Compund 3 was obtained as a white powder.
The 1H-NMR spectrum of 3 showed the signals of
three olefinic protons at H 5.41 (s), 5.71 (dd, J =
1.5, 10.5 Hz), and 6.01 (dd, J = 3.0, 10.5 Hz), two
hydroxymethine protons at H 3.37 (br s) and 4.00
(dt, J = 4.0, 11.0 Hz), and six methyl groups at H
0.75 (s), 0.88 (s), 0.99 (d, J = 6.5 Hz), 1.00 (s), 1.01
(s), 1.10 (d, J = 7.0 Hz), and 2.16 (s). The 13C-NMR
and DEPT spectra of 3 displayed the signals of 30
carbons, including seven methyls at δC 16.5, 17.1,
19.4, 20.3, 21.8, 28.3, 29.1 and four olefinics at δC
128.2, 128.4, 131.3, 144.0 and one carbonyl carbon
at δC 178.5. Analysis the 1H- and 13C-NMR spectra
of 3 suggested 3 was very similar to those of 2α,3α-
dihydroxy-19-oxo-18,19-seco-urs-11,13(18)-dien-
28-oic acid [7]. The HMBC correlations between H-
23 (δH 1.01)/H-24 (δH 0.88) and C-3 (δC 80.1);
between H-3 (δH 3.37) and C-2 (δC 67.0) indicated
the position of the hydroxyl group at C-3. The
HMBC correlations indicated the hydroxyl group
was located at C-2. The HMBC correlations from H-
27 (δH 1.00) to C-8 (δC 41.9)/C-13 (δC 144.0)/C-14
(δC 42.4)/C-15 (δC 27.1); from H-12 (δH 6.01) to C-9
(δC 55.3)/C-11 (δC 128.2)/C-13 (δC 144.0)/C-18 (δC
128.4); and from H-18 (δH 5.41) to C-12 (δC
131.3)/C-14 (δC 42.4)/C-16 (δC 27.9)/C-17 (δC 48.5)/
C-22 (δC 39.4) proved the location of two the double
bond at C-11/C-12 and C-13/C-18. The HMBC
correlations between H-29 (δH 2.16) and C-19 (δC
215.1)/C-20 (δC 48.7); between H-30 (δH 1.10) and
C-19 (δC 215.1)/C-20 (δC 47.8)/C-21 (δC 28.7)
proved the oxo group at C-19. All NMR assignments
of 3 were confirmed by detailed analyses of
HSQC and HMBC spectra (table 1), which are in
good agreement with those reported for 2α,3α-
dihydroxy-19-oxo-18,19-seco-urs-11,13(18)-dien-
28-oic acid in the literature [7], and further
confirmed by the exhibition of an ESIMS ion peak at
m/z 487 [M+H]+, corresponding to the formula of
C30H46O5. Thus, compound 3 was identified as
2α,3α-dihydroxy-19-oxo-18,19-seco-urs-11,13(18)-
dien-28-oic acid
5 trang |
Chia sẻ: honghp95 | Lượt xem: 706 | Lượt tải: 0
Bạn đang xem nội dung tài liệu Triterpenes from Vitex limonifolia - Nguyen Thi Kim Thoa, để tải tài liệu về máy bạn click vào nút DOWNLOAD ở trên
Vietnam Journal of Chemistry, International Edition, 55(6): 715-719, 2017
DOI: 10.15625/2525-2321.2017-00531
715
Triterpenes from Vitex limonifolia
Nguyen Thi Kim Thoa
2
, Ninh Khac Ban
1
, Do Thi Trang
1
, Tran My Linh
1
, Vu Huong Giang
1
,
Nguyen Xuan Nhiem
1
, Phan Van Kiem
2*
1Institute of Marine Biochemistry, Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology (VAST)
2Faculty of Basic Science, Hanoi University of Mining and Geology
Received 2 December 2017; Accepted for Publication 29 December 2017
Abstract
Using combined chromatographic methods, four triterpenoids, 2α,3α-dihydroxyurs-12-en-28-oic acid (1),
euscaphic acid (2), 2α,3α-dihydroxy-19-oxo-18,19-seco-urs-11,13(18)-dien-28-oic acid (3), and maslinic acid (4) were
isolated from the methanol extract of the leaves of Vitex limonifolia. Their structures were elucidated by 1D-, 2D-NMR
spectra as well as by comparison with those reported in the literature. Compound 3 was reported from Vitex genus for
the first time.
Keywords. Vitex limonifolia, triterpenoid, ursane, oleanane.
1. INTRODUCTION
Vitex is the genus of shrubs and trees and mainly
distributed in tropics and subtropics [1]. Since
ancient times, civilization used Vitex plants for
treating many diseases such as malaria, herpes,
itches, dermatitis or controlling menstruation [1].
Phytochemical study of the genus Vitex revealed the
presence of flavonoids, terpenoids, ecdysteroids,
iridoid glucosides, etc. [2]. However,
phytochemistry study of this plant has not been
studied yet. This paper reported the isolation and
structure elucidation of four triterpenes from the
methanol extract of the leaves of V. limonifolia.
2. MATERIAL AND METHODS
2.1. Plant materials
The leaves of Vitex limonifolia Wall. ex C.B.Clarke
were collected in Bachma National Park, Thua
Thien Hue, Vietnam in September 2015, and
identified by one of the authors, Prof. Dr. Ninh Khac
Ban. A voucher specimen was deposited at the
Herbarium Institute of Marine Biochemistry, VAST.
2.2. General experimental procedures
Optical rotations were determined on a Jasco DIP-
370 automatic polarimeter. The NMR spectra were
recorded using a Bruker DRX 500 spectrometer (1H-
NMR, 500 MHz; 13C-NMR, 125 MHz). Column
chromatography was performed using silica-gel
(Kieselgel 60, 230-400 mesh, Merck) or RP-18
resins (30-50 μm, Fujisilisa Chemical Ltd.), and thin
layer chromatography (TLC) was performed using a
precoated silica gel 60 F254 (0.25 mm, Merck) and
RP-18 F254S plates (0.25 mm, Merck).
2.3. Extraction and isolation
The dried leaves of V. limonifolia (4.2 kg) were
extracted with hot MeOH three times (3 × 5 L)
under reflux for 12 h to yield 350 g extract after
evaporation of the solvent. This extract was
suspended in H2O and successively partitioned with
CH2Cl2 and EtOAc to obtain the CH2Cl2 (VIL1,
130.0 g), EtOAc (VIL2, 27.0 g), and H2O (VIL3,
190.0 g) extracts after removal of the solvents in
vacuo. The VIL1 fraction was chromatographed on a
silica gel column eluting with a gradient of n-
hexane:acetone (100:0 → 0:1, v/v) to give six
fractions, VIL1A – VIL1F.
The VIL1C fraction was chromatographed on an
RP-18 column eluting with MeOH:water (5:1, v/v)
to give three fractions, VIL1C1-VIL1C3. VIL1C3
was chromatographed on a silica gel column eluting
with n-hexane:EtOAc (1.4:1, v/v) to yield 1 (16.0
mg).
The VIL1D fraction was chromatographed on an
RP-18 column eluting with MeOH:water (4:1, v/v)
to give five fractions, VIL1D1-VIL1D5. VIL1D2
was chromatographed on an RP-18 column eluting
VJC, 55(6), 2017 Phan Van Kiem et al.
716
Figure 1: The chemical structures of compounds 1−4
with acetone:water (1.8:1, v/v) to give three smaller
fractions, VIL1D2A-VIL1D2C. Compounds 2 (18.0
mg) and 3 (4.5 mg) were obtained from VIL1D2A
fraction using silica gel column (n-hexane:EtOAc,
1.4:1, v/v as eluent solvent). Compound 4 (7.0 mg)
was obtained from VIL1D2C using silica gel column
with solvent of n-hexane:EtOAc (1.4:1, v/v).
2α,3α-Dihydroxyurs-12-en-28-oic acid (1):
white amorphous powder; 25][ D : +30.0 (c 0.1,
MeOH); ESIMS m/z 473 [M+H]+, C30H48O4; MW:
472; 1H- and 13C-NMR (DMSO-d6), see table 1.
Euscaphic acid (2): white amorphous powder;
25][ D : +20.0 (c 0.1, MeOH); ESIMS m/z 489 [M+H]
+,
C30H48O5; MW: 488;
1H- and 13C-NMR (DMSO-d6),
see table 1.
