Cities are in quasi permanent transition.
Organizing them taking into account the
principles and dynamics of the urban
metabolism as revealed by a greensustainable-smart-blue city approach might
alleviate many problems which increased over
the years. Acting on the major challenges
reviewed in this paper will necessitate new
processes of decision making. Instruments
dealing with these challenges become
gradually clearer and include:
Long term planning, including green
infrastructure, systematic investment in
natural areas (both on land and in the marine
environment);
Cleaner technology innovations (on water
treatment, low carbon emission technology,
advanced waste prevention and treatment
management, green roofs, and (artificial)
wetlands);
Smart IT-solutions (on mobility, and
trade).
The monitoring of these aspects should be
structured, and the feed-back organized.
These are considered essential instruments for
the coming generation of decision makers in
coastal cities.
21 trang |
Chia sẻ: honghp95 | Lượt xem: 675 | Lượt tải: 0
Bạn đang xem trước 20 trang tài liệu Shifting challenges for coastal green cities, để xem tài liệu hoàn chỉnh bạn click vào nút DOWNLOAD ở trên
odel (modified after Kennedy and Sgouridis, 2011)
Next to their dense energy consumption
and the related high emissions of greenhouse
gasses, cities have a second important driver
to act on the subject: The urban heat island
effect. This is one of the best established, and
long known features of urbanization. The
phenomenon refers to the increased urban
surface temperature in cities, which is more
intense than in the surrounding non-urban
regions. The effect can be 6°C in a small
Mediterranean city during the day in
summertime, and 3.8°C during the nocturnal
hours (Vadoulakis et al., 2013). Moreover the
effect is limited to the first 300 m above the
ground surface. The urban heat island is
enhanced by temperature extremes which are
climate change related. The combination of
heat islands and heat wave events, may result
in many deaths and a good deal of discomfort
(Knowlton et al., 2007). It has been estimated
that urban planning giving more attention
to increasing urban greenery, reducing
motorized traffic, and improving building
design, a cooling effect of 4°C can be
achieved (Mueller et al., 2016). However its
social significance and implications for
environmental justice, and urban
infrastructure should be subject to more
research (Huang et al., 2011).
3.2. Fresh water
Fresh water management is most important
in cities. However, fast growing megacities
are skating on water-related problems as
pollution, eutrophication, missing wastewater
treatment, and severe scarcity of clean water
(Hinrichsen, 1998; Haase, 2015). Cities have
a complex water cycle with supply, sewage,
and storm water as main elements. In cities
both direct and indirect use of water matters.
Direct aspects relate to the soil cover which is
cities is more extended as compared to rural
Vietnam Journal of Earth Sciences, 39(2), 109-129
117
areas. This contributes to a fast evacuation of
rainwater, preventing it from percolation
through the soil and replenishing ground
water reserves, which are under threat by an
increasing demand for water supply
by households, agriculture, industrial,
recreational, and greening urban activities.
Moreover the fast removal of the rainwater
affects the quality of the groundwater. Direct
use of household drinking water is limited to
about 1% of the total water consumption.
Indirect use of water exceeds the direct
water use. Food production necessitates high
amounts of water. Agriculture accounts for
70% of water use. Different foodstuffs and
production systems have differential impacts
on water: With 15.000-70.000 liter of water
per kilogram, meat has the greatest impact,
vegetables have a smaller water footprint.
Cities import most of their food from the
neighboring or more remote rural areas.
Actually, this indirect use of water should be
put on their account.
Realizing the combined importance of
direct and indirect water use resulted in
establishing the concept of the water footprint
(Hoekstra and Chapagain, 2007). Moreover
the world faces a water quality transition
which might be handled by the prevention of
water contamination, removal of pollutants
(using a battery of water treatment
technology), and more efficient coping with
excess of water in case of disasters. Extreme
environmental events contribute to
catastrophic damages in urbanized areas
across the world. For politicians, architects,
sociologists and geoscientists protecting
people and cities has become a paramount
task.
The local level is increasingly important in
addressing these water issues. Urban water
management and sanitation infrastructure
have to deal with the imminent water scarcity,
and varying and changing rainfall patterns.
Moreover coastal cities face rising sea levels.
Cities are supposed linking sanitation,
drainage, drinking water supply, and
wastewater in a coordinated approach, the
target being to deliver high quality water to all
citizens at an affordable price (Camarsa et al.,
2010).
Over-all cities need shifting away from the
traditional, fragmented urban water
management, which prevails today. They
should move towards a more integrated
approach based on the water cycle. This
policy should deal with the problems of
contemporary issues and the future needs
(Diaz et al., 2016). This goes beyond using
the grey-and wastewater, and integrates
among others the use of ground and rainwater
in the urban water strategy, but also deals with
water security and quality, drinking
water, sanitation, infrastructure, climate
robustness, biodiversity, attractiveness and
perception, and governance, including public
participation.
In coastal cities water winning and
retraction is a critical issue because of the risk
of salt water intrusion.
Dealing with fresh water problems in cities
entails a variety of aspects:
Blue infrastructure includes wetlands,
ponds, waterways, and floodplains (acting as
buffers in case of inundation).
Green infrastructure includes accessible
greenways and corridors. More vegetation
regulates less runoff, more infiltration and
recharge of the water table, and less urban
heath islands. It contributes to less pollution,
e.g. from particulates.
Most of these global considerations apply
to Vietnam, a country which highly depends
on, among others, agricultural irrigation water
and increasingly saline groundwater. The
shortage of supplied water in general and
drinking water in particular, affected many
coastal cities, particularly in the central
provinces Quang Tri, Binh Dinh, Khanh Hoa
and Ninh Thuan (MONRE, 2015).
