Results and discussion
In order to find a condition that is appropriate to our case, the A3 model reaction was
carried out with 30 mol% of each catalyst in different solvents or solvent free at 110C
or at boiling point of the solvent, Scheme 1, Table 1, [15]. Anhydrous FeCl3 (entry 2)
seemed to be more effective than the hydrate form of FeCl3 as the yield of entry 1 was
slightly smaller. In entry 3, ethanol was added, but the yield of the reaction stayed the same
as in entry 1. Another catalyst, a mixture of copper sulfate and glucose promoted
dramatically reaction forward to the product in 70% yield in ethanol solvent (entry 4).
However, as heated without solvent, entry 5 gave a bit better yield (75%). Thus, it is
concluded that there is no need for the solvent to carry out the reaction this reaction and
solvent-free is the best condition for the synthesis of propargylamines via A3. Further,
SnCl2.2H2O (entry 6), ZnCl2.2H2O (entry 7), and FeCl2.4H2O (entry 8) in solvent free
condition gave yields of 61, 50, 45 yield, respectively. In the presence of CuI under
solvent-free conditions (entry 9) also performed better than in methanol (entry 10). We
could include that CuI under solvent free condition was suitable for our case, Scheme 1.
To optimize the concentration of catalyst, we further examined the influence of
catalyst concentration on the reaction time and percentage yield. So, the model reaction
was performed using different concentration of catalyst 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35 mol% of
CuI at 110C under solvent-free conditions and the product 5a was obtained in 40, 52,
59, 69, 73, 83 and 83 % yields, respectively. Further, the yield of the product did not
improve as the concentration of catalyst increased, Table 2.
Conclusions
In conclusion, highly efficient, the one-pot multi-component protocol has been
developed for the synthesis of some propargylamines using copper(I) iodide (30% mol)
under the solvent free conditions in good yields. Four propargylamines were synthesized
in up to 85% yield. Structures of propargylamines were firm with NMR, MS methods.
6 trang |
Chia sẻ: hachi492 | Lượt xem: 7 | Lượt tải: 0
Bạn đang xem nội dung tài liệu Synthesis of some propargylamines via A³ coupling reaction, để tải tài liệu về máy bạn click vào nút DOWNLOAD ở trên
67
HNUE JOURNAL OF SCIENCE DOI: 10.18173/2354-1059.2020-0049
Natural Sciences 2020, Volume 65, Issue 10, pp. 67-72
This paper is available online at
SYNTHESIS OF SOME PROPARGYLAMINES
VIA A3 COUPLING REACTION
Hoang Thi Thanh1, Tran Thi Thu Trang2 and Duong Quoc Hoan2*
1Student of the Faculty of Chemistry, Hanoi National University of Education
2Faculty of Chemistry, Hanoi National University of Education
Abstract. Condition for synthesis of propargylamines has been found in highly
efficient as a one-pot multi-component protocol. Copper(I) iodide (30% mol) under
solvent free condition gave propargylamine in good yields. Structures of
propargylamines were elucidated with NMR, MS methods.
Keywords: one-pot multi-component reaction, propargylamine, copper (I) iodide,
solvent free, A3 coupling reaction.
1. Introduction
Propargylamines have recently been used for synthesis of nitrogen-containing
compounds such as β-lactam[1, 2], pyrrole [3], pyrrolidine [4], pyrrolophane [5],
3-aminobenzofuran [6], aminoindolizine [7], 2-aminoimidazole [8], oxazolidinone [9],
quinoline [10] and multifunctional monoamine oxidase and ChE inhibitors ladostigil (1)
and PF9601N (2) [11, 12].
Figure 1. Examples of propargylamines and designed propargylamines
Current treatment options include the use of monoamine oxidase inhibitors like
selegiline (3, Deprenyl) and rasagiline (4, Azilect) (Figure 1) in the treatment of
Parkinson’s disease.
Received September 24, 2020. Revised October 12, 2020. Accepted October 19, 2020.
Contact Duong Quoc Hoan, e-mail address: hoandq@hnue.edu.vn
Hoang Thi Thanh, Tran Thi Thu Trang and Duong Quoc Hoan
68
These drugs are aimed at correcting disturbances in the monoaminergic
neurotransmitter system by virtue of inhibiting the monoamine oxidase-B enzyme that is
responsible for catalyzing the oxidative degradation of dopamine [13, 14]. Therefore,
synthesis of propargylamines has been considered, in which A3coupling reaction is one
of the most popular methods since they are convenient approach, atom economy and eco-
friendly reaction condition. In order to take advantages of A3coupling reaction in the
synthesis of propargylamine derivatives, herein, we wish to report an optimized condition
and synthesis of four new propargylamine derivatives (5) via A3 coupling reaction, Figure 1.
