Each complex pairing HNO and CHX3 (X:
F, Cl, Br) contains five separate minima on the
potential energy surface. The binding energies
obtained at the MP2/6-311++G(d,p) level are
from 7 to 11 kJ.mol-1 with the BSSE correction
and from 4 to 8 kJ.mol-1 with both the ZPE and
BSSE corrections. The most stable are the
complexes pairing CHBr3 with HNO, and the
least stable are the complexes between CHF3
and HNO. The difference is due to the
deprotonation enthalpy of the C-H bond which
is the smallest in the CHBr3 and the largest in
the CHF3. The contractions of the bond length
and the blue shifts of the stretching frequency
are observed in all the N2-H3 and C4-H5 bonds
going from F to Cl to Br. However, the infrared
intensities of the C4-H5 bonds are increase in
the complexes of CHCl3.HNO and
CHBr3.HNO, while the decrease of the infrared
intensities is obtained in the complexes of
CHF3.HNO. The shortening of the C-H bond
and blue shift of its stretching frequency depend
on the nature of the proton donor, particularly
the polarity of the C-H bond. The EDT and RE
can be used for classification of type of
hydrogen bond.
7 trang |
Chia sẻ: honghp95 | Lượt xem: 475 | Lượt tải: 0
Bạn đang xem nội dung tài liệu The blue shifts of the c-H and n-h bonds in the complexes of chx3 (x = f, cl, br) and hno: a theoretical study - Nguyễn Tiến Trung, để tải tài liệu về máy bạn click vào nút DOWNLOAD ở trên
535
Journal of Chemistry, Vol. 47 (5), P. 535 - 541, 2009
THE BLUE SHIFTS OF THE C-H AND N-H BONDS IN THE
COMPLEXES OF CHX3 (X = F, Cl, Br)
AND HNO: A THEORETICAL STUDY
Received 13 Sep 2007
Nguyen Tien Trung1,2*, Tran Thanh Hue2
1Faculty of Chemistry, Quy Nhon University
2Faculty of Chemistry, Hanoi National University of Education
abstract
All calculations were performed at the high level of theory (MP2/6-311++G(d,p)). Five
separate minima were identified on the potential energy surface of each complex pairing CH3X
with HNO. In general, strength of complexes increases in going from F to Cl to Br, which is
consistent with respective decrease of deprotonation enthalpy of the C-H bond respectively. All
the C-H and N-H bonds are shortened upon complexation, corresponding to increase in their
stretching frequencies. It is interesting that blue shift is observed in the N-H bonds; such a
contraction in the N-H covalent bond is extremely rare. Linear correlation between change of
stretching frequencies and change of the N-H and C-H bond lengths in all complexes has been
reported in equation (1) and (2). Besides, the change of the N-H bond lengths and their stretching
frequencies as a function of the change of occupation of σ*(N-H) orbitals and that of s-character
of N hybrid orbitals were obtained as in expression (3) and (4).
I - Introduction
The hydrogen bond A-H...B plays an
important role in many chemical, physical and
biochemical processes [1, 2]. Recently, a new
type of intermolecular bond, commonly
designated as a blue-shifting hydrogen bond,
continues to receive a good deal of both
experimental and theoretical attention. The
majority of these blue-shifting hydrogen bonds
contains a C-H bond as the proton donor. In
general, the N-H bond will shift to the red of
stretching frequency because of its more
polarization. However, there are some very
small numbers of exceptions recently reported
for the N-H bond that the blue shift is found in
the type of the N-H...O and N-H...X (F, Cl, Br)
hydrogen bonds [3 - 5]. Simultaneously, the
complexes that combine CHX3 (X = F, Cl, Br)
with HNO are of paramount interest in the field
of atmospheric chemistry. In spite of the
potential importance of these complexes, there
is available in the literature neither theoretical
nor experimental information. Our other
purposes when considering the interaction
between HNO and CHX3 are to reveal the blue
shift of N-H bond in more systems, to provide
some interesting data and also to understand the
more obvious origin of blue-shifting hydrogen
bond.
2. Computational Methods
All calculations of the isolated monomers
and their complexes were performed within the
second order perturbation method (MP2) in
conjunction with the 6-311++G(d,p) basis set
using the GAUSSIAN 03 program [6]. The
interaction energies were corrected for basis set
536
superposition errors (BSSE) via the standard
counterpoise procedure of Boys and Bernadi [7].
Charges on individual atoms, orbital
occupancies and hyperconjugation energies
were obtained by the natural bond orbital (NBO)
population scheme [8].