Cases of anthropogenic water pollution in
rivers that supply fresh water to coastal
cities/provinces are documented. For example,
downstream of the Red River in the Nam
Dinh province the water is locally polluted
with organic matter and nutrients at values
close to or exceeding the Vietnamese standard
(Figure 2).
Nguyen Van Thanh, et al./Vietnam Journal of Earth Sciences 39 (2017)
118
Figure 3 shows the increasing percentage
of the population in the coastal city of Hai
Phong supplied with drinking water during the
period 2009-2013. This is an indicator for the
increase in the amount of supplied potable
water in spite of the most convincing efforts
of the city authorities positioning Hai Phong
as a “Green city”.
Figure 2. COD concentration in water of Red River tributaries in Nam Dinh province, 2011-2014 (MONRE, 2015)
Figure 3. Percentage of the population in Hai Phong
with potable water supply (Nguyen Van Thanh, 2014)
3.3. Green ports
Worldwide most cities are located at the
edge of the continents or along the banks of
the main estuaries. Most of them are proud on
their “waterfront”, which, worldwide attracts
local people and tourists. Many of these cities
host ports of variable size, but all of these
(different types of) harbors have significant
impacts on the local economy and the urban
quality of life (QoL). The development of
city-port relationship shows the importance of
ports to the local economy of a coastal city
(Boulos, 2016). Ports are major enterprises
and as such they have as a rule a profound
impact on both their direct, port-bound
environment and on their (both marine and
hinterland environment.
Specific, direct environmental impacts of
ports entail:
- The water in and around the port is
polluted with oil and chemicals. Both
problems originate in the normal operation of
the port (minor spills), which is a source of
chronic pollution, but also in massive spills
resulting from occasional main (intended and
Vietnam Journal of Earth Sciences, 39(2), 109-129
119
accidental) incidents. Part of the oil pollution
also originates from the treatment of water
contaminated with oil. The water of the Cam
River downstream of the port of Hai Phong
contained 1.62 mg of oil per liter water in
2007 (Duong Thanh Nghi et al., 2014).
Moreover in and near ports high
concentrations of bacterial contamination
were found.
- Water soils act as a memory of the water
pollution and contain higher concentrations of
PCBs, heavy metals, butyltins, and a wide
series of hydrocarbons including pesticides. In
205 the sediments in the port of Da Nang
showed total concentrations of butyltins of
22.3 ng/g dry weight. Of this total value the
endocrine disrupter tributyltin accounted for
8.4 ng/g dry weight (Do Thi Thu Hong and
Tran Dinh Lan, 2014).
- Waste from the in-port operations and the
waste collected from the ships totals variable
amounts which are most significant in major
ports. Huge amounts of waste result from
dredging activities. Their disposal might result
in important environmental consequences.
Next to waste from dredging, ballast water
from ships might offer particular problems as
it might introduce align species in new
environments.
- Ship recycling (dismantling old and
decommissioned ships enabling the reuse of
valuable materials) serves a typical port bound
activity with significant environmental
impacts. This activity is a major supplier of
steel and an important part of the economy of
port cities in many countries. The recycling of
scrap also reduces the need for mining which
as a rule has important environmental and
social impacts. Ship recycling is a vital part of
the circular economy - which supports to
minimize waste and recycle materials. On the
other hand the pollution caused by scrap
reflects the pollution in the harbors: Heavy
metals, petroleum and non-oil associate
hydrocarbons are found in the (water bottoms)
of the ship recycling yards. The activities are,
among others, linked to carcinogenic air
pollution, asbestos exposure, and disruption of
the water (micro-) organism communities.
Costs of upgrading these sites of intense
pollution vary according to the type of
contamination and the size of the brownfield
area, but amounts to millions of US dollars.
Likely a more appropriate recycling targeted
ship design might significantly reduce these
costs, prevents pollution, and is
environmentally more sustainable. (Science
for Environment Policy, 2016).
- As any other organization, ports
use energy, water and materials. An
environmental management targeted to less
consumption of resources and less pollution of
these streams is indicated (Le Xuan Quynh,
2014).
- Port activities generate massive amounts
of traffic, among which these of dangerous
goods. An appropriate intermodal mix of
transport (truck, inland waterways, and
railway), transport planning, and optimization
of transport loads might alleviate the
environmental impacts.
Land use: Ports with an increasing
throughput, in growing economies, are in
constant need of land replying to their
increasing activities. In general they find this
land in the industrial, agro- and aqua-cultural,
recreational and (protected) natural areas of
their periphery. For port cities the increasing
role of the peri-urban space (between the port
and its rural-urban setting) is of increasing
importance for recreational and leisure
purposes by urban and rural dwellers (Zlender
and Thompson, 2016). A deliberate policy of
densification of the port activities might
reduce the latent need of land in an increasing
economical context.
These environmental problems in ports and
port areas can be badderessed using high
quality, certified environmental management
systems. Because of their complexity and the
specificity of some of these problems, specific
processes and procedures adapted to
ports have been developed. Examples of
environmental port management in Hai
Phong, Vung Tau and Da Nang are provided
in box 3.
Nguyen Van Thanh, et al./Vietnam Journal of Earth Sciences 39 (2017)
120
Box 3: Environmental management at the ports of Hai Phong, Da Nang and Vung Tau
The construction and operation of the ports in Hai Phong impacts the environment. A series
of measures is proposed aiming at reducing the negative impacts, limiting the exposure to
pollutants, to enhance the capacity of the port, and to act on emergency situations. The target is
to define mitigation measures for the identified environmental impacts. These should be applied
on a life cycle basis, during all the phases of the master plan: construction, operation and during
demolition. The mitigation measures combine technological improvements and adjustments,
with managerial procedures. The measures are categorized according to the impacted
environmental compartment.
