Shifting challenges for coastal green cities

Cities are in quasi permanent transition. Organizing them taking into account the principles and dynamics of the urban metabolism as revealed by a greensustainable-smart-blue city approach might alleviate many problems which increased over the years. Acting on the major challenges reviewed in this paper will necessitate new processes of decision making. Instruments dealing with these challenges become gradually clearer and include: Long term planning, including green infrastructure, systematic investment in natural areas (both on land and in the marine environment); Cleaner technology innovations (on water treatment, low carbon emission technology, advanced waste prevention and treatment management, green roofs, and (artificial) wetlands); Smart IT-solutions (on mobility, and trade). The monitoring of these aspects should be structured, and the feed-back organized. These are considered essential instruments for the coming generation of decision makers in coastal cities.

pdf21 trang | Chia sẻ: honghp95 | Lượt xem: 599 | Lượt tải: 0download
Bạn đang xem trước 20 trang tài liệu Shifting challenges for coastal green cities, để xem tài liệu hoàn chỉnh bạn click vào nút DOWNLOAD ở trên
odel (modified after Kennedy and Sgouridis, 2011) Next to their dense energy consumption and the related high emissions of greenhouse gasses, cities have a second important driver to act on the subject: The urban heat island effect. This is one of the best established, and long known features of urbanization. The phenomenon refers to the increased urban surface temperature in cities, which is more intense than in the surrounding non-urban regions. The effect can be 6°C in a small Mediterranean city during the day in summertime, and 3.8°C during the nocturnal hours (Vadoulakis et al., 2013). Moreover the effect is limited to the first 300 m above the ground surface. The urban heat island is enhanced by temperature extremes which are climate change related. The combination of heat islands and heat wave events, may result in many deaths and a good deal of discomfort (Knowlton et al., 2007). It has been estimated that urban planning giving more attention to increasing urban greenery, reducing motorized traffic, and improving building design, a cooling effect of 4°C can be achieved (Mueller et al., 2016). However its social significance and implications for environmental justice, and urban infrastructure should be subject to more research (Huang et al., 2011). 3.2. Fresh water Fresh water management is most important in cities. However, fast growing megacities are skating on water-related problems as pollution, eutrophication, missing wastewater treatment, and severe scarcity of clean water (Hinrichsen, 1998; Haase, 2015). Cities have a complex water cycle with supply, sewage, and storm water as main elements. In cities both direct and indirect use of water matters. Direct aspects relate to the soil cover which is cities is more extended as compared to rural Vietnam Journal of Earth Sciences, 39(2), 109-129 117 areas. This contributes to a fast evacuation of rainwater, preventing it from percolation through the soil and replenishing ground water reserves, which are under threat by an increasing demand for water supply by households, agriculture, industrial, recreational, and greening urban activities. Moreover the fast removal of the rainwater affects the quality of the groundwater. Direct use of household drinking water is limited to about 1% of the total water consumption. Indirect use of water exceeds the direct water use. Food production necessitates high amounts of water. Agriculture accounts for 70% of water use. Different foodstuffs and production systems have differential impacts on water: With 15.000-70.000 liter of water per kilogram, meat has the greatest impact, vegetables have a smaller water footprint. Cities import most of their food from the neighboring or more remote rural areas. Actually, this indirect use of water should be put on their account. Realizing the combined importance of direct and indirect water use resulted in establishing the concept of the water footprint (Hoekstra and Chapagain, 2007). Moreover the world faces a water quality transition which might be handled by the prevention of water contamination, removal of pollutants (using a battery of water treatment technology), and more efficient coping with excess of water in case of disasters. Extreme environmental events contribute to catastrophic damages in urbanized areas across the world. For politicians, architects, sociologists and geoscientists protecting people and cities has become a paramount task. The local level is increasingly important in addressing these water issues. Urban water management and sanitation infrastructure have to deal with the imminent water scarcity, and varying and changing rainfall patterns. Moreover coastal cities face rising sea levels. Cities are supposed linking sanitation, drainage, drinking water supply, and wastewater in a coordinated approach, the target being to deliver high quality water to all citizens at an affordable price (Camarsa et al., 2010). Over-all cities need shifting away from the traditional, fragmented urban water management, which prevails today. They should move towards a more integrated approach based on the water cycle. This policy should deal with the problems of contemporary issues and the future needs (Diaz et al., 2016). This goes beyond using the grey-and wastewater, and integrates among others the use of ground and rainwater in the urban water strategy, but also deals with water security and quality, drinking water, sanitation, infrastructure, climate robustness, biodiversity, attractiveness and perception, and governance, including public participation. In coastal cities water winning and retraction is a critical issue because of the risk of salt water intrusion. Dealing with fresh water problems in cities entails a variety of aspects: Blue infrastructure includes wetlands, ponds, waterways, and floodplains (acting as buffers in case of inundation). Green infrastructure includes accessible greenways and