Synthesis of some propargylamines via A³ coupling reaction

Results and discussion In order to find a condition that is appropriate to our case, the A3 model reaction was carried out with 30 mol% of each catalyst in different solvents or solvent free at 110C or at boiling point of the solvent, Scheme 1, Table 1, [15]. Anhydrous FeCl3 (entry 2) seemed to be more effective than the hydrate form of FeCl3 as the yield of entry 1 was slightly smaller. In entry 3, ethanol was added, but the yield of the reaction stayed the same as in entry 1. Another catalyst, a mixture of copper sulfate and glucose promoted dramatically reaction forward to the product in 70% yield in ethanol solvent (entry 4). However, as heated without solvent, entry 5 gave a bit better yield (75%). Thus, it is concluded that there is no need for the solvent to carry out the reaction this reaction and solvent-free is the best condition for the synthesis of propargylamines via A3. Further, SnCl2.2H2O (entry 6), ZnCl2.2H2O (entry 7), and FeCl2.4H2O (entry 8) in solvent free condition gave yields of 61, 50, 45 yield, respectively. In the presence of CuI under solvent-free conditions (entry 9) also performed better than in methanol (entry 10). We could include that CuI under solvent free condition was suitable for our case, Scheme 1. To optimize the concentration of catalyst, we further examined the influence of catalyst concentration on the reaction time and percentage yield. So, the model reaction was performed using different concentration of catalyst 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35 mol% of CuI at 110C under solvent-free conditions and the product 5a was obtained in 40, 52, 59, 69, 73, 83 and 83 % yields, respectively. Further, the yield of the product did not improve as the concentration of catalyst increased, Table 2. Conclusions In conclusion, highly efficient, the one-pot multi-component protocol has been developed for the synthesis of some propargylamines using copper(I) iodide (30% mol) under the solvent free conditions in good yields. Four propargylamines were synthesized in up to 85% yield. Structures of propargylamines were firm with NMR, MS methods.

pdf6 trang | Chia sẻ: hachi492 | Lượt xem: 7 | Lượt tải: 0download
Bạn đang xem nội dung tài liệu Synthesis of some propargylamines via A³ coupling reaction, để tải tài liệu về máy bạn click vào nút DOWNLOAD ở trên
67 HNUE JOURNAL OF SCIENCE DOI: 10.18173/2354-1059.2020-0049 Natural Sciences 2020, Volume 65, Issue 10, pp. 67-72 This paper is available online at SYNTHESIS OF SOME PROPARGYLAMINES VIA A3 COUPLING REACTION Hoang Thi Thanh1, Tran Thi Thu Trang2 and Duong Quoc Hoan2* 1Student of the Faculty of Chemistry, Hanoi National University of Education 2Faculty of Chemistry, Hanoi National University of Education Abstract. Condition for synthesis of propargylamines has been found in highly efficient as a one-pot multi-component protocol. Copper(I) iodide (30% mol) under solvent free condition gave propargylamine in good yields. Structures of propargylamines were elucidated with NMR, MS methods. Keywords: one-pot multi-component reaction, propargylamine, copper (I) iodide, solvent free, A3 coupling reaction. 