For the port of Hai Phong the following areas of environmental management were identified
(Duong Thanh Nghi et al., 2014):
- Limit the use of land which is important for biodiversity when the port facilities expand.
- Construction activities of specific port facilities (warehouses, quays) should not hamper the
safety and health of professionals and locals.
- Limit changes in water turbidity during dredging and dumping operations.
- Limit the run-off and environmental spread of bulk goods as coal, phosphate ore, sulphite,
and bauxite, just mentioning these examples.
- Act on waste water from ships. Pay specific attention to invasive species.
- Limit pollution from ship construction and repair.
- Prevent spills of oil and chemicals both in the port and off shore.
- Develop environmental monitoring and study environmental impacts of port activities on
the environment.
Environmental issues the Da Nang port faces include: degradation of water quality, air
pollution and waste management. The water quality degrades as a result of oil pollution,
inorganics and heavy metals. Moreover, the air around Da Nang port is polluted by dust caused
by the cargo activities (especial of wood-pulp and white sand in the Tien Sa port).
Environmental management in Da Nang port is still weak, although parts of an EMS are under
development. Waste management and prevention of environmental pollution are challenges for
the environment management. The port has insufficient capacity dealing with these issues by
itself. The problem is addressed in an efficient way with the support of environmental experts,
and international collaboration.
The rate of increase of the cargo throughput in the southern port of Vung Tau is spectacular,
and on par with the fast economic development of the wider Ho Chi Minh region. However, the
resulting effects on the environment, biodiversity and water quality are insufficiently addressed
by the port. Port bound environmental problems, include disposal of rainwater, release of
untreated domestic effluents, the absence of collection and treatment facilities for on board
waste water and solid waste, a partially functioning network for oil spill responses, and
chemicals as paints and rust discharged in the water. Moreover the inspection and control
actions by the port authorities face significant difficulties. A sustainable seaport in Vung Tau
necessitates strategies integrating environmental protection in the general plan. An
environmental management system (EMS) is mandatory for the port. This will benefit the port
and provide Vung Tau with a pioneer role in environmental protection in Vietnam (Tran Dinh
Lan et al., 2014).
Port activities however also impact the
wider area surrounding the port, both on sea
and on land. On land they are inconstant
interaction with their hosting city, and
its neighboring (agricultural, industrial,
recreational) areas. Managing these aspects
necessitates a structured involvement of the
complex target groups interacting with the
Vietnam Journal of Earth Sciences, 39(2), 109-129
121
(expanding) port activities: Farmers,
competent authorities, city, the urban
population as a whole.
As much as with the mobility issues on
land, port activities are associated with the
routes over sea. Shipping is a significant
source of greenhouse gas emissions,
accounting for an estimated 2.7% of the
global CO2-emissions in 2013 (Ülpre and
Eames, 2014). Moreover the combustion of
heavy diesel oil releases SOx-compounds
which contribute to acidification, NOx and
particulates, which are harmful for the marine
biodiversity and human health. Accidents on
the sea (mainly oil spills and to a lesser extent
also spills of non-oil chemicals) might have
most important environmental impacts
sometimes over large areas. The issue exceeds
the media sensitive clean-up of e.g. floating
oil or oil slicks deposited along the beaches. It
is mainly a matter of being prepared for the
next spill, so that the impacts can be limited.
Part of this prevention policy is
the concentration and the geographical
distribution of the sea-routes, and in the
establishment of marine protected areas. Part
of the prevention responsibility in the open
sea is assumed by the International Maritime
Organization, but it is evident that also ports
and their competent authorities are
instrumental in this respect.
3.4. Green building
As mentioned in the introduction to this
paper, cities attract major amounts of
(environmental) resources from their nearby
or more remote hinterland. By the end of last
century, 70% of the non-fuel materials in the
US were used for construction. The
construction industry is responsible for 40%
of the energy consumption and the CO2-
emissions in the country. Also the increasing
demand for housing facilities, the growing
suburbs of inappropriate settlements and the
increasing housing prices put the urban
system under continuously increasing
pressure. Not only is the construction phase
important. Buildings in industrialized
countries are the greatest energy consumers.
40% of the energy consumed is used for
heating, cooling, lighting, and powering
machines and devices in buildings (Henn and
Hoffman, 2013). The real challenge is making
the nowadays city and the way we live in it
more sustainable.
Suggested solutions are multiple and
varied:
- Sustainable building: Applies the
concepts of sustainable development
(environmentally sound, societally desirable,
and economically feasible in the building
sector). New construction technologies and
new building components would allow to
reduce the ecological load of buildings to a
fraction of its present value. However, the
problem of making our building stock more
sustainable is only to a minor extent a
technical one. The required change of
technologies can only be managed by
simultaneously taking into account technical
potentials and their social context.
Consequently sustainable buildings use
limited amounts of energy and high quality
drinking water, cultivate an high standard of
indoor air quality, advanced lighting, limited
and definitely no disturbing noise, contribute
to a high satisfaction of the inhabitants, and
are part of the zero waste activities of the city.
(Malcolm, 2004).
- Bio-regions and bio-urbanism: Merging
nature and culture, combining living,
recreational and economic values of the city.
The eco-city concept is closely associated
with this approach.
