In this study, we investigated two separation methods for the isolation of the bioactive
compound Murrayafoline A from the roots of the Vietnamese plant Glycosmis stenocarpa and
developed an HPLC method for the determination of its contents in plant material and methanol
extracts. The yield of Murrayafoline A using steam distillation method was 1.5 times higher than
that of the separate method using column chromatography. By HPLC method, the content of
Murrayafoline A was determined to be 0.38 % (w/w) in the roots and 16.69 % (w/w) in the
methanol extract of G. stenocarpa
7 trang |
Chia sẻ: honghp95 | Lượt xem: 624 | Lượt tải: 0
Bạn đang xem nội dung tài liệu Separation and hplc quantitative analysis of murrayafoline a from the roots of glycosmis stenocarpa - Tran Quoc Toan, để tải tài liệu về máy bạn click vào nút DOWNLOAD ở trên
Journal of Science and Technology 54 (2C) (2016) 530-537
SEPARATION AND HPLC QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS OF
MURRAYAFOLINE A FROM THE ROOTS OF
GLYCOSMIS STENOCARPA
Tran Quoc Toan1, Le Xuan Duy1, Tran Thu Huong1, To Dao Cuong1,
Tran Thi Thu Thuy1, Nguyen Quang Tung2, Bui Huu Tai3, Nguyen Manh Cuong1, *
1Institute of Natural Products Chemistry, VAST, 18 Hoang Quoc Viet road, Cau Giay, Hanoi
2Faculty of Chemical Technology, Hanoi University of Industry, km 13, 32 Road,
Minh Khai commune, Bac Tu Liem, Hanoi
3Institute of Marine Biochemistry, VAST, 18 Hoang Quoc Viet road, Cau Giay,Hanoi
*Email: nmcuong_inpc@yahoo.com.vn
Received: 15 June 2016; Accepted for publication: 29 October 2016
ABSTRACT
In this study, we investigated two methods for the separation and purification of alkaloid
Murrayafoline A from the roots of the Vietnamese plant Glycosmis stenocarpa and developed an
HPLC method for the determination of its contents in plant materials and the methanol extract.
The yield of Murrayafoline A using steam distillation method was 1.5 times higher than the
separation method using column chromatography. By HPLC method, the content of
Murrayafoline A was determined to be 0.38 % (w/w) in the roots and 16.69 % (w/w) in the
methanol extract of G. stenocarpa.
Keywords:Glycosmis stenocarpa, Rutaceae, carbazole alkaloid, Murrayafoline A.
1. INTRODUCTION
Murrayafoline A is a carbazole alkaloid which has strong activity against cancer cells [1 - 3],
enhances myocardial contractility, prevents myocardial ischemia and minimizes the risk of stroke
[4]. In Vietnam, Murrayafoline A was found in the medicinal plant Glycosmis stenocarpa Drake.
(Rutaceae), which is widely distributed in some northern provinces [5, 6, 7]. Our recent studies
showed that the methanol extract from the leaves and stem of G. stenocarpa has anti-cancer, anti-
fungal and anti-bacterial activities [8, 9]. In this paper, we report a new and effective method for
the isolation of Murrayafoline A from G. stenocarpa using steam distillation and an HPLC method
for the determination of its content in plant materials and extracts.
2. MATERIALS AND METHODS
2.1. Plant materials
Separation and HPLC quantitative analysis of murrayafoline A from the roots of Glycosmis...
531
Plant samples of G. stenocarpa were collected at Hoang Hoa Tham commune, Hai Duong
province, Vietnam in March 2011 and were identified by Dr. Ngo Van Trai - Department of
Botany, National Institute of Medicinal Materials (NIMM). A voucher specimen (TC-036) was
deposited in the Herbarium of the Institute of Natural Products Chemistry, VAST, Hanoi,
Vietnam. The roots of G. stenocarpa were collected, washed, dried and crushed to obtain the plant
material as dried powder.
2.2. General experimental procedures
1H-NMR (500 MHz) and 13C-NMR (125 MHz) spectra were measured on a Bruker Avance
500 MHz spectrometer. Column chromatography was carried out on silica gel 60 (40 - 63 μm,
Merck). Pre-coated TLC plates (Si 60 F254) were used for analytical purposes. HPLC solvents
were from Burdick & Jackson, USA and other solvents were redistilled before use.
2.3. Quantification of Murrayafoline A by HPLC
2.3.1. HPLC apparatus and chromatographic conditions
HPLC was carried out using a Gilson system equipped with a Gemini® 5 μm C18 100 Å
column (250 x 4.6 mm, 5 μm particle size, Phenomenex) and a UV/VIS-151 detector. Data was
collected and analyzed using Gilson Trilution software. Chromatographic analysis was
conducted with isocratic elution using a solution of 60 % acetonitrile in water at a flow rate of
1.0 mL/min, in 25 minutes. The injection volume was 20 μL.