corridors. More vegetation regulates less runoff, more infiltration and recharge of the water table, and less urban heath islands. It contributes to less pollution, e.g. from particulates. Most of these global considerations apply to Vietnam, a country which highly depends on, among others, agricultural irrigation water and increasingly saline groundwater. The shortage of supplied water in general and drinking water in particular, affected many coastal cities, particularly in the central provinces Quang Tri, Binh Dinh, Khanh Hoa and Ninh Thuan (MONRE, 2015). Cases of anthropogenic water pollution in rivers that supply fresh water to coastal cities/provinces are documented. For example, downstream of the Red River in the Nam Dinh province the water is locally polluted with organic matter and nutrients at values close to or exceeding the Vietnamese standard (Figure 2). Nguyen Van Thanh, et al./Vietnam Journal of Earth Sciences 39 (2017) 118 Figure 3 shows the increasing percentage of the population in the coastal city of Hai Phong supplied with drinking water during the period 2009-2013. This is an indicator for the increase in the amount of supplied potable water in spite of the most convincing efforts of the city authorities positioning Hai Phong as a “Green city”. Figure 2. COD concentration in water of Red River tributaries in Nam Dinh province, 2011-2014 (MONRE, 2015) Figure 3. Percentage of the population in Hai Phong with potable water supply (Nguyen Van Thanh, 2014) 3.3. Green ports Worldwide most cities are located at the edge of the continents or along the banks of the main estuaries. Most of them are proud on their “waterfront”, which, worldwide attracts local people and tourists. Many of these cities host ports of variable size, but all of these (different types of) harbors have significant impacts on the local economy and the urban quality of life (QoL). The development of city-port relationship shows the importance of ports to the local economy of a coastal city (Boulos, 2016). Ports are major enterprises and as such they have as a rule a profound impact on both their direct, port-bound environment and on their (both marine and hinterland environment. Specific, direct environmental impacts of ports entail: - The water in and around the port is polluted with oil and chemicals. Both problems originate in the normal operation of the port (minor spills), which is a source of chronic pollution, but also in massive spills resulting from occasional main (intended and Vietnam Journal of Earth Sciences, 39(2), 109-129 119 accidental) incidents. Part of the oil pollution also originates from the treatment of water contaminated with oil. The water of the Cam River downstream of the port of Hai Phong contained 1.62 mg of oil per liter water in 2007 (Duong Thanh Nghi et al., 2014). Moreover in and near ports high concentrations of bacterial contamination were found. - Water soils act as a memory of the water pollution and contain higher concentrations of PCBs, heavy metals, butyltins, and a wide series of hydrocarbons including pesticides. In 205 the sediments in the port of Da Nang showed total concentrations of butyltins of 22.3 ng/g dry weight. Of this total value the endocrine disrupter tributyltin accounted for 8.4 ng/g dry weight (Do Thi Thu Hong and Tran Dinh Lan, 2014). - Waste from the in-port operations and the waste collected from the ships totals variable amounts which are most significant in major ports. Huge amounts of waste result from dredging activities. Their disposal might result in important environmental consequences. Next to waste from dredging, ballast water from ships might offer particular problems as it might introduce align species in new environments. - Ship recycling (dismantling old and decommissioned ships enabling the reuse of valuable materials) serves a typical port bound activity with significant environmental impacts. This activity is a major supplier of steel and an important part of the economy of port cities in many countries. The recycling of scrap also reduces the need for mining which as a rule has important environmental and social impacts. Ship recycling is a vital part of the circular economy - which supports to minimize waste and recycle materials. On the other hand the pollution caused by scrap reflects the pollution in the harbors: Heavy metals, petroleum and non-oil associate hydrocarbons are found in the (water bottoms) of the ship recycling yards. The activities are, among others, linked to carcinogenic air pollution, asbestos exposure, and disruption of the water (micro-) organism communities. Costs of upgrading these sites of intense pollution vary according to the type of contamination and the size of the brownfield area, but amounts to millions of US dollars. Likely a more appropriate recycling targeted ship design might significantly reduce these costs, prevents pollution, and is environmentally more sustainable. (Science for Environment Policy, 2016). - As any other organization, ports use energy, water and materials. An environmental management targeted to less consumption of resources and less pollution of these streams is indicated (Le Xuan Quynh, 2014). - Port activities generate massive amounts of traffic, among which these of dangerous goods. An appropriate intermodal mix of transport (truck, inland waterways, and railway), transport planning, and optimization of transport loads might alleviate the environmental impacts. Land use: Ports with an increasing throughput, in growing economies, are in constant need of land replying to their increasing activities. In general they find this land in the industrial, agro- and aqua-cultural, recreational and (protected) natural areas of their periphery. For port cities the increasing role of the peri-urban space (between the port and its rural-urban setting) is of increasing importance for recreational and leisure purposes by urban and rural dwellers (Zlender and Thompson, 2016). A deliberate policy of densification of the port activities might reduce the latent need of land in an increasing economical context. These environmental problems in ports and port areas