- Rural-urban industrial ecology: Cities
attract both their human and their physical
resources from their (near and more remote)
surroundings. Sustainable cities should strive
towards more autonomy and self-sufficiency.
Apart from maximizing green spaces, using
Nguyen Van Thanh, et al./Vietnam Journal of Earth Sciences 39 (2017)
122
e.g. green roofs (Olivien et al., 2013), and
generating its own food, cities should pay
more attention to recycle and reuse the
materials they attracted from abroad.
- Transport-city structure nexus: From a
mobility system which causes increasingly car
congestion, cities should move towards
compact, dense, vertical structures with
multiple uses. Pedestrians should be given
priority over cars. Modelling work showed
that compact development reduces the
distances travelled, the energy use and the
CO2-emissions.
- Design: Sustainable buildings are energy
neutral (rely on the energy they capture from
abroad), while the materials fit within a
cradle-to-cradle (zero waste concept), and fit
within the ecosystem.
- Green architecture: Provides energy
neutral houses and buildings which suit
humans and their activities, and restore the
balance with nature. Green architecture shows
specific aspects such as green roofs (and
facades). Constructing a “roof garden” on
solid roofing membranes is expensive, but not
only contributes to a more attractive urban
environment and biodiversity of local plants,
insects and microorganisms, but also regulates
the indoor temperature, increases the energy
efficiency of the buildings, and attenuates air
pollution and the heat island effect city-wide.
Green roofs are an essential element of
sustainable building.
- Special attention should go to buildings
with specific functions, in areas which are not
familiar with incorporating the concept of
sustainable building. Health care buildings,
hospitals in particular, offer an example: They
are the second most energy-intensive type of
“commercial” building as a result of their 24
hours operational activity, concentrate people,
and have to pay special attention to the quality
of their indoor environment. Next to their
medical infrastructure, they run a significant
“hotel” and administrative section. They
should take more than average advantage of
applying up-to-date energy- and water-
efficiency technology, life cycle cost analysis,
and aesthetical quality of their buildings
(Castro et al., 2015). In short, they should be
the first ones lining up for healthcare without
harm to the environment, also when it comes
to heathy buildings (WHO, 2016).
- For the city sustainable buildings are part
of the urban design, which is addressed by
architects, landscapers, and planners since the
1950ies. However, the new urban challenges
are adapting to nowadays economic
restructuring, mass migrations, and climate
change. Contemporary urban design is
therefore more than ever before a multi-
disciplinary and multi-stakeholder approach
involving civil society, community actors,
environmental experts, engineers, and city
managers (Childers et al., 2015). At its
environmental side urban design entails
greenfield (incorporating natural elements),
greyfield (build to resist environmental
hazards), and brownfield (reuse of
decontaminated polluted sites).
In conclusion, urban green building should
contribute to a diversified economy and an
increased resilience in different steps:
By restoring and regenerating biotopes,
natural cycles and wildlife in the cities.
By integrating blue and green aspects of
the economy, brownfield (contaminated sites)
development, and using sustainable energy
sources.
By eliminating cars and giving priority to
pedestrians.
3.5. Green spaces
Urban green space availability has become
more and more important in eco-city planning
because of its importance for the urban
residents’ wellbeing (Kabisch et al., 2016).
Green cities “consider green urban elements
as a physical structure forming an integral part
of the city (e.g. green corridors, or green
belts), as a network of “green” elements, as a
Vietnam Journal of Earth Sciences, 39(2), 109-129
123
physical infrastructure which has a role in
water management, the urban micro-climate
and in biodiversity, and also as a social
infrastructure for leisure, relaxation, human
interaction, and other social activities.”
(Duhem, 2005). Green spaces as common
goods take a variety of appearances ranging
from fallow land, over parks and road
separations, to urban woodlands and forests.
Their common characteristic is that they are
localized within the city boundaries. They
absorb CO2 and enhance the resilience and climate change mitigation and adaptation
capacity of the city. Providing habitats to local
plants and animals, they contribute to the
urban biodiversity. They provide recreational
opportunities for city dwellers and the
inhabitants of the neighboring villages. They
clean the air, reduce noise, and regulate the
urban ecosystem. WHO recommends that
urban dwellers should live within 300 m of a
green space greater than 0.5 hectares in size.
Citizens frequently visiting and using urban
green areas have less medical complains,
payless visits to their doctor, stay shorter
periods in hospital when hospitalized, take
less medical drugs, and feel more healthy. In
the coastal city of Barcelona (Spain) almost
3000 deaths (coinciding with 20% of the
yearly mortality) are premature, and would be
preventable if residents lived in urban
environments that met international exposure
recommendations for physical activity, noise,
heat, and access to green spaces. If these
premature deaths were prevented, urban
residents could expect to live on average,
360 days longer. This supposes reducing
motorized traffic, promote active (e.g.
bicycling) and public transport, and provide
adequate green space (Mueller et al., 2016). In
many cities green spaces are under pressure
and their area is declining. A sustainable city
provides ample green space to its inhabitants.
3.6. Other aspects
The aspects governing the quality of life in
cities are not limited to the main challenges
discussed above. In this contribution the focus
was mainly on the physical environmental
aspects. Consequently social and cultural
aspects in which cities excel remained under-
lightened. Education, monuments, museums,
migration and safety provide examples.
In the previous discussions mobility and
traffic infrastructure were cross-cutting. When
it comes to new energy patterns, the build
environment, or port issues, mobility is
mentioned. The conclusion on a transition
towards pedestrianization and limited access
to city centers for (privately owned, old)
combustion engine cars and vehicles) appears
invariably. This option has unexpected health
consequences. There is few doubt that the
emissions of in particular noise, NOx and
particulates from cars affect human health (Vu
Van Hieu et al., 2015). However recent
research showed that the main health benefits
from reduced traffic-related pollution in cities
is from increased physical activity as people
walk, cycle, and move to catch the public
transport.
4. Discussions
Issues on urban sustainable development
are increasingly of critical importance around
the world. In particular polluted, physically,
societally, and economically disadvantaged
cities deserve attention.
This paper anchors on five first order
issues for the livability of the city of
tomorrow:
The energy transition: Both the nature and
the quantity of the urban energy consumption
are at stake. Carbon based energy sources are
the main contributor to climate change, while
the effects are most intensively felt in coastal
cities. The enormous amounts of energy a city
imports, illustrate its parasite character. Cities
should strive towards the use of sustainable
energy forms, they maximally produce
themselves from solar, wind, water, and soil.
Fresh water: Sufficient supply of high
quality drinking water offers increasingly a
problem for urban management. The
increasing numbers of urban dwellers put
the demand for this scarce resource
under increasing pressure, while pollution,
Nguyen Van Thanh, et al./Vietnam Journal of Earth Sciences 39 (2017)
124
unsustainable economic activities, and lack of
rational coastal management are main threats
in particular to coastal water resources.
Inventive approaches will be needed in the
future preventing the use of water of lower
quality, which might damage public health.
Built environment: By definition cities
accumulate high amounts of materials and
resources extracted by humans. Until now
gathering these assets was characterized by
spillage and environmental inefficiency. The
city of tomorrow will be based much more on
recognizing that human wellbeing requires a
restored balance with nature. This needs needs
to be reflected both in the green character of
the urban structure and meta-management and
at the level of sustainable buildings and green
neighborhoods. Green cities of the future
will offer a new synthesis of these complex
aspects.
Ports are a most essential part of many
coastal cities. They contribute to a blue
economy which iss eesential in the social and
economic life of port cities and their
hinterland. Pollution caused mainly in the port
area and off-shore can significantly be
mitigated using environmental management
systems aas pat of a more comprehensive
environmental policy. Ports should adot a land
use policy and a green environment in line
with the green organization of the coastal city
they are part off.
Over-all these care aspects of urban
greening in the years to come show that issues
related to growing (coastal) cities, including
protection of the environment and adaptation
to climate changes cannot be ignored,
especially when it comes to dealing with the
challenges discussed above. Even the
analytical approach breaking down the
problem in dominant factors as energy, water,
buildings, green ports, and others, shows the
intrinsic complexity of the problem. Each of
these factors shows environmental, economic,
social, organizational and policy elements
which need to be aligned in a sustainable,
long term way. Moreover also the integration
of the domains covered by the main
challenges necessitates bridges and interlinks.
This complexity can only be addressed in an
interdisciplinary way, using innovative
concepts (carbon negative and zero waste
cities), instruments (sustainability assessment,
multi criteria analysis, footprint analysis), and
policies (integrated, life cycle based water
management, carbon impacts in association
with carbon costs and accounting). A cross-
cutting element in the above analysis of
challenges for green cities is that each of the
constituents should be approached by an
interdisciplinary group of professionals:
urban planners, architects, meteorologists,
engineers, human ecologists, economists, and
social scientists.
Next to inter-disciplinarity, a numerical
approach is an essential tool for the
understanding of the complex urban
environment. Data varying in space and over
time should contribute to systemic modelling,
which merges the fragmented instruments
(e.g. planning, safety, climate models) which
are used today (Bosh et al., 2016).
Green urban planning integrates the
physical implementation and planning aspects
with health and wellbeing benefits. The extent
to which a city manages to keep these
different aspects under control, with a clear
outlook on the future, differs. This results in
different shades of green cities: From most
engaged, over mainstream, to a superficiality
which does not go in depth. Hai Phong is a
city which recently moved in a most
interesting way to green urban management.
The quantification of the system using
indicators provides the transition with
international scientific attention (Box 4).
Indicators are only one method supporting
decision makers on the road to sustainable
development. Other methods include urban
sustainability profiles (complex interpretative
description of the sustainability of an urban
region and its immediate hinterland),
questionnaires measuring community
sustainability (dealing with a difficult process
that is prone to subjectivism and lack of
systemic rigor, and scenario establishment to
project and simulate future trends (James,
2015).
Vietnam Journal of Earth Sciences, 39(2), 109-129
125
Cities in coastal areas might adopt
integrated coastal zone management (ICZM),
which started as a priority area in Europe and
North America, but in spite of its limited
results spreads worldwide. ICZM aims at
integrating the sustainable management of
oceans and coasts to maintain, restore or
improve the quality of the coastal systems and
their associated human societies (Olsen,
2003). This is a fundamental shift in
comparison with the traditional fragmented
approaches.
In port cities the sustainable integration of
the port activities in the quality of the city life
attracts particular attention. A well-organized
environmental management system and a Port
Authority optioning for Corporate Social
Responsibility, is indicated dealing with the
internal port management aspects. However,
the port influences also the city life through its
traffic generating capacity at the land side,
and its responsibility for marine biodiversity,
including marine protected areas, at the sea
side. Establishing such a port strategy should
be aligned with the stakeholders, and the city
and national strategies.
Budgets allowing cities to adapt to this
complexity and its intrinsic uncertainties are
difficult to estimate. Storm protection and
dealing with other effects of climate change
on cities increasingly necessitate significant
amounts of financial resourcesboth of private
and public budgets (Hallegatte et al., 2013).
