The blue shifts of the c-H and n-h bonds in the complexes of chx3 (x = f, cl, br) and hno: a theoretical study - Nguyễn Tiến Trung

Each complex pairing HNO and CHX3 (X: F, Cl, Br) contains five separate minima on the potential energy surface. The binding energies obtained at the MP2/6-311++G(d,p) level are from 7 to 11 kJ.mol-1 with the BSSE correction and from 4 to 8 kJ.mol-1 with both the ZPE and BSSE corrections. The most stable are the complexes pairing CHBr3 with HNO, and the least stable are the complexes between CHF3 and HNO. The difference is due to the deprotonation enthalpy of the C-H bond which is the smallest in the CHBr3 and the largest in the CHF3. The contractions of the bond length and the blue shifts of the stretching frequency are observed in all the N2-H3 and C4-H5 bonds going from F to Cl to Br. However, the infrared intensities of the C4-H5 bonds are increase in the complexes of CHCl3.HNO and CHBr3.HNO, while the decrease of the infrared intensities is obtained in the complexes of CHF3.HNO. The shortening of the C-H bond and blue shift of its stretching frequency depend on the nature of the proton donor, particularly the polarity of the C-H bond. The EDT and RE can be used for classification of type of hydrogen bond.

pdf7 trang | Chia sẻ: honghp95 | Lượt xem: 458 | Lượt tải: 0download
Bạn đang xem nội dung tài liệu The blue shifts of the c-H and n-h bonds in the complexes of chx3 (x = f, cl, br) and hno: a theoretical study - Nguyễn Tiến Trung, để tải tài liệu về máy bạn click vào nút DOWNLOAD ở trên
535 Journal of Chemistry, Vol. 47 (5), P. 535 - 541, 2009 THE BLUE SHIFTS OF THE C-H AND N-H BONDS IN THE COMPLEXES OF CHX3 (X = F, Cl, Br) AND HNO: A THEORETICAL STUDY Received 13 Sep 2007 Nguyen Tien Trung1,2*, Tran Thanh Hue2 1Faculty of Chemistry, Quy Nhon University 2Faculty of Chemistry, Hanoi National University of Education abstract All calculations were performed at the high level of theory (MP2/6-311++G(d,p)). Five separate minima were identified on the potential energy surface of each complex pairing CH3X with HNO. In general, strength of complexes increases in going from F to Cl to Br, which is consistent with respective decrease of deprotonation enthalpy of the C-H bond respectively. All the C-H and N-H bonds are shortened upon complexation, corresponding to increase in their stretching frequencies. It is interesting that blue shift is observed in the N-H bonds; such a contraction in the N-H covalent bond is extremely rare. Linear correlation between change of stretching frequencies and change of the N-H and C-H bond lengths in all complexes has been reported in equation (1) and (2). Besides, the change of the N-H bond lengths and their stretching frequencies as a function of the change of occupation of σ*(N-H) orbitals and that of s-character of N hybrid orbitals were obtained as in expression (3) and (4). I - Introduction The hydrogen bond A-H...B plays an important role in many chemical, physical and biochemical processes [1, 2]. Recently, a new type of intermolecular bond, commonly designated as a blue-shifting hydrogen bond, continues to receive a good deal of both experimental and theoretical attention. The majority of these blue-shifting hydrogen bonds contains a C-H bond as the proton donor. In general, the N-H bond will shift to the red of stretching frequency because of its more polarization. However, there are some very small numbers of exceptions recently reported for the N-H bond that the blue shift is found in the type of the N-H...O and N-H...X (F, Cl, Br) hydrogen bonds [3 - 5]. Simultaneously, the complexes that combine CHX3 (X = F, Cl, Br) with HNO are of paramount interest in the field of atmospheric chemistry. In spite of the potential importance of these complexes, there is available in the literature neither theoretical nor experimental information. Our