Based on the above analysis of tourism
competitiveness and performance, the
observations are made as follows.
Although Cambodia, Myanmar, and
Laos achieved the average growth rate of
4.3%, 3.6% and 3.1% in terms of international
visitors for three years inclusively, the number
still accounts for only a small fraction in the
region. The Philippines and Indonesia are the
two closest competitors to Vietnam with strong
growth both in terms of volume and revenue.
Though the Philippines is currently ranked
below Vietnam, the potential, opportunities
and the diversity of tourism development and
products are not less competitive. According
to the World Bank updates on tourism
development in developing countries in East
Asia, in Vietnam, the number of domestic
tourists is four to nine times higher than
that of international visitors. Nevertheless,
this number is 25 times in Indonesia, and 50
times in the Philippines (World Bank Group,
2017, p. 89). Though Vietnam witnessed
positive growth in tourist arrivals in the past
two years, it is still behind other tourism
developed countries in the region such as
Thailand, Malaysia and Singapore in terms of
the absolute numbers of visitors and revenue.
Indonesia has a slightly higher number of
tourist arrivals than Vietnam, but its revenue
is considerably higher than Vietnam.
The issues that Vietnam tourism is facing
in the situation of rapid tourism growth is
the infrastructure and tourism facilities, as it
has to ensure sustainable development when
Vietnam ranked the 8th out of eight countries
reviewed in tourism infrastructure (WEF).
In addition, the ground and air transport
infrastructure of Vietnam is also a constraint,
requiring a master plan and close coordination
between the tourism and the transport sector.
The issue of business and institutional
environment which facilitates businesses is
still a gap that Vietnam needs to fill in.
10 trang |
Chia sẻ: hachi492 | Ngày: 10/01/2022 | Lượt xem: 328 | Lượt tải: 1
Bạn đang xem nội dung tài liệu Phân tích năng lực cạnh tranh của du lịch Việt Nam trong mối liên hệ với các quốc gia Asean hiện nay, để tải tài liệu về máy bạn click vào nút DOWNLOAD ở trên
COMPETITIVENESS ANALYSIS ON VIETNAM TOURISM
IN RELATION WITH ASEAN COUNTRIES AT PRESENT
Vu Chien Thang*
Research Management and International Cooperation, Institute for Tourism Development Research,
58 Kim Ma, Ba Dinh, Ha Noi, Viet Nam
Received 19 April 2019
Revised 21 May 2019; Accepted 30 May 2019
Abstract: This paper aims at analyzing aspects that are affecting the competitiveness of Vietnam tourism
in relation with other Southeast Asian (ASEAN) countries. The issues to be addressed are as follows: (1) the
international tourist market share of Vietnam in ASEAN; (2) Vietnam’s position in competitiveness ranking by
the World Economic Forum (WEF); (3) Effectiveness of tourism in Vietnam in relation to ASEAN countries.
Keywords: ASEAN tourism, Vietnam Tourism, competitiveness
1. Introduction 1
It is a positive outlook of GDP’s growth
in Southeast Asia during 2018-2022 that shows
the countries’ average growth rate of 5.2%.2
As a result of the establishment of the ASEAN
Economic Community, the contribution of
tourism to their national income has increased.
Statistic shows that Japan, Korea and China
are the top source markets (ADB, 2017, p. 69).
Tourism has created many jobs and become a
driving force for the economic development
of ASEAN countries. According to the WEF’s
Travel and Tourism Competitiveness Report,
most ASEAN countries are ranked over the
50th out of more than 130 countries surveyed,
* Tel.: 84-988759957
Mail: phaptanhnt@gmail.com
1 The cut-off date is 31 October 2017. ASEAN growth
rates are the weighted averages of those of the
individual economies. Source: OECD Development
Centre, MPF-2018 (Medium-term Projection
Framework). For more information on the MPF,
please see www.oecd.org/dev/asia-pacific/mpf.htm.
which reflects that the regional countries focus
on tourism development.