can be badderessed using high quality, certified environmental management systems. Because of their complexity and the specificity of some of these problems, specific processes and procedures adapted to ports have been developed. Examples of environmental port management in Hai Phong, Vung Tau and Da Nang are provided in box 3. Nguyen Van Thanh, et al./Vietnam Journal of Earth Sciences 39 (2017) 120 Box 3: Environmental management at the ports of Hai Phong, Da Nang and Vung Tau The construction and operation of the ports in Hai Phong impacts the environment. A series of measures is proposed aiming at reducing the negative impacts, limiting the exposure to pollutants, to enhance the capacity of the port, and to act on emergency situations. The target is to define mitigation measures for the identified environmental impacts. These should be applied on a life cycle basis, during all the phases of the master plan: construction, operation and during demolition. The mitigation measures combine technological improvements and adjustments, with managerial procedures. The measures are categorized according to the impacted environmental compartment. For the port of Hai Phong the following areas of environmental management were identified (Duong Thanh Nghi et al., 2014): - Limit the use of land which is important for biodiversity when the port facilities expand. - Construction activities of specific port facilities (warehouses, quays) should not hamper the safety and health of professionals and locals. - Limit changes in water turbidity during dredging and dumping operations. - Limit the run-off and environmental spread of bulk goods as coal, phosphate ore, sulphite, and bauxite, just mentioning these examples. - Act on waste water from ships. Pay specific attention to invasive species. - Limit pollution from ship construction and repair. - Prevent spills of oil and chemicals both in the port and off shore. - Develop environmental monitoring and study environmental impacts of port activities on the environment. Environmental issues the Da Nang port faces include: degradation of water quality, air pollution and waste management. The water quality degrades as a result of oil pollution, inorganics and heavy metals. Moreover, the air around Da Nang port is polluted by dust caused by the cargo activities (especial of wood-pulp and white sand in the Tien Sa port). Environmental management in Da Nang port is still weak, although parts of an EMS are under development. Waste management and prevention of environmental pollution are challenges for the environment management. The port has insufficient capacity dealing with these issues by itself. The problem is addressed in an efficient way with the support of environmental experts, and international collaboration. The rate of increase of the cargo throughput in the southern port of Vung Tau is spectacular, and on par with the fast economic development of the wider Ho Chi Minh region. However, the resulting effects on the environment, biodiversity and water quality are insufficiently addressed by the port. Port bound environmental problems, include disposal of rainwater, release of untreated domestic effluents, the absence of collection and treatment facilities for on board waste water and solid waste, a partially functioning network for oil spill responses, and chemicals as paints and rust discharged in the water. Moreover the inspection and control actions by the port authorities face significant difficulties. A sustainable seaport in Vung Tau necessitates strategies integrating environmental protection in the general plan. An environmental management system (EMS) is mandatory for the port. This will benefit the port and provide Vung Tau with a pioneer role in environmental protection in Vietnam (Tran Dinh Lan et al., 2014). Port activities however also impact the wider area surrounding the port, both on sea and on land. On land they are inconstant interaction with their hosting city, and its neighboring (agricultural, industrial, recreational) areas. Managing these aspects necessitates a structured involvement of the complex target groups interacting with the Vietnam Journal of Earth Sciences, 39(2), 109-129 121 (expanding) port activities: Farmers, competent authorities, city, the urban population as a whole. As much as with the mobility issues on land, port activities are associated with the routes over sea. Shipping is a significant source of greenhouse gas emissions, accounting for an estimated 2.7% of the global CO2-emissions in 2013 (Ülpre and Eames, 2014). Moreover the combustion of heavy diesel oil releases SOx-compounds which contribute to acidification, NOx and particulates, which are harmful for the marine biodiversity and human health. Accidents on the sea (mainly oil spills and to a lesser extent also spills of non-oil chemicals) might have most important environmental impacts sometimes over large areas. The issue exceeds the media sensitive clean-up of e.g. floating oil or oil slicks deposited along the beaches. It is mainly a matter of being prepared for the next spill, so that the impacts can be limited. Part of this prevention policy is the concentration and the geographical distribution of the sea-routes, and in the establishment of marine protected areas. Part of the prevention responsibility in the open sea is assumed by the International Maritime Organization, but it is evident that also ports and their competent authorities are instrumental in this respect. 3.4. Green building As mentioned in the introduction to this paper, cities attract major amounts of (environmental) resources from their nearby or more remote hinterland. By the end of last century, 70% of the non-fuel materials in the US were used for construction. The construction industry is responsible for 40% of the energy consumption and the CO2- emissions in the country. Also the increasing demand for housing facilities, the growing suburbs of inappropriate settlements and the increasing housing prices put the urban system under continuously increasing pressure. Not only is the construction phase important. Buildings in industrialized countries are the greatest energy consumers. 