2. Content
2.1. Experimental
2.1.1. Chemicals and equipment
Solvents and chemicals were bought from Sigma-Aldrich (phenylacetylene), Merck
Corp (m-nitroaniline), Aladdin (p-bromoaniline), Vietnam (ethanol), or other China’s
companies (aniline) were used as received unless indicated. The NMR spectra were
recorded on the Bruker Avance 500 MHz NMR spectrometer in DMSO-d6. Chemical-
shift data for each signal was reported in ppm. Mass spectra were obtained from the Mass
Spectrometry Facility of The Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology on LC-
MSD-Trap-SL spectrometer.
2.1.2. Synthetic procedure
N-(1-phenyl-3-phenyl-2-propynyl)-aniline (5a)
A mixture of aniline (1.0 mmol, 121.5 mg), benzaldehyde (1mmol; 115.6 mg),
phenylacetylene (1.1 mmol; 112.3 mg), CuI (1% mol; 22.3 mg) was heated at 110oC for 8h.
The progress of reaction was monitored with TLC. The title product was purified with a
flask column in eluent n-hexane: ethyl acetate = 20:1 in 83% yield. 1H NMR (500 Hz,
CDCl3, ppm): 7.65 (d, J = 7.5Hz, 2 H), 7.39 (t, J = 8.0 Hz, 4H), 7.32 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 1H),
7.25 (dd, J = 8.0, 1.5 Hz, 3H), 7.19 (t, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H), 6.70 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 3H), 5.49 (s, 1H),
4.10 (br, 1H); 13C NMR (125 Hz, CDCl3, ppm): 147.5, 146.0, 129.4, 128.5, 128.45,
128.4, 128.2, 126.9, 126.7, 122.7, 120.8, 113.5, 88.8, 85.7, 54.5; +MS = 283.8 au (100%).
N-(1-phenyl-3-phenyl-2-propynyl)-m-nitroaniline (5b)
Following the procedure of 5a: m-nitroaniline (0.3 mmol; 42.1 mg), benzaldehyde
(0.3 mmol; 38.4 mg), phenylacetylene (0.33 mmol, 56.5 mg), CuI (30% mol, 25.3 mg),
12 h, n-hexane: ethyl acetate = 10:1, 85% yield.1H NMR (500 Hz, CDCl3, ppm): 7.66-
7.64 (m, 3 H), 7.62 (ddd, J = 1.0, 2.5, 8.0 Hz, 1 H), 7.45-7.35(m, 5 H), 7.33- 7.25(m, 4
H), 7.02 (ddd, J = 1.0, 2.5, 8.0 Hz, 1 H), 5.49 (d, J = 1.5 Hz, 1H), 4.49 (d, J = 1.5Hz, 1
H); 13C NMR (125 Hz, CDCl3, ppm): 149.2, 147.2, 138.5, 131.8, 129.7, 128.6, 128.5,
127.3, 122.3, 119.8, 113.2, 108.1, 86.9, 85.4, 50.4 (ppm); +MS = 328.9 au (100%).
N-[1-(4-methoxiphenyl)-3-phenyl-2-propynyl]-m-nitroaniline (5c)
Following the procedure of 5a: p-methoxyaniline (0.3 mmol, 42.8 mg), p-
methoxibenzaldehyde (0.3 mmol, 42.3 mg), phenylacetylene (0.33 mmol, 50.8 mg), CuI
(30% mol, 20.0 mg), 110oC, 12h, n-hexane: ethyl acetate = 10:1, 74% yield; 1H NMR
Synthesis of some propargylamines via A3 coupling reaction
69
(500 Hz, CDCl3, ppm): 7.64 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.61(dd, J = 8.0, 1.5 Hz, 1H),
7.57(d, J = 8.5Hz, 2H), 7,41(dd, J = 8.0, 1.5 Hz, 2H); 7,33(d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H), 7.31 (s,
1H), 7.28 (t, J = 8.5Hz, 1H), 7.03 (dd, J = 2.0, 8.5Hz, 2H), 6.95 (d, J = 8.5Hz, 2H), 5.50
(d, J = 5.5 Hz, 1H) 4.44 (d, J = 5.5Hz,1H), 3.83 (s,3H); 13C NMR (125 Hz, CDCl3,
ppm): 159.7, 149.2, 147.2, 131.7, 130.5, 129.6, 128.6, 128.5, 128.3, 122.3, 119.8, 114.3,
113.1, 108.0, 87.2, 85.7, 55.3, 49.8; +MS = 358.9 au (100%).