Future research will most likely focus on
the current gaps in knowledge (e.g. on climate
change impacts), and erode and quantify
uncertainty, providing more appropriate and
reliable frameworks to integrate the multiple
aspects governing the quality of life in cities.
Box 4: Indicators used by Hai Phong, measuring the sustainability of the city.
The strategy and vision of Hai Phong on a green port city overcomes the challenges that the
coastal cities are facing. The city of Hai Phong developed next to a model (Figure 4) a set of
indicators for a livable city. Seven core indicator domains were selected: Air quality, water
sources; waste management (solid and liquid), waste from dredging activities, noise, energy/fuel
saving, pollution from the marine port activities, protection of the surrounding environment, and
biodiversity in the coastal area. The city has been taken seven actions to cope with these
carefully monitored indicators, including: 1. Localize GCIF to build Green Port City Indicators
(GPCI), 2. Classify the City into 4 zones for application G: Old urban, New urban, Coastal
Area, Islands, 3. Cat Ba World First Learning Lab, 4. Better City Governance using a systems
approach, 5. Ecological City as Economic City (Eco2), CDM, River Basin Management,
Mangro For Future, 6. Management of the Islands (MPA, ICM - Integrated Coastal
Management, Cat Ba GeoPark, Cat Ba Biosphere Reserve) and 7. Establish 11 green sectors by
UNEP (Nguyen Van Thanh, 2014).
GCIF: Global City Indicator Facility
GPCI: Green Port City Indicators
SWOT: Strength, Weakness, Opportunities, Threats
(The model (cycle) can be explained as follows: the GCIF successfully developed an
international standard on city metrics through the International Organization for Standardization
(ISO) under the Technical Committee TC268 on Sustainable Development of Communities,
including ISO 37120. The ISO 37120 Sustainable Development of Communities - Indicators for
City Services and Quality of Life was published in May 2014 and is the first ISO international
standard on city indicators. To build Green Port City of Hai Phong to meet ISO37120 and the
Government green growth strategy of Vietnam, GPCI for Hai Phong is built up and then the
Action plan for it is made. After a stage of the Action plan implementing, the GPCI needs to be
adjust and complete to apply and monitored then evaluated to have the balancing between
economic development and protection of ecosystem and environment. The last stage of the
cycle is SWOT analysis for the new cycle.)
Nguyen Van Thanh, et al./Vietnam Journal of Earth Sciences 39 (2017)
126
Figure 4. Green port city indicators model (Nguyen Van Thanh, 2014)
5. Conclusions
Cities are in quasi permanent transition.
Organizing them taking into account the
principles and dynamics of the urban
metabolism as revealed by a green-
sustainable-smart-blue city approach might
alleviate many problems which increased over
the years. Acting on the major challenges
reviewed in this paper will necessitate new
processes of decision making. Instruments
dealing with these challenges become
gradually clearer and include:
Long term planning, including green
infrastructure, systematic investment in
natural areas (both on land and in the marine
environment);
Cleaner technology innovations (on water
treatment, low carbon emission technology,
advanced waste prevention and treatment
management, green roofs, and (artificial)
wetlands);
Smart IT-solutions (on mobility, and
trade).
The monitoring of these aspects should be
structured, and the feed-back organized.
These are considered essential instruments for
the coming generation of decision makers in
coastal cities.
Acknowledgements
This paper is based in part on the
contribution of Luc Hens and Tran Dinh Lan
to the “International Workshop on Public
Administration of the Sea and Islands: Issues
and Approaches” Hanoi, December 2nd, 2016.
References
Akcin M., Kaygusuz A., Karabiber A., Alagoz S.,
Alagoz B.B., Keles C., 2016. Opportunities for
energy efficiency in smart cities. Smart grid
congress and fair (ICSG), Istanbul,
Turkey. IEEE Xplore document
DOI:10.1109/SGCF.2016.7492425.
Avin U., Holden D., 2000. Does your growth smart?
Planning 66(1), 26-29.
Bosh O., Nguyen Nam, Nguyen Van Thanh, 2016.
Systems thinking for everyone. The journey from
theory to making an impact in Vietnam, pp.126.
Syspac PTY Ltd., Australia.
Boulos, J., 2016. Sustainable Development of Coastal
Cities-Proposal of a Modelling Framework to
Achieve Sustainable City-Port Connectivity.
Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 216(6),
974-985.
Camarsa G., Toland J., O’Hara E., Hudson T., Jones W.,
Thorpe E., Théirgnot C., 2010. LIFE and local
Vietnam Journal of Earth Sciences, 39(2), 109-129
127
authorities. Helping regions and municipalities
tackle environmental challenges, pp.56. Publications
office of the European Union, Luxemburg.
Castro M. de Fatima, Mateus R., Braganca L., 2015. A
critical analysis of buildings sustainability
assessment methods for healthcare buildings.
Environ. Dev. Sustain. 17, 1381-1412.
Chapple K., 2015. Planning sustainable cities and
regions. Towards equitable development. pp.307.
Routledge, Oxon, UK.
Childers D.L., Cadenasso M.L., Grove J.M., Marshall
V., McGrath B., Pickett S.T.A., 2015. An ecology
for cities: A transformational nexus of design and
ecology to advance climate change resilience and
urban sustainability. Sustainability 7, 3774-3791.
DOI: 10.3390/su7043774.
Colombo R., 2016. Unpreceded rise in cities disclosing
climate strategies. pp.3. Raffaella.colombo@cdp.net.
Dasgupta S., Lapla B., Murray S., Wheeler D., 2009.