40% of the energy consumed is used for heating, cooling, lighting, and powering machines and devices in buildings (Henn and Hoffman, 2013). The real challenge is making the nowadays city and the way we live in it more sustainable. Suggested solutions are multiple and varied: - Sustainable building: Applies the concepts of sustainable development (environmentally sound, societally desirable, and economically feasible in the building sector). New construction technologies and new building components would allow to reduce the ecological load of buildings to a fraction of its present value. However, the problem of making our building stock more sustainable is only to a minor extent a technical one. The required change of technologies can only be managed by simultaneously taking into account technical potentials and their social context. Consequently sustainable buildings use limited amounts of energy and high quality drinking water, cultivate an high standard of indoor air quality, advanced lighting, limited and definitely no disturbing noise, contribute to a high satisfaction of the inhabitants, and are part of the zero waste activities of the city. (Malcolm, 2004). - Bio-regions and bio-urbanism: Merging nature and culture, combining living, recreational and economic values of the city. The eco-city concept is closely associated with this approach. - Rural-urban industrial ecology: Cities attract both their human and their physical resources from their (near and more remote) surroundings. Sustainable cities should strive towards more autonomy and self-sufficiency. Apart from maximizing green spaces, using Nguyen Van Thanh, et al./Vietnam Journal of Earth Sciences 39 (2017) 122 e.g. green roofs (Olivien et al., 2013), and generating its own food, cities should pay more attention to recycle and reuse the materials they attracted from abroad. - Transport-city structure nexus: From a mobility system which causes increasingly car congestion, cities should move towards compact, dense, vertical structures with multiple uses. Pedestrians should be given priority over cars. Modelling work showed that compact development reduces the distances travelled, the energy use and the CO2-emissions. - Design: Sustainable buildings are energy neutral (rely on the energy they capture from abroad), while the materials fit within a cradle-to-cradle (zero waste concept), and fit within the ecosystem. - Green architecture: Provides energy neutral houses and buildings which suit humans and their activities, and restore the balance with nature. Green architecture shows specific aspects such as green roofs (and facades). Constructing a “roof garden” on solid roofing membranes is expensive, but not only contributes to a more attractive urban environment and biodiversity of local plants, insects and microorganisms, but also regulates the indoor temperature, increases the energy efficiency of the buildings, and attenuates air pollution and the heat island effect city-wide. Green roofs are an essential element of sustainable building. - Special attention should go to buildings with specific functions, in areas which are not familiar with incorporating the concept of sustainable building. Health care buildings, hospitals in particular, offer an example: They are the second most energy-intensive type of “commercial” building as a result of their 24 hours operational activity, concentrate people, and have to pay special attention to the quality of their indoor environment. Next to their medical infrastructure, they run a significant “hotel” and administrative section. They should take more than average advantage of applying up-to-date energy- and water- efficiency technology, life cycle cost analysis, and aesthetical quality of their buildings (Castro et al., 2015). In short, they should be the first ones lining up for healthcare without harm to the environment, also when it comes to heathy buildings (WHO, 2016). - For the city sustainable buildings are part of the urban design, which is addressed by architects, landscapers, and planners since the 1950ies. However, the new urban challenges are adapting to nowadays economic restructuring, mass migrations, and climate change. Contemporary urban design is therefore more than ever before a multi- disciplinary and multi-stakeholder approach involving civil society, community actors, environmental experts, engineers, and city managers (Childers et al., 2015). At its environmental side urban design entails greenfield (incorporating natural elements), greyfield (build to resist environmental hazards), and brownfield (reuse of decontaminated polluted sites). In conclusion, urban green building should contribute to a diversified economy and an increased resilience in different steps: By restoring and regenerating biotopes, natural cycles and wildlife in the cities. By integrating blue and green aspects of the economy, brownfield (contaminated sites) development, and using sustainable energy sources. By eliminating cars and giving priority to pedestrians. 3.5. Green spaces Urban green space availability has become more and more important in eco-city planning because of its importance for the urban residents’ wellbeing (Kabisch et al., 2016). Green cities “consider green urban elements as a physical structure forming an integral part of the city (e.g. green corridors, or green belts), as a network of “green” elements, as a Vietnam Journal of Earth Sciences, 39(2), 109-129 123 physical infrastructure which has a role in water management, the urban micro-climate and in biodiversity, and also as a social infrastructure for leisure, relaxation, human interaction, and other social activities.” (Duhem, 2005). Green spaces as common goods take a variety of appearances ranging from fallow land, over parks and road separations, to urban woodlands and forests. Their common characteristic is that they are localized within the city boundaries. They absorb CO2 and enhance the resilience and climate change mitigation and adaptation capacity of the city. Providing habitats to local plants and animals, they contribute to the urban biodiversity. They