This study has been presented a sensorless speed contro
for PMSM drive and successfully demonstrated
performance through co-simulation by using Simulink
ModelSim. After confirming the effective of VHDL cod
sensorless speed control IP, we will realize this code in
experimental FPGA-based PMSM drive system for fur
verifying its function in the future work.
6 trang |
Chia sẻ: huongthu9 | Lượt xem: 507 | Lượt tải: 0
Bạn đang xem nội dung tài liệu Simulink/ModelSim Co-Simulation of Sensorless PMSM Speed Controller, để tải tài liệu về máy bạn click vào nút DOWNLOAD ở trên
Simulink/ModelSim Co-Simulation of Sensorless
PMSM Speed Controller
1Ying-Shieh Kung and 2Nguyen Vu Quynh
1,2Department of Electrical Engineering
Southern Taiwan University, Tainan, Taiwan
2Lac Hong University, Vietnam
1kung@mail.stut.edu.tw, 2vuquynh@lhu.edu.vn
3Chung-Chun Huang and 4Liang-Chiao Huang
3,4Green Energy and Environment Research Laboratories
Industrial Technology Research Institute
Hsinchu, Taiwan
3CCHuang@itri.org.tw, 4liang.qiao@itri.org.tw
Abstract—Based on Simulink/Modelsim co-simulation technology,
the design of a sensorless control IP (Intellectual Property) for
PMSM (Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor) drive is
presented in this paper. Firstly, a mathematical model for PMSM
is derived and the vector control is adopted. Secondly, a rotor
flux position is estimated by using a sliding mode observer
(SMO). These estimated values are feed-backed to the current
loop for vector control and to the speed loop for speed control.
Thirdly, the Very-High-Speed IC Hardware Description
Language (VHDL) is adopted to describe the behavior of the
sensorless speed control IP which includes the circuits of space
vector pulse width modulation (SVPWM), coordinate
transformation, SMO, fuzzy controller, etc. Fourthly, the
simulation work is performed by MATLAB/Simulink and
ModelSim co-simulation mode, provided by Electronic Design
Automation (EDA) Simulator Link. The PMSM, inverter and
speed command are performed in Simulink and the sensorless
speed control IP of PMSM drive is executed in ModelSim. Finally,
the co-simulation results validate the effectiveness of the
sensorless PMSM speed control system.
Keywords-PMSM; Simulink/Modelsim co-simulation; Sliding
mode observer; Sensorless speed control; Fuzzy controller; VHDL.
I. INTRODUCTION
PMSM has been increasingly used in many automation
control fields as actuators, due to its advantages of superior
power density, high-performance motion control with fast
speed and better accuracy. However, conventional motor
control needs a speed sensor or an optical encoder to measure
the rotor speed and feedback it to the controller for ensuring
the precision speed control. Such sensor presents some
disadvantages such as drive cost, machine size, reliability and
noise immunity. In recent year, a sensorless control without
position and speed sensors for PMSM drive become a popular
research topic in literature [1-7]. Those sensorless control
strategies have sliding mode observer, Kalmam filter, neural
network, etc. However, the back EMF and the sliding mode
observer are suitable to be implemented by the fix-pointed
processor and have been implemented by a digital signal
processor (DSP) in most studies [4-5]. Unfortunately, DSP
suffers from a long period of development and exhausts many
resources of the CPU [8]. FPGA can provide another
alternative solution in this issue. Especially, FPGA with
programmable hard-wired feature, fast computation ability,
shorter design cycle, embedding processor, low power
consumption and higher density is better for the
implementation of the digital system [9-10] than DSP.
Recently, a co-simulation work by Electronic Design
Automation (EDA) Simulator Link has been gradually applied
to verify the effectiveness of the Verilog and VHDL code in
the motor drive system [11-14]. The EDA Simulator Link [15]
provides a co-simulation interface between MALTAB or
Simulink and HDL simulators-ModelSim [16]. Using it you
can verify a VHDL, Verilog, or mixed-language
implementation against your Simulink model or MATLAB
algorithm [15]. Therefore, EDA Simulator Link lets you use
MATLAB code and Simulink models as a test bench that
generates stimulus for an HDL simulation and analyzes the
simulation’s response [15]. In this paper, a co-simulation by
EDA Simulator Link is applied to sensorless speed control for
PMSM drive and shown in Fig.1. The PMSM, inverter and
speed command are performed in Simulink and the sensorless
speed controller described by VHDL code is executed in
ModelSim. Finally, some simulations results validate the
effectiveness of the sensorless speed control system of PMSM
drive.
II. SYSTEM DESCRIPTION OF PMSM DRIVE AND
SENSORLESS SPEED CONTROLLER DESIGN
The sensorless speed control block diagram for PMSM
drive is shown in Fig. 1. The modelling of PMSM, the SMO-
based flux position estimation and the fuzzy controller are
introduced as follows:
A. Mathematical Model of PMSM
The typical mathematical model of a PMSM is described,
in two-axis d-q synchronous rotating reference frame, as
follows
d
d
q
d
q
ed
d
sd
L
i
L
L
i
L
r
dt
di v1 (1)
q
qq
eq
q
s
d
q
d
e
q
LL
Ki
L
ri
L
L
dt
di
v1
E (2)
where vd, vq are the d and q axis voltages; id, iq, are the d and q
axis currents, rs is the phase winding resistance; Ld, Lq are the d
and q axis inductance; e is the rotating speed of magnet
flux; EK is the permanent magnet flux linkage.
DC
Power
PMSM
Model
IGBT-based
Inverter
PWM1
PWM6
PWM2
PWM3
PWM4
PWM5
r
Flux angle
Transform. r
SimuLink
A B C
External load
SVPWM
PI
0* di
qi
di
Park Clark
Park-1 Clark-1
—
—
+
PI
1refv
3refv
2refv
qv
dv
v
v
i
i
*
qi
+
a,b,c
,d,q
,
,
d,q ,
a,b,c
Current
controller
ai
bi
ci
Modify
sin /cos of
Flux angle
ee
ˆcos/ˆsin
+
—
rˆ
*
r
Speed
estimator
Speed
controller
v
v
i
i
Rotor flux
position
estimation
eˆ
FC
+
11 Z
KI
fu
PK
e
de
1-Z-1
ModelSim
ai
bi
ci
e
r
Current controllers and coordinate
transformation (CCCT)
Fig.1 The sensorless speed control block diagram for PMSM drive
The current loop control of PMSM drive in Fig.1 is
based on a vector control approach. That is, if the id is
controlled to 0 in Fig.1, the PMSM will be decoupled and
controlling a PMSM like to control a DC motor. Therefore,
after decoupling, the torque of PMSM can be written as the
following equation,
qtqEe iKiK
PT
4
3 (3)
Considering the mechanical load, the overall dynamic
equation of PMSM drive system is obtained by
Lermrm TTBdt
dJ (4)
where Te is the motor torque, P is pole pairs, Kt is torque
constant, Jm is the inertial value, Bm is damping ratio, TL is the
external torque, r is rotor speed.
B. Design of the rotor flux position estimation
Rotor flux position estimation in Fig.1 constructed by a
sliding mode observer (SMO), a bang-bang controller, a low-
pass filter and a position computation is shown in Fig. 2. The
detailed formulation is described as follows.
Firstly, the circuit equation of PMSM on the d-q rotating
coordinate in (1) is re-formulated as
Eeq
d
se
es
q
d
Ki
i
sLrL
LsLr
v
v
0
(5)
Where qd LLL . Transforming (5) of the circuit equation of
PMSM on the fixed coordinate can be derived by the
following equation
e
e
Ee
s
s K
i
i
sLr
sLr
v
v
cos
sin
0
0 (6)
where Tvv ] [ is voltage on fixed coordinate;
Tii ] [ is
current on fixed coordinate; L is the inductance of the d-axis
or q axis, respectively; e is angular position at magnet flux; s
is differential operator. In addition, in (6), let’s define the
EMF as
e
e
EeKe
e
e
cos
sin
(7)
The EMF includes the position information from the flux.
Secondly, to easily observe the EMF, (6) is rewritten as the
state space form by current variable,
e
e
Lv
v
Li
i
A
i
i
dt
d 11 (8)
where
Lr
Lr
A
s
s
/0
0/ (9)
Thirdly, a sliding mode observer is designed by
z
z
Lv
v
Li
i
A
i
i
dt
d 11
ˆ
ˆ
ˆ
ˆ (10)
where the Tii ]ˆ ˆ[ is the estimated current on fixed coordinate
and the Z is defined in (10) which is the output gain of the
bang-bang controller in Fig.2.