2.3.2. Preparation of standard solutions of Murrayafoline A
Stock standard solution of Murrayafoline A (1.0 mg/mL) was correctly weighed and
dissolved in methanol and then diluted to prepare seven solutions with concentrations of 10, 30,
50, 100, 150, 200 and 300 μg/mL for the establishment of calibration curve. These solutions
were stored away from light at 5 oC.
2.3.3. Preparation of sample solution
The dried powdered roots of G. stenocarpa (2 g) were weight accurately, added into filter
bag, and extracted with 20 mL methanol by reflux for three times (each 60 mins) to give
methanol extract. Methanol extract was then re-dissolved in methanol to form 3 mg/mL solution.
After filtration using filter membrane 0.45 μm (Whatman), filtrate was injected into the HPLC
system in triplicate. The content of Murrayafoline A was determined from the corresponding
calibration.
3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
3.1. Separation of Murrayafoline A by column chromatography and steam distillation
The dried root powder of G. stenocarpa (10 kg) was extracted by sonication with methanol
(25 L × 3 times) for 2 hours at room temperature and concentrated under reduced pressure to
yield a black crude methanol extract. The crude methanol extract was then suspended in MeOH:
H2O (1:1, v/v) and partitioned with n-hexane, ethyl acetate and n-butanol. The resulting fractions
Tran Quoc Toan, Le Xuan Duy, Tran Thu Huong
532
were concentrated under reduced pressure to give the corresponding n-hexane (508 g), ethyl
acetate (196 g) and n-butanol residues (322 g).
Half of the n-hexane residue (254 g) was subjected to silica gel column chromatography (40-
63 mesh, Merck), eluted with gradient solutions of n-hexane / ethyl acetate (100:0 to 1:1, v/v) to
afford 8 sub-fractions (H1-H8). The fraction M1 (64.2 g) was obtained by combination of sub-
fractions H2, H3 and H4 according to their thin layer chromatography (TLC) profiles. The fraction
M1 (64.2 g) was further subjected to silica gel column chromatography (40-63 mesh, Merck),
eluted with n-hexane/ethylacetate (50:1, v/v) to afford 3 sub-fractions (M1A-M1C). Murrayafoline
A (20.1 g) was obtained by re-crystallization of sub-fraction M1B (30 g) in cold n-hexane/ethyl
acetate (10:1, v/v). The confirmed structure of Murrayafoline A agreed well with spectral data as
described in references [10, 11].
Figure 1. Chemical structure of Murrayafoline A.
Murrayafoline A: white crystal, C14H13NO; EI-MS m/z: 211 (100 %) (M+), 196 (M−CH3+);
UV λmax (CHCl3) nm: 209, 222, 243, 291, 327, 340; 1H-NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3), δH (ppm): 8.12
(1H, br s, NH), 8.00 (1H, d, J = 7.4 Hz, H-5), 7.46 (1H, br s, H-4), 7.39 (1H, d, J = 7.4 Hz, H-8),
7.36 (1H, t, J = 7.4 Hz, H-7), 7.18 (1H, t, J = 7.4 Hz, H-6), 6.71 (1H, br s, H-2), 3.97 (3H, s, 1-
OCH3), 2.52 (3H, s, 3-CH3); 13C-NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3), δC (ppm): 145.4 (C-1), 139.5 (C-8a),
129.5 (C-3), 128.0 (C-9a), 125.5 (C-7), 124.4 (C-4a), 123.6 (C-4b), 120.4 (C-5), 119.2 (C-6),
112.5 (C-4), 110.9 (C-8), 107.7 (C-2), 55.5 (1-OCH3), 21.9 (3-CH3).
The remaining n-hexane residue (254 g) was subjected to steam distillation for 2 hours. The
distillate was extracted with n-hexane/ethyl acetate (10:1, v/v). The organic layer was dried over
Na2SO4, filtered and then concentrated under reduced pressure to afford fraction A (38.1 g).
Murrayafoline A (28.6 g) was obtained by re-crystallization of fraction A in cold n-hexane/ethyl
acetate (10:1, v/v).
Thus, the yield of Murrayafoline A by separation using steam distillation is 1.5 times higher
than column chromatography method.
3.2. Determination of content of Murrayafoline A by HPLC
3.2.1. Selection of detection wavelength
Murrayafoline A shows UV absorption in the range from 200 to 400 nm (Figure 2). The
maximum wavelength of 243 nm was set for HPLC monitoring of Murrayafoline A.
Separation and HPLC quantitative analysis of murrayafoline A from the roots of Glycosmis...
533
Figure 2. UV absorption spectrum of Murrayafoline A.
3.2.2. Construction of calibration curve
Table 1. Analysis of Murrayafoline A at
different concentrations.
Concentration
(μg/mL)
Peak
height
Peak area
10 6.3330 154875.8333
30 16.9631 439035.0000
50 30.0313 763078.3274
100 63.4159
1637177.0
30
150 94.3660 2423289.5790
200 127.9864 3297047.4810
300 179.9900 4822432.0833
Figure 3. The calibration curve of Murrayafoline
A.
Stock solution of Murrayafoline A was diluted with methanol to prepare seven samples with
different concentrations. HPLC analysis of each sample was performed in triplicates. Calibration
curve was established by linear regression analysis. The results are summarized in Table 1 and
Figure 3. The calibration curve of Murrayafoline A was determined as
y = 16285x – 20370, R2 = 0.9995.
3.2.3. Repeatability of method
Table 2. Repeatability data of determination of Murrayafoline A.
No Concentration (μg/mL) Peak area Average peak area RSD (%)
1 60 907308.3
909935.4
0.27
2 60 909506.6
3 60 913791.6
4 60 908381.5
5 60 910689.2
Abs
nm
200 220 240 260 280
Tran Quoc Toan, Le Xuan Duy, Tran Thu Huong
534
The repeatability of the method was evaluated by assaying five replicate injections of
Murrayafoline A at the same concentration (60 μg/mL), during the same day, under the same
experimental conditions. The RSD values of the retention time, area, and height of
Murrayafoline A peak were found to be < 0.3 %. The results are summarized in Table 2.
3.2.4. Accuracy
Recovery test was used to evaluate the accuracy of the analysis. Dried powdered roots of G.
stenocarpa were spiked with the known amount of standard before extraction. The mixtures
were extracted and analyzed under the above-established method. Sample was analyzed in
triplicate. For comparison, a blank sample (not spiked with standard compound) was prepared
and analyzed. The average percentage recoveries were evaluated by calculating the ratio of
detected amount vs added amount. As shown in Table 3, the recovery rates were in the range
99.7 - 100.1 %, and their RSD values were less than 2 %.
Table 3. Recovery of Murrayafoline A from the methanol extract of G. stenocarpa.
No
Amount added
(μg/mL)
Average recovery
(n = 3) (μg/mL)
Recovery
(%) RSD (%)
1 10.00 9.98 ± 0.16 99.8 1.63
2 20.00 19.94 ± 0.11 99.7 0.57
3 40.00 40.03 ± 0.19 100.1 0.48
3.2.5. Sample analysis
Figure 4. Chromatogram of Murrayafoline A mixture with methanol extract from the roots of
G. stenocarpa.
The developed HPLC method was applied to determine the content of Murrayafoline A in
G. Stenocarpa plant material and extracts. HPLC chromatograms are shown in Figure 4. Based
on the regression equation, the content of Murrayafoline A was determined to be 0.38 % (w/w)
in the roots and 16.69 % (w/w) in the methanol extract of G. stenocarpa.
Murrayafoline A
Separation and HPLC quantitative analysis of murrayafoline A from the roots of Glycosmis...
535
4. CONCLUSION
In this study, we investigated two separation methods for the isolation of the bioactive
compound Murrayafoline A from the roots of the Vietnamese plant Glycosmis stenocarpa and
developed an HPLC method for the determination of its contents in plant material and methanol
extracts. The yield of Murrayafoline A using steam distillation method was 1.5 times higher than
that of the separate method using column chromatography. By HPLC method, the content of
Murrayafoline A was determined to be 0.38 % (w/w) in the roots and 16.69 % (w/w) in the
methanol extract of G. stenocarpa.
Acknowledgements. This study was supported by the Institute of Natural Products Chemistry, VAST.
REFERENCES
1. Choi H., Gwak J., Cho M., Ryu M. J., Lee J. H., Kim Y. H., Lee G. W., Yun M. Y.,
Cuong N. M., Shin J. K., Song G. Y., Oh S. T. - Murrayafoline A attenuates the wnt/beta-
catenin pathway by promoting the degradation of intracellular beta-catenin protein,
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 391 (2010) 915-920.
2. Ahmad K., Tan S. P, Sukari M. A., Ali A. M., Nafiah M. A. - Cytotoxic and Anti-Tumour
Promoting Activities of Carbazole Alkaloids from Malayan Murraya koenigii (L.) Spreng,
American J. Plant Sci. 5 (2014) 2869-2877.