Sea-level rise and storm surges: A comparative
analysis of impacts in developing countries. World
Bank Policy Research Working Paper (42)
WPS4901. World Bank, Washington DC.
De Las Heras A., 2014. Sustainability science and
technology. An introduction, 322pp. CRC Press,
Taylor and Francis Group, Boca Roca, Fl.
Diaz P., Stanek P., Frantzeskaki N., Yeh D., 2016.
Shifting paradigms, changing waters: Transitioning
to integrated urban water management in the coastal
city of Dunedin, USA. Sustainable Cities and
Society 26, 555-567.
Do Thi Thu Huong, Tran Dinh Lan, 2014. Da Nang
Ports. In: Environmental management of seaports in
Vietnam. Tran Dinh Lan, Luc Hens, Cao Thi Thu
Trang, Do Thi Thu Huong Eds., pp.316. Publishing
House for Science and Technology, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Duhem B., 2005. Introduction. In: Green structure and
urban planning. Final report, pp.13-14.A.C.
Werquin, B. Duhem, G. Lindholm, B. Oppermann,
S. Pauleit, S. Tjallingii Eds. Office for Official
publications of the European Communities.
Luxemburg.
Duong Thanh Nhi, Chu The Cuong, Tran Dinh Lan,
2014. The ports of Hai Phong. In: Environmental
management of seaports in Vietnam. Tran Dinh Lan,
Luc Hens, Cao Thi Thu Trang, Do Thi Thu Huong
Eds., 177-219. Publishing House for Science and
Technology, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Giffinger R., Fertner C., Kramar H., Kalasek R., 2007.
Smart cities: ranking of European medium-sized
cities. Vienna University of Technology, Vienna,
Austria.
Godschalk D.R., 2007. Land use planning challenges:
Coping with conflicts in visions of sustainable
development and livable communities. Journal of the
American Planning Association 70(1), 5-13, DOI:
10.1080/01944360409876334.
Griggs D., Stafford-Smith M., Gaffney O., Rockström
J., Öhman M.C., Shyamsundar P., Steffen W.,
Glaser G., Kanie N., Noble I., 2013. Policy:
Sustainable development goals for people and
planet. Nature 495, 305-307.
Haase, D., 2015. Reflections about blue ecosystem
services in cities. Sustainability of Water Quality
and Ecology 5, 77-83.
Hallegate S., Green C., Nicholls R.J., Corfee-Morlot J.,
2013. Future flood losses in major coastal cities.
Nature Climate Change 3, 802-806.
Hassan A.M., Lee H., 2015. The paradox of the
sustainable city: Definition and examples. Environ.
Dev. Sustain. 17, 1267-1285.
Henn R., Hoffman A.J., 2013. Constructing green. The
social structures of sustainability. pp.398. MIT
Press, Cambridge, Ma.
Hinrichsen D., 1998. Coastal waters of the world.
Trends, threats, and strategies. pp.275. Island Press,
Washington DC.
Hoekstra A. Y., Chapagain A. K., 2007. Water
footprints of nations: Water use by people as
function of their consumption pattern. Water
Resources Management 21, 35-48.
Huang G.L., Zhou W.Q., Cadenasso M.L., 2011. Is
everyone hot in the city? Spatial pattern of land
surface temperatures, land cover and neighborhood
socioeconomic characteristics in Baltimore M.D. J.
Environ. Manag, 92, 1753-1759.
IDF-International Diabetes Federation, 2015. IDF atlas,
7th ed. Brussels, Belgium.
IPCC-Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Changes,
2007. Climate change 2007 - Impacts, adaptation,
Nguyen Van Thanh, et al./Vietnam Journal of Earth Sciences 39 (2017)
128
and vulnerability. Contribution of working group III
to the fourth assessment report of the IPCC.
Cambridge University Press, NY.
IPCC-Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Changes,
2014. Climate change 2014. Synthesis Report-
Longer report, pp.116. United Nations, New York.
James P., 2015. Urban sustainability in theory and
practice. Circles of sustainability, pp.260. Earthscan
from Routledge, Oxon, UK.
Jung H.S., Jeong C.S., Lee Y.W., et al., 2009. An
intelligent ubiquitous middleware for U-city: Smart
UM. Journal of Information Science and
Engineering 25, 375-388.
Kabisch N., Strohbach M., Haase D., Kronenberg J.,
2016. Urban green space availability in European
cities. Ecological Indicators 70, 586-596.
Kennedy S., Sgouridis S., 2011. Rigorous classification
and carbon accounting principles for low and Zero
Carbon Cities. Energy Policy 39, 5259-5268.
Khazaei, M., Razavian, M.T., 2013. Sustainable Urban
Development (an innovative approach in the
development of cities around the world).
International Research Journal of Applied and Basic
Sciences 4, 1543-1547.
Le Xuan Quynh, 2014. Environmental management
system in ports. In: Environmental management of
seaports in Vietnam. Tran Dinh Lan, Luc Hens, Cao
Thi Thu Trang, Do Thi Thu Huong Eds, pp.115-148.
Publishing House for Science and Technology,
Hanoi, Vietnam.
Luccarelli M., Roe P.G. (Eds.), 2012. Green Oslo.
Visions, planning and discourse. Ashgate,
Farnham, UK.
Malcolm L., 2004. Integrated design for sustainable
buildings. ASHRAE Journal 46, S22-S26, S28-S30.
For the summer performance assessment of
extensive green roofs in a Mediterranean coastal
climate. Energy and Buildings 63, 1-14.