provide recreational opportunities for city dwellers and the inhabitants of the neighboring villages. They clean the air, reduce noise, and regulate the urban ecosystem. WHO recommends that urban dwellers should live within 300 m of a green space greater than 0.5 hectares in size. Citizens frequently visiting and using urban green areas have less medical complains, payless visits to their doctor, stay shorter periods in hospital when hospitalized, take less medical drugs, and feel more healthy. In the coastal city of Barcelona (Spain) almost 3000 deaths (coinciding with 20% of the yearly mortality) are premature, and would be preventable if residents lived in urban environments that met international exposure recommendations for physical activity, noise, heat, and access to green spaces. If these premature deaths were prevented, urban residents could expect to live on average, 360 days longer. This supposes reducing motorized traffic, promote active (e.g. bicycling) and public transport, and provide adequate green space (Mueller et al., 2016). In many cities green spaces are under pressure and their area is declining. A sustainable city provides ample green space to its inhabitants. 3.6. Other aspects The aspects governing the quality of life in cities are not limited to the main challenges discussed above. In this contribution the focus was mainly on the physical environmental aspects. Consequently social and cultural aspects in which cities excel remained under- lightened. Education, monuments, museums, migration and safety provide examples. In the previous discussions mobility and traffic infrastructure were cross-cutting. When it comes to new energy patterns, the build environment, or port issues, mobility is mentioned. The conclusion on a transition towards pedestrianization and limited access to city centers for (privately owned, old) combustion engine cars and vehicles) appears invariably. This option has unexpected health consequences. There is few doubt that the emissions of in particular noise, NOx and particulates from cars affect human health (Vu Van Hieu et al., 2015). However recent research showed that the main health benefits from reduced traffic-related pollution in cities is from increased physical activity as people walk, cycle, and move to catch the public transport. 4. Discussions Issues on urban sustainable development are increasingly of critical importance around the world. In particular polluted, physically, societally, and economically disadvantaged cities deserve attention. This paper anchors on five first order issues for the livability of the city of tomorrow: The energy transition: Both the nature and the quantity of the urban energy consumption are at stake. Carbon based energy sources are the main contributor to climate change, while the effects are most intensively felt in coastal cities. The enormous amounts of energy a city imports, illustrate its parasite character. Cities should strive towards the use of sustainable energy forms, they maximally produce themselves from solar, wind, water, and soil. Fresh water: Sufficient supply of high quality drinking water offers increasingly a problem for urban management. The increasing numbers of urban dwellers put the demand for this scarce resource under increasing pressure, while pollution, Nguyen Van Thanh, et al./Vietnam Journal of Earth Sciences 39 (2017) 124 unsustainable economic activities, and lack of rational coastal management are main threats in particular to coastal water resources. Inventive approaches will be needed in the future preventing the use of water of lower quality, which might damage public health. Built environment: By definition cities accumulate high amounts of materials and resources extracted by humans. Until now gathering these assets was characterized by spillage and environmental inefficiency. The city of tomorrow will be based much more on recognizing that human wellbeing requires a restored balance with nature. This needs needs to be reflected both in the green character of the urban structure and meta-management and at the level of sustainable buildings and green neighborhoods. Green cities of the future will offer a new synthesis of these complex aspects. Ports are a most essential part of many coastal cities. They contribute to a blue economy which iss eesential in the social and economic life of port cities and their hinterland. Pollution caused mainly in the port area and off-shore can significantly be mitigated using environmental management systems aas pat of a more comprehensive environmental policy. Ports should adot a land use policy and a green environment in line with the green organization of the coastal city they are part off. Over-all these care aspects of urban greening in the years to come show that issues related to growing (coastal) cities, including protection of the environment and adaptation to climate changes cannot be ignored, especially when it comes to dealing with the challenges discussed above. Even the analytical approach breaking down the problem in dominant factors as energy, water, buildings, green ports, and others, shows the intrinsic complexity of the problem. Each of these factors shows environmental, economic, social, organizational and policy elements which need to be aligned in a sustainable, long term way. Moreover also the integration of the domains covered by the main challenges necessitates bridges and interlinks. This complexity can only be addressed in an interdisciplinary way, using innovative concepts (carbon negative and zero waste cities), instruments (sustainability assessment, multi criteria analysis, footprint analysis), and policies (integrated, life cycle based water management, carbon impacts in association with carbon costs and accounting). A cross- cutting element in the above analysis of challenges for green cities is that each of the constituents should be approached by an interdisciplinary group of professionals: urban planners, architects, meteorologists, engineers, human ecologists, economists, and social scientists. Next to inter-disciplinarity, a numerical approach is an essential tool for