III - Results and Discussion
1. Interaction Energies, Geometries and
Stretching Frequencies
The structures of monomers and their
complexes were optimized at the high level of
theory (MP2/6-311++G(d,p)). The geometries
of optimized structures of the complexes were
displayed in figure 1. Five minima are located
on the potential energy surface of each complex.
The interaction energies with ZPE and BSSE
corrections were gathered in table 1. The
binding energies lie in the ranges of 7 - 11
kJ.mol-1 with BSSE correction and 4 - 8 kJ.mol-1
with both the ZPE and BSSE corrections. In
general, the strength of complexes increases in
going from F to Cl to Br, which is in consistent
with decreasing of the deprotonation enthalpy of
the C-H bond in the isolated monomers with the
values of 1577, 1496 and 1463 kJ.mol-1,
respectively [9]. There is only an exception that
the binding energy in S5 geometry of
CHF3...HNO is slightly larger than in that of
CHCl3...HNO. This magnitude order of
deprotonation enthalpy is directed to that of the
intramolecular hyperconjugative energy
resulting in transfer of electron density from nX
to σ*(C4-H5) orbital. The calculated values of
this work obtained at MP2/6-311++G(d,p) level
of theory are in turn 27.33, 21.36 and 15.45
kcal.mol-1 going from CHF3 to CHCl3 to CHBr3.
It means that the larger the intramolecular
hyperconjugative energy from nX to σ*(C4-H5)
orbital is, the larger the deprotonation energy of
C-H bond is. There is little sensitivity to identify
the halogen atom because the difference of
binding energies is small, ca 1.0 kJ.mol-1, in
each geometrical type upon going from F to Cl
to Br.
Table 1: Interaction energies with BSSE ((ΔE(BSSE), in kJ.mol-1) and both BSSE and ZPE
((ΔE(ZPE+BSSE), in kJ.mol-1) corrections of complexes and the distances of hydrogen bond
(R, in Å)
S1 S2 S3 S4 S5
CHF3-HNO ΔE(BSSE) -7.87 -7.19 -9.38 -8.28 -7.87
ΔE(ZPE+BSSE) -4.47 -3.47 -5.67 -5.35 -4.92
R(H5...O1(N2)) 2.60 2.67 2.62 2.72 2.45(2.57)a
R(H3...X(6,7,8)) 2.39 2.62 2.81 3.08
C4H5O1(N2) 120.2 99.4 119.3 100.8 164.2(136.1)b
N2H3X(6,7,8) 129.3 118.7 90.6 81.0
CHCl3-HNO ΔE(BSSE) -7.90 -8.07 -9.79 -9.79 -7.70
ΔE(ZPE+BSSE) -4.43 -5.02 -6.57 -6.28 -4.12
R(H5...O1(N2)) 2.36 2.46 2.37 2.45 2.37(2.45)a
R(H3...X(6,7,8)) 2.86 3.06 3.41 3.39
C4H5O1(N2) 141.4 120.4 143.3 121.0 164.5(135.1)b
N2H3X(6,7,8) 131.1 119.7 86.1 84.5
CHBr3-HNO ΔE(BSSE) -8.91 -9.03 -10.67 -10.97 -8.20
ΔE(ZPE+BSSE) -5.65 -6.35 -7.41 -7.72 -5.15
R(H5...O1(N2)) 2.34 2.45 2.33 2.41 2.34(2.47)a
R(H3...X(6,7,8)) 3.00 3.18 3.58 3.52
C4H5O1(N2) 146.1 125.4 148.7 126.1 168.6(139.2)b
N2H3X(6,7,8) 132.8 121.1 86.3 85.4
a refers to the H5...N2 distances; b refers to the C4H5N2 angle; the scaling factor for ZPE is 0.97.
537
Figure 1: The geometries of optimized structures of the complexes pairing CHX3
(X: F, Cl, Br) with HNO
Similarly, the H5...O1(N2) intermolecular
distances tend to decrease, which is consistent
with the increase of the polarity of the C-H
bond. On the other hand, there is a increase of
the H3...X(6,7,8) distances in going from F to
Cl to Br, as shown in table 1. It should be
explained that this order of increase depends on
the size and NBO charge of X atom.
From the result of table 1, it indicates that
the strength of the complex going from F to Cl
to Br is determined by the distance of the
H5...O1(N2) contact and the C4H5O1(N2)
angle in each geometry. This is because the
smaller the deviation of the angle from linearity
is, the larger the overlap of electron density
between the σ*(C4-H5) and n(O1) or n(N2)
orbital is. This larger overlap leads to the
complex becoming more stable. The change of
bond lengths and stretching frequencies and
infrared intensities of the C4-H5 and N2-H3
bonds is listed in table 2.