2α,3α-Dihydroxy-19-oxo-18,19-seco-urs-
11,13(18)-dien-28-oic acid (3): white amorphous
powder; 25][ D : –40.0 (c 0.1, MeOH); ESIMS m/z 487
[M+H]+, C30H46O5; MW: 486;
1H- and 13C-NMR
(CD3OD), see table 1.
Maslinic acid (4): white amorphous powder;
25][ D : –64.1 (c 0.1, MeOH); ESIMS m/z 473 [M+H]
+,
C30H48O4; MW: 472;
1H- and 13C-NMR (CD3OD),
see table 1.
3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Compound 1 was obtained as a white powder. The
1H-NMR spectrum of 1 showed the signals of one
olefinic proton at H 5.14 (1H, t, J = 3.0 Hz) and
seven methyl groups at H 0.70 (3H, s), 0.78 (3H, s),
0.82 (3H, d, J = 6.5 Hz), 0.88 (3H, s), 0.89 (3H, s),
0.91 (3H, d, J = 7.0 Hz), 1.04 (3H, s), two
oximethine protons at H 3.15 (br s) and 3.77 (br d, J
= 11.0 Hz). The 13C-NMR and DEPT spectra of 1
displayed the signals of thirty carbons, including
seven methyls, eight methylenes, eight methines,
and seven quaternary carbons in which two olefinic
carbons at C 124.5 and 138.2. Analysis the
1H- and
13C-NMR spectra of 1 suggested the presence of an
ursan-12-ene-type triterpene skeleton [3]. In
addition, the NMR data of 1 was found to be similar
to those of 2α,3α-dihydroxyurs-12-en-28-oic acid
methyl ester [4] except for the disappearance of
methyl ester group. The HMBC correlations
between H-23 (δH 0.89)/H-24 (δH 0.78) and C-3 (δC
77.8)/C-4 (δC 38.0)/C-5 (δC 47.6) indicated the
position of the hydroxyl group at C-3. The HMBC
correlations between H-1 (δH 1.13 and 1.41)/H-3 (δH
3.15) and C-2 (δC 64.7) indicated the hydroxyl group
was located at C-2. Beside, the large coupling
constant of H-1 and H-2, J = 11.0 Hz [H-2: δH 3.77
(br d, J = 11.0 Hz)] and small coupling constant of
H-2 and H-3 (J~0 Hz) [H-3: δH 3.15 (br s)]
suggested the configurations of two hydroxyl groups
at C-2/C-3 as equatorial and axial, respectively. The
HMBC correlations between H-27 (δH 1.04) and C-8
(δC 39.1)/C-13 (δC 138.2)/C-14 (δC 41.7)/C-15 (δC
28.2); between H-12 (δH 5.14) and C-9 (δC 46.8)/C-
14 (δC 41.7)/C-18 (δC 52.4) proved the position of
the double bond at C-12/C-13. The ESIMS of 1
exhibited an ion peak at m/z 473 [M+H]+,
corresponding to the formula of C30H48O4.
Consequently, compound 1 was identified as 2α,3α-
dihydroxyurs-12-en-28-oic acid and previously
reported from V. altissima [5] and V. negundo [6].
Analysis the NMR spectra of 2 exhibited the
structure was similar to those of 1 except for the
additional hydroxyl group at C-19. This was
confirmed by the HMBC correlations between H-29
(δH 1.08) and C-18 (δC 53.2)/C-19 (δC 71.6)/C-20 (δC
41.4); between H-30 (δH 0.84) and C-19 (δC 71.6)/C-
20 (δC 41.4)/C-21 (δC 25.9). The molecular formular
of 2 was futher confirmed by the exhibition of an
ESIMS ion peak at m/z 489 [M+H]+, corresponding
to the formula of C30H48O5. Thus, the structure of 2
was determined to be euscaphic acid [3]. This
compound was already isolated from V. altissima
[5], V. negundo [6].
VJC, 55(6), 2017 Triterpenes from Vitex limonifolia.