1. Introduction Propargylamines have recently been used for synthesis of nitrogen-containing compounds such as β-lactam[1, 2], pyrrole [3], pyrrolidine [4], pyrrolophane [5], 3-aminobenzofuran [6], aminoindolizine [7], 2-aminoimidazole [8], oxazolidinone [9], quinoline [10] and multifunctional monoamine oxidase and ChE inhibitors ladostigil (1) and PF9601N (2) [11, 12]. Figure 1. Examples of propargylamines and designed propargylamines Current treatment options include the use of monoamine oxidase inhibitors like selegiline (3, Deprenyl) and rasagiline (4, Azilect) (Figure 1) in the treatment of Parkinson’s disease. Received September 24, 2020. Revised October 12, 2020. Accepted October 19, 2020. Contact Duong Quoc Hoan, e-mail address: hoandq@hnue.edu.vn Hoang Thi Thanh, Tran Thi Thu Trang and Duong Quoc Hoan 68 These drugs are aimed at correcting disturbances in the monoaminergic neurotransmitter system by virtue of inhibiting the monoamine oxidase-B enzyme that is responsible for catalyzing the oxidative degradation of dopamine [13, 14]. Therefore, synthesis of propargylamines has been considered, in which A3coupling reaction is one of the most popular methods since they are convenient approach, atom economy and eco- friendly reaction condition. In order to take advantages of A3coupling reaction in the synthesis of propargylamine derivatives, herein, we wish to report an optimized condition and synthesis of four new propargylamine derivatives (5) via A3 coupling reaction, Figure 1. 2. Content 2.1. Experimental 2.1.1. Chemicals and equipment Solvents and chemicals were bought from Sigma-Aldrich (phenylacetylene), Merck Corp (m-nitroaniline), Aladdin (p-bromoaniline), Vietnam (ethanol), or other China’s companies (aniline) were used as received unless indicated. The NMR spectra were recorded on the Bruker Avance 500 MHz NMR spectrometer in DMSO-d6. Chemical- shift data for each signal was reported in ppm. Mass spectra were obtained from the Mass Spectrometry Facility of The Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology on LC- MSD-Trap-SL spectrometer. 2.1.2. Synthetic procedure N-(1-phenyl-3-phenyl-2-propynyl)-aniline (5a) A mixture of aniline (1.0 mmol, 121.5 mg), benzaldehyde (1mmol; 115.6 mg), phenylacetylene (1.1 mmol; 112.3 mg), CuI (1% mol; 22.3 mg) was heated at 110oC for 8h. The progress of reaction was monitored with TLC. The title product was purified with a flask column in eluent n-hexane: ethyl acetate = 20:1 in 83% yield. 1H NMR (500 Hz, CDCl3,  ppm): 7.65 (d, J = 7.5Hz, 2 H), 7.39 (t, J = 8.0 Hz, 4H), 7.32 (t, J = 7.0 Hz, 1H), 7.25 (dd, J = 8.0, 1.5 Hz, 3H), 7.19 (t, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H), 6.70 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 3H), 5.49 (s, 1H), 4.10 (br, 1H); 13C NMR (125 Hz, CDCl3,  ppm): 147.5, 146.0, 129.4, 128.5, 128.45, 128.4, 128.2, 126.9, 126.7, 122.7, 120.8, 113.5, 88.8, 85.7, 54.5; +MS = 283.8 au (100%). N-(1-phenyl-3-phenyl-2-propynyl)-m-nitroaniline (5b) Following the procedure of 5a: m-nitroaniline (0.3 mmol; 42.1 mg), benzaldehyde (0.3 mmol; 38.4 mg), phenylacetylene (0.33 mmol, 56.5 mg), CuI (30% mol, 25.3 mg), 12 h, n-hexane: ethyl acetate = 10:1, 85% yield.1H NMR (500 Hz, CDCl3,  ppm): 7.66- 7.64 (m, 3 H), 7.62 (ddd, J = 1.0, 2.5, 8.0 Hz, 1 H), 7.45-7.35(m, 5 H), 7.33- 7.25(m, 4 H), 7.02 (ddd, J = 1.0, 2.5, 8.0 Hz, 1 H), 5.49 (d, J = 1.5 Hz, 1H), 4.49 (d, J = 1.5Hz, 1 H); 13C NMR (125 Hz, CDCl3,  ppm): 149.2, 147.2, 138.5, 131.8, 129.7, 128.6, 128.5, 127.3, 122.3, 119.8, 113.2, 108.1, 86.9, 85.4, 50.4 (ppm); +MS = 328.9 au (100%). N-[1-(4-methoxiphenyl)-3-phenyl-2-propynyl]-m-nitroaniline (5c) Following the procedure of 5a: p-methoxyaniline (0.3 mmol, 42.8 mg), p- methoxibenzaldehyde (0.3 mmol, 42.3 mg), phenylacetylene (0.33 mmol, 50.8 mg), CuI (30% mol, 20.0 mg), 110oC, 12h, n-hexane: ethyl acetate = 10:1, 74% yield; 1H NMR Synthesis of some propargylamines via A3 coupling reaction 69 (500 Hz, CDCl3,  ppm): 7.64 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.61(dd, J = 8.0, 1.5 Hz, 1H), 7.57(d, J = 8.5Hz, 2H), 7,41(dd, J = 8.0, 1.5 