Table 2: The change of bond lengths of the C4-H5 and N2-H3 bonds (Å), their stretching
frequencies (cm-1) and infrared intensities (km.mol-1) in the examined complexes
compared to monomers respectively
S1 S2 S3 S4 S5
CHF3-HNO Δr(C4-H5) -0.0017 -0.0021 -0.0019 -0.0025 -0.0025
Δr(N2-H3) -0.0029 -0.0021 -0.0017 -0.0010 -0.0024
Δν(C4-H5) 25.48 28.37 28.27 33.12 39.37
Δν(N2-H3) 61.56 48.48 34.7 25.28 43.05
ΔI(C4-H5) -18.03 -16.12 -19.62 -13.61 -25.65
ΔI(N2-H3) -66.08 -57.88 -47.16 -42.04 -30.11
CHCl3-HNO Δr(C4-H5) -0.0015 -0.0011 -0.0009 -0.0011 -0.0023
Δr(N2-H3) -0.0019 -0.0010 -0.0016 -0.0009 -0.0019
Δν(C4-H5) 27.85 21.12 16.39 21.58 41.02
Δν(N2-H3) 43.81 31.88 31.76 23.95 38.4
ΔI(C4-H5) 12.66 3.49 33.80 10.17 16.31
ΔI(N2-H3) -63.38 -55.96 -54.99 -52.11 -18.80
CHBr3-HNO Δr(C4-H5) -0.0012 -0.0009 -0.0004 -0.0008 -0.0019
Δr(N2-H3) -0.0017 -0.0011 -0.0016 -0.0011 -0.0018
Δν(C4-H5) 22.51 17.51 7.44 15.13 35.62
Δν(N2-H3) 39.41 30.98 32.11 26.12 36.08
ΔI(C4-H5) 28.70 10.97 70.09 27.77 36.21
ΔI(N2-H3) -67.88 -58.87 -58.89 -57.33 -11.66
538
The Δr(C4-H5) and Δr(N2-H3) values are
all negative, indicating that these hydrogen
bonds are shortened upon complexation.
Simultaneously, there is an increase of the
respective C4-H5 and N2-H3 stretching
frequencies. However, there is a different
change of infrared intensity between the N2-H3
and C4-H5 bonds via complex formation. The
decrease of the infrared intensity is observed in
all the N2-H3 bonds and the C4-H5 bonds of the
complexes of CHF3 with HNO, corresponding to
the increase of the respective stretching
frequencies. Contrastly, there is an increase of
the infrared intensities of the C4-H5 bonds in
case of complexes between CHX3(X = Cl, Br)
and HNO. It should be explained that the
different change of the infrared intensity
depends on the nature of the CHX3 isolated
monomers. In particular, there is signal
difference of dipole moment derivative along
the C-H stretch of CHF3, CHCl3 and CHBr3 [10].
Both the contraction of the C4-H5 and N2-H3
bonds and the increase of their stretching
frequencies indicate that they are blue-shifting
hydrogen bonds upon complexation. Such a
contraction in the N-H covalent bond is
extremely rare; this bond is normally elongated
when a hydrogen bond is formed. The blue shift
in the N2-H3 bonds is larger than in the C4-H5
bonds. It may be noted that the degree to which
the C-H bond contracts is largest for X=F and
least for X=Br. The inversely proportional linear
correlations between the change of C4-H5 and
N2-H3 bond lengths and their respective
stretching frequencies are obtained as in
equation (1) and (2), and plotted in figure 2.
Δν(C-H) = -14203 Δr(C-H) + 4.6487 (r = 0.959)
(1)
Δν(N-H) = -16195 Δr(N-H) + 9.8371
(r = 0.929) (2)
It is interesting that the N2-H3 bonds are
significantly contracted in the S5 geometries
although they don’t participate in hydrogen
bond. It indicates that the contraction of N2-H3
bond corresponding to an increase of its
stretching frequency depends on nature of the
isolated HNO monomer. This new direction has
been recently studied and will be continued in
our following papers. Along with the
contraction of the C4-H5 and N2-H3 bonds in
each geometrical structure, there is a change of
bond length of the remaining bonds.