)ˆ
ˆ
(*
ii
ii
signk
z
z
Z (11)
where the current error is defined by TTcur iiiiiie ˆˆ~~ . Further, if we choose the k
be large enough, the inequality in (12) can be reached
cur
T
curee <0 (12)
and the SMO can enter into sliding mode condition. Therefore,
it generates the results of 0 curcur ee . Substituting the
result into (8) and (10), the Z in (10) will approach to EMF in
(6),
e
e
Ee Ke
e
z
z
cos
sin (13)
Fourthly, to alleviate the high frequency switching in bang-
bang control, a low-pass filter is applied in Fig.2,
z
z
eˆ
eˆ
eˆ
eˆ
00-dt
d (14)
where 00 f2 . Finally, the rotor position eˆ can be
computed by
)
ˆ
ˆ
(tanˆ 1
e
e
e (15)
Sliding mode
observer
—
+
—
+ Bang-bang
controller
Low-pass
filter
Flux angle
computation
v
v
i
i
iˆ
i
z
z
eˆ
eˆ
eˆ
Rotor position estimation
Fig.2 Rotor flux position estimation based on SMO
In implementation, the above formulations in the
continuous system have to transfer to the discrete system.
Besides, we use Te ]eˆ ˆ[ instead of Tz ]z [ as the feedback
value in SMO; therefore, the difference equation of the
modified sliding mode observer in (10) is
)(ˆ
)(ˆ
)(
)(
)(ˆ
)(ˆ
0
0
)1(ˆ
)1(ˆ
ne
ne
nv
nv
ni
ni
ni
ni
(16)
where ss TL
r
e
, )1(1 ss TL
r
s
e
r
and sT is the sampling time. In
addition, from (14), the difference equation of the EMF
estimation can also be expressed by
)(ˆ)(
)(ˆ)(
2
)(ˆ
)(ˆ
)1(ˆ
)1(ˆ
0 nenz
nenz
f
ne
ne
ne
ne
(17)
Once the EEMF is estimated, the estimated rotor position eˆ
can be directly computed by
)
)(ˆ
)(ˆ(tan)(ˆ 1
ne
nene
(18)
Finally, a summary for estimating the rotor position is shown
by the following design procedures:
Step1: Estimate the estimated current by SMO in (16).
Step2: Calculate the current error by )()(ˆ)(~ ninini and
)()(ˆ)(~ ninini
Step3: Obtain the Z gain of the current observer in (11)
Step4: Estimate the EMF in (17).
Step5: Obtain the estimated rotor position in (18)
C. Fuzzy controller (FC)
The fuzzy controller in this study uses singleton fuzzifier,
triangular membership function, product-inference rule and
central average defuzzifier method. In Fig. 1, the tracking
error e and the error change de are defined by
)()()( * nnne rr (19)
)1()()( nenende (20)
and uf represents the output of the fuzzy controller. The *r is
the speed command. The design procedure of the fuzzy
controller is as follows:
(a) Take e, de and uf as the input and output variable of fuzzy
controller and define their linguist values E and dE in Fig.3
by {A0, A1, A2, A3, A4, A5, A6} and {B0, B1, B2, B3, B4, B5,
B6}, respectively. Each linguist value of E and dE are
based on the symmetrical triangular membership function.
The symmetrical triangular membership function are
determined uniquely by three real numbers 321 , if
one fixes 0ff 31 )()( and 1f 2 )( .
(b) Compute the membership degree of e and de. Figure 3
shows that the only two linguistic values are excited and
gave a non-zero membership in any input value, and the
membership degree )(eAi can be derived, in which the
error e is located between ei and ei+1, two linguist values of
Ai and Ai+1 are excited, and the membership degree is
obtained by
2
eee 1iAi
)( and )()( e1e i1i AA (21)
where )(* 1i26e 1i . Similar results can be obtained
in computing the membership degree )(deB j .
(c) Select the initial fuzzy control rules, such as,
ij,fji c is u THEN B is e and A is e IF (22)
where i and j = 0~6, Ai and Bj are fuzzy number, and cj,i is
real number.
(d) Construct the fuzzy system uf(e,de) by using the singleton
fuzzifier, product-inference rule, and central average
defuzzifier method. For example, if the error e is located
between ei and ei+1, and the error change de is located
between dej and dej+1, only four linguistic values Ai, Ai+1, Bj,
Bj+1 and corresponding consequent values cj,i, cj+1,i, cj,i+1,
cj+1,i+1 can be excited, and the (22) can be replaced by the
following expression:
m,n
i
in
j
jm
n,mi
in
j
jm
BA
i
in
j
jm
BAn,m
f d*c
)de(*)e(
)]de(*)e([c
)de,e(u
mn
mn
1 1
1 1
1 1
(23)
where )de(*)e( d
mn BAm,n
. And those n,mc denote the value of
the singleton fuzzier.