717
Table 1: The 1H- and 13C-NMR data for compounds 1-4
C 1 2 3 4
C
# δC
a,c
δH
a,d (J in
Hz)
δC
¥ δC
a,c δH
a,d (J in Hz) δC
$ δC
b,c
δH
b,d (J in
Hz)
δC
£ δC
b,c
δH
b,d (J in
Hz)
1 42.2 41.7 1.13 (m)
1.41 (m)
42.6 41.6 1.15 (m)
1.39 (m)
43.0 42.3 1.32 (m)
1.85 (m)
46.8 48.2 0.92 (m)
1.95 (m)
2 66.7 64.7 3.77 (br d,
11.0)
66.2 64.7 3.77 (br
d,11.0)
66.3 67.0 4.00 (dt,
4.0, 11.0)
68.8 69.5 3.64 (dt,
4.5, 10.0)
3 79.2 77.8 3.15 (br s) 79.3 77.9 3.15 (d, 1.0) 79.8 80.1 3.37 (br s) 83.8 84.4 2.93 (d,
10.0)
4 39.3 38.0 - 38.9 38.0 - 39.3 39.5 - 39.1 40.6 -
5 48.3 47.6 1.11 (m) 48.8 47.6 1.15 (dd, 4.0,
13.5)
48.7 49.0 1.36 (m) 55.3 56.7 0.86 (m)
6 18.2 17.6 1.27 (m)
1.35 (m)
18.8 17.7 1.28 (m)
1.35 (m)
18.6 19.0 1.45 (m)
1.54 (m)
18.3 19.6 1.45 (m)
1.58 (m)
7 33.0 32.6 1.25 (m)
1.42 (m)
33.7 32.6 1.21 (m)
1.43 (m)
32.9 33.2 1.30 (m)
1.42 (m)
32.6 33.8 1.52 (m)
1.57 (m)
8 40.0 39.1 - 40.8 39.5 - 41.6 41.9 - 39.1 40.5 -
9 47.6 46.8 1.54 (m) 47.8 46.5 1.66 (m) 55.0 55.3 2.19 (br s) 47.5 49.0 1.65 (m)
10 38.4 37.8 - 38.8 37.8 - 38.8 39.1 - 38.3 39.3 -
11 23.4 22.9 1.85 (m) 24.3 23.1 1.89 (m) 128.0 128.2 5.71
(dd, 1.5,
10.5)
23.5 24.6 1.92 (m)
1.96 (m)
12 125.8 124.5 5.14 (t, 3.0) 128.7 126.8 5.17 (br s) 130.9 131.3 6.01 (dd,
3.0, 10.5)
122.0 123.5 5.27 (t, 3.5)
13 138.7 138.2 - 139.6 138.6 - 142.9 144.0 - 143.6 145.3 -
14 42.4 41.7 - 42.3 41.2 - 41.9 42.4 - 41.7 42.9 -
15 28.2 27.4 0.98 (m)
1.80 (m)
29.1 28.0 0.89 (m)
1.69 (m)
26.9 27.1 1.16
1.82
27.6 28.8 1.10 (m)
1.79 (m)
16 24.4 23.8 1.52 (m)
1.93 (m)
26.3 25.2 1.39 (m)
2.49 (m)
27.8 27.9 1.48 (m)
2.20 (m)
23.1 24.0 1.62 (m)
2.03 (m)
17 48.3 46.9 - 48.3 46.9 - 47.9 48.5 - 46.6 47.6 -
18 53.2 52.4 2.11 (d,
11.5)
54.4 53.2 2.37 (s) 129.2 128.4 5.41 (s) 41.3 42.7 2.87
(dd, 4.0,
14.0)
19 39.1 38.5 1.31 (m) 73.2 71.6 - 211.8 215.1 - 45.8 47.2 1.16 (m)
1.51 (m)
20 38.5 38.4 0.94 (m) 42.5 41.4 1.13 (m) 47.8 48.7 2.56 (m) 30.7 31.6 -
21 30.8 30.2 1.28 (m)
1.43 (m)
27.0 25.9 1.12 (m)
1.61 (m)
28.6 28.7 1.34 (m)
1.70 (m)
33.8 34.9 1.22 (m)
1.42 (m)
22 36.8 36.3 1.51 (m)
1.59 (m)
38.4 37.3 1.50 (m)
1.59 (m)
39.4 39.4 1.42 (m)
1.69 (m)
32.3 33.9 1.36 (m)
1.76 (m)
23 28.6 28.9 0.89 (s) 29.5 28.9 0.88 (s) 29.7 29.1 1.01 (s) 28.6 29.3 1.04 (s)
24 22.0 21.9 0.78 (s) 22.3 21.8 0.78 (s) 22.1 21.8 0.88 (s) 16.8 17.7 0.84 (s)
25 16.5 16.2 0.88 (s) 16.7 16.1 0.88 (s) 19.6 20.3 0.99 (s) 16.8 17.5 0.83 (s)
26 17.1 17.0 0.70 (s) 17.4 16.6 0.68 (s) 17.2 17.1 0.75 (s) 16.8 17.1 1.03 (s)
27 23.9 23.2 1.04 (s) 24.7 24.1 1.29 (s) 20.4 19.4 1.00 (s) 26.0 26.4 1.18 (s)