the understanding of the complex urban environment. Data varying in space and over time should contribute to systemic modelling, which merges the fragmented instruments (e.g. planning, safety, climate models) which are used today (Bosh et al., 2016). Green urban planning integrates the physical implementation and planning aspects with health and wellbeing benefits. The extent to which a city manages to keep these different aspects under control, with a clear outlook on the future, differs. This results in different shades of green cities: From most engaged, over mainstream, to a superficiality which does not go in depth. Hai Phong is a city which recently moved in a most interesting way to green urban management. The quantification of the system using indicators provides the transition with international scientific attention (Box 4). Indicators are only one method supporting decision makers on the road to sustainable development. Other methods include urban sustainability profiles (complex interpretative description of the sustainability of an urban region and its immediate hinterland), questionnaires measuring community sustainability (dealing with a difficult process that is prone to subjectivism and lack of systemic rigor, and scenario establishment to project and simulate future trends (James, 2015). Vietnam Journal of Earth Sciences, 39(2), 109-129 125 Cities in coastal areas might adopt integrated coastal zone management (ICZM), which started as a priority area in Europe and North America, but in spite of its limited results spreads worldwide. ICZM aims at integrating the sustainable management of oceans and coasts to maintain, restore or improve the quality of the coastal systems and their associated human societies (Olsen, 2003). This is a fundamental shift in comparison with the traditional fragmented approaches. In port cities the sustainable integration of the port activities in the quality of the city life attracts particular attention. A well-organized environmental management system and a Port Authority optioning for Corporate Social Responsibility, is indicated dealing with the internal port management aspects. However, the port influences also the city life through its traffic generating capacity at the land side, and its responsibility for marine biodiversity, including marine protected areas, at the sea side. Establishing such a port strategy should be aligned with the stakeholders, and the city and national strategies. Budgets allowing cities to adapt to this complexity and its intrinsic uncertainties are difficult to estimate. Storm protection and dealing with other effects of climate change on cities increasingly necessitate significant amounts of financial resourcesboth of private and public budgets (Hallegatte et al., 2013). Future research will most likely focus on the current gaps in knowledge (e.g. on climate change impacts), and erode and quantify uncertainty, providing more appropriate and reliable frameworks to integrate the multiple aspects governing the quality of life in cities. Box 4: Indicators used by Hai Phong, measuring the sustainability of the city. The strategy and vision of Hai Phong on a green port city overcomes the challenges that the coastal cities are facing. The city of Hai Phong developed next to a model (Figure 4) a set of indicators for a livable city. Seven core indicator domains were selected: Air quality, water sources; waste management (solid and liquid), waste from dredging activities, noise, energy/fuel saving, pollution from the marine port activities, protection of the surrounding environment, and biodiversity in the coastal area. The city has been taken seven actions to cope with these carefully monitored indicators, including: 1. Localize GCIF to build Green Port City Indicators (GPCI), 2. Classify the City into 4 zones for application G: Old urban, New urban, Coastal Area, Islands, 3. Cat Ba World First Learning Lab, 4. Better City Governance using a systems approach, 5. Ecological City as Economic City (Eco2), CDM, River Basin Management, Mangro For Future, 6. Management of the Islands (MPA, ICM - Integrated Coastal Management, Cat Ba GeoPark, Cat Ba Biosphere Reserve) and 7. Establish 11 green sectors by UNEP (Nguyen Van Thanh, 2014). GCIF: Global City Indicator Facility GPCI: Green Port City Indicators SWOT: Strength, Weakness, Opportunities, Threats (The model (cycle) can be explained as follows: the GCIF successfully developed an international standard on city metrics through the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) under the Technical Committee TC268 on Sustainable Development of Communities, including ISO 37120. The ISO 37120 Sustainable Development of Communities - Indicators for City Services and Quality of Life was published in May 2014 and is the first ISO international standard on city indicators. To build Green Port City of Hai Phong to meet ISO37120 and the Government green growth strategy of Vietnam, GPCI for Hai Phong is built up and then the Action plan for it is made. After a stage of the Action plan implementing, the GPCI needs to be adjust and complete to apply and monitored then evaluated to have the balancing between economic development and protection of ecosystem and environment. The last stage of the cycle is SWOT analysis for the new cycle.) Nguyen Van Thanh, et al./Vietnam Journal of Earth Sciences 39 (2017) 126 Figure 4. Green port city indicators model (Nguyen Van Thanh, 2014) 5. Conclusions Cities are in quasi permanent transition. Organizing them taking into account the principles and dynamics of the urban metabolism as revealed by a green- sustainable-smart-blue city approach might alleviate many problems which increased over the years. Acting on the major challenges reviewed in this paper will necessitate new processes of decision making. Instruments dealing with these challenges become gradually clearer and include: Long term planning, including green infrastructure, systematic investment in natural areas (both on land and in the marine environment); Cleaner technology innovations (on water treatment, low carbon emission technology, advanced waste prevention