other purposes when considering the interaction between HNO and CHX3 are to reveal the blue shift of N-H bond in more systems, to provide some interesting data and also to understand the more obvious origin of blue-shifting hydrogen bond. 2. Computational Methods All calculations of the isolated monomers and their complexes were performed within the second order perturbation method (MP2) in conjunction with the 6-311++G(d,p) basis set using the GAUSSIAN 03 program [6]. The interaction energies were corrected for basis set 536 superposition errors (BSSE) via the standard counterpoise procedure of Boys and Bernadi [7]. Charges on individual atoms, orbital occupancies and hyperconjugation energies were obtained by the natural bond orbital (NBO) population scheme [8]. III - Results and Discussion 1. Interaction Energies, Geometries and Stretching Frequencies The structures of monomers and their complexes were optimized at the high level of theory (MP2/6-311++G(d,p)). The geometries of optimized structures of the complexes were displayed in figure 1. Five minima are located on the potential energy surface of each complex. The interaction energies with ZPE and BSSE corrections were gathered in table 1. The binding energies lie in the ranges of 7 - 11 kJ.mol-1 with BSSE correction and 4 - 8 kJ.mol-1 with both the ZPE and BSSE corrections. In general, the strength of complexes increases in going from F to Cl to Br, which is in consistent with decreasing of the deprotonation enthalpy of the C-H bond in the isolated monomers with the values of 1577, 1496 and 1463 kJ.mol-1, respectively [9]. There is only an exception that the binding energy in S5 geometry of CHF3...HNO is slightly larger than in that of CHCl3...HNO. This magnitude order of deprotonation enthalpy is directed to that of the intramolecular hyperconjugative energy resulting in transfer of electron density from nX to σ*(C4-H5) orbital. The calculated values of this work obtained at MP2/6-311++G(d,p) level of theory are in turn 27.33, 21.36 and 15.45 kcal.mol-1 going from CHF3 to CHCl3 to CHBr3. It means that the larger the intramolecular hyperconjugative energy from nX to σ*(C4-H5) orbital is, the larger the deprotonation energy of C-H bond is. There is little sensitivity to identify the halogen atom because the difference of binding energies is small, ca 1.0 kJ.mol-1, in each geometrical type upon going from F to Cl to Br. Table 1: Interaction energies with BSSE ((ΔE(BSSE), in kJ.mol-1) and both BSSE and ZPE ((ΔE(ZPE+BSSE), in kJ.mol-1) corrections of complexes and the distances of hydrogen bond (R, in Å) S1 S2 S3 S4 S5 CHF3-HNO ΔE(BSSE) -7.87 -7.19 -9.38 -8.28 -7.87 ΔE(ZPE+BSSE) -4.47 -3.47 -5.67 -5.35 -4.92 R(H5...O1(N2)) 2.60 2.67 2.62 2.72 2.45(2.57)a R(H3...X(6,7,8)) 2.39 2.62 2.81 3.08 C4H5O1(N2) 120.2 99.4 119.3 100.8 164.2(136.1)b N2H3X(6,7,8) 129.3 118.7 90.6 81.0 CHCl3-HNO ΔE(BSSE) -7.90 -8.07 -9.79 -9.79 -7.70 ΔE(ZPE+BSSE) -4.43 -5.02 -6.57 -6.28 -4.12 R(H5...O1(N2)) 2.36 2.46 2.37 2.45 2.37(2.45)a R(H3...X(6,7,8)) 2.86 3.06 3.41 3.39 C4H5O1(N2) 141.4 120.4 143.3 121.0 164.5(135.1)b N2H3X(6,7,8) 131.1 119.7 86.1 84.5 CHBr3-HNO ΔE(BSSE) -8.91 -9.03 -10.67 -10.97 -8.20 ΔE(ZPE+BSSE) -5.65 -6.35 -7.41 -7.72 -5.15 R(H5...O1(N2)) 2.34 2.45 2.33 2.41 2.34(2.47)a R(H3...X(6,7,8)) 3.00 3.18 3.58 3.52 C4H5O1(N2) 146.1 125.4 148.7 126.1 168.6(139.2)b N2H3X(6,7,8) 132.8 121.1 86.3 85.4 a refers to the H5...N2 distances; b refers to the C4H5N2 angle; the scaling factor for ZPE is 0.97. 