28 178.4 178.3 - 179.4 179.0 - 178.3 178.5 - 178.0 181.8 -
29 17.1 16.9 0.82 (d, 6.5) 27.2 26.4 1.08 (s) 28.4 28.3 2.16 (s) 33.1 33.6 0.93 (s)
30 21.2 21.1 0.91 (d, 7.0) 16.6 16.3 0.84 (d, 6.5) 16.7 16.5 1.10 (d, 7.0) 23.5 24.0 0.96 (s)
arecorded in DMSO-d6,
bCD3OD,
c125MHz, d500MHz, #C
of methyl 2α,3α-dihydroxy-urs-12-en-28-oate [4], ¥δC of
euscaphic acid [3], $δC
of 2α,3α-dihydroxy-19-oxo-18,19-seco-urs-11,13(18)-diene-28-oic acid [7], £δC
of maslinic acid
[8].
VJC, 55(6), 2017 Phan Van Kiem et al.
718
Compund 3 was obtained as a white powder.
The 1H-NMR spectrum of 3 showed the signals of
three olefinic protons at H 5.41 (s), 5.71 (dd, J =
1.5, 10.5 Hz), and 6.01 (dd, J = 3.0, 10.5 Hz), two
hydroxymethine protons at H 3.37 (br s) and 4.00
(dt, J = 4.0, 11.0 Hz), and six methyl groups at H
0.75 (s), 0.88 (s), 0.99 (d, J = 6.5 Hz), 1.00 (s), 1.01
(s), 1.10 (d, J = 7.0 Hz), and 2.16 (s). The 13C-NMR
and DEPT spectra of 3 displayed the signals of 30
carbons, including seven methyls at δC 16.5, 17.1,
19.4, 20.3, 21.8, 28.3, 29.1 and four olefinics at δC
128.2, 128.4, 131.3, 144.0 and one carbonyl carbon
at δC 178.5. Analysis the
1H- and 13C-NMR spectra
of 3 suggested 3 was very similar to those of 2α,3α-
dihydroxy-19-oxo-18,19-seco-urs-11,13(18)-dien-
28-oic acid [7]. The HMBC correlations between H-
23 (δH 1.01)/H-24 (δH 0.88) and C-3 (δC 80.1);
between H-3 (δH 3.37) and C-2 (δC 67.0) indicated
the position of the hydroxyl group at C-3. The
HMBC correlations indicated the hydroxyl group
was located at C-2. The HMBC correlations from H-
27 (δH 1.00) to C-8 (δC 41.9)/C-13 (δC 144.0)/C-14
(δC 42.4)/C-15 (δC 27.1); from H-12 (δH 6.01) to C-9
(δC 55.3)/C-11 (δC 128.2)/C-13 (δC 144.0)/C-18 (δC
128.4); and from H-18 (δH 5.41) to C-12 (δC
131.3)/C-14 (δC 42.4)/C-16 (δC 27.9)/C-17 (δC 48.5)/
C-22 (δC 39.4) proved the location of two the double
bond at C-11/C-12 and C-13/C-18. The HMBC
correlations between H-29 (δH 2.16) and C-19 (δC
215.1)/C-20 (δC 48.7); between H-30 (δH 1.10) and
C-19 (δC 215.1)/C-20 (δC 47.8)/C-21 (δC 28.7)
proved the oxo group at C-19. All NMR assignments
of 3 were confirmed by detailed analyses of
HSQC and HMBC spectra (table 1), which are in
good agreement with those reported for 2α,3α-
dihydroxy-19-oxo-18,19-seco-urs-11,13(18)-dien-
28-oic acid in the literature [7], and further
confirmed by the exhibition of an ESIMS ion peak at
m/z 487 [M+H]+, corresponding to the formula of
C30H46O5. Thus, compound 3 was identified as
2α,3α-dihydroxy-19-oxo-18,19-seco-urs-11,13(18)-
dien-28-oic acid.