Hz, 2H); 7,33(d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H), 7.31 (s, 1H), 7.28 (t, J = 8.5Hz, 1H), 7.03 (dd, J = 2.0, 8.5Hz, 2H), 6.95 (d, J = 8.5Hz, 2H), 5.50 (d, J = 5.5 Hz, 1H) 4.44 (d, J = 5.5Hz,1H), 3.83 (s,3H); 13C NMR (125 Hz, CDCl3,  ppm): 159.7, 149.2, 147.2, 131.7, 130.5, 129.6, 128.6, 128.5, 128.3, 122.3, 119.8, 114.3, 113.1, 108.0, 87.2, 85.7, 55.3, 49.8; +MS = 358.9 au (100%). N-[1-(4-methoxiphenyl)-3-phenyl-2-propynyl]-p-bromoaniline (5d) Following the procedure of 5a: p-bromoaniline (0.3 mmol, 54.7 mg), p- methoxibenzaldehyde (0.3 mmol, 51.7 mg), phenylacetylene (0.33 mmol, 53.5 mg), CuI (30% mol, 24.9 mg), 110oC , 12h, n-hexane: ethyl acetate = 10:1, 70% yield; 1H NMR (500 Hz, CDCl3,  ppm): 7.55 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 7.41-7.39 (m, 2H), 7.30-7.26 (m, 5H), 6.93 (d, J = 8.5Hz, 2H), 6.66 (d, J = 8.0Hz, 2H), 5.39 (s,1H), 4.13 (br, 1H), 3.83 (s,3H); 13C NMR (125 Hz, CDCl3,  ppm): 159.5, 145.5, 131.8, 131.7, 131.3, 128.5, 128.4, 128.2, 122.6, 115.7, 114.2, 110.3, 88.1, 85.1, 55.2, 50.0; +MS = 391.8 au (100%); 393.8 au (94%). 2.2. Results and discussion In order to find a condition that is appropriate to our case, the A3 model reaction was carried out with 30 mol% of each catalyst in different solvents or solvent free at 110C or at boiling point of the solvent, Scheme 1, Table 1, [15]. Anhydrous FeCl3 (entry 2) seemed to be more effective than the hydrate form of FeCl3 as the yield of entry 1 was slightly smaller. In entry 3, ethanol was added, but the yield of the reaction stayed the same as in entry 1. Another catalyst, a mixture of copper sulfate and glucose promoted dramatically reaction forward to the product in 70% yield in ethanol solvent (entry 4). However, as heated without solvent, entry 5 gave a bit better yield (75%). Thus, it is concluded that there is no need for the solvent to carry out the reaction this reaction and solvent-free is the best condition for the synthesis of propargylamines via A3. Further, SnCl2.2H2O (entry 6), ZnCl2.2H2O (entry 7), and FeCl2.4H2O (entry 8) in solvent free condition gave yields of 61, 50, 45 yield, respectively. In the presence of CuI under solvent-free conditions (entry 9) also performed better than in methanol (entry 10). We could include that CuI under solvent free condition was suitable for our case, Scheme 1. Scheme 1. The A3 model reaction for optimizing Hoang Thi Thanh, Tran Thi Thu Trang and Duong Quoc Hoan 70 Table 1. Optimization of catalyst No. Catalyst Solvent Yield (%)* 1 FeCl3.3H2O - 42 2 FeCl3 (anhydrous) - 54 3 FeCl3.3H2O Ethanol 42 4 CuSO4 + glucose Ethanol 70 5 CuSO4 + glucose - 75 6 SnCl2. 2H2O - 61 7 ZnCl2.2H2O - 50 8 FeCl2.4H2O - 45 9 CuI - 83 10 CuI Methanol 68 * Isolated yield To optimize the concentration of catalyst, we further examined the influence of catalyst concentration on the reaction time and percentage yield. So, the model reaction was performed using different concentration of catalyst 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35 mol% of CuI at 110C under solvent-free conditions and the product 5a was obtained in 40, 52, 59, 69, 73, 83 and 83 % yields, respectively. Further, the yield of the product did not improve as the concentration of catalyst increased, Table 2. Table 2. The effect of catalyst loading on the model Entry Catalyst (mol %) Isolated Yield (%) 1 5 40 2 10 52 3 15 59 4 20 69 5 25 73 6 30 83 7 35 83 Using optimized condition, three propargylamines were synthesized in good yields (see experimental), Figure 2. Figure 2. Synthesized propargylamines Synthesis of some propargylamines via A3 coupling reaction 71 3. Conclusions In conclusion, highly