537 Figure 1: The geometries of optimized structures of the complexes pairing CHX3 (X: F, Cl, Br) with HNO Similarly, the H5...O1(N2) intermolecular distances tend to decrease, which is consistent with the increase of the polarity of the C-H bond. On the other hand, there is a increase of the H3...X(6,7,8) distances in going from F to Cl to Br, as shown in table 1. It should be explained that this order of increase depends on the size and NBO charge of X atom. From the result of table 1, it indicates that the strength of the complex going from F to Cl to Br is determined by the distance of the H5...O1(N2) contact and the C4H5O1(N2) angle in each geometry. This is because the smaller the deviation of the angle from linearity is, the larger the overlap of electron density between the σ*(C4-H5) and n(O1) or n(N2) orbital is. This larger overlap leads to the complex becoming more stable. The change of bond lengths and stretching frequencies and infrared intensities of the C4-H5 and N2-H3 bonds is listed in table 2. Table 2: The change of bond lengths of the C4-H5 and N2-H3 bonds (Å), their stretching frequencies (cm-1) and infrared intensities (km.mol-1) in the examined complexes compared to monomers respectively S1 S2 S3 S4 S5 CHF3-HNO Δr(C4-H5) -0.0017 -0.0021 -0.0019 -0.0025 -0.0025 Δr(N2-H3) -0.0029 -0.0021 -0.0017 -0.0010 -0.0024 Δν(C4-H5) 25.48 28.37 28.27 33.12 39.37 Δν(N2-H3) 61.56 48.48 34.7 25.28 43.05 ΔI(C4-H5) -18.03 -16.12 -19.62 -13.61 -25.65 ΔI(N2-H3) -66.08 -57.88 -47.16 -42.04 -30.11 CHCl3-HNO Δr(C4-H5) -0.0015 -0.0011 -0.0009 -0.0011 -0.0023 Δr(N2-H3) -0.0019 -0.0010 -0.0016 -0.0009 -0.0019 Δν(C4-H5) 27.85 21.12 16.39 21.58 41.02 Δν(N2-H3) 43.81 31.88 31.76 23.95 38.4 ΔI(C4-H5) 12.66 3.49 33.80 10.17 16.31 ΔI(N2-H3) -63.38 -55.96 -54.99 -52.11 -18.80 CHBr3-HNO Δr(C4-H5) -0.0012 -0.0009 -0.0004 -0.0008 -0.0019 Δr(N2-H3) -0.0017 -0.0011 -0.0016 -0.0011 -0.0018 Δν(C4-H5) 22.51 17.51 7.44 15.13 35.62 Δν(N2-H3) 39.41 30.98 32.11 26.12 36.08 ΔI(C4-H5) 28.70 10.97 70.09 27.77 36.21 ΔI(N2-H3) -67.88 -58.87 -58.89 -57.33 -11.66 538 The Δr(C4-H5) and Δr(N2-H3) values are all negative, indicating that these hydrogen bonds are shortened upon complexation. Simultaneously, there is an increase of the respective C4-H5 and N2-H3 stretching frequencies. However, there is a different change of infrared intensity between the N2-H3 and C4-H5 bonds via complex formation. The decrease of the infrared intensity is observed in all the N2-H3 bonds and the C4-H5 bonds of the complexes of CHF3 with HNO, corresponding to the increase of the respective stretching frequencies. Contrastly, there is an increase of the infrared intensities of the C4-H5 bonds in case of complexes between CHX3(X = Cl, Br) and HNO. It should be explained that the different change of the infrared intensity depends on the nature of the CHX3 isolated monomers. In particular, there is signal difference of dipole moment derivative along the C-H stretch of CHF3, CHCl3 and CHBr3 [10]. Both the contraction of the C4-H5 and N2-H3 bonds and the increase of their stretching frequencies indicate that they are blue-shifting hydrogen bonds upon complexation. Such a contraction in the N-H covalent bond is extremely rare; this bond is normally elongated when a hydrogen bond is formed. The blue shift in the N2-H3 bonds is larger than in the C4-H5 bonds. It may be noted that the degree to which the C-H bond contracts is largest for X=F and least for X=Br. The inversely proportional linear correlations between the change of C4-H5 and N2-H3 bond lengths and their respective stretching frequencies are obtained as in equation (1) and (2), and plotted in figure 2. Δν(C-H) = -14203 Δr(C-H) + 4.6487 (r = 0.959) (1) Δν(N-H) = -16195 Δr(N-H) + 9.8371 (r = 0.929) (2) It is interesting that the N2-H3 bonds are significantly contracted in the S5 geometries although they don’t participate in hydrogen bond. It indicates that the contraction of N2-H3 bond corresponding to an increase of its stretching frequency depends on nature of the isolated HNO monomer. This new direction has been recently studied and will be continued in our following papers. Along with the contraction of the C4-H5 and N2-H3 bonds in each geometrical