and treatment management, green roofs, and (artificial) wetlands); Smart IT-solutions (on mobility, and trade). The monitoring of these aspects should be structured, and the feed-back organized. These are considered essential instruments for the coming generation of decision makers in coastal cities. Acknowledgements This paper is based in part on the contribution of Luc Hens and Tran Dinh Lan to the “International Workshop on Public Administration of the Sea and Islands: Issues and Approaches” Hanoi, December 2nd, 2016. References Akcin M., Kaygusuz A., Karabiber A., Alagoz S., Alagoz B.B., Keles C., 2016. Opportunities for energy efficiency in smart cities. Smart grid congress and fair (ICSG), Istanbul, Turkey. IEEE Xplore document DOI:10.1109/SGCF.2016.7492425. Avin U., Holden D., 2000. Does your growth smart? Planning 66(1), 26-29. Bosh O., Nguyen Nam, Nguyen Van Thanh, 2016. Systems thinking for everyone. The journey from theory to making an impact in Vietnam, pp.126. Syspac PTY Ltd., Australia. Boulos, J., 2016. Sustainable Development of Coastal Cities-Proposal of a Modelling Framework to Achieve Sustainable City-Port Connectivity. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 216(6), 974-985. Camarsa G., Toland J., O’Hara E., Hudson T., Jones W., Thorpe E., Théirgnot C., 2010. LIFE and local Vietnam Journal of Earth Sciences, 39(2), 109-129 127 authorities. Helping regions and municipalities tackle environmental challenges, pp.56. Publications office of the European Union, Luxemburg. Castro M. de Fatima, Mateus R., Braganca L., 2015. A critical analysis of buildings sustainability assessment methods for healthcare buildings. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 17, 1381-1412. Chapple K., 2015. Planning sustainable cities and regions. Towards equitable development. pp.307. Routledge, Oxon, UK. Childers D.L., Cadenasso M.L., Grove J.M., Marshall V., McGrath B., Pickett S.T.A., 2015. An ecology for cities: A transformational nexus of design and ecology to advance climate change resilience and urban sustainability. Sustainability 7, 3774-3791. DOI: 10.3390/su7043774. Colombo R., 2016. Unpreceded rise in cities disclosing climate strategies. pp.3. Raffaella.colombo@cdp.net. Dasgupta S., Lapla B., Murray S., Wheeler D., 2009. Sea-level rise and storm surges: A comparative analysis of impacts in developing countries. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper (42) WPS4901. World Bank, Washington DC. De Las Heras A., 2014. Sustainability science and technology. An introduction, 322pp. CRC Press, Taylor and Francis Group, Boca Roca, Fl. Diaz P., Stanek P., Frantzeskaki N., Yeh D., 2016. Shifting paradigms, changing waters: Transitioning to integrated urban water management in the coastal city of Dunedin, USA. Sustainable Cities and Society 26, 555-567. Do Thi Thu Huong, Tran Dinh Lan, 2014. Da Nang Ports. In: Environmental management of seaports in Vietnam. Tran Dinh Lan, Luc Hens, Cao Thi Thu Trang, Do Thi Thu Huong Eds., pp.316. Publishing House for Science and Technology, Hanoi, Vietnam. Duhem B., 2005. Introduction. In: Green structure and urban planning. Final report, pp.13-14.A.C. Werquin, B. Duhem, G. Lindholm, B. Oppermann, S. Pauleit, S. Tjallingii Eds. Office for Official publications of the European Communities. Luxemburg. Duong Thanh Nhi, Chu The Cuong, Tran Dinh Lan, 2014. The ports of Hai Phong. In: Environmental management of seaports in Vietnam. Tran Dinh Lan, Luc Hens, Cao Thi Thu Trang, Do Thi Thu Huong Eds., 177-219. Publishing House for Science and Technology, Hanoi, Vietnam. Giffinger R., Fertner C., Kramar H., Kalasek R., 2007. Smart cities: ranking of European medium-sized cities. Vienna University of Technology, Vienna, Austria. Godschalk D.R., 2007. Land use planning challenges: Coping with conflicts in visions of sustainable development and livable communities. Journal of the American Planning Association 70(1), 5-13, DOI: 10.1080/01944360409876334. Griggs D., Stafford-Smith M., Gaffney O., Rockström J., Öhman M.C., Shyamsundar P., Steffen W., Glaser G., Kanie N., Noble I., 2013. Policy: Sustainable development goals for people and planet. Nature 495, 305-307. Haase, D., 2015. Reflections about blue ecosystem services in cities. Sustainability of Water Quality and Ecology 5, 77-83. Hallegate S., Green C., Nicholls R.J., Corfee-Morlot J., 2013. Future flood losses in major coastal cities. Nature Climate Change 3, 802-806. Hassan A.M., Lee H., 2015. The paradox of the sustainable city: Definition and examples. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 17, 1267-1285. Henn R., Hoffman A.J., 2013. Constructing green. The social structures of sustainability. pp.398. MIT Press, Cambridge, Ma. Hinrichsen D., 1998. Coastal waters of the world. Trends, threats, and strategies. pp.275. Island Press, Washington DC. Hoekstra A. Y., Chapagain A. K., 2007. Water footprints of nations: Water use by people as function of their consumption pattern. Water Resources Management 21, 35-48. Huang G.L., Zhou W.Q., Cadenasso M.L., 2011. Is everyone hot in the city? Spatial pattern of land surface temperatures, land cover and neighborhood socioeconomic characteristics in Baltimore M.D. J. Environ. Manag, 92, 1753-1759. IDF-International Diabetes Federation, 2015. IDF atlas, 7th ed. Brussels, Belgium. IPCC-Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Changes, 2007. Climate change 2007 - Impacts, adaptation, Nguyen Van Thanh, et al./Vietnam Journal of Earth Sciences 39 (2017) 128 and vulnerability. Contribution of working group III to the fourth assessment report of the IPCC. Cambridge University Press, NY. IPCC-Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Changes, 2014. Climate change 2014. Synthesis Report- Longer report, pp.116. United Nations, New York. James P., 2015. Urban sustainability in theory and practice. Circles of sustainability, pp.260. Earthscan from Routledge, Oxon, UK. Jung H.S., Jeong C.S., Lee Y.W., et al., 2009. An intelligent ubiquitous middleware for U-city: Smart UM. Journal of Information Science and Engineering 25, 375-388. Kabisch N., Strohbach M., Haase D., Kronenberg J., 