DISCUSSION
DNA barcoding is a useful tool for
identifying species, providing information on
specimens in different regions on the world. In
this study, 16 DNA barcoding sequences of
nine species examined in this work were
recorded for the first time from Vietnam and
five species Aulacophora mouhoti,
Aspidimorpha dorsata, Chiridopsis bowringi,
Lema (Lema) praeusta and Lema (Lema)
demangei were recorded for the first time on
the online database. Those data can be used for
studies on biodiversity, ecology, and evolution
if the data is complete with all data sets.
Therefore, adding DNA barcode data of any
species to these online resources is valuable.
We observed the low intraspecific
genetic distance of Cassida circumdata.
Probably it is due to the number of samples;
five DNA sequences were obtained from
Cassida circumdata but the remaining
species obtained only one or two sequences.
These results could be related to different
haplotype diversity (Magoga et al., 2018).
The optimal threshold for molecular
identification of Chrysomelidae is genetic
distances below 3% for species level
(Magoga et al., 2018; Papadopoulou et al.,
2013). The values of intra -specific distances
of two species Cassida circumdata and
Aspidimorpha dorsata are below 3% (0%
and 2%, respectively). The value of
intraspecific distance of Lema (Lema)
saigonensis is 6%, higher than the optimal
threshold but several research get similar
result as the value of intraspecific distance of
Exosoma lusitanicum (6%) (Magoga et al.,
2016) and 20.6% of Lachnaia tristigma
(Lalordaire, 148) (Magoga et al., 2018). Two
specimens of Lema (Lema) saigonensis were
collected from two different locations (Son
La Province and Thai Nguyen Province) and
the lengths of obtained sequences are
different (596 bp and 636 bp, respectively).
The number of species in this study is still
small to understanding their evolution and/or
phylogeography, therefore, DNA barcoding
data of Chrysomelidae in Vietnam should be
further researched for future study.
7 trang |
Chia sẻ: hachi492 | Lượt xem: 7 | Lượt tải: 0
Bạn đang xem nội dung tài liệu The DNA barcoding data and genetic distance of leaf beetles (coleoptera, chrysomelidae) in Viet Nam, để tải tài liệu về máy bạn click vào nút DOWNLOAD ở trên
ACADEMIA JOURNAL OF BIOLOGY 2020, 42(4): 25–31
DOI: 10.15625/2615-9023/v42n4.15124
25
THE DNA BARCODING DATA AND GENETIC DISTANCE OF LEAF
BEETLES (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae) IN VIETNAM
Nguyen Thi Dinh
Institute of Ecology and Biological Resources, VAST, Vietnam
Received 8 June 2020, accepted 20 September 2020
ABSTRACT
DNA barcoding is a useful tool in identifying species, biodiversity assessment, and revealing
phylogenetic relationships of living organisms in the world. However, the DNA barcode data for
leaf beetles in Vietnam is lacking. In this study, sixteen DNA sequences of 658 bp of COI gene
from nine species (five genera; three subfamilies) of Chrysomelidae in Vietnam were (obtained).
Intra- and inter-specific diversities, and phylogenetic relationships of these species were
analyzed.
Keywords: Biodiversity, COI gene, intra- and inter-species diversity, molecular identification,
tropical forest.
Citation: Nguyen Thi Dinh, 2020. The dna barcoding data and genetic distance of leaf beetles (Coleoptera,
Chrysomelidae) in Vietnam. Academia Journal of Biology, 42(4): 25–31. https://doi.org/10.15625/2615-
9023/v42n4.15124
Corresponding author email: ntdinh.iebr@gmail.com
©2020 Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology (VAST)
Nguyen Thi Dinh
26
INTRODUCTION
The family Chrysomelidae is one of the
largest family of the order Coleoptera, with
35,000–60,000 species in the world (Schmitt,
1996; Futuyma, 2004; Splipnski et al., 2011;
Jolivet, 2015).
DNA barcoding was proposed as a method
of species identification (Hebert et al., 2003). It
uses a short standard fragment, 658 bp of
mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase subunit I
(COI), to identify the species. Obtained DNA
barcoding sequences have been stored in the
online databases (GenBank or BOLD), the total
number of accepted and described organism
species is estimated to be close to 1,900,000
(Chapman, 2009). Although approximately 8.7
million species on the planet (Mora et al.,
2011), the number of species in DNA
barcoding data base is still limited; only
214,288 species were recovered. Of these,
3,204 species of Chrysomelidae were
recovered on BOLD (BOLDSYSTEM,
accessed 15 December 2019). In Vietnam,
DNA sequences of 829 bp of COI gene for 141
species Chrysomelidae in Nui Chua national
park (South of Vietnam) were recorded in the
online database (Nguyen & Gómez-Zurita,
2016). Among these species, only 18 species
were identified to species level by morphology
(Nguyen & Gómez-Zurita, 2017), remaining
123 morphological form were only identified
to subfamily or genus level.
This study generated and submitted sixteen
DNA sequences of 658 bp of COI of nine
species belonging to five genera of three
subfamilies that were collected in several
provinces in Vietnam. These are the first DNA
barcoding data for those species. Phylogenetic
tree, and intra- and inter- specific distances
were analyzed. Furthermore, the host plant of
some species were also recorded.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Sample collection and identification
Specimens were collected by sweeping
trees by bug catching net randomly along
roads and by hand directly (catch specimens
directly by hand without collectional tools)
in six provinces in Vietnam, such as Bac
Ninh, Ha Noi, Son La, Thai Nguyen, Tuyen
Quang, and Kien Giang (Table 1). Specimens
were captured in vials containing 96%
alcohol and were labeled with sampling date,
location, and collector.
Table 1. Localities and host plants of Chrysomelidae analysed in this study
(morphology of those species are in Figure 2)
Subfamily Genus Species Locality
No. of
specimens
Host plant
Galerucinae
Aulacophora
Dejean, 1835
indica (Gmelin, 1790) Kien Giang 01
Cucurbita
(Cucurbitaceae)
mouhoti Baly, 1886 Son La 01 -
Cassidinae
Cassida
Linnaeu, 1758
circumdata Herbst,
1799
Ha Noi 03 Ipomoea
(Convolvulaceae) Bac Ninh 02
Aspidimorpha
Hope, 1840
dorsata Fabricius,
1787
Tuyen Quang 01
-
furcata (Thunberg,
1789)
Ha Noi 01
Bac Ninh 01
Kien Giang 01
Chiridopsis
Spaeth, 1922
bowringi (Boheman,
1855)
Tuyen Quang 01
Criocerinae
Lema
Fabricius,
1798
demangei Pic, 1924 Ha Noi 01
Pueraria
(Fabaceae)
saigonensis Pic,
1923
Son La 01
Thai Nguyen 01
praeusta (Fabricius,
1792)
Bac Ninh 01 -
The dna barcoding data
27
In the laboratory, specimens were
morphologically identified with the
identification keys of Kimoto & Gressitt
(1979), Kimoto (1989, 1998), Kimoto &
Takizawa (1997), Warchalowski (2011),
Nguyen & Gómez-Zurita (2017). All the
identified specimens were preserved in vials
containing 96% alcohol until DNA extraction.
DNA extraction, amplification and
sequencing
Total DNA was extracted using
QIAamp® DNA Investigator (QIAGEN)
extraction kit from 1–3 legs of each specimen
following the manufacturer’s protocol.
Primers LepF1 (forward direction) (5’-
ATTCAACCAATCATAAAGATATTGG-3’)
and LepR1 (Reverse direction) (5’-
TAAACTTCTGGATGTCCAAAAAATCA-
3’) (Hebert et al., 2004) were used to amplify
the COI fragment of 658 pb. Each PCR
reaction mixture contained 2.5 µl of 10x
reaction buffer (Evrogen, Russia), 0.5 µl of 10
mM dNTPs, 0.5 µl of 10 µM forward primer,
0.5 µl of 10 µM reverse primer, 1 µl of 25
mM Mg
2+
, 2 µl of template DNA, 0.2 µl of
thermostable Taq DNA polymerase (Evrogen,
Russia), and 17.8 µl deionized water. The
PCR regime included initial denaturation at 94
o
C for 3 min; 35 cycles of denaturation at 94
o
C for 30 s, annealing at 42
o
C for 40 s,
elongation at 72
o
C for 60 s; and final
elongation at 72
o
C for 5 min. The PCR
products were checked by 1.5% agarose gel
electrophoreis and were sequenced in both
directions using the BigDye Terminator v3.1
Cycle Sequencing kit (Applied Biosystems,
Foster City CA, USA) with the same PCR
primers. Specimens after DNA extraction
were preserved in 96% alcohol and were
stored in -4
o
C at Institute of Ecology and
Biological Resouces.
Analyses
Obtained DNA sequences were edited and
aligned in Geneious Prime 11.1.4 version
(https://www.geneious.com). The Maximum
Likelihood trees were constructed using
RAxML v7.0.3 for windows (Stamatakis,
2006) and Bayesian Inference (BI) analysis
was also executed with MrBayes v3.2.1
(Ronquist et al., 2012). For the ML analysis,
optimal ML tree was obtained with an initial
step to explore the best initial rearrangement
setting from a collection of 100 most
parsimonious random starting trees, and a
second step using these optimal settings in a
multiple inference search for the best-known
likelihood tree using 1,000 replicates. In BI
analysis, the number of generations (mcmc
ngen) was set to 1,000,000, print frequency
(printfreq) was 200, sample frequency
(samplefreq) was 500, number of chains
(nchains) was four, and the ‘save branch
length’ information in the tree (savebrlens)
was selected. To check the result of BI
analysis, we used the Tracer v.1.7.1
(Rambaut, 2018): if the values of the effective
sample size (ESS) got some red (or < 200) we
ran mcmc ngen longer until all of the ESS
values were black. We calculate posterior
probabilities from remaining tree after burnin
25% of generation trees. Both methods
included Pidonia ruficollis voucher BIOUG
(Cerambycidae) as an out-group.
To do the species delimitation analyses,
the bipartition tree that was produced from
RAxML software was analyzed online by the
bPTP web server (https://species.h-its.org/)
(Zhang et al., 2013). We also estimated intra-
and inter-specific genetic distances by using
Mega X v.10.0.5 (Kumar et al., 2018) with
Kimura’s 2-parameter model with 500
bootstrap replications.
RESULTS
Sixteen DNA sequences of the 658 bp
fragment of COI were obtained for the nine
species (Table 1). Sequences generated in
this study have been deposited in GenBank
with accession number “MN845114 -
MN845129”. Notably, the DNA barcoding
sequences of nine species: Aulacophora
indica, Aulacophora mouhoti, Aspidimorpha
dorsata, Aspidimorpha furcata, Cassida
circumdata, Chiridopsis bowringi, Lema
(Lema) demangei, Lema (Lema) praeusta
and Lema (Lema) saigonensis in Viet Nam
were firstly recorded.
Nguyen Thi Dinh
28
Values of intra- and inter-specific genetic
distances are presented in table 2. In this
study, we could obtain intraspecific distances
in three species; slightly large values were
observed in Lema (Lema) saigonensis (0.06 ±
0.01), but other two species show smaller
(0.02, A. furcata) or zero (C. circumdata)
distances. Interspecific distances range from a
minimum of 0.07 ± 0.01 (Chiridopsis
bowringi with Cassida circumdata) to a
maximum 0.32 ± 0.03 (Chiridopsis bowringi
with Lema (Lema) praeusta; Table 2).
Interspecific distance of Cassida circumdata
with the other species is low, ranging from
0.07 ± 0.01 to 0.15 ± 0.01, whereas the
interspecific distance of Chiridopsis bowringi
with species in Lema genus is high, from 0.21
± 0.02 to 0.32 ± 0.03.
Table 2. The intra- and interspecies genetic distances (Kimura’s 2-parameter) and standard
deviation values of Chrysomelidae in this study (intra - species genetic distances are grey boxes)
Species
A.
indica
A.
mouhoti
A.
dorsata
A.
furcata
C.
circumdata
C.
bowringi
L.(L.)
praeusta
L. (L.)
saigonensis
L. (L.)
demangei
A. indica
A. mouhoti
0.16 ±
0.02
A. dorsata
0.31 ±
0.03
0.31 ±
0.03
A. furcata
0.17 ±
0.02
0.17 ±
0.02
0.10 ±
0.01
0.02
C.
circumdata
0.10 ±
0.01
0.09 ±
0.01
0.09 ±
0.01
0.13 ±
0.01
0
C. bowringi
0.25 ±
0.03
0.25 ±
0.03
0.28 ±
0.03
0.15 ±
0.02
0.07 ±
0.01
L. (L.)
praeusta
0.26 ±
0.03
0.28 ±
0.03
0.31 ±
0.04
0.15 ±
0.02
0.10 ±
0.01
0.32 ±
0.03
L. (L.)
saigonensis
0.21 ±
0.02
0.19 ±
0.02
0.21 ±
0.02
0.17 ±
0.02
0.15 ±
0.01
0.21 ±
0.02
0.16 ±
0.02
0.06 ± 0.01
L. (L.)
demangei
0.29 ±
0.03
0.29 ±
0.03
0.31 ±
0.03
0.18 ±
0.02
0.10 ±
0.01
0.29 ±
0.03
0.26 ±
0.03
0.16 ± 0.02
Figure 1. The phylogenetic tree obtained by Maximum likelihood (ML) method for COI gene
with 1,000 bootstrap replicates based on 16 sequences of nine species and one outgroup (Pidonia
ruficollis (Say, 1824). Black boxes are species which were delimited by bPTP method, each black
box corresponds with one morphospecies. The numbers above branches are the support values of
ML and Bayesian Inference for nodes (bootstrap and posterior probability values, respectively)
The dna barcoding data
29
Figure 2. Morphology of species examined in this study (localities of those species as Table 1).
1: Aulacophora indica (a - dorsal view, b - abdoment view); 2: Aulacophora mouhoti (a- dorsal
view, b- abdoment view); 3: Lema (Lema) praeusta (a- dorsal view, b- abdoment view); 4:
Lema (Lema) demangei (a- dorsal view, b- lateral view); 5: Lema (Lema) saigonensis (a- dorsal
view, b- lateral view); 6: Chiridopsis bowringi (a- dorsal view, b- abdoment view); 7: Cassida
circumdata (a- dorsal view, b- abdoment view); 8: Aspidimorpha dorsata (a- dorsal view, b-
abdoment view); 9: Aspidimorpha furcata (a- dorsal view, b- abdoment view)
DISCUSSION
DNA barcoding is a useful tool for
identifying species, providing information on
specimens in different regions on the world. In
this study, 16 DNA barcoding sequences of
nine species examined in this work were
recorded for the first time from Vietnam and
five species Aulacophora mouhoti,
Aspidimorpha dorsata, Chiridopsis bowringi,
Lema (Lema) praeusta and Lema (Lema)
demangei were recorded for the first time on
the online database. Those data can be used for
studies on biodiversity, ecology, and evolution
if the data is complete with all data sets.
Therefore, adding DNA barcode data of any
species to these online resources is valuable.
We observed the low intraspecific
genetic distance of Cassida circumdata.
Probably it is due to the number of samples;
five DNA sequences were obtained from
Cassida circumdata but the remaining
species obtained only one or two sequences.
These results could be related to different
haplotype diversity (Magoga et al., 2018).
The optimal threshold for molecular
identification of Chrysomelidae is genetic
distances below 3% for species level
(Magoga et al., 2018; Papadopoulou et al.,
2013). The values of intra -specific distances
of two species Cassida circumdata and
Aspidimorpha dorsata are below 3% (0%
and 2%, respectively). The value of
intraspecific distance of Lema (Lema)
saigonensis is 6%, higher than the optimal
threshold but several research get similar
result as the value of intraspecific distance of
Exosoma lusitanicum (6%) (Magoga et al.,
2016) and 20.6% of Lachnaia tristigma
(Lalordaire, 148) (Magoga et al., 2018). Two
specimens of Lema (Lema) saigonensis were
collected from two different locations (Son
Nguyen Thi Dinh
30
La Province and Thai Nguyen Province) and
the lengths of obtained sequences are
different (596 bp and 636 bp, respectively).
The number of species in this study is still
small to understanding their evolution and/or
phylogeography, therefore, DNA barcoding
data of Chrysomelidae in Vietnam should be
further researched for future study.
REFERENCES
Chapman A. D., 2009. Numbers of living
species in Australia and the world.
Australian Biological Resources Study,
Canberra, 80 pp.
Futuyma D. J., 2004. Preface. In: Jolivet P,
Santiago-Blay J. A, Schmitt M (eds) New
developments in the Biology of
Chrysomelidae. SPB Academic
Publishing, The Hague, pp. 19–20.
Hebert P. D., Cywinska A., Ball S. L., de
Waard J. R., 2003. Biological
identifications through DNA barcodes.
Proceedings of the Royal Society B:
Biological Sciences, 270 (1512): 313–321.
https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2002.2218
Hebert P. D., Penton, E. H., Burns, J. M.,
Janzen, D. H., Hallwachs W., 2004. Ten
species in one: DNA barcoding reveals
cryptic species in the Neotropical skipper
butterfly Astraptes fulgerator. PNAS, 101:
14812–14817.
Hillis D. M., Bull J. J., 1993. An empirical
test of bootstrapping as a method for
assessing confidence in phylogenetic
analysis. Systematic Biology, 42:182–192.
Jolivet P., 2015. Together with 30 years of
symposia on Chrysomelidae! Memories
and personal reflections on what we know
more about leaf beetles. ZooKeys, 547:
35–61.
https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.547.7181
Kimoto S., 1989. Chrysomelidae (Coleoptera)
of Thailand, Cambodia, Laos and Vietnam.
IV. Galerucinae. Esakia, 27: 1–241.
Kimoto S., 1998. Chrysomelidae (Coleoptera)
of Thailand, Laos and Vietnam. V.
Cassidinae. Bulletin of the Institute of
Comparative Studies of International
Cultures and Societies, 21: 1–88.
Kimoto S., Gressitt, J. L., 1979.
Chrysomelidae (Coleoptera) of Thailand,
Cambodia, Laos and Vietnam. I. Sagrinae,
Donaciinae, Zeugophorinae,
Megalopodinae and Criocerinae. Pacific
Insects, 20(2–3): 191–256.
Kimoto S., Takizawa H., 1997. Leaf beetles
(Chrysomelidae) of Taiwan. Tokai
University Press, Tokyo, 581 pp.
Kumar S., Stecher G., Li M., Knyaz C.,
Tamura K., 2018. MEGA X: Molecular
evolutionary genetics analysis across
computing platforms. Molecular Biology
and Evolution, 35:1547–1549.
Magoga G., Sahin D. C., Fontaneto D.,
Montagna M., 2018. Barcoding of
Chrysomelidae of Euro-Mediterranean
area: efficiency and problematic species.
Science Report, 1:13398.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-
31545-9
Magoga G., Sassi D., Daccordi M., Leonardi
C., Mirzaei M., Regalin R., Lozzia G.,
Montagna M., 2016. Barcoding
Chrysomelidae: a resource for taxonomy
and biodiversity conservation in the
Mediterranean Region. In: Jolivet P,
Santiago-Blay J, Schmitt M (eds)
Research on Chrysomelidae 6. ZooKeys
597: 27–38. https://doi.org/10.3897/
zookeys.597. 7241
Mora C., Tittensor D. P., Adl S., Simpson A.
G., Worm B., 2011. How many species
are there on Earth and in the ocean? PLoS
Biol. 9(8): e1001127. https://doi.org/
10.1371/journal.pbio.1001127
Nguyen D. T., Gómez-Zurita J., 2016. Subtle
ecological gradient in the tropics triggers
high species-turnover in a local
geographical scale. PLoS ONE, 11(6):
e0156840. https://doi.org/10.1371/
journal.pone.0156840
Nguyen D. T., Gómez-Zurita J., 2017.
Diversity and trophic ecology of the
The dna barcoding data
31
Monoleptites group (Chrysomelidae:
Galerucinae, Luperini) in the Núi Chúa
National Park (S Vietnam) with
description of new species of Monolepta
Chevrolat and Paleosepharia Laboissière.
Journal of Asia-Pacific Entomology, 20:
65–87.
Papadopoulou A., Cardoso A., Gomez-Zurita
J., 2013. Diversity and diversification of
Eumolpinae (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae)
in New Caledonia. Zoological Journal of
the Linnean Societ, 168: 473–495.
https://doi.org/10.1111/zoj.12039
Rambaut A., Drummond A. J., Xie D., Baele
G., Suchard M. A., 2018. Posterior
summarisation in Bayesian phylogenetics
using Tracer 1.7. Systematic Biology, 67:
901–904. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/
syy032
Ronquist F., Teslenko M., van der Mark P.,
Ayres D. L., Darling A., Höhna S., Larget
B., Liu L., Suchard M. A., Huelsenbeck, J.
P., 2012. MrBayes 3.2: efficient Bayesian
phylogenetic inference and model choice
across a large model space. Systematic
Biology, 61:539–542. https://doi.org/
10.1093/sysbio/sys029
Schmitt M., 1996. The phylogenetic system of
the Chrysomelidae - history of ideas and
present state of knowledge. In: Jolivet PH,
Cox ML (eds) Chrysomelidae Biology,
Vol. I. The Classification, Phylogeny and
Genetics. Amsterdam. SPB Academic
Publishing BV, pp. 57–96.
Splipnski S. A., Leschen R. A. B., Lawrence
J. F., 2011. Order Coleoptera Linnaeus,
1758. In: Zhang Z.Q. (ed) Animal
biodiversity: An outline of higher-level
classification and survey of taxonomic
richness. Zootaxa, 3148:203–208.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0005
502.Franz
Stamatakis A., 2006. RAxML-VI-HPC:
Maximum Likelihood-based phylogenetic
analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed
models. Bioinformatics, 22: 2688–2690.
Warchałowski A., 2011. An introductory
review of Lema Fabr. Species from
Eastern and Southeastern Asia
(Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Criocerinae).
Genus, 22 (1): 29–93.
Zhang J., Kapli, P., Pavlidis P., Stamatakis A.,
2013. A general species delimitation
method with applications to phylogenetic
placements. Bioinformatics, 29: 2869–
2876. https://doi.org/10.1093/
bioinformatics/btt499
Các file đính kèm theo tài liệu này:
the_dna_barcoding_data_and_genetic_distance_of_leaf_beetles.pdf