One of the strengths of the region’s
destinations is their reasonable tour prices.
According to the cost of living index,3 the
most affordable ASEAN destinations in the
world are led by Cambodia, Indonesia and
Vietnam. In addition, the region benefits from
having top hotels at competitive prices in
China, Indonesia and Malaysia for less than
100 USD/night. This price competitiveness
is quite impressive in comparison with such
high-income neighboring destinations as
Japan, Singapore, and South Korea. However,
many ASEAN countries are facing gaps
in infrastructure development, including
air, road and tourism facilities and ICT
readiness. In addition, regional countries that
encountered political instability reduced their
2 Based on Numbeo’s cost-of-living index compared
to New York City. This is a consumer price index,
including grocery, restaurant, transportation and
common supporting services.
167VNU Journal of Foreign Studies, Vol.35, No.3 (2019) 166-175
competitiveness in safety and security index
(WEF, 2017, p. 15).
Since 2010, the number of international
tourists has grown three-fold from 5 million to
more than 15 million in 2018. Tourism industry,
generated 620 trillion VND (26.75 billion USD)
in total tourist revenue, up 110 billion VND
(4.75 billion USD) compared to 2017. In 2018,
international arrivals to Vietnam reached 15.5
million, up 2.7 million compared to 2017, while
domestic tourists grew by 6.8 million compared
to 2017, to an estimated 80 million in 2018. In
this paper, we assess the competitiveness of
Vietnam tourism among ASEAN countries in
the various aspects of World Economic Forum’s
competitiveness index described below in the
links with comparison of international arrivals,
revenue and heritage in ASEAN countries
through years. Accordingly, we locate the
position of Vietnam competitiveness among
ASEAN countries.
2. Literature review
Tourism industry plays an important
role in economy, employment and prosperity
of countries as it offers opportunities for
on-spot exports, female and youth workers,
medium and small enterprises, and culture
exchanges among others. In the supply
side of this industry, it is notable that many
tourism products, which are throughout the
value chain, can be creatively formed. It has a
strong effect on local economy. In the demand
side, the global demand for travel and tourism
is currently booming, especially in ASEAN
countries. In the next decade (2018-2028), the
worldwide demand for tourism is expected to
increase nearly 4% annually, faster than the
global economic growth (WTTC, 2018, p. 1)31.
3 ht tps: / /www.wttc.org/- /media/f i les/reports/
economic-impact-research/archived/regions-2018/
world2018.pdf, retrieved on 20 May 2019
Southeast Asia international tourist arrivals
in 2017 reached 120.4 million (accounting
for 9% of the global figure), which shows
significant demand (UNWTO, 2018, p. 5),
and the region’s share in global demand is
expected to grow by 10.3% by 2030 (or 187
million visitors) (UNWTO, 2011, p. 34).
The government of Vietnam visions
tourism as a strategic and driving force of
socio-economic development. The Politburo
resolution No. 08-NQ/TW dated 16/1/2017
set the objectives which develop tourism
into a spearhead industry and Vietnam into a
leading destination in Southeast Asia, through
a focus on, inter alia, (i) developing tourism
infrastructure, (ii) strengthening tourism
promotion, (iii) generating a favorable
environment for tourism businesses, (iv)
developing tourism human resources, and (v)
improving State management of the tourism
sector. Currently, Vietnam is developing a
national tourism strategy to 2030, vision to
2050 and an action plan that guide activities
and investments to achieve the 2030 targets
and to drive the development of the tourism
sector over the coming decades.