N-[1-(4-methoxiphenyl)-3-phenyl-2-propynyl]-p-bromoaniline (5d)
Following the procedure of 5a: p-bromoaniline (0.3 mmol, 54.7 mg), p-
methoxibenzaldehyde (0.3 mmol, 51.7 mg), phenylacetylene (0.33 mmol, 53.5 mg), CuI
(30% mol, 24.9 mg), 110oC , 12h, n-hexane: ethyl acetate = 10:1, 70% yield; 1H NMR
(500 Hz, CDCl3, ppm): 7.55 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 7.41-7.39 (m, 2H), 7.30-7.26 (m, 5H),
6.93 (d, J = 8.5Hz, 2H), 6.66 (d, J = 8.0Hz, 2H), 5.39 (s,1H), 4.13 (br, 1H), 3.83 (s,3H);
13C NMR (125 Hz, CDCl3, ppm): 159.5, 145.5, 131.8, 131.7, 131.3, 128.5, 128.4, 128.2,
122.6, 115.7, 114.2, 110.3, 88.1, 85.1, 55.2, 50.0; +MS = 391.8 au (100%); 393.8 au (94%).
2.2. Results and discussion
In order to find a condition that is appropriate to our case, the A3 model reaction was
carried out with 30 mol% of each catalyst in different solvents or solvent free at 110C
or at boiling point of the solvent, Scheme 1, Table 1, [15]. Anhydrous FeCl3 (entry 2)
seemed to be more effective than the hydrate form of FeCl3 as the yield of entry 1 was
slightly smaller. In entry 3, ethanol was added, but the yield of the reaction stayed the same
as in entry 1. Another catalyst, a mixture of copper sulfate and glucose promoted
dramatically reaction forward to the product in 70% yield in ethanol solvent (entry 4).
However, as heated without solvent, entry 5 gave a bit better yield (75%). Thus, it is
concluded that there is no need for the solvent to carry out the reaction this reaction and
solvent-free is the best condition for the synthesis of propargylamines via A3. Further,
SnCl2.2H2O (entry 6), ZnCl2.2H2O (entry 7), and FeCl2.4H2O (entry 8) in solvent free
condition gave yields of 61, 50, 45 yield, respectively. In the presence of CuI under
solvent-free conditions (entry 9) also performed better than in methanol (entry 10). We
could include that CuI under solvent free condition was suitable for our case, Scheme 1.
Scheme 1. The A3 model reaction for optimizing
Hoang Thi Thanh, Tran Thi Thu Trang and Duong Quoc Hoan
70
Table 1. Optimization of catalyst
No. Catalyst Solvent Yield (%)*
1 FeCl3.3H2O - 42
2 FeCl3 (anhydrous) - 54
3 FeCl3.3H2O Ethanol 42
4 CuSO4 + glucose Ethanol 70
5 CuSO4 + glucose - 75
6 SnCl2. 2H2O - 61
7 ZnCl2.2H2O - 50
8 FeCl2.4H2O - 45
9 CuI - 83
10 CuI Methanol 68
* Isolated yield
To optimize the concentration of catalyst, we further examined the influence of
catalyst concentration on the reaction time and percentage yield. So, the model reaction
was performed using different concentration of catalyst 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35 mol% of
CuI at 110C under solvent-free conditions and the product 5a was obtained in 40, 52,
59, 69, 73, 83 and 83 % yields, respectively. Further, the yield of the product did not
improve as the concentration of catalyst increased, Table 2.
Table 2. The effect of catalyst loading on the model
Entry Catalyst (mol %) Isolated Yield (%)
1 5 40
2 10 52
3 15 59
4 20 69
5 25 73
6 30 83
7 35 83
Using optimized condition, three propargylamines were synthesized in good yields
(see experimental), Figure 2.
Figure 2. Synthesized propargylamines
Synthesis of some propargylamines via A3 coupling reaction
71
3. Conclusions
In conclusion, highly efficient, the one-pot multi-component protocol has been
developed for the synthesis of some propargylamines using copper(I) iodide (30% mol)
under the solvent free conditions in good yields. Four propargylamines were synthesized
in up to 85% yield. Structures of propargylamines were firm with NMR, MS methods.