Particularly, all N2=O1 bonds are lengthened
when the complexes are formed. Besides, the
hydrogen bonded C-X bonds are elongated and
the hydrogen non-bonded C-X bonds are
contracted upon complexation, except for the
elongation of all the C-X bonds in the S5
geometries going from F to Cl to Br.
y = -14203x + 4.6487
r = 0.959
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
-0.003 -0.0025 -0.002 -0.0015 -0.001 -0.0005 0
y = -16195x + 9.8371
r = 0.929
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
-0.0035 -0.003 -0.0025 -0.002 -0.0015 -0.001 -0.0005 0
Figure 2: The linear correlation between the change of the stretching frequencies and
that of the bond length
Δν(C-H)/cm-1
Δν(N-H)/cm-1
Δr(C-H)/Å Δr(N-H)/Å
539
2. NBO analysis
To get more information on the blue shifts of the C4-H5 and N2-H3 stretching frequencies,
NBO analysis has been carried out at the MP2/6-311++G(d,p) level. The corresponding results are
reported in table 3.
Table 3: NBO analysis and RE energy index
S1 S2 S3 S4 S5
CHF3-HNO EDT/e 0.0009 0.0010 0.0025 0.0014 0.0045
Δσ*(C4-H5)/e -0.0012 -0.0015 -0.0004 -0.0010 -0.0005
Δσ*(N2-H3)/e -0.0016 -0.0011 -0.0005 -0.0003 -0.0013
Δ%s(C4-H5) 0.48 0.48 0.57 0.50 0.69
Δ%s(N2-H3) 0.54 0.41 0.53 0.45 0.60
RE(C4-H5) 0.51 0.18 0.75 0.33 0.77(0.26)
c
RE (N2-H3) 0.42 0.29 0.00 0.00 0.00
CHCl3-HNO EDT/e 0.0007 0.0003 0.0044 0.0008 0.0051
Δσ*(C4-H5)/e -0.0023 -0.0017 -0.0012 -0.0014 -0.0020
Δσ*(N2-H3)/e -0.0007 -0.0005 -0.0002 -0.0000 -0.0011
Δ%s(C4-H5) 0.86 0.62 1.16 0.84 0.99
Δ%s(N2-H3) 0.48 0.40 0.57 0.50 0.55
RE(C4-H5) 0.70 0.41 0.89 0.53 0.69(0.15)
c
RE (N2-H3) 0.65 0.42 0.00 0.00 0.00
CHBr3-HNO EDT/e 0.0005 0.0003 0.00552 0.0012 0.0057
Δσ*(C4-H5)/e -0.0020 -0.0013 -0.00075 -0.0010 -0.0018
Δσ*(N2-H3)/e -0.0003 -0.0003 -0.00016 -0.0001 -0.0012
Δ%s(C4-H5) 1.02 0.69 1.45 1.00 1.15
Δ%s(N2-H3) 0.51 0.44 0.57 0.53 0.51
RE(C4-H5) 0.87 0.53 1.07 0.69 0.85(0.13)
c
RE (N2-H3) 0.80 0.53 0.00 0.00 0.00
crefers to the energy index for interaction transferring electron from the N2 to σ*(C4-H5) orbital.
EDT values are all positive, it means that
there is electron density transfer from HNO to
CHX3 when the complex is formed. As shown in
table 3, the electron density decrease in both the
σ*(C4-H5) and σ*(N2-H3) anti-bonding
orbitals. The decrease of the electron density in
the σ*(C4-H5) and σ*(N2-H3) orbitals
strengthens the C4-H5 and N2-H3 bonds, which
contributes to the blue shift of the corresponding
stretching frequency. Simultaneously, the
increase in s-character of the C4 and N2 hybrid
orbitals in the C4-H5 and N2-H3 bonds is also
observed in all the examined complexes. As a
result, this increase strengthens the C4-H5 and
N2-H3 bonds and results in the contraction of
these bonds corresponding to increase in their
stretching frequencies. In a word, the
contraction of the C4-H5 and N2-H3 bonds
corresponding to the blue shift of stretching
frequencies is contributed by both the increase
of s-character and the decrease of electron
density in the σ-antibonding orbital.
The variation of the occupation of σ-
antibonding orbitals results from two effects
acting in opposite directions. If we consider a Z-
X-H...Y hydrogen bond, the intermolecular n(Y)
540
to σ*(XH) hyperconjugative interaction leads to
an increase in electron density in the σ*(XH)
orbital. In contrast, a decrease of the n(Z) →
σ*(XH) intramolecular interaction with respect
to the monomer, has the opposite effect and
results in a decrease in occupation of the
σ*(XH) orbital. On the basis of these
considerations, it may be useful to use the RE
index defined as follows [10, 11].