Vietnam, however, is not alone in this
pursuit to leverage economic opportunities
from tourism, and will have to contend
for market share with proactive regional
competitors. Eager to capitalize on the
rapidly-increasing outbound travelers to the
region, many countries in Southeast Asia
are prioritizing tourism in their economic
development agendas, setting lofty visitor
number targets, and formulating sector
strategies and investment plans. Thailand is
finalizing its National Tourism Development
Plan 2017-2021, Indonesia is preparing
Integrated Tourism Master plans for the
development of 10 high-priority destinations,
and in the Philippines, the government
168 V.C.Thang/ VNU Journal of Foreign Studies, Vol.35, No.3 (2019) 166-175
is finalizing the new National Tourism
Development Plan (NTDP 2016-2022). In
this fiercely competitive environment for
visitors, Vietnam will have to be strategic in
focusing on the market segments where it
has a competitive edge, resist the temptation
to prioritize the quantity of visitors over
their economic yield, and be cognizant of the
implications of the pace and composition of
its tourism growth for the sustainability of
the sector and its impacts on the environment
and natural and cultural assets (World Bank,
ITDR, 2018, p. 2).
3. Methodology
This article is completed by the method of
desk study to collect, analyze, and synthesize
secondary data. Research materials, survey
reports and situation reports by individuals and
organizations within ASEAN countries are
collected and synthesized. The data derived
from biennial WEF report in 2017 were
produced from 2016 data base. Likewise, the
data that are collected from ASEAN secretariat
were also updated in 2017. Therefore, it has
a slight lateness to date, however, the figures
are used as a tool to review Vietnam tourism
industry’s competitiveness and can be a
thermometer to track our progress over time
and broaden outlook for the future. In Tables
12 and 13, the avarage number is calculated
based on the 3 latest consecutive years of
2014, 2015, and 2016.
4. The international tourist market share of
Vietnam in ASEAN
In 2016, the total number of international
tourist arrivals to ASEAN is 116 million.
Table 1 shows that the five countries which
receive less international tourist arrivals are
the Philippines, Cambodia, Laos, Myanmar,
and Brunei Darussalam. Vietnam ranks the
5th among ASEAN countries, accounting for
8.62% of international tourist arrivals. The
destinations that have steady growth in the
region with the largest tourist market shares
in 2016 are Thailand, Malaysia, Singapore,
and Indonesia.
Table 1: International tourist arrivals to ASEAN nations in 2016
in comparison to it is in the region
No. Country Arrivals (million) Share (%)
1 Thailand 32.53 28.04
2 Malaysia 26.76 22.49
3 Singapore 16.4 14.14
4 Indonesia 11.52 9, 93
5 Vietnam 10 8.62
6 Philippines 5.97 5.15
7 Cambodia 5.01 4.21
8 Laos 4.24 3.66
9 Myanmar 2.91 2.51
10 Brunei Darussalam 0.22 0.02
At present, the
average growth rate of
international visitors to
Viet Nam is impressive
with 7.15% in the
period of 2007 - 2016.
(Figure 1)
169VNU Journal of Foreign Studies, Vol.35, No.3 (2019) 166-175
Figure 1. The share of international tourist arrivals to Vietnam in ASEAN from 2007 to 2016
Table 2: Shares of international
tourists to Vietnam in total of that to
ASEAN
Year Share (%)
2007 6.77
2008 6.47
2009 5.69
2010 6.78
2011 7.39
2012 7.67
2013 7.41
2014 7.50
2015 7.25
2016 8.62
5. Vietnam’s position in the competitiveness
ranking by the World Economic Forum (WEF)
According to WEF, the 2017
competitiveness index of Vietnam increased 8
positions, ranked at 67th out of 136 surveyed
countries (in 2016).
Figure 2: Overview of Vietnam tourism competitiveness (WEF 2017)
In comparison with other ASEAN countries
in Travel and Tourism competitiveness
in 2016, Vietnam is at the fifth rank after
Singapore, Malaysia, Thailand, and
Indonesia (Table 3).