c00
dE
1 A0 A1
A2 A3 A4 A5 A6
0 6-6
e
e
E
de
de
(e)
(d
e) 1
A3(e)
A4(e)=1- A3(e)
B
1(
de
)
B
2(
de
)=
1-
B
1(
de
)
0
6
-6
Fuzzy Rule Table
Input of e (for i=3)
In
pu
t o
f d
e
(f
or
j=
1)
A0 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6
c01 c02 c03 c04 c05 c06
c10 c11 c12 c13 c14 c15 c16
c20 c21 c22 c23 c24 c25 c26
c30 c31 c32 c33 c34 c35 c36
c40 c41 c42 c43 c44 c45 c46
c50 c51 c52 c53 c54 c55 c56
c60 c61 c62 c63 c64 c65 c66
B0
B1
B2
B3
B4
B5
B6
B 0
B 1
B 2
B 3
B 4
B 5
B 6
42-4 -2
4
2
-4
-2
Fig. 3. The designed fuzzy controller
III. SIMULINK/MODELSIM CO-SIMULATION OF SENSORLESS
SPEED CONTROLL FOR PMSM DRIVE
In Fig.1, it shows the sensorless speed control block
diagram for PMSM drive and its Simulink/ModelSim co-
simulation architecture is presented in Fig.4. The PMSM,
IGBT-based inverter and speed command are performed in
Simulink, and the sensorless speed controller described by
VHDL code is executed in ModelSim with three works., The
work-1 to work-3 of ModelSim in Fig.4 respectively performs
the function of speed estimation and speed loop fuzzy
controller, the function of current controller and coordinate
transformation (CCCT) and SVPWM, and the function of
SMO-based rotor flux position estimation. All works in
ModelSim are described by VHDL. The sampling frequency
of current and speed control is designed with 16 kHz and
2kHz, respectively. The clocks of 50MHz and 12.5MHz will
supply all works of ModelSim.
A finite state machine (FSM) is employed to model the
work-1 and work-3 of ModelSim, and shown in Fig.5 and
Fig.6, respectively. In Fig.5, the data type adopts 16-bit length
with Q15 format and 2’s complement operation. The
multiplier and adder apply Altera LPM (Library Parameterized
Modules) standard. It manipulates 22 steps machine to carry
out the overall computations. The steps s0~s1 execute the
speed estimation, s2~s3 perform the computation of speed error
and error change; steps s4~s7 execute the function of the
fuzzification; s8 describe the look-up table and s9~s17
defuzzification; and steps s18~s21 execute the computation of
PI controller and command output. The SD is the section
determination of e and de and the RS,1 represents the right
shift function with one bit. The operation of each step in Fig.5
is 80ns (12.5MHz) in FPGA; therefore total 22 steps only need
1.76s operation times. Further, In Fig.6, The data type adopts
12-bit length with Q11 format and 2’s complement operation.
The multiplier, adder and divider apply Altera LPM standard
component but the arctan function uses our developed
component. It manipulates 36 steps machine to carry out the
overall computations. The steps s0~s8 execute the estimation of
current value; steps s9~s10 compute the current error; s11 is the
bang-bang control; s12~s15 describe the computation of EMF
and s16~s35 perform the computation of the rotor position. The
operation of each step in Fig.6 is 80ns (12.5MHz) in FPGA;
therefore total 36 steps only need 2.88s operation times. In
Fig.4 the circuit design of CCCT and SVPWM in work-2 of
ModelSim refers to [9]. The FPGA (Altera) resource usages of
work-1 to work-3 of ModelSim in Fig.4 are 2,043 LEs (Logic
Elements) and 0RAM bits, 2,085 LEs and 24,576 RAM bits;
1,151LEs and 49,152 RAM bits, respectively.
IV. SIMULATION RESULTS
The co-simulation architecture for sensorless PMSM speed
control system is shown in Fig.4. The SimPowerSystem
blockset in the Simulink executes the PMSM and the inverter.
The EDA simulator link for ModelSim executes the co-
simulation using Verilog HDL code running in ModelSim
program. The designed PMSM parameters used in simulation
of Fig.4 are that pole pairs is 4, stator phase resistance is 1.3,
stator inductanc is 6.3mH, inertia is J=0.000108 kg*m2 and
friction factor is F=0.0013 N*m*s.