efficient, the one-pot multi-component protocol has been developed for the synthesis of some propargylamines using copper(I) iodide (30% mol) under the solvent free conditions in good yields. Four propargylamines were synthesized in up to 85% yield. Structures of propargylamines were firm with NMR, MS methods. REFERENCES [1] Ma, S., Wu, B., Jiang, X. 2005. PdCl2-Catalyzed Efficient Transformation of Propargylic Amines to (E)-α-Chloroalkylidene-β-lactams. J. Org. Chem., 70, pp. 2588-2593. [2] Matsuda, I., Sakakibara, J., Nagashima, H., 1991. A Novel Approach to α- Silylmethylene-β-lactams via Rh-catalyzed Silylcarbonylation of Propargylamine Derivatives. Tetrahedron Lett. 32, pp. 7431-7434. [3] Yamamoto, Y., Hayashi, H., Saigoku, T., Nishiyama, H., 2005. Domino coupling relay approach to polycyclic pyrrole-2-carboxylates. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 127, pp. 10804-10805. [4] Harvey, D. F.; Sigano, D. M., 1996. Synthesis of Cyclopropylpyrrolidines via Reaction of N-Allyl-N-propargylamides with a Molybdenum Carbene Complex. Effect of Substituents and Reaction Conditions. J. Org. Chem., 61, pp. 2268-2272. [5] Fürstner, A.; Szillat, H.; Stelzer, F., 2000. Novel Rearrangements of Enynes Catalyzed by PtCl2. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 122, pp. 6785-6786. [6] Li, H.; Liu, J.; Yan, B.; Li, Y., 2009. New domino approach for the synthesis of 2, 3-disubstituted benzo[b]furans via copper-catalyzed multi-component coupling reactions followed by cyclization. Tetrahedron Lett., 50, pp. 2353-2357. [7] Yan, B.; Liu, Y., 2007. Gold-Catalyzed Multicomponent Synthesis of Aminoindolizines from Aldehydes, Amines, and Alkynes under Solvent-Free Conditions or in Water. Org. Lett., 9, pp. 4323-4326. [8] Ermolat’ev, D. S., Bariwal, J. B., Steenackers, H. P. L., De Keersmaecker, S. C. J., Van der Eycken, E. V. 2010. Silver-Catalyzed Synthesis of 2-Amino-imidazole Alkaloids. Angew. Chem., 122, pp. 9655-9658. [9] Lee, E.-S.; Yeom, H.-S.; Hwang, J.-H.; Shin, S. 2007. A Practical Gold-Catalyzed Route to 4-Substituted Oxazolidin-2-ones from N-Boc Propargylamines. Eur. J. Org. Chem., pp. 3503-3507. [10] Xiao, F., Chen, Y., Liu, Y., Wang, J., 2008. Sequential catalytic process: synthesis of quinoline derivatives by AuCl3/CuBr-catalyzed three-component reaction of aldehydes, amines, and alkynes. Tetrahedron., 64, pp. 2755-2761. Hoang Thi Thanh, Tran Thi Thu Trang and Duong Quoc Hoan 72 [11] Morphy J. R., 2012. Historical strategies for lead generation. In: Designing Multi- Target Drugs. Morphy J.R., Harris, C. J. (Eds). The Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge, UK, p. 114-115. [12] Pérez V, Marco JL, Fernández-Alvarez E, Unzeta M., 1999. Relevance of benzyloxy group in 2-indolyl methylamines in the selective MAO-B inhibition. Br. J. Pharmacol, 127(4), pp. 869-876. [13] Matos, M.J., Santana, L., Janeiro, P., 2008. Design, Synthesis and pharmacological evaluation of new coumarin derivatives as monoamine oxidase A and B inhibitors. Electronic Conferences on Synthetic Organic Chemistry, 12, p. 1-30. [14] Matos, M. J, Vilar, S., Gonzalez-Franco, R., 2013. Novel (coumarin-3-yl)carbamates as selective MAO-B inhibitors: synthesis, in vitro and in vivo assays, theoretical evaluation of ADME properties and docking study. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 63, pp. 151-161. [15] Irfana Jesin, and Ganesh Chandra Nandi, 2019. Recent Advances in the A3 Coupling Reactions and Their Applications. European Journal of Organic Chemistry, 16, pp. 2704-2720.

Các file đính kèm theo tài liệu này:

  • pdfsynthesis_of_some_propargylamines_via_a_coupling_reaction.pdf