Table 3: ASEAN countries competitiveness
No. Country Index
1 Singapore 13
2 Malaysia 26
3 Thailand 34
4 Indonesia 42
5 Vietnam 67
6 Philippines 79
7 Laos 94
8 Cambodia 101
170 V.C.Thang/ VNU Journal of Foreign Studies, Vol.35, No.3 (2019) 166-175
In terms of Human Resources
and Labor Market, Vietnam
is only behind Singapore,
Malaysia and Thailand
(Table 4); To other highly
competitive factor as
Natural resources, Vietnam
ranks only after Thailand,
Indonesia, and Malaysia
(Table 5)
In general, ASEAN countries are facing with health and sanitation issues. Singapore and Malaysia
are the leading ASEAN countries in this area. Vietnam ranks the third in eight countries (Table 9).
The poor in Ground and air transport infrastructure will definitely affect the quality and capacity
of the destination. The strong growth of tourism will lead to difficulties in the waste and wastewater
treatment, causing the risk of environmental degradation, economic loss, and local people’s life
quality decrease. In Tables 10 and 11, Vietnam ranks the fifth out of eight countries examined.
Table 9: Health and hygiene
No. Country Score
1 Singapore 5.5
2 Malaysia 5.2
3 Vietnam 5
4 Thailand 4.9
5 Philippines 4.8
6 Indonesia 4.3
7 Lao 4.3
8 Cambodia 4
Table 10: Land transport
Infrastructure
No. Country Score
1 Singapore 6.3
2 Malaysia 4.4
3 Indonesia 3.2
4 Thailand 3.1
5 Vietnam 3.1
6 Philippines 2.5
7 Lao 2.4
8 Cambodia 2.4
Business environment is
a concern for Vietnam,
which is only at higher
ranking than Cambodia
and the Philippines. In
addition, Vietnam’s tourist
service infrastructure
is the lowest ranking in
comparison to ASEAN
countries. (Table 13)
Table 4: Human Resources
and labor market
No. Country Score
1 Singapore 5.6
2 Malaysia 5.2
3 Thailand 4.9
4 Vietnam 4.9
5 Philippines 4.8
6 Indonesia 4.6
7 Laos 4.6
8 Cambodia 4.1
Table 5: Natural Resources
No. Country Score
1 Thailand 4.9
2 Indonesia 4.7
3 Malaysia 4.1
4 Vietnam 4
5 Philippines 4
6 Cambodia 3.2
7 Laos 3
8 Singapore 2.4
For Cultural resources and Safety and Security, Vietnam is ranked the third, which are the most
competitive strengths in the region. (Tables 6 and 7) In particular, the ICT readiness of Vietnam
rose 17 positions compared to its index in 2016, ranking the 80th, after Singapore, Malaysia and
Thailand. (Table 8)
Table 6: Cultural resources
No. Country Score
1 Indonesia 3.3
2 Singapore 3.1
3 Vietnam 3
4 Malaysia 2.9
5 Thailand 2.8
6 Philippines 1.9
7 Cambodia 1.6
8 Laos 1.3
Table 7: Security and Safety
No. Country Score
1 Singapore 6.5
2 Malaysia 5.8
3 Vietnam 5.6
4 Laos 5.4
5 Indonesia 5.1
6 Cambodia 5.1
7 Thailand 4
8 Philippines 3.6
Table 8: ICT Readiness
No. Country Score
1 Singapore 6.1
2 Malaysia 5.2
3 Thailand 4.8
4 Vietnam 4.2
5 Philippines 4
6 Indonesia 3.8
7 Cambodia 3.6
8 Laos 3.1
171VNU Journal of Foreign Studies, Vol.35, No.3 (2019) 166-175
Table 13: Tourism service infrastructure
No. Score Country
1 Thailand 5.8
2 Singapore 5.4
3 Malaysia 4.7
4 Laos 3.5
5 Phili ppines 3.4
6 Indonesia 3.1
7 Cambodia 2.9
8 Vietnam 2.6
6. Vietnam tourism performance in relation
to ASEAN countries in terms of important
market segments (marine, urban, culture
and eco-tourism)
Tourism benefits from the natural and
cultural destinations, including the World
Heritage sites.