(work-2)
(work-1)
(work-3)
Fig.4 The Simulink/ModelSim co-simulation architecture for sensorless speed control of PMSM drive
+-
+
-
s2 s3
)(ne
)1( ne
)1( ne
s4
Computation of speed error and
error change
s9
x
+
1
-
)(e
iA
)(de
jB
jid ,
+
-
x
x
x
s10 s11 s12
)(de
jB
)e(
iA 1
1
)de(
jB 1
j,id 1
1j,id
11 j,id
)(de
jB
)(e
iA
s13
x
x
+
x
x
+ + x +
ui
x +
s15 s16 s18 s19s14 s17 s20
ijc ,
i,jc 1
1i,jc
11 i,jc
jid ,
jid ,1
1,1 jid
1, jid
iK
pK
fu
ui
Defuzzification PI controller and generate
the command
+
-
+
-
&
i
j
j&i
s5 s6 s7 s8
)(kde
)(e
iA
)(de
jB
ijc ,
1i,jc
i,jc 1
11 i,jc
1ie
1jde
Look-up
Fuzzy rule
table
RS,1
RS,1
Fuzzification
SD
ke
SD
kde
)(ne)(ˆ nr
s21
)( * niq
Look-up fuzzy table
)(* nr
)(ˆ ne +
-
)1(ˆ ne
x
st
k
Speed estimation
s0 s1
Fig.5 State diagram of an FSM for describing the speed estimation and FC
+ x
s0 s1 s2 s3 s4
)n(v
Estimation of the current values
s10
s11
)(ˆ ne x
)n(iˆ +
)n(iˆ 1
+ x
s5 s6 s7 s8 s9
)n(v
)n(eˆ x)n(iˆ
+
)n(iˆ 1
-
+
)n(i
-)n(iˆ )n(i
~
+
)n(i
-
)n(iˆ
Y
N
k)n(z
k)n(z
Y
N
k)n(z
k)n(z
x
s12 s13 s14 s15 s24
)n(z
02 f
)n(eˆ
s34
- + +
)n(eˆ
)n(eˆ 1
x)n(z
)n(eˆ
-
+ +
)n(eˆ
)n(eˆ 1
eˆ
)n(i~
)n(eˆ
)n(eˆ
s16 s23
-
tan-1 atan2
s35
Computation of
current errors Bang-bang control
Estimation of the EMF Computation of the rotor position
Table
s17
-
02 f
Fig.6 State diagram of an FSM for describing the SMO-based rotor position
estimation algorithm
In the simulation of the rotor flux position estimation,
sensor speed control is considered and the running speeds of
PMSM with 250rpm, 500rpm, 1000rpm and 2000 rpm are
tested. The simulation results for the actual rotor flux
position e , the estimated rotor flux position eˆ are shown in
Fig. 7. It presents that the estimated rotor flux position can
follows the actual rotor flux position with some delay time.
The delay time is about 600s while PMSM running speed at
2000 rpm, but about 200s at 250 rpm. After confirming the
effectiveness of the rotor flux position estimation in the sensor
speed control, we continue the simulation work in sensorless
control architecture. The estimated rotor flux position will be
feed-backed to the current loop for vector control and to the
speed loop for speed control. The simulation work of the step
speed response is tested. The motor speeds command is
designed with step varying from 0rpm500rpm1000rpm
1500rpm1000rpm, and the results for actual rotor speed,
estimated rotor speed response and current response are shown
in Fig.8. The rising time and steady-state value are about
210ms and near 0mm, which presents a good speed following
response without overshoot occurred. However, the
simulations shown in Figs. 7~8 demonstrate the effectiveness
and correctness of the sensorless speed control IP for PMSM.
0 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.09 0.1
0
100
200
300
400
0 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.09 0.1
0
100
200
300
400
0 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.09 0.1
0
100
200
300
400
0 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.09 0.1
0
100
200
300
400
e e
e
e
time (sec)(b)
time (sec)(c)
e
e
time (sec)(a)
time (sec)(d)
e
e
Fig. 7 Actual rotor flux angle ( e ) and estimated rotor flux angle ( eˆ ) under
PMSM speed running at (a)250rmp (b)500rpm (c)1000rpm (d)2000rpm
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2
-200
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
time (sec)(b)
time (sec)(a)
Speed
command
Actual rotor
speed
Estimated
rotor speed
Sp
ee
d
(r
pm
)
cu
rr
en
t (
A)
Fig. 8 (a) Step speed command, actual rotor speed and estimated rotor speed
response (b) current response
V. CONCLUSIONS
This study has been presented a sensorless speed control IP
for PMSM drive and successfully demonstrated its
performance through co-simulation by using Simulink and
ModelSim. After confirming the effective of VHDL code of
sensorless speed control IP, we will realize this code in the
experimental FPGA-based PMSM drive system for further
verifying its function in the future work.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The financial support provided by Bureau of Energy is
gratefully acknowledged.