(2)
int er
E (2)
int ra
E
R
E
=
where (2) (2) *int erE E [n(Y) (XH)]σ= →
(2) (2) * (2) *
int ra mon complE E [n(Z) (XH)] E [n(Z) (XH)]σ σΔ = → − →
The RE values of the C4-H5 bonds are from
0.00 to 1.16, while that of the N2-H3 bonds
from 0.00 to 0.80. All these RE values are
smaller than 2.98 which is upper limited value
of RE for the blue shift of the C-H bonds in ref
10 and 11. Therefore, the RE index can be used
to consider the classification of blue-shifting or
red-shifting hydrogen bond. The RE
index with
the zero value indicates that for the S3, S4 and
S5 geometries going F to Cl to Br, there is no
transfer of the electron density from the n(X) to
σ*(N2-H3) orbital as shown in Table 3. Hence,
the decrease in electron density of the σ*(N2-
H3) orbital results from the decrease in the
intramolecular n(O1) to σ*(N2-H3)
hyperconjugative interaction. The dual
correlation between the change of the N2-H3
bond lengths, that of the electron density in the
σ*(N2-H3) orbitals, and that of hybridization in
the N2 hybrid orbitals when the S5 geometries
are obtained as the following:
Δr(N-H)= 1.174967Δσ*(N-H) –
0.00438Δ%s(N-H) + 0.001176 (r = 0.962) (3)
Δν(N-H)= -23017.68905Δσ*(N-H) +
33.134337Δ%s(N-H) + 8.471835 (r = 0.959) (4)
To check of reliability of these correlations,
we calculated the change of the bond length and
the stretching frequency based on equation (3)
and (4). The results indicate that the correlations
are reasonable and reliable as follows:
Δr(N-H)calculation =
0.9256 Δr(N-H)theoretical - 0.0001(r = 0.962) (5)
Δν(N-H)calculation =
0.9189 Δν(N-H)theoretical + 2.9064 (r = 0.959) (6)
IV - Concluding remarks
Each complex pairing HNO and CHX3 (X:
F, Cl, Br) contains five separate minima on the
potential energy surface. The binding energies
obtained at the MP2/6-311++G(d,p) level are
from 7 to 11 kJ.mol-1 with the BSSE correction
and from 4 to 8 kJ.mol-1 with both the ZPE and
BSSE corrections. The most stable are the
complexes pairing CHBr3 with HNO, and the
least stable are the complexes between CHF3
and HNO. The difference is due to the
deprotonation enthalpy of the C-H bond which
is the smallest in the CHBr3 and the largest in
the CHF3. The contractions of the bond length
and the blue shifts of the stretching frequency
are observed in all the N2-H3 and C4-H5 bonds
going from F to Cl to Br. However, the infrared
intensities of the C4-H5 bonds are increase in
the complexes of CHCl3...HNO and
CHBr3...HNO, while the decrease of the infrared
intensities is obtained in the complexes of
CHF3...HNO. The shortening of the C-H bond
and blue shift of its stretching frequency depend
on the nature of the proton donor, particularly
the polarity of the C-H bond. The EDT and RE
can be used for classification of type of
hydrogen bond.
This work is supported by NAFOSTED
under project 104.03.142.09.
References
1. G. R. Desiraju; T. Steiner. The Weak
Hydrogen Bond in Structural Chemistry and
Biology, Oxford University Press, New
York (1999).
2. Grabowski, S. J. Ed. Hydrogen Bonding-
New Insights, Springer, Dordrecht, the
Netherlands (2006).
3. Y. Yang, W. J. Zhang, X. M. Gao. Int. J.
Quant. Chem., 106, 1199 (2006).
541
4. Y. Liu, W. Liu, H. Li, J. Liu, J. Yang. J.
Phys. Chem A, 110, 11760, (2006).
5. M. Solimannejad, S. Scheiner. J. Phys.
Chem. A, 111, 4431 (2007).
6. M. J. Frisch and et al., Gaussian 03,
Revision B.03, Gaussian Inc., Pittsburgh,
PA (2003).
7. S. F. Boys, F. Bernardi. Mol. Phys., 19, 553
(1970).
8. A. E. Reed, L. A. Curtiss, F. Weinhold.
Chem. Rev., 88, 899 (1988).
9. J. E. Bartmess, J. A. Scott, R. T. McIver. J.
Am. Chem. Soc., 101, 6047, (1979); J. A.
Paulino, R. R. Squires. J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
113, 5573 (1991); M. Born, S. Ingemann, N.
M. Nibbering. Int. J. Mass Spectrom., 194,
103 (2000).
10. Nguyen Tien Trung, Tran Thanh Hue.
Journal of Chemistry, 45, 685 (2007).
11. Nguyen Tien Trung, Nguyen Phi Hung,
Tran Thanh Hue, Journal of Chemistry, 46,
7 (2008).
Các file đính kèm theo tài liệu này:
- 4636_16627_1_pb_4989_2086751.pdf