Indonesia and Vietnam are the two leading
countries with the highest number of UNESCO
World Heritage Sites in the 10 ASEAN
countries. Indonesia has four cultural heritages,
four natural heritages; Vietnam has five cultural
heritages, two natural heritages and one mixed
heritage; Thailand has three cultural heritages,
two natural heritages. (Table 14)
Table 14: UNESCO World Heritage Sites
in ASEAN
No. Country Number of Heritage
1 Indonesia 8
2 Vietnam 8
3 Philippines 6
4 Thailand 5
5 Malaysia 4
6 Laos 2
7 Cambodia 2
8 Singapore 1
9 Myanmar 1
10 Brunei
Darussalam
0
ASEAN Marketing Strategy presents
its focus which includes comprehensive
themes and is relevant to the global trend,
namely, gastronomy, health care, culture and
heritage; and natural and adventure (ASEAN
Secretariat, 2017, p. 12). In 2017, the total
revenue generated from tourism in Vietnam
is 541,000 billion VND (23 billion USD),
in which the most tourists’ expenditure is on
food and beverage and accommodation, and
transportation, followed by other expenses such
as shopping, sightseeing, and others (Figure 3).
Table 11: Air transport infrastructure
No. Country Score
1 Singapore 5.3
2 Thailand 4.6
3 Malaysia 4.5
4 Indonesia 3.8
5 Vietnam 2.8
6 Philippines 2.7
7 Lao 2.1
8 Cambodia 2.1
Table 12: Business Environment
No. Score Country
1 Singapore 6.1
2 Malaysia 5.4
3 Thailand 4.7
4 Laos 4.7
5 Indonesia 4.5
6 Vietnam 4.4
7 Philippines 4.3
8 Cambodia 3.7
172 V.C.Thang/ VNU Journal of Foreign Studies, Vol.35, No.3 (2019) 166-175
Figure 3: Shares of total tourism revenue in
2017 (Source: VNAT)
In the past four years, Thailand
witnesses the most impressive growth in terms
of international visitors, which surpassed
Malaysia by 2015 and 2016 with the annual
increases of 20.6% and 8.9% respectively.
In particular, although Thailand is not
completely in outstanding role to Malaysia in
terms of arrivals, it generated higher revenue
compared to Malaysia and Singapore, being
the regional leading destination with nearly
45 billion USD in 2015 and 50 billion USD
in 2016. Though Vietnam ranked at the 4th
position in terms of tourist arrivals, it takes
the 5th position on the revenue list and only
covers 16.54% in comparison with Thailand
in 2016. In the period of 2014-2016, Thailand
accounts for major share of visitors of 23.6%,
27.45% and 28.10% respectively compared
to the region. The average rate of 3 years is
26.38%. At the same time, the number of
international visitors to Vietnam in ASEAN
was 7.58%, 7.29% and 8.63% respectively.
The 3-year average is 7.83%, which covers
29.7% to Thailand’s (Table 12, 13).