Mnowlton K., Lynn R., Goldberg R.A., Hogrefe C.,
Rosenthal J., Kinney P.L., 2007. Projecting health-
related mortality impacts under a changing climate
in the New York City region. Am. J. Public Health
07, 2028-2034.
MONRE-Ministry of Natural resources and
Environment, 2012. Climate change and sea level
rise scenarios for Vietnam. Hanoi, Vietnam.
MONRE-Ministry of Natural Resources and
Environment, 2015. State Report of Environment
2011-2015, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Mueller N., Rojas-Rueda D., Basagana X., Cirach M.,
Cole-Hunter T., Dadvand P.,Donaire-Gonzalez D.,
Foraster M., Gascin M., Martinez D., Tonne C.,
Triguero-Mas M., Valentin A., Niewenhijsen M.,
2016. Urban and transport planning related
exposures and mortality: A health impact assessment
for cities. Environmental Health Perspectives.
DOI: 10.1289/EHP220. Also available at
Neirott P., De Marco A., Cagliano A.C., Mangano G.,
Scorrano F., 2014. Current trends in smart city
initiatives: Some stylised facts. Cities 38, 25-36.
Nguyen Van Thang, Nguyen Trong Hieu, Tran Thuc,
Pham Thi Thanh Huong, Nguyen Thi Lan, Vu Van
Thang, 2011. Climate change and its impacts in
Vietnam. Science and Technology Publishing
House, Hanoi, Vietnam, 259pp (in Vietnamese).
Nguyen Van Thanh, 2014. Applying GCIF & ISO37120
for Building Hai Phong Green Port City. Report at
the London Conference, 17-18 Nov. 2014.
Olivien F., Di Pema C., D’Orazio M., Olivien N., Neila
J., 2013. Experimental measurements and numerical
model for the summer performance assessment of
extensive green roofs in a Mediterranean coastal
climate. Energy and Buildings, 63, 1-14.
Olsen S.B., 2003. Frameworks and indicators for
assessing progress in integrated coastal management
initiatives. Ocean & Coastal Management 46,
347-361.
Schnitzer H. Resource efficient and clean urban
technologies, 2015. In Gianetti B.F., Almeida
C.M.V.B., Agostinho F., Bonilla S.H. Eds.
Advances in Cleaner Production. Proceedings of the
5th International Workshop, UNIP, Sao Paulo, SP,
Brazil. May 20th-22nd, 2015, p.20.
Taghvaei, M., 2013. Urban sustainable development and
the factors affecting it (Case Study: Kermanshah).
Urban Sociological Studies 3, 1-22.
Tran Dinh Lan, Luc Hens, Cao Thi Thu Trang, Do Thi
Thu Huong, 2014. Environmental management of
seaports in Vietnam, pp.316. Publishing House for
Science and Technology, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Vietnam Journal of Earth Sciences, 39(2), 109-129
129
Ülpre H., Eames I., 2014. Environmental policy
constrains for acidic exhaust gas scrubber discharges
from ships. Marine Pollution Bulletin 88, 292-301.
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpobul.2014.08.027.
UNDP-United Nations Development Programme, 2007.
Fighting climate change: Human solidarity in a
divided world. Human Development Report
2007/2008. United Nations, NY.
UN-United Nations, 1992. Agenda 21: The United
Nations Programme of Action from Rio. United
Nations, New York. Available on line at
http//www.un.org/esa/dsd/agenda21/res_agenda21_0
0.shtm (last accessed November 11th, 2016).
UN-Habitat, 2009. Planning sustainable cities. Global
report on human settlements 2009, pp.306.
Earthscan, Sterling, Va.
Upton S., 2015. Organisation for Economic Cooperation
and Development. The OECD Observer, suppl.
OECD Yearbook 2015 (Jun 2015), 64-65.
Vadineanu A., 2001. Sustainable development: Theory
and practice regarding the transition of socio-
economic systems towards sustainability, pp.304.
Tip Art Group Publishing and Printing Company,
Bucharest, Romania.
Vardoulakisq E., Koromanis B., Fotiadi A.,
Mihalakakov G., 2013. The urban heat island effect
in a small Mediterranean city of high summer
temperatures and cooling energy demands. Solar
Energy 94, 128-144.
Varol, C., Ercoskun, O., Gurer, Y., 2010. Local
participatory mechanisms and collective actions for
sustainable urban development in Turkey. Habitat
International 35, 9-16.
Vu Thanh Ca, Du Van Toan, Nguyen Van Tien, Nguyen
Hoang Anh, Nguyen Hai Anh, Tran The Anh, Vu
Thi Hien, 2010. Some preliminary results and
numerical model for inundation calculation of
Haiphong coastal area in the climate change and
sea level rise. Journal of Marine Science and
Technology, 10(2), 45-62.
Vu Van Hieu, Le Xuan Quynh, Pham Ngoc Ho, Hens
L., 2013. Application of GIS and modeling in health
risk assessment for urban road and mobility.
Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 20, 5138-5149, DOI:
10.1007/s11356-013-1492-5.
WB-World Bank, 2010. Natural hazards, unnatural
disasters: The economics of effective protection.
International Bank for Reconstruction and
Development. World Bank Publications,
Washington DC.
WHO-World Health Organization, Regional Office for
Europe, 2016. Towards environmentally sustainable
health systems in Europe. A review of the evidence.
Publications of the WHO Regional Office for
Europe, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Zlender V., Thompson C. W., 2016. Accessibility and
use of peri-urban green space for inner-city dwellers:
A comparative study. Landscape and Urban
Planning, in press.
Các file đính kèm theo tài liệu này:
- 9373_36407_1_pb_2226_2090295.pdf