structure, there is a change of bond length of the remaining bonds. Particularly, all N2=O1 bonds are lengthened when the complexes are formed. Besides, the hydrogen bonded C-X bonds are elongated and the hydrogen non-bonded C-X bonds are contracted upon complexation, except for the elongation of all the C-X bonds in the S5 geometries going from F to Cl to Br. y = -14203x + 4.6487 r = 0.959 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 -0.003 -0.0025 -0.002 -0.0015 -0.001 -0.0005 0 y = -16195x + 9.8371 r = 0.929 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 -0.0035 -0.003 -0.0025 -0.002 -0.0015 -0.001 -0.0005 0 Figure 2: The linear correlation between the change of the stretching frequencies and that of the bond length Δν(C-H)/cm-1 Δν(N-H)/cm-1 Δr(C-H)/Å Δr(N-H)/Å 539 2. NBO analysis To get more information on the blue shifts of the C4-H5 and N2-H3 stretching frequencies, NBO analysis has been carried out at the MP2/6-311++G(d,p) level. The corresponding results are reported in table 3. Table 3: NBO analysis and RE energy index S1 S2 S3 S4 S5 CHF3-HNO EDT/e 0.0009 0.0010 0.0025 0.0014 0.0045 Δσ*(C4-H5)/e -0.0012 -0.0015 -0.0004 -0.0010 -0.0005 Δσ*(N2-H3)/e -0.0016 -0.0011 -0.0005 -0.0003 -0.0013 Δ%s(C4-H5) 0.48 0.48 0.57 0.50 0.69 Δ%s(N2-H3) 0.54 0.41 0.53 0.45 0.60 RE(C4-H5) 0.51 0.18 0.75 0.33 0.77(0.26) c RE (N2-H3) 0.42 0.29 0.00 0.00 0.00 CHCl3-HNO EDT/e 0.0007 0.0003 0.0044 0.0008 0.0051 Δσ*(C4-H5)/e -0.0023 -0.0017 -0.0012 -0.0014 -0.0020 Δσ*(N2-H3)/e -0.0007 -0.0005 -0.0002 -0.0000 -0.0011 Δ%s(C4-H5) 0.86 0.62 1.16 0.84 0.99 Δ%s(N2-H3) 0.48 0.40 0.57 0.50 0.55 RE(C4-H5) 0.70 0.41 0.89 0.53 0.69(0.15) c RE (N2-H3) 0.65 0.42 0.00 0.00 0.00 CHBr3-HNO EDT/e 0.0005 0.0003 0.00552 0.0012 0.0057 Δσ*(C4-H5)/e -0.0020 -0.0013 -0.00075 -0.0010 -0.0018 Δσ*(N2-H3)/e -0.0003 -0.0003 -0.00016 -0.0001 -0.0012 Δ%s(C4-H5) 1.02 0.69 1.45 1.00 1.15 Δ%s(N2-H3) 0.51 0.44 0.57 0.53 0.51 RE(C4-H5) 0.87 0.53 1.07 0.69 0.85(0.13) c RE (N2-H3) 0.80 0.53 0.00 0.00 0.00 crefers to the energy index for interaction transferring electron from the N2 to σ*(C4-H5) orbital. EDT values are all positive, it means that there is electron density transfer from HNO to CHX3 when the complex is formed. As shown in table 3, the electron density decrease in both the σ*(C4-H5) and σ*(N2-H3) anti-bonding orbitals. The decrease of the electron density in the σ*(C4-H5) and σ*(N2-H3) orbitals strengthens the C4-H5 and N2-H3 bonds, which contributes to the blue shift of the corresponding stretching frequency. Simultaneously, the increase in s-character of the C4 and N2 hybrid orbitals in the C4-H5 and N2-H3 bonds is also observed in all the examined complexes. As a result, this increase strengthens the C4-H5 and N2-H3 bonds and results in the contraction of these bonds corresponding to increase in their stretching frequencies. In a word, the contraction of the C4-H5 and N2-H3 bonds corresponding to the blue shift of stretching frequencies is contributed by both the increase of s-character and the decrease of electron density in the σ-antibonding orbital. The variation of the occupation of σ- antibonding orbitals results from two effects acting in opposite directions. If we consider a Z- X-H...Y hydrogen bond, the intermolecular n(Y) 540 to σ*(XH) hyperconjugative interaction leads to an increase in electron density in the σ*(XH) orbital. In contrast, a decrease of the n(Z) → σ*(XH) intramolecular interaction with respect to the monomer, has the opposite effect and results in a decrease in occupation of the σ*(XH) orbital. On the basis of these considerations, it may be useful to use the RE index defined as follows [10, 11]. (2) int er E (2) int ra E R E = where (2) (2) *int erE E [n(Y) (XH)]σ= → (2) (2) * (2) * int ra mon complE E [n(Z) (XH)] E [n(Z) (XH)]σ σΔ = → − → The RE values of the C4-H5 bonds are from 0.00 to 1.16, while