REFERENCES
[1] Ma, S., Wu, B., Jiang, X. 2005. PdCl2-Catalyzed Efficient Transformation of
Propargylic Amines to (E)-α-Chloroalkylidene-β-lactams. J. Org. Chem., 70,
pp. 2588-2593.
[2] Matsuda, I., Sakakibara, J., Nagashima, H., 1991. A Novel Approach to α-
Silylmethylene-β-lactams via Rh-catalyzed Silylcarbonylation of Propargylamine
Derivatives. Tetrahedron Lett. 32, pp. 7431-7434.
[3] Yamamoto, Y., Hayashi, H., Saigoku, T., Nishiyama, H., 2005. Domino coupling
relay approach to polycyclic pyrrole-2-carboxylates. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 127,
pp. 10804-10805.
[4] Harvey, D. F.; Sigano, D. M., 1996. Synthesis of Cyclopropylpyrrolidines via
Reaction of N-Allyl-N-propargylamides with a Molybdenum Carbene Complex.
Effect of Substituents and Reaction Conditions. J. Org. Chem., 61, pp. 2268-2272.
[5] Fürstner, A.; Szillat, H.; Stelzer, F., 2000. Novel Rearrangements of Enynes
Catalyzed by PtCl2. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 122, pp. 6785-6786.
[6] Li, H.; Liu, J.; Yan, B.; Li, Y., 2009. New domino approach for the synthesis of 2,
3-disubstituted benzo[b]furans via copper-catalyzed multi-component coupling
reactions followed by cyclization. Tetrahedron Lett., 50, pp. 2353-2357.
[7] Yan, B.; Liu, Y., 2007. Gold-Catalyzed Multicomponent Synthesis of
Aminoindolizines from Aldehydes, Amines, and Alkynes under Solvent-Free
Conditions or in Water. Org. Lett., 9, pp. 4323-4326.
[8] Ermolat’ev, D. S., Bariwal, J. B., Steenackers, H. P. L., De Keersmaecker, S. C. J.,
Van der Eycken, E. V. 2010. Silver-Catalyzed Synthesis of 2-Amino-imidazole
Alkaloids. Angew. Chem., 122, pp. 9655-9658.
[9] Lee, E.-S.; Yeom, H.-S.; Hwang, J.-H.; Shin, S. 2007. A Practical Gold-Catalyzed
Route to 4-Substituted Oxazolidin-2-ones from N-Boc Propargylamines. Eur. J. Org.
Chem., pp. 3503-3507.
[10] Xiao, F., Chen, Y., Liu, Y., Wang, J., 2008. Sequential catalytic process: synthesis
of quinoline derivatives by AuCl3/CuBr-catalyzed three-component reaction of
aldehydes, amines, and alkynes. Tetrahedron., 64, pp. 2755-2761.
Hoang Thi Thanh, Tran Thi Thu Trang and Duong Quoc Hoan
72
[11] Morphy J. R., 2012. Historical strategies for lead generation. In: Designing Multi-
Target Drugs. Morphy J.R., Harris, C. J. (Eds). The Royal Society of Chemistry,
Cambridge, UK, p. 114-115.
[12] Pérez V, Marco JL, Fernández-Alvarez E, Unzeta M., 1999. Relevance of benzyloxy
group in 2-indolyl methylamines in the selective MAO-B inhibition. Br. J.
Pharmacol, 127(4), pp. 869-876.
[13] Matos, M.J., Santana, L., Janeiro, P., 2008. Design, Synthesis and pharmacological
evaluation of new coumarin derivatives as monoamine oxidase A and B inhibitors.
Electronic Conferences on Synthetic Organic Chemistry, 12, p. 1-30.
[14] Matos, M. J, Vilar, S., Gonzalez-Franco, R., 2013. Novel (coumarin-3-yl)carbamates
as selective MAO-B inhibitors: synthesis, in vitro and in vivo assays, theoretical
evaluation of ADME properties and docking study. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 63, pp. 151-161.
[15] Irfana Jesin, and Ganesh Chandra Nandi, 2019. Recent Advances in the A3 Coupling
Reactions and Their Applications. European Journal of Organic Chemistry, 16,
pp. 2704-2720.
Các file đính kèm theo tài liệu này:
synthesis_of_some_propargylamines_via_a_coupling_reaction.pdf