2016. Urban green space availability in European cities. Ecological Indicators 70, 586-596. Kennedy S., Sgouridis S., 2011. Rigorous classification and carbon accounting principles for low and Zero Carbon Cities. Energy Policy 39, 5259-5268. Khazaei, M., Razavian, M.T., 2013. Sustainable Urban Development (an innovative approach in the development of cities around the world). International Research Journal of Applied and Basic Sciences 4, 1543-1547. Le Xuan Quynh, 2014. Environmental management system in ports. In: Environmental management of seaports in Vietnam. Tran Dinh Lan, Luc Hens, Cao Thi Thu Trang, Do Thi Thu Huong Eds, pp.115-148. Publishing House for Science and Technology, Hanoi, Vietnam. Luccarelli M., Roe P.G. (Eds.), 2012. Green Oslo. Visions, planning and discourse. Ashgate, Farnham, UK. Malcolm L., 2004. Integrated design for sustainable buildings. ASHRAE Journal 46, S22-S26, S28-S30. For the summer performance assessment of extensive green roofs in a Mediterranean coastal climate. Energy and Buildings 63, 1-14. Mnowlton K., Lynn R., Goldberg R.A., Hogrefe C., Rosenthal J., Kinney P.L., 2007. Projecting health- related mortality impacts under a changing climate in the New York City region. Am. J. Public Health 07, 2028-2034. MONRE-Ministry of Natural resources and Environment, 2012. Climate change and sea level rise scenarios for Vietnam. Hanoi, Vietnam. MONRE-Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment, 2015. State Report of Environment 2011-2015, Hanoi, Vietnam. Mueller N., Rojas-Rueda D., Basagana X., Cirach M., Cole-Hunter T., Dadvand P.,Donaire-Gonzalez D., Foraster M., Gascin M., Martinez D., Tonne C., Triguero-Mas M., Valentin A., Niewenhijsen M., 2016. Urban and transport planning related exposures and mortality: A health impact assessment for cities. Environmental Health Perspectives. DOI: 10.1289/EHP220. Also available at Neirott P., De Marco A., Cagliano A.C., Mangano G., Scorrano F., 2014. Current trends in smart city initiatives: Some stylised facts. Cities 38, 25-36. Nguyen Van Thang, Nguyen Trong Hieu, Tran Thuc, Pham Thi Thanh Huong, Nguyen Thi Lan, Vu Van Thang, 2011. Climate change and its impacts in Vietnam. Science and Technology Publishing House, Hanoi, Vietnam, 259pp (in Vietnamese). Nguyen Van Thanh, 2014. Applying GCIF & ISO37120 for Building Hai Phong Green Port City. Report at the London Conference, 17-18 Nov. 2014. Olivien F., Di Pema C., D’Orazio M., Olivien N., Neila J., 2013. Experimental measurements and numerical model for the summer performance assessment of extensive green roofs in a Mediterranean coastal climate. Energy and Buildings, 63, 1-14. Olsen S.B., 2003. Frameworks and indicators for assessing progress in integrated coastal management initiatives. Ocean & Coastal Management 46, 347-361. Schnitzer H. Resource efficient and clean urban technologies, 2015. In Gianetti B.F., Almeida C.M.V.B., Agostinho F., Bonilla S.H. Eds. Advances in Cleaner Production. Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop, UNIP, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil. May 20th-22nd, 2015, p.20. Taghvaei, M., 2013. Urban sustainable development and the factors affecting it (Case Study: Kermanshah). Urban Sociological Studies 3, 1-22. Tran Dinh Lan, Luc Hens, Cao Thi Thu Trang, Do Thi Thu Huong, 2014. Environmental management of seaports in Vietnam, pp.316. Publishing House for Science and Technology, Hanoi, Vietnam. Vietnam Journal of Earth Sciences, 39(2), 109-129 129 Ülpre H., Eames I., 2014. Environmental policy constrains for acidic exhaust gas scrubber discharges from ships. Marine Pollution Bulletin 88, 292-301. DOI: 10.1016/j.marpobul.2014.08.027. UNDP-United Nations Development Programme, 2007. Fighting climate change: Human solidarity in a divided world. Human Development Report 2007/2008. United Nations, NY. UN-United Nations, 1992. Agenda 21: The United Nations Programme of Action from Rio. United Nations, New York. Available on line at http//www.un.org/esa/dsd/agenda21/res_agenda21_0 0.shtm (last accessed November 11th, 2016). UN-Habitat, 2009. Planning sustainable cities. Global report on human settlements 2009, pp.306. Earthscan, Sterling, Va. Upton S., 2015. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. The OECD Observer, suppl. OECD Yearbook 2015 (Jun 2015), 64-65. Vadineanu A., 2001. Sustainable development: Theory and practice regarding the transition of socio- economic systems towards sustainability, pp.304. Tip Art Group Publishing and Printing Company, Bucharest, Romania. Vardoulakisq E., Koromanis B., Fotiadi A., Mihalakakov G., 2013. The urban heat island effect in a small Mediterranean city of high summer temperatures and cooling energy demands. Solar Energy 94, 128-144. Varol, C., Ercoskun, O., Gurer, Y., 2010. Local participatory mechanisms and collective actions for sustainable urban development in Turkey. Habitat International 35, 9-16. Vu Thanh Ca, Du Van Toan, Nguyen Van Tien, Nguyen Hoang Anh, Nguyen Hai Anh, Tran The Anh, Vu Thi Hien, 2010. Some preliminary results and numerical model for inundation calculation of Haiphong coastal area in the climate change and sea level rise. Journal of Marine Science and Technology, 10(2), 45-62. Vu Van Hieu, Le Xuan Quynh, Pham Ngoc Ho, Hens L., 2013. Application of GIS and modeling in health risk assessment for urban road and mobility. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 20, 5138-5149, DOI: 10.1007/s11356-013-1492-5. WB-World Bank, 2010. Natural hazards, unnatural disasters: The economics of effective protection. International Bank for Reconstruction and Development. World Bank Publications, Washington DC. WHO-World Health Organization, Regional Office for Europe, 2016. Towards environmentally sustainable health systems in Europe. A review of the evidence. Publications of the WHO Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen, Denmark. Zlender V., Thompson C. W., 2016. Accessibility and use of peri-urban green space for inner-city dwellers: A comparative study. Landscape and Urban Planning, in press.

Các file đính kèm theo tài liệu này:

  • pdf9373_36407_1_pb_2226_2090295.pdf
Tài liệu liên quan