Analysis the NMR and mass spectra of 4
indicated that the structure of 4 was similar to those
of maslinic acid [8]. The HMBC correlations
between two methyl groups H-23 (H 1.04)/H-24
(H 0.84) and C-3 (δC 84.4); between H-3 (H 2.93)
and C-2 (C 69.5) indicated two hydroxyl groups
located at C-3 and C-2. The HMBC correlations
between two methyl groups H-29 (H 0.93)/H-30 (H
0.96) and C-19 (δC 47.2)/C-20 (δC 31.6)/C-21 (δC
34.9) confirmed the location of two methyl groups at
C-20. The HMBC correlations between H-27 (δH
1.18) and C-8 (δC 40.5)/C-14 (δC 42.9)/C-15 (δC
28.8) proved the double bond at C-12/C-13.
Consequently, 4 was elucidated as maslinic acid [8]
and previously reported from V. altissima [5], and V.
negundo [9].
Figure 2: The key HMBC correlations of 1 and 3
Acknowledgment. This research is funded by
Vietnam National Foundation for Science and
Technology Development (NAFOSTED) under grant
number 104.01-2014.02.
REFERENCES
1. A. Rani, A. Sharma. The genus Vitex: a review.
Pharmacognosy Reviews, 7, 188-198 (2013).
2. S. Ganapaty, K. N. Vidyadhar. Phytoconstituents and
biological activities of Vitex-a review. Journal of
Natural Remedies, 5, 75-95 (2005).
3. J. -J. Cheng, L. -J. Zhang, H. -L. Cheng, C. -T.
Chiou, I. J. Lee, Y.-H. Kuo. Cytotoxic hexacyclic
triterpene acids from Euscaphis japonica, Journal of
Natural Products, 73, 1655-1658 (2010).
4. Hisashi Kojima, H. Ogura. Triterpenenoids from
Prunella vulgaris, Phytochemistry, 25(3), 729-733
(1986).
5. C. Sridhar, K. V. Rao, G. V. Subbaraju. Flavonoids,
triterpenoids and a lignan from Vitex altissima,
Phytochemistry, 66, 1707-1712 (2005).
6. M. M. Li, X. Q. Su, J. Sun, Y. F. Gu, Z. Huang, K.
W. Zeng, Q. Zhang, Y. F. Zhao, D. Ferreira, J. K.
Zjawiony, J. Li, P. F. Tu. Anti-inflammatory ursane-
and oleanane-type triterpenoids from Vitex negundo
var. cannabifolia, Journal of Natural Products, 77,
2248-2254 (2014).
7. H. Ping, K. Gloria, W. Shanxin, W. Peter. Triterpene
acids from Toddalia asiatica, Natural Product
Research and Development, 17, 404-408 (2005).
719
VJC, Vol. 56(0), 2018 Phan Van Kiem et al.
8. S. Taniguchi, Y. Imayoshi, E. Kobayashi, Y.
Takamatsu, H. Ito, T. Hatano, H. Sakagami, H.
Tokuda, H. Nishino, D. Sugita, S. Shimura, T.
Yoshida. Production of bioactive triterpenes by
Eriobotrya japonica calli, Phytochemistry, 59, 315-
323 (2002).
9. C. -J. Zheng, B. -K. Huang, Y. -B. Wu, T. Han, Q. -
Y. Zhang, H. Zhang, L. -P. Qin. Terpenoids from
Vitex negundo seeds, Biochemical Systematics and
Ecology, 38, 247-249 (2010).
Corresponding author: Phan Van Kiem
Institute of Marine Biochemistry
Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology
18, Hoang Quoc Viet road, Cau Giay district, Hanoi, Viet Nam
E-mail: phankiem@yahoo.com.
Các file đính kèm theo tài liệu này:
- 11117_40750_1_sm_6531_2090139.pdf