3. Itoigawa M., Kashiwada Y., Ito C., Furukawa H., Tachibana Y., Bastow K. F., Lee K. H. -
Antitumor Agents. 203. Carbazole Alkaloid Murrayaquinone A and Related Synthetic
Carbazolequinones as Cytotoxic Agents, J. Nat. Prod. 63 (2000) 893-897.
4. Son M. J., Chidipi B., Kim J. C., Huong T. T., Tai B. H., Kim Y. H., Ahn C. J, Cuong N.
M., Woo S. H. - Alterations of contractions and L-type Ca2+ currents by murrayafoline-A
in rat ventricular myocytes, European J. Pharmacol. 740 (2014) 81-87.
5. Cường N. M., Hường T. T., Toàn T. Q., Hùng H. M, Tùng M. H. T., Chiến N. Q. - Đóng
góp mới về nghiên cứu thành phần hóa học cây Cơm rượu trái hẹp Glycosmis stenocarpa,
Tạp chí Hóa học 48 (2010) 516-519.
6. Cuong N. M., Hung T. Q., Sung T. V., Taylor W. C. - A New Dimeric Carbazole Alkaloid
from Glycosmis stenocarpa Roots, Chem. Pharm. Bull. 52 (2004) 1175-1178.
7. Hộ P. H., Cây cỏ Việt Nam, Tập 2, Nhà xuất bản Trẻ, 2000, tr. 421.
8. Cuong N. M., Nam N. H., Kim Y. H., You Y. J., Bae K. H., Sung T. V., Ahn B. Z. -
Cytotoxic activity of Vietnamese Herbal Medicines against A549 cells, Korean J.
Pharmacogn. 33 (2002) 64-68.
9. Cường N. M., Hương L. M., Hằng T. N., Sung T. V. - Tác dụng chống nấm và chống vi
sinh vật của cây thuốc Việt nam, Tạp chí Dược liệu 5 (2002) 144-148.
10. Abu B. N. H., Sukari M. A, Rahmani M., Sharif M. A., Khalid K., Yusuf U. K. -
Chemical constituents from stem barks and roots of Murraya koenigii (Rutaceae), Malays.
J. Anal. Sci. 11 (2007) 173-176.
11. Sripisut T., Cheenpracha S., Ritthiwigrom T., Prawat U., Laphookhieo S. - Chemical
Constituents from the Roots of Clausena excavata and Their Cytotoxicity, Rec. Nat. Prod.
6 (2012) 386-389.
Tran Quoc Toan, Le Xuan Duy, Tran Thu Huong
536
TÓM TẮT
PHÂN LẬP VÀ PHÂN TÍCH ĐỊNH LƯỢNG BẰNG HPLC HỢP CHẤT
MURRAYAFOLINE A TỪ RỄ CÂY CƠM RƯỢU TRÁI HẸP (GLYCOSMIS STENOCARPA)
Trần Quốc Toàn1, Lê Xuân Duy1, Trần Thu Hường1, Tô Đạo Cường1, Trần Thị Thu Thủy1,
Nguyễn Quang Tùng2, Bùi Hữu Tài3, Nguyễn Mạnh Cường , *
1Viện Hóa học các hợp chất thiên nhiên, Viện HLKHCNVN, 18 Hoàng Quốc Việt, Hà Nội
2Khoa Công nghệ Hóa, Trường Đại học Công nghiệp Hà Nội, Km 13, Đường 32, Minh Khai,
Bắc Từ Liêm, Hà Nội
3Viện Hóa sinh biển, Viện HLKHCNVN 18 Hoàng Quốc Việt, Cầu Giấy, Hà Nội
*Email: nmcuong_inpc@yahoo.com.vn
Trong nghiên cứu này chúng tôi thực hiện 2 phương pháp phân lập và tinh chế hợp chất có
hoạt tính sinh học Murrayafoline A từ rễ cây Cơm rượu trái hẹp (Glycosmis stenocarpa) của
Việt Nam và xây dựng phương pháp định lượng hợp chất này bằng HPLC. Hiệu suất phân lập
Murrayafoline A bằng phương pháp cất lôi cuốn hơi nước cao gấp 1,5 lần so với phương pháp
sắc ký cột. Định lượng bằng HPLC, hàm lượng Murrayafoline A trong rễ khô cây Cơm rượu trái
hẹp là 0,38 % và trong cao chiết methanol là 16,69 %.
Từ khóa: Glycosmis stenocarpa Drake., Rutaceae, carbazole alkaloid, Murrayafoline A.
Các file đính kèm theo tài liệu này:
- 11884_103810382207_1_sm_9228_2061524.pdf