REFERENCE
[1] V.C. Ilioudis and N.I. Margaris, “PMSM Sensorless Speed Estimation
Based on Sliding Mode Observers,” in Proceedings of Power
Electronics Specialists Conference (PESC), pp.2838~2843, 2008.
[2] W. Lu and Y. Hu and W. Huang and J. Chu and X. Du and J. Yang,
“Sensorless Control Of Permanent Magnet Synchronous Machine Based
on A Novel Sliding Mode Observer,” in Proceedings of Power
Electronics and Applications Conference, pp.1~4, 2009.
[3] M. Ezzat and J.d. Leon and N. Gonzalez and A. Glumineau, “Sensorless
Speed Control of Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor by using
Sliding Mode Observer,” in Proceedings of 2010 11th International
Workshop on Variable Structure Systems, pp.227~232, June 26 - 28,
2010.
[4] S. Chi and Z. Zhang and L. Xu, “Sliding-Mode Sensorless Control of
Direct-Drive PM Synchronous Motors for Washing Machine
Applications,” IEEE Trans. on Indus. Applica., vol. 45, no. 2,
pp.582~590,Mar./Apr. 2009.
[5] D. Jiang and Z. Zhao and F. Wang, “A Sliding Mode Observer for
PMSM Speed and Rotor Position Considering Saliency,” in Proceedings
of IEEE Power Electronics Specialists Conference (PESC), pp.809~814,
2008.
[6] P. Borsje, and T.F Chan,. and Y.K. Wong, and S.L. Ho, “A Comparative
Study of Kalman Filtering for Sensorless Control of a Permanent-
Magnet Synchronous Motor Drive,” in Proceedings of IEEE
International Conference on Electric Machines and Drives, pp.815~822,
2005.
[7] H.A.F. Mohamed and S. S. Yang and M. Moghavvemi , “Sensorless
Fuzzy SMC for a Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor ,” in
Proceedings of ICROS-SICE International Joint Conference 2009,
pp.619~623.
[8] Z.Zhou, T. Li, T. Takahahi and E. Ho, “FPGA realization of a high-
performance servo controller for PMSM,” in Proceeding of the 9th IEEE
Application Power Electronics conference and Exposition, 2004, vol.3,
pp. 1604-1609.
[9] Y.S. Kung and M.H. Tsai, “FPGA-based speed control IC for PMSM
drive with adaptive fuzzy control,” IEEE Trans. on Power Electronics,
vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 2476-2486, Nov. 2007.
[10] E. Monmasson and M. N. Cirstea, “FPGA design methodology for
industrial control systems – a review” IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol.
54, no.4, pp.1824-1842, Aug. 2007.
[11] M. F. Castoldi, G. R. C. Dias, M. L. Aguiar and V. O. Roda, “Chopper-
Controlled PMDC motor drive using VHDL code,” in Proceedings of the
5th Southern Conference on Programmable Logic, pp. 209~212, 2009.
[12] M. F. Castoldi and M. L. Aguiar, “Simulation of DTC strategy in VHDL
code for induction motor control,” in Proceedings of the IEEE
International Symposium on Industrial Electronics (ISIE), pp.2248-2253,
2006.
[13] J. L´azaro, A. Astarloa, J. Arias, U. Bidarte and A. Zuloaga,
“Simulink/Modelsim simulable VHDL PID core for industrial SoPC
multiaxis controllers,” in Proceedings of the IEEE Industrial Electronics
32nd Annual Conference (IECON), pp.3007-3011, 2006.
[14] Y. Li , J. Huo, X. Li, J. Wen, Y. Wang and B. Shan, “An open-loop sin
microstepping driver based on FPGA and the Co-simulation of
Modelsim and Simulink,” in Proceedings of the International
Conference on Computer, Mechatronics, Control and Electronic
Engineering (CMCE), pp. 223-227, 2010.
[15] The Mathworks, Matlab/Simulink Users Guide, Application Program
Interface Guide, 2004
[16] Modeltech, ModelSim Reference Manual, 2004.
Các file đính kèm theo tài liệu này:
- simulinkmodelsim_co_simulation_of_sensorless_pmsm_speed_cont.pdf