No Country
Table 15: International tourist arrivals to ASEAN countries
(1000) Shares in ASEAN (%)
2010 2014 2015 2016
2014 2015 2016 3-year average
ASEAN 73,800 105,000 108,900 116,000
1 Thailand 15,936 24,810 29,923 32,588 23.63 27.48 28.09 25.55
2 Malaysia 24,577 27,437 25,721 26,757 26.13 23.62 23.07 24.87
3 Singapore 9,161 11,864 12,052 12,913 11.30 11.07 11.13 11.18
4 Indonesia 7,003 9,435 9,963 11,520 8.99 9.15 9.93 9.07
5 Vietnam 5,050 7,960 7,944 10,013 7.58 7.29 8.63 7.44
6 Philippines 3,520 4,833 5,361 5,967 4.60 4.92 5.14 4.76
7 Cambodia 2,508 4,503 4,775 5,012 4.29 4.38 4.32 4.34
8 Myanmar 792 3,081 4,681 2,91 2.93 4.30 2.51 3.62
9 Laos 1,670 3,164 3,543 3,315 3.01 3.25 2.86 3.13
10 Brunei 214 201 218 219 0.19 0.20 0.19 0.20
No. Country
Table 16: International tourism revenue by ASEAN countries (million USD)
2010 2014 2015 2016 3-consecutive year average
1 Thailand 20.104 38.418 44.922 49.871 44.404
2 Singapore 14.178 19.134 16.563 18.386 18.0 28
3 Malaysia 18.115 22.595 17.584 18.074 19.418
4 Indonesia 6.958 10.261 10.761 11.349 10.790
5 Vietnam 4.450 7.410 7.350 8.250 7.670
6 Philippines 2.645 5.030 5.272 5.139 5.147
7 Cambodia 1.519 2,953 3,130 3,207 3,097
8 Myanmar 72 1,613 2,101 2,177 1,964
9 Laos 382 642 581 540 588
10 Brunei --- 79 140 --- 110
(UNWTO, 2017, p. 9)
173VNU Journal of Foreign Studies, Vol.35, No.3 (2019) 166-175
To most countries in ASEAN, tourism is
one of the main on-spot export sectors and the
main source of foreign currencies. Cambodia
is a leading country which generates high-
income from international tourists, accounting
for 29% of the total national export income
value in GDP. The total contribution of
tourism in GDP of Indonesia is 6.2%.
Source: World Development Index (WDI)
2017
7. Observations
Based on the above analysis of tourism
competitiveness and performance, the
observations are made as follows.
Although Cambodia, Myanmar, and
Laos achieved the average growth rate of
4.3%, 3.6% and 3.1% in terms of international
visitors for three years inclusively, the number
still accounts for only a small fraction in the
region. The Philippines and Indonesia are the
two closest competitors to Vietnam with strong
growth both in terms of volume and revenue.
Though the Philippines is currently ranked
below Vietnam, the potential, opportunities
and the diversity of tourism development and
products are not less competitive. According
to the World Bank updates on tourism
development in developing countries in East
Asia, in Vietnam, the number of domestic
tourists is four to nine times higher than
that of international visitors. Nevertheless,
this number is 25 times in Indonesia, and 50
times in the Philippines (World Bank Group,
2017, p. 89). Though Vietnam witnessed
positive growth in tourist arrivals in the past
two years, it is still behind other tourism
developed countries in the region such as
Thailand, Malaysia and Singapore in terms of
the absolute numbers of visitors and revenue.
Indonesia has a slightly higher number of
tourist arrivals than Vietnam, but its revenue
is considerably higher than Vietnam.
The issues that Vietnam tourism is facing
in the situation of rapid tourism growth is
the infrastructure and tourism facilities, as it
has to ensure sustainable development when
Vietnam ranked the 8th out of eight countries
reviewed in tourism infrastructure (WEF).
In addition, the ground and air transport
infrastructure of Vietnam is also a constraint,
requiring a master plan and close coordination
between the tourism and the transport sector.
The issue of business and institutional
environment which facilitates businesses is
still a gap that Vietnam needs to fill in.
In conclusion, many of the advantages
of Vietnam tourism are highlighted by
international organizations in ASEAN
such as natural and cultural resources,
ICT readiness, human resources and labor
market for tourism development. In order to
maintain the growth momentum and enhance
the position of tourism in the ASEAN region,
Vietnam needs to give prioritization to the
satisfaction of the needs of the key markets,
overcome weaknesses in infrastructure and
favorable policies for businesses, improve
environmental quality standards, eco-
friendly tourism products, and enhance the
participation of local communities in tourism.
174 V.C.Thang/ VNU Journal of Foreign Studies, Vol.35, No.3 (2019) 166-175
8. Recommendations
Vietnam witnesses the encouraging
increase of international arrivals in recent
years and enjoys economic benefits from
this booming tourism activity. However,
the tourism quality must be shifted rather
than the quantity of tourism, and the sector
development should be strengthened in
a more environmentally, culturally, and
socially sustainable manner. Therefore, some
recommendations which are based on the
above observations are as follows:
- Diversification of products and
marketing strategies: Product development
and diversification should focus on eco-friendly
tourism offerings and be increasingly targeted
at higher-spending visitor source markets.
- Strengthening tourism human
resources and local economy linkages: The
supply of skilled tourism labor should be grown
faster to keep up with accelerating demand. The
sufficient quantity of local workers should be in
line with the various goods and services offered
as the two sides of a coin.
- Improvement of tourism infrastructure:
The quality of tourism infrastructure must meet
higher standards in line with the orientation of
developing more eco-friendly tourism products.
- Tourism destination management:
Strategic coordination of destination planning
and product development should be highlighted.
If we have proper and strategic view
on development oritentation, avoiding mass
tourism, and follow the trend of maintaining
environmental, cultural, and social
sustainability, the results will be invaluable
as it ensures the right measures, effective
monitoring and evaluation, and sustainable
economic growth for decades to come.
References
ASEAN Secretariat, (2017), ASEAN Tourism Marketing
Strategy (ATMS) 2017-2020, p.12. Jakarta: The
ASEAN Secretariat.
Asian Development Bank, (2017), Asian Development
Outlook 2017, p. 69. Manila: Asian Development
Bank.
Crotti, R., & Misrahi, T. (2017), The Travel & Tourism
Competitiveness Report 2017, p.15. Geneva: World
Economic Forum
Manzo, G., (2018), Travel & Tourism Economic Impact:
World, p.2. London: World Travel & Tourism
Council
World Bank, (2017), East Asia and Pacific Economic
Update, October 2017 – Balancing Act, p. 89.
Washington, D.C.: World Bank Group
World Bank, ITDR, (2018), Vietnam Tourism Sector
Analysis, p.2. Hanoi: World Bank – Institute for
Development Research
World Tourism Organization, (2011), Towards Tourism
2030/ Global Overview, p.34. Madrid: World
Tourism Organization
World Tourism Organization, (2017), UNWTO Tourism
Highlights: 2017 Edition, p. 9. Madrid: World
Tourism Organization
World Tourism Organization, (2018), UNWTO Tourism
Highlights: 2018 Edition, p.5. Madrid: World
Tourism Organization
175VNU Journal of Foreign Studies, Vol.35, No.3 (2019) 166-175
PHÂN TÍCH NĂNG LỰC CẠNH TRANH CỦA DU LỊCH
VIỆT NAM TRONG MỐI LIÊN HỆ VỚI CÁC QUỐC GIA
ASEAN HIỆN NAY
Vũ Chiến Thắng
Phòng Quản lý khoa học và Hợp tác quốc tế, Viện Nghiên cứu Phát triển Du lịch,
58 Kim Mã, Ba Đình, Hà Nội, Việt Nam
Tóm tắt: Bài báo này phân tích các khía cạnh ảnh hưởng tới năng lực cạnh tranh của du lịch
Việt Nam trong mối liên hệ với các quốc gia Đông Nam Á (ASEAN). Các vấn đề được đề cập bao
gồm: (1) thị phần khách du lịch quốc tế của Việt Nam trong ASEAN; (2) Thứ bậc của Việt Nam
trong bảng xếp hạng năng lực cạnh tranh của Diễn đàn Kinh tế Thế giới (WEF); (3) Hiệu quả của
du lịch Việt Nam trong mối tương quan với các quốc gia ASEAN.
Từ khóa: du lịch ASEAN, du lịch Việt Nam, năng lực cạnh tranh
Các file đính kèm theo tài liệu này:
- phan_tich_nang_luc_canh_tranh_cua_du_lich_viet_nam_trong_moi.pdf