that of the N2-H3 bonds from 0.00 to 0.80. All these RE values are smaller than 2.98 which is upper limited value of RE for the blue shift of the C-H bonds in ref 10 and 11. Therefore, the RE index can be used to consider the classification of blue-shifting or red-shifting hydrogen bond. The RE index with the zero value indicates that for the S3, S4 and S5 geometries going F to Cl to Br, there is no transfer of the electron density from the n(X) to σ*(N2-H3) orbital as shown in Table 3. Hence, the decrease in electron density of the σ*(N2- H3) orbital results from the decrease in the intramolecular n(O1) to σ*(N2-H3) hyperconjugative interaction. The dual correlation between the change of the N2-H3 bond lengths, that of the electron density in the σ*(N2-H3) orbitals, and that of hybridization in the N2 hybrid orbitals when the S5 geometries are obtained as the following: Δr(N-H)= 1.174967Δσ*(N-H) – 0.00438Δ%s(N-H) + 0.001176 (r = 0.962) (3) Δν(N-H)= -23017.68905Δσ*(N-H) + 33.134337Δ%s(N-H) + 8.471835 (r = 0.959) (4) To check of reliability of these correlations, we calculated the change of the bond length and the stretching frequency based on equation (3) and (4). The results indicate that the correlations are reasonable and reliable as follows: Δr(N-H)calculation = 0.9256 Δr(N-H)theoretical - 0.0001(r = 0.962) (5) Δν(N-H)calculation = 0.9189 Δν(N-H)theoretical + 2.9064 (r = 0.959) (6) IV - Concluding remarks Each complex pairing HNO and CHX3 (X: F, Cl, Br) contains five separate minima on the potential energy surface. The binding energies obtained at the MP2/6-311++G(d,p) level are from 7 to 11 kJ.mol-1 with the BSSE correction and from 4 to 8 kJ.mol-1 with both the ZPE and BSSE corrections. The most stable are the complexes pairing CHBr3 with HNO, and the least stable are the complexes between CHF3 and HNO. The difference is due to the deprotonation enthalpy of the C-H bond which is the smallest in the CHBr3 and the largest in the CHF3. The contractions of the bond length and the blue shifts of the stretching frequency are observed in all the N2-H3 and C4-H5 bonds going from F to Cl to Br. However, the infrared intensities of the C4-H5 bonds are increase in the complexes of CHCl3...HNO and CHBr3...HNO, while the decrease of the infrared intensities is obtained in the complexes of CHF3...HNO. The shortening of the C-H bond and blue shift of its stretching frequency depend on the nature of the proton donor, particularly the polarity of the C-H bond. The EDT and RE can be used for classification of type of hydrogen bond. This work is supported by NAFOSTED under project 104.03.142.09. References 1. G. R. Desiraju; T. Steiner. The Weak Hydrogen Bond in Structural Chemistry and Biology, Oxford University Press, New York (1999). 2. Grabowski, S. J. Ed. Hydrogen Bonding- New Insights, Springer, Dordrecht, the Netherlands (2006). 3. Y. Yang, W. J. Zhang, X. M. Gao. Int. J. Quant. Chem., 106, 1199 (2006). 541 4. Y. Liu, W. Liu, H. Li, J. Liu, J. Yang. J. Phys. Chem A, 110, 11760, (2006). 5. M. Solimannejad, S. Scheiner. J. Phys. Chem. A, 111, 4431 (2007). 6. M. J. Frisch and et al., Gaussian 03, Revision B.03, Gaussian Inc., Pittsburgh, PA (2003). 7. S. F. Boys, F. Bernardi. Mol. Phys., 19, 553 (1970). 8. A. E. Reed, L. A. Curtiss, F. Weinhold. Chem. Rev., 88, 899 (1988). 9. J. E. Bartmess, J. A. Scott, R. T. McIver. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 101, 6047, (1979); J. A. Paulino, R. R. Squires. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 113, 5573 (1991); M. Born, S. Ingemann, N. M. Nibbering. Int. J. Mass Spectrom., 194, 103 (2000). 10. Nguyen Tien Trung, Tran Thanh Hue. Journal of Chemistry, 45, 685 (2007). 11. Nguyen Tien Trung, Nguyen Phi Hung, Tran Thanh Hue, Journal of Chemistry, 46, 7 (2008).

Các file đính kèm theo tài liệu này:

  • pdf4636_16627_1_pb_4989_2086751.pdf