DISCUSSION
The rbcL gene was used as DNA barcode
to identify species in flowering plant, but its
limitations have also been shown by previous
studies. Previous studies showed that 58.5%
of sister species were not identifiable by the
rbcL gene sequence (Kang, 2017) because of
the 100% similarity. In this study, with 4
samples of 3 species and 1 subspecies were
used, the rbcL gene of 523 bp segment was
able to distinguish S. rotunda with S.
japonica or S. polygona but could not
distinguish S. .japonica with S. polygona.
However, this is a taxonomically significant
result which helps botanist to separate
species group by molecular analysis, thereby
guiding to find for morphological differences
among groups. Molecular data is a good tool
to support for morphology in species
identification and rearrangement of
classification system (Xie, 2015).
In an analysis that included genbank
sequences, we found that the tag gene
segment used in this study could not
distinguish between species in the same
group: group (1) S. abyssinica; S. longa; S.
japonica; S. elegans and group (2) S. venosa;
S. cephalantha; S. brachyandra; S. rotunda.
However, it distinguishes very well between
two species belonging to two different groups.
These are two groups with different
morphological characteristics of root, a major
feature used in key to species identification of
Stephania. About DNA barcode for genus
Stephania, we suggest that should examine
furthely other locus such as nuclear ITS,
chloroplast trnH - psbA space or study a
combination of multiple gene locus.
CONCLUSION
Using data of the rbcL gene can
distinguish several species Stephania from
each other, but is restricted to close species
because the nucleotide sequence difference
between species is quite small. Phylogenetic
tree based on partial rbcL gene have divided
3 examined species into two groups,
corresponding to the morphological
characteristics of the tuberous rootstock and
the main roots. The study has added
molecular data for 3 species and 1
subspecies of Stephania which were
collected in Vietnam.
7 trang |
Chia sẻ: hachi492 | Lượt xem: 3 | Lượt tải: 0
Bạn đang xem nội dung tài liệu Using the chloroplast rbcl gene to clarify the relationship between species of the genus stephania (menispermaceae) from Viet Nam, để tải tài liệu về máy bạn click vào nút DOWNLOAD ở trên
ACADEMIA JOURNAL OF BIOLOGY 2020, 42(2): 109–115
DOI: 10.15625/2615-9023/v42n2.15006
109
USING THE CHLOROPLAST rbcL GENE TO CLARIFY THE
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SPECIES OF THE GENUS
Stephania (Menispermaceae) FROM VIETNAM
Vu Tien Chinh
1,2,*
, Tran Thi Lieu
1
, Duong Van Tang
1
1
Vietnam National Museum of Nature, VAST, Vietnam
2
Graduate University of Science and Technology, VAST, Vietnam
Received 23 April 2020, accepted 15 June 2020
ABSTRACT
The rbcL gene of the chloroplast genome is widely used as an additional data for the study of
species origin, molecular evolution and phylogeny. In this study, we used the rbcL gene to
separate three species of genus Stephania: S. japonica, S. polygona, S. rotunda and one
subspecies S. japonica var. discolor from Vietnam. Molecular analysis was performed on 523 bp
segment of the rbcL genes with 4 examined samples of the genus Stephania and 18 other
genbank sequences of five genera Pachygone, Antizoma, Cissampelos, Cyclea and
Syntriandrium. The dataset consists of 22 sequences used to reconstruct the evolutionary tree
using two methods: Bayesian Infer (BI) and Maximum Likelihood (MP). The results showed that
S. rotunda was able to distinguish from S. japonica or S. polygona, while S. japonica, S. japonica
var. discolor and S. polygona could not distinguished each another. The phylogenetic tree splited
three examined species into two groups, representing the two main groups of morphology in
genus Stephania: a group with tuberous rootstock and another group with main root.
Keywords: Chloroplast genome, gene rbcL, phylogeny, Stephania.
Citation: Vu Tien Chinh, Tran Thi Lieu, Duong Van Tang, 2020. Using the chloroplast rbcL gene to clarify the
relationship between species of the genus Stephania (Menispermaceae) from Vietnam. Academia Journal of Biology,
42(2): 109–115. https://doi.org/10.15625/2615-9023/v42n2.15006.
*Corresponding author email: tienchinhvu@gmail.com
©2020 Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology (VAST)
Vu Tien Chinh et al.
110
INTRODUCTION
Stephania Lour. is a large genus of family
Menispermaceae with about 60 species, most
of which are distributed in tropical and
subtropical regions of Asia and Africa, some
species are also found in Oceania. Recently,
37 species were recorded in China, 15 species
in Thailand (Lo, 1978; Hu, 2008; Chinh,
2016; Phuc, 2019). In Vietnam, this genus
comprises ca. 20 species with the similar
dioecious flower (Hang, 2014). In Vietnam,
Stephania species have long been used in the
traditional medicine to treat various diseases,
such as asthma, tuberculosis, dysentery,
hyperglycemia, malaria and cancer (Hang,
2014; Xie, 2015; Chinh 2019).
Presently, DNA data are widely and
regularly used to provide additional evidence
at the molecular level for plant taxonomic
studies. The trend of combination
morphological characteristics and chemical
and genetic fingerprints into a dataset for
species identification, becomes very
important for systematic studies. Molecular
analysis have been used as a tool to
determine the evolutionary relationships
among taxons at level the genus or family or
order. DNA considered to be suitable for
phylogenetic tree because nucleotide
difference were accumulated over time in
different groups of organisms, associated
with the process of splitting species into new
species. So, normally, close species will have
a small genetic distance and vice versa,
distant species will have a more large genetic
distance. Molecular data is not only evidence
for identifying species or supporting
evidence to new species, it is also used to
study the evolution process. The contribution
of studies at the molecular level helps to
rearrange the classification system more
accurately and easily.
DNA data has been proposed as a tool to
identify species through the comparison of
short DNA sequences from an unknown
sample to a library of DNA sequences of
known species (Chase, 2005; Kress, 2005;
Cowan, 2006). Although controversial, DNA
data is still an effective tool to review taxon of
plant (Fazekas, 2008; Lahaye, 2008). One of
the difficulties in studying DNA data in plants
is the poor ability to distinguish close species
(sister species). Previous studies has shown
that only 17% to 41.50% of examined species
have different rbcL gene sequence (Bafeel,
2012, Kang, 2017) and this is low level of
variability. However, the differences on DNA
sequences between genera are obvious and
large enough to identify different genera
(Bafeel, 2012). The chloroplast genes rbcL,
matK, trnH-psbA, and the nuclear ITS gene
regions are considered to be DNA Barcode for
species identification. According to the
suggestion of The Consortium for the Barcode
of Life, DNA Barcode of plant should be a
combination marker as matK and rbcL genes
(Kress, 2007). In this study, we tested the
ability to distinguish species in the genus
Stephania of chloroplast rbcL gene sequences.
The purpose of the study is to assