There are eight existent feasible isomers on the
potential energy surface [H, N, C, O], in which
isocyanic acid and cyanic acid are the most stable
isomers. The HNOC isomer contains a N O
unstable donor – acceptor bond is intermediate
complex forming CO, NH products. Isomerizations
are difficult to occur at normal temperature and
pressure condition. Isomerization isocyanic acid is
easier above 2000 K and favorable to generate
H(CNO) ring compound before forming the other
isomer products
6 trang |
Chia sẻ: honghp95 | Lượt xem: 457 | Lượt tải: 0
Bạn đang xem nội dung tài liệu Thermokinetic study of the isomerization of isocyanic acid - Nguyen Huu Tho, để tải tài liệu về máy bạn click vào nút DOWNLOAD ở trên
Vietnam Journal of Chemistry, International Edition, 55(4): 478-483, 2017
DOI: 10.15625/2525-2321.2017-00494
478
Thermokinetic study of the isomerization of isocyanic acid
Nguyen Huu Tho
Sai Gon University
Received 7 December 2016; Accepted for publication 28 August 2017
Abstract
In this work, the detailed study on the mechanism, kinetics and thermochemistry of the isomerization of isocyanic
is described. Theoretical study was carried out by ab initio molecular orbital theory based on the CCSD(T) and
B3LYP/6-311++G(3df,2p) methods in conjunction with statistical theoretical kinetic Rice-Ramsperger-Kassel-
Marcus (RRKM) Master equation calculations. The potential energy surface (PES) for the isomeric reactions was also
examined. At 760 Torr pressure, temperature dependent rate constants of the isomeric reactions HNCO HOCN (a),
HNCO H(CNO) (b) and HNCO H(NCO) (c) were: k(T) (a) = 10
-37.70
.T
13.09
.e
-93.30kcal/mol/RT
, k(T) (b) =
10
3.46
.T
1.76
.e
-93.98kcal/mol/RT
, k(T) (c) = 10
-28.50
.T
10.61
.e
-91.16kcal/mol/RT
respectively. Calculated results show that the
isomerization of isocyanic acid may take place via three mechanisms and have very high barriers; all rate constants of
them are very small in the temperature range from 300 to 2000 K.
Keywords. Potential energy surface, isocyanic acid, density function theory, isomerization.
1. INTRODUCTION
Isocyanic acid (HNCO) is known as the simplest
organic compound which has full four most
important biogenic elements C, H, N, O in organic
chemistry. This molecule has sixteen valence
electrons, symmetric group CS. Its electronic
configuration in ground state is given by
(1a’)2(2a’)2(3a’)2(4a’)2(5a’)2(6a’)2(7a’)2(1a”)2(8a’)2(
9a’)2(2a”)2(10a’)0 [1, 2]. In daily life, the major
source forming isocyanic acid is from tobacco
smoke, biomass burning, fuel burning at low
temperature, forest fires, etc. At concentration over 1
ppbv (parts per billion by volume), isocyanic acid
can cause cataract, heart failure and other chronic
diseases efor example rheumatoid arthritis [3].
Isocyanic acid is also formed from dissociative
photoionization reaction of urea [4].
CO(NH2)2 + h → NH3
+
+ HNCO + e
-
Fulminic acid (iosomer of isocyanic acid) plays
an important role in the combustion chemistry due to
its involvement in the NO-reburning process for the
reduction of NOx pollutants. It is also one of the
components of photochemical smog. Fulminic acid
is formed primarily by the combustion of fossil fuels
whose normal products include water vapor, CO2
and some pollutant gas such as CO, and NOx, [3, 5,
6]. Therefore, the understanding of the isomerization
of HNCO isomers has particular significance for
environmental research.
The study on the HNCO isomerization were
performed firstly by Dieter Poppinger et al. in 1976
by using Roothaan’ method with STO-3G, 4-31G,
and 6- 31G* basis sets. Seven minima found on the
potential energy surface is isocyanic acid, cyanic
acid, fulminic acid, isofulminic acid, formylnitrene,
oxazirine, and oxaziridinylidene. However, the
structures of formylnitrene, oxazirine were only
found at very small STO-3G basis set, with a larger
basis set these structures did not exist. In addition,
this potential energy surface was not indicated fully.
The HCON and HNOC isomers had not been
mentioned on the potential energy surface [7].
Recently, some of the properties of electrons and
magnetic properties of four stable isomers including
isocyanic acid, cyanic acid, fulminic acid, and
isofulminic acid were also studied in the ground
state [8-10]. On the other hand, the kinetics of the
isomerization of HCN, CH3NC had been studied
[11-14] but without any kinetics of isocyanic acid
isomerization. A full theoretical study on the
potential energy surface of the isomerization at
higher level as well as their kinetics is very
necessary.
2. COMPUTATIONAL METHODS
Geometric optimizations for the eight isomers and ten
VJC, 55(4), 2017 Nguyen Huu Tho
479
transition states (TS) were carried out at the B3LYP
level of density functional theory (DFT) using the 6-
311++G(3df,2p) basis set. The vibrational frequencies
of the transition state were calculated at the same
level. The symbol TS i/j is used to denote the
transition state connecting isomers (i) and (j). All of
the stationary points were confirmed to be local
minima or transition states by harmonic vibrational
analysis. Single point energy (SP) calculations of all
species were performed at the CCSD(T)/6-
311++G(3df,2p) level using the B3LYP/6-
311++G(3df,2p) optimized geometries. Natural bond
orbital (NBO) analysis was calculated at HF/STO-3G
level. All calculations were carried out using the
GAUSSIAN-03 program packages [15].
The thermodynamic parameters and vibrational
frequencies that were scaled down by 0.989 [16]
were used to calculate kinetic by using RRKM
theory and ChemRate program [17, 18]. This is the
RRKM formula:
‡
0
- /
0( - )( )
( ) 1 ( ) /
BE k T
E
N E E e
k T dE
hQ T k E
where k(T) is the rate constant, T is the temperature,
h is Plank’s constant, kB is Boltzmann’s constant,
is the reaction symmetry factor, Q is the partition
function, E is the reactant internal energy, E0 is the
critical energy of the reaction, N
‡
is the sum of the
TS states, ω is the collisional frequency, k(E) is the
microcanonical rate constant.
The Lennard-Jone parameters for HNCO
isomers and Ar bath gas were: σHNCO = 4.42 Å, εHNCO
= 258 K, σAr = 3.47 Å, εAr = 116 K [19]. In the
present work, temperature was taken in the range
from 300-3000 K, at 760 Torr Ar pressure.
3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
3.1. Potential energy surface
Figure 1 depicts the structures of isomers and
transition states. All structures have singlet
electronic ground state. Isocyanic acid, HNCO has
the lowest relative energy (Erel) among all CHNO
isomers on potential energy surface (PES) [H, C, N,
O]. Cyanic acid, fulminic acid and isofulminic acid
lie respectively, 25.03, 69.21 and 83.41 kcal/mol
higher in energy than isocyanic acid. Our results
agree well with the previous study results of Michael
S. Schuurman that are 24.7, 70.7 and 84.1 kcal/mol
respectively [20]. The four acid isomers above have
the lowest relative energy on the PES. Therefore,
they are the most stable isomers. Isofulminic acid
(HONC) is the least stable of the four acid isomers.
These are in good agreement with Dieter Poppinger’
prediction [7]. The oxaziridinylidene H(NCO) (6)
structure is a three-membered ring, relative energy
of which is 105.84 kcal/mol. The oxazirine H(CNO)
(5) structure is also a three-membered ring. Its
relative energy is nearly 2 kcal/mol higher than
isofulminic acid. We also established the reaction
pathway for the structure (7) that was predicted but
not finished by Dieter Poppinger [7].
Analyzing NBO at HF/STO-3G level shows that
in the N-O bond of (7) structure, the distribution of
O atom is 84.05%, only 15.95% for N atom. This
means that the structure (7) is very similar to a
complex compound which contains a N O donor –
acceptor bond. This N O bond length is 1,47 Å
(figure 1) longer than a normal N-O bond length.
Therefore, the (7) structure is unstable, ready to go
(CO+NH) formation. This suggested a new pathway
for forming (CO+NH): fulminic acid TS6/3
oxaziridinylidene TS6/7 HNOC (NH +
CO). The data in figure 1 show that barriers of this
pathway are not much higher than the barriers of the
path recommended by J. K. Yu group, fulminic acid
TS5/3 H(CNO) TS1/5 HNCO TS
(NH + CO) when they studied the photolysis of
fulminic acid at 248 nm ultraviolet wavelength [21].
With the acyclic compound (8) – HCON, it was
predicted and optimized at STO-3G level by Dieter
Poppinger et al. [7] but not successfully at higher
basis set due to converting to (1), (2) or (4). We
optimized successfully (8) with a very large 6-
311++G(3df, 2p) basis set, which is also the
minimum has the highest relative energy on the PES,
thus, the viability of (8) isomer is very small at low
temperature.
As mentioned in the preceding section, the three
lowest relative energy structures including isocyanic
acid, cyanic acid and fulminic acid have very high
barrier in isomeric reactions. The isomerization of
isocyanic acid has three mechanisms, either via TS 1/2
(140.58 kcal/mol) to form cyanic acid, or via TS 1/5
(106.37 kcal/mol) to form (5) (85.3 kcal/mol), or via
TS 1/6 (129.41kcal/mol) to form (6) (105.84 kcal/mol).
Among these mechanisms, the one via TS 1/5 with the
lowest barrier will occur in the easiest way. For cyanic
acid (25.03 kcal/mol), there are only two isomeric
mechanisms, via TS 1/2 to come back isocyanic acid or
via TS 2/4 (109.89 kcal/mol) to form isofulminic acid
(83.41 kcal/mol). Likewise, fulminic acid (69.21
kcal/mol) also has only two isomeric mechanisms, via
TS 6/3 (136.10 kcal/mol) to form (6) or via TS 5/3
(137.21 kcal/mol) to form (5). The data on PES in
figure 1 show that all isomerizations will have to
overcome very high barriers. Therefore, the isomeric
ability of (1), (2), (3) is impossible under normal
VJC, 55(4), 2017 Thermokinetic study of the isomerization
480
condition. The quantitative result of these processes will be considered further at the later kinetic section.
Figure 1: Detailed PES (kcal.mol
−1
) of the isomers [H, C, N, O] obtained at the CCSD(T)/6-311++G(3df,2p)
level of theory. The optimized geometries at the B3LYP/6-311++G(3df,2p). Bond distances in (Å), bond
angles in degrees
Table 1: ZPE, SP (a.u.), Erel, Hf
0
0K, Hf
0
298K (kcal/mol) of isomers and transition states
Species ZPE SP Erel Hf
0
0K Hf
0
298K
(1) HNCO
Isocyanic acid
0.021327 -168.434757 0.00
-27.99
(-27.9±1) [16]
–(27.8±0.3) [4]
-28.74
(-27.7±1.1) [22]
(-27.8±0.4) [23]
(-28.5±0.3) [4]
(2) HOCN
Cyanic acid
0.021568 -168.3951152 25.03 -3.12
-3.80
(-3.55±0.24) [24]
(3) HCNO
Fulminic acid
0.019933 -168.3230662 69.21 42.09
41.63
(40.26±0.29) [24]
(4) HONC
Isofulminic acid
0.020368 -168.3008765 83.41 56.02
55.58
(55.72±0.24) [24]
(5) H(CNO)
Oxazirine
0.019896 -168.2973992 85.30 58.20 57.40
(6) H(NCO)
Oxaziridinylidene
0.019567 -168.2643246 105.84 78.96 78.13
(7) HNOC 0.017903 -168.2208136 132.10 106.26 105.93
(8) HCON 0.018257 -168.1787261 158.74 132.67 131.99
5/6 0.014168 -168.1942293 146.44 122.94 122.14
6/3 0.017783 -168.2111434 138.10 112.33 111.41
2/4 0.018603 -168.2569079 109.89 83.61 82.81
1/5 0.016805 -168.2607305 106.37 81.21 80.28
1/2 0.013512 -168.2029086 140.58 117.49 116.75
5/3 0.015893 -168.2106653 137.21 112.63 111.86
1/6 0.017175 -168.2243748 129.41 104.02 103.13
5/8 0.014591 -168.1096919 199.75 175.99 175.35
6/7 0.015236 -168.2232176 128.92 104.75 104.52
6/4 0.014664 -168.2066894 138.93 115.12 114.36
VJC, 55(4), 2017 Nguyen Huu Tho
481
3.2. Thermodynamic properties
By spectroscopy techniques, in 1995, Zhang et al.
detemined the heat of formation of isocyanic acid
H
0
f K(HNCO, g) = –(27.9±1.0) kJ.mol
-1
[16]. In
1996, Steven S. Brown and coworkers via
calculation the N-H and C-O binding energy of
HNCO molecule gave H
0
f (HNCO, g) -(27.7±1.1)
kcal.mol
-1
[22]. Also in 1996, M. Zyrianov et al.
using photodissociation specified H
0
f (HNCO, g) =
-27.8±0.4 kcal.mol
-1
[23]. Most recently, in 2013,
Andras Bodi et al. using dissociative
photoionization technology reported H
0
f 0K(HNCO,
g) = -(27.8±0.3) kcal.mol
-1
, H
0
f (HNCO, g) =
-(28.5±0.3) kcal.mol
-1
[4]. Comparing with heat of
formation reported previously, our theoretical result
H
0
f 0K(HNCO, g) = -27.99 kcal.mol
-1
, H
0
f (HNCO,
g) = -28.74 kcal.mol
-1
are in good agreement. As
shown in table 1, the heat of formation values of
cyanic acid, fulminic acid, isofulmic acid are also
not much different with experimental values.
Remarkably, only heat of formation of isocyanic and
cyanic acid are negative. These are also
energetically lowest lying iosmers on PES.
Therefore, they are the stablest isomers. Whereas,
fulminic acid and isofulminic acid, their heat of
formation and relative energy are much higher. The
results of calculation Gibbs free energy for three
isocyanic acid isomeric reactions:
HNCO HOCN (a) G
0
298K = 24.88 kcal/mol
HNCO H(CNO) (b) G
0
298K = 84.74 kcal/mol
HNCO H(NCO) (c) G
0
298K = 105.35 kcal/mol
At standart condition, Gibbs free energy
( G
0
298K) of the reactions (a, b, c) are quite positive.
Hence, (a), (b) and (c) are likely not to occur at 298
K thermodynamically.
3.3. Rate constant
In order to test the validity of the present ab initio
chemical kinetic predictive approach by RRKM
calculations, we have computed the rate constant for
the CH3NC→ CH3CN isomeric reaction. The result
in table 2 showed that obtained theoretical rate
constant k = 5.88×10
-4
[s
-1
] at T = 500 K; P = 13 bar
was in good agreement with experimental values.
Thus, using the CCSD(T)/B3LYP/6-
311++G(3df,2p) methods in conjunction with
statistical theoretical kinetic RRKM Master equation
calculations is very appropriate for computing
kinetics of the isomerizations.
Table 2: Rate constant k(T) [s
-1
] at 500K of the reaction CH3NC → CH3CN
T (K)
k(T) [s
-1
]
2.67E-3 - 0.13
Bar
1.33E-3 - 13.33
Bar
Infinite
pressure
13.00
Bar
500 4.71E-4 6.86E-4 7.81E-4 5.88E-04
Literature [11] [12] [13] This work
Table 3: Rate constant k(T) [s
-1
] in the temperature range 2100-3000K of the HNCO isomeric reactions
T (K) k(1 TS 1/2) k1 TS 1/5 k1 TS 1/6 T (K) k(1 TS 1/2) k1 TS 1/5 k1 TS 1/6
2100 0.000122 0.347449 0.001927 2600 0.146886 38.50341 1.241308
2200 0.000618 1.049844 0.008524 2700 0.469952 80.72601 3.561637
2300 0.002798 2.891444 0.033826 2800 1.407905 160.9078 9.612161
2400 0.011436 7.342240 0.122000 2900 3.974057 306.4966 24.54340
2500 0.042683 17.35576 0.404186 3000 10.62645 560.4015 59.59463
The predicted rate constants of the (a, b, c) isomeric
reactions given in units of s
-1
at 760 Torr Ar pressure
in the temperature range 300-3000K can be
represented by:
k(T) (a) = 10
-37.70
.T
13.09
.e
-93.30kcal/mol/RT
,
k(T) (b) = 10
3.46
.T
1.76
.e
-93.98kcal/mol/RT
,
k(T) (c) = 10
-28.50
.T
10.61
.e
-91.16kcal/mol/RT
.
The specific values of rate constants of three above
isomeric reactions at different temperature in table 3
and figure 2 showed that it was very difficult for the
isomeric reactions to occur in the temperature range
300-2000 K. The reactions only occur considerably
at T > 2000 K and the direction of forming H(CNO)
oxazirine three-membered ring isomer via transition
state TS 1/5 is more favorable.
VJC, 55(4), 2017 Thermokinetic study of the isomerization
482
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
k (1-TS1/2)
k (1-TS1/5)
k (1-TS1/6)
k
(
1
/s
)
Temperature (K)
Figure 2: Temperature dependence of rate constants
of the HNCO isomeric reactions
4. CONCLUSION
There are eight existent feasible isomers on the
potential energy surface [H, N, C, O], in which
isocyanic acid and cyanic acid are the most stable
isomers. The HNOC isomer contains a N O
unstable donor – acceptor bond is intermediate
complex forming CO, NH products. Isomerizations
are difficult to occur at normal temperature and
pressure condition. Isomerization isocyanic acid is
easier above 2000 K and favorable to generate
H(CNO) ring compound before forming the other
isomer products.
REFERENCES
1. M. Mladenovic, M. Elhiyani, M. Lewerenz, Marius.
Electric and magnetic properties of the four most
stable CHNO isomers from ab initio CCSD(T)
studies, J. Chem. Phys., 131, 034302 (2009).
2. J.S. Zhang, M. Dulligan, C. Wittig. HNCO +
h.nu.(193.3 nm).fwdarw. H + NCO: Center-of-Mass
Translational Energy Distribution, Reaction
Dynamics, and D0(H-NCO), J. Phys. Chem., 99,
7446-7452 (1995).
3. J. M. Roberts, P. R. Veres, A. K. Cochran, C.
Warneke, I. R. Burling, R. J. Yokelson, B. Lerner, J.
B. Gilman, W. C. Kuster, R. Fall and Joost de Gouw.
Isocyanic acid in the atmosphere and its possible link
to smoke-related health effects, Proceedings of the
National Academy of Sciences of the United States
of American, 108(22), 8966-8971 (2011).
4. A. Bodi, P. Hemberger, T. Gerber, A robust link
between the thermochemistry of urea and isocyanic
acid by dissociative photoionization, J. Chem.
Thermodynamics, 58, 292-299 (2013).
5. A. L. East, C. S. Johnson and W. D. Allen,
Characterization of the X
1A’ state of isocyanic acid,
J. Chem. Phys., 98(2), 1299-1328 (1993).
6. Yan Li, Hui-ling Liu, Yan-bo Sun, Zhuo Li, Xu-ri
Huang, Chia-chung Sun. Radical reaction HCNO +
3
NH: a mechanistic study, Theor. Chem. Acc., 124,
123-137 (2009).
7. D. Poppinger, L. Radom, and J. A. Pople.
Theoretical Study of the CHNO Isomers, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 99(24), 7806-7816 (1977).
8. M. Mladenovic, M. Lewerenz, M. C. McCarthy, P.
Thaddeus. Isofulminic acid, HONC: Ab initio theory
and microwave spectroscopy, J. Chem. Phys., 131,
174308 (2009).
9. Donghui Quan, Eric Herbst, Yoshihiro Osamura, and
Evelyne Roueff. Gas-grain Modeling of Isocyanic
Acid (HNCO), Cyanic Acid (HOCN), Fulminic Acid
(HCNO), and Isofulminic Acid (HONC) in Assorted
Interstellar Environments, The Astrophysical
Journal, 725, 2101-2109 (2010).
10. M. Mladenovic and M. Lewerenz. Equilibrium
structure and energetics of CHNO isomers: steps
towards ab initio rovibrational spectra of quasi-
linear molecules, Chemical Physics, 343, 129-140
(2008).
11. J. L. Collister, H. O. Pritchard. The Thermal
Isomerisation of Methyl Isocyanide in the
Temperature Range 120-320
o
C, Can. J. Chem., 54,
2380-2384 (1976).
12. F. W. Schneider, B. S. Rabinovitch. The thermal
unimolecular isomerization of methyl isocyanide.
Fall-off behavior, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 20, 4215-4230
(1962).
13. M. E. Clarkson, H. O. Pritchard. Partial state-to-state
calculation of the infinite-pressure rate constant for
the isomerisation of methyl isocyanide, J. Chem.
Phys., 117, 29-37 (1987).
14. M. C. Lin, Y. He, F. Melius. Communication:
implications of the HCN → HNC process to high-
temperature nitrogen-containing fuel chemistry, Int.
J. Chem. Kinet., 24, 1103-1107 (1992).
15. M. J. Frisch et al. Gaussian 03, revision E.01,
Gaussian Inc.: Wallingford, CT (2004).
16. C. J. Cramer. Essentials of Computational Chemistry:
Theories and Models, John Wiley & Sons Ltd,
(2004).
17. T. Baer, W. L. Hase. Unimolecular Reaction
Dynamics: Theory and Experiments, Oxford, New
York (1996).
18. V. Mokrushin, V. Bedanov, W. Tsang, M. R.
Zachariah, V. D. Knyazev, W. S. McGivern.
ChemRate, version 1.5.8, in: Technology, N.I.o.S.a.
(Ed.), Gaithersburg, MD (2011).
19. L. V. Moskaleva and M. C. Lin. The Spin-Conserved
Reaction CH + N2 → H + NCN: A Major Pathway to
Prompt NO Studied by Quantum-Statistical Theory
VJC, 55(4), 2017 Nguyen Huu Tho
483
Calculations and Kinetic Modeling of Rate Constant,
Proc. Combust. Inst., 28, 2393-2401 (2000).
20. M. S. Schuurman, S. R. Muir, W. D. Allen, and H. F.
Schaefer. Toward subchemical accuracy in
computational thermochemistry: focal point analysis
of the heat of formation of NCO and [H,N,C,O]
isomers, J. Chem. Phys., 120, 11586-11599 (2004).
21. J. K. Yu, S. Wang, H. Zhang, H. X. Zhang, D. J.
Ding, C. C. Sun. Theoretical study on the
decomposition mechanism of the HCNO molecules,
Acta Chim. Sin., 66, 597-602 (2008).
22. S. S. Brown, H. L. Berghout, and F. F. Crim. The
HNCO heat of formation and the N–H and C–N bond
enthalpies from initial state selected
photodissociation, J. Chem. Phys., 105, 8103-
8110 (1996).
23. M. Zyrianov, T. Droz-Georget, A. Sanov, and H.
Reisler. Competitive photodissociation channels in
jet-cooled HNCO: Thermochemistry and near-
threshold predissociation, J. Chem. Phys., 105(18),
8111-8116 (1996).
24. B. Ruscic. Updated Active Thermochemical Tables
(ATcT) values based on ver.
1.112 of the Thermochemical Network (2012);
available at ATcT.anl.gov; Last update
6/Mar/(2015).
Corresponding author: Nguyen Huu Tho
Natural Sciences Pedagogy, Sai Gon University
No. 273, An Duong Vuong Str., Ward 3, Dist. 5, Ho Chi Minh City
E-mail: nguyenhuutho04@gmail.com; Telephone: 0983869335.
Các file đính kèm theo tài liệu này:
- 10724_39236_1_sm_9577_2090103.pdf