DC-5 - NonP-1 0.513333 2.20513 DC-5 - NonP-5 *3.44333 2.20513 DC-5 - NonPChitosan1 1.33667 2.20513 DC-5 - NonPChitosan5 *2.6 2.20513 DC-5 - STPP-1 -0.17 2.20513 DC-5 - STPP-5 1.18667 2.20513 DC-5 - STPPChitosan1 -1.39667 2.20513 DC-5 - STPPChitosan5 1.0 2.20513 NonP-1 - NonP-5 *2.93 2.20513 NonP-1 - NonPChitosan1 0.823333 2.20513 NonP-1 - NonPChitosan5 2.08667 2.20513 NonP-1 - STPP-1 -0.683333 2.20513 NonP-1 - STPP-5 0.673333 2.20513 NonP-1 - STPPChitosan1 -1.91 2.20513 NonP-1 - STPPChitosan5 0.486667 2.20513 NonP-5 - NonPChitosan1 -2.10667 2.20513 NonP-5 - NonPChitosan5 -0.843333 2.20513 NonP-5 - STPP-1 *-3.61333 2.20513 NonP-5 - STPP-5 *-2.25667 2.20513 NonP-5 - STPPChitosan1 *-4.84 2.20513 NonP-5 - STPPChitosan5 *-2.44333 2.20513 NonPChitosan1 - NonPChitosan5 1.26333 2.20513 NonPChitosan1 - STPP-1 -1.50667 2.20513 NonPChitosan1 - STPP-5 -0.15 2.20513 NonPChitosan1 - STPPChitosan1 *-2.73333 2.20513 NonPChitosan1 - STPPChitosan5 -0.336667 2.20513 NonPChitosan5 - STPP-1 *-2.77 2.20513 NonPChitosan5 - STPP-5 -1.41333 2.20513 NonPChitosan5 - STPPChitosan1 *-3.99667 2.20513 NonPChitosan5 - STPPChitosan5 -1.6 2.20513 STPP-1 - STPP-5 1.35667 2.20513 STPP-1 - STPPChitosan1 -1.22667 2.20513 STPP-1 - STPPChitosan5 1.17 2.20513 STPP-5 - STPPChitosan1 *-2.58333 2.20513 STPP-5 - STPPChitosan5 -0.186667 2.20513 STPPChitosan1 - STPPChitosan5 *2.39667 2.20513 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- * denotes a statistically significant difference. Analysis Summary Luận văn tốt nghiệp khóa 29 – 2008 Phụ chương Chuyên ngành Công nghệ Thực phẩm - xl - Trường Đại học Cần Thơ Dependent variable: Cau truc Factors: Phuong phap nhung Thoi gian tru dong Number of complete cases: 30 Analysis of Variance for Cau truc - Type III Sums of Squares -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Source Sum of Squares Df Mean Square F-Ratio P-Value -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- MAIN EFFECTS A:Phuong phap nhung 11419,5 4 2854,88 1,53 0,2256 B:Thoi gian tru dong 1241,63 1 1241,63 0,66 0,4229 RESIDUAL 44822,2 24 1867,59 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- TOTAL (CORRECTED) 57483,4 29 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- All F-ratios are based on the residual mean square error. Table of Least Squares Means for Cau truc with 95,0 Percent Confidence Intervals -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Stnd. Lower Upper Level Count Mean Error Limit Limit -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- GRAND MEAN 30 151,567 Phuong phap nhung Doi chung 6 169,667 17,6427 133,254 206,08 Non-P 6 119,833 17,6427 83,4205 156,246 Non-P =>chitosan 6 172,0 17,6427 135,587 208,413 STPP 6 140,167 17,6427 103,754 176,58 STPP =>chitosan 6 156,167 17,6427 119,754 192,58 Thoi gian tru dong 1 ngay 15 158,0 11,1582 134,97 181,03 5 ngay 15 145,133 11,1582 122,104 168,163 Multiple Range Tests for Cau truc by Phuong phap nhung -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Method: 95,0 percent LSD Level Count LS Mean Homogeneous Groups -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Non-P 6 119,833 X STPP 6 140,167 XX STPP =>chitosan6 156,167 XX Doi chung 6 169,667 XX Non-P=>chitosan6 172,0 X -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Contrast Difference +/- Limits -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Doi chung - Non-P 49,8333 51,4955 Doi chung - Non-P =>chitosan -2,33333 51,4955 Doi chung - STPP 29,5 51,4955 Doi chung - STPP =>chitosan 13,5 51,4955 Non-P - Non-P =>chitosan *-52,1667 51,4955 Non-P - STPP -20,3333 51,4955 Non-P - STPP =>chitosan -36,3333 51,4955 Non-P =>chitosan - STPP 31,8333 51,4955 Non-P =>chitosan - STPP =>chitosan 15,8333 51,4955 STPP - STPP =>chitosan -16,0 51,4955 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- * denotes a statistically significant difference. Multiple Range Tests for Cau truc by Thoi gian tru dong -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Method: 95,0 percent LSD Level Count LS Mean Homogeneous Groups -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 5 ngay 15 145,133 X 1 ngay 15 158,0 X -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Contrast Difference +/- Limits -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 ngay - 5 ngay 12,8667 32,5686 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Luận văn tốt nghiệp khóa 29 – 2008 Phụ chương Chuyên ngành Công nghệ Thực phẩm - xli - Trường Đại học Cần Thơ * denotes a statistically significant difference. ANOVA Table for Cau truc by Mau thi nghiem Analysis of Variance ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Source Sum of Squares Df Mean Square F-Ratio P-Value ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Between groups 15094.7 9 1677.19 0.79 0.6278 Within groups 42388.7 20 2119.43 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total (Corr.) 57483.4 29 Multiple Range Tests for Cau truc by Mau thi nghiem -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Method: 95.0 percent LSD Mau thi nghiem Count Mean Homogeneous Groups -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- NonP-1 3 111.667 X NonP-5 3 128.0 X STPP-5 3 131.667 X STPP-1 3 148.667 X STPPChitosan5 3 155.0 X DC-5 3 155.333 X NonPChitosan5 3 155.667 X STPPChitosan1 3 157.333 X DC-1 3 184.0 X NonPChitosan1 3 188.333 X -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Contrast Difference +/- Limits -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- DC-1 - DC-5 28.6667 78.4101 DC-1 - NonP-1 72.3333 78.4101 DC-1 - NonP-5 56.0 78.4101 DC-1 - NonPChitosan1 -4.33333 78.4101 DC-1 - NonPChitosan5 28.3333 78.4101 DC-1 - STPP-1 35.3333 78.4101 DC-1 - STPP-5 52.3333 78.4101 DC-1 - STPPChitosan1 26.6667 78.4101 DC-1 - STPPChitosan5 29.0 78.4101 DC-5 - NonP-1 43.6667 78.4101 DC-5 - NonP-5 27.3333 78.4101 DC-5 - NonPChitosan1 -33.0 78.4101 DC-5 - NonPChitosan5 -0.333333 78.4101 DC-5 - STPP-1 6.66667 78.4101 DC-5 - STPP-5 23.6667 78.4101 DC-5 - STPPChitosan1 -2.0 78.4101 DC-5 - STPPChitosan5 0.333333 78.4101 NonP-1 - NonP-5 -16.3333 78.4101 NonP-1 - NonPChitosan1 -76.6667 78.4101 NonP-1 - NonPChitosan5 -44.0 78.4101 NonP-1 - STPP-1 -37.0 78.4101 NonP-1 - STPP-5 -20.0 78.4101 NonP-1 - STPPChitosan1 -45.6667 78.4101 NonP-1 - STPPChitosan5 -43.3333 78.4101 NonP-5 - NonPChitosan1 -60.3333 78.4101 NonP-5 - NonPChitosan5 -27.6667 78.4101 NonP-5 - STPP-1 -20.6667 78.4101 NonP-5 - STPP-5 -3.66667 78.4101 NonP-5 - STPPChitosan1 -29.3333 78.4101 NonP-5 - STPPChitosan5 -27.0 78.4101 NonPChitosan1 - NonPChitosan5 32.6667 78.4101 NonPChitosan1 - STPP-1 39.6667 78.4101 NonPChitosan1 - STPP-5 56.6667 78.4101 NonPChitosan1 - STPPChitosan1 31.0 78.4101 NonPChitosan1 - STPPChitosan5 33.3333 78.4101 NonPChitosan5 - STPP-1 7.0 78.4101 NonPChitosan5 - STPP-5 24.0 78.4101 NonPChitosan5 - STPPChitosan1 -1.66667 78.4101 NonPChitosan5 - STPPChitosan5 0.666667 78.4101 STPP-1 - STPP-5 17.0 78.4101 STPP-1 - STPPChitosan1 -8.66667 78.4101 STPP-1 - STPPChitosan5 -6.33333 78.4101 STPP-5 - STPPChitosan1 -25.6667 78.4101 STPP-5 - STPPChitosan5 -23.3333 78.4101 STPPChitosan1 - STPPChitosan5 2.33333 78.4101 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Luận văn tốt nghiệp khóa 29 – 2008 Phụ chương Chuyên ngành Công nghệ Thực phẩm - xlii - Trường Đại học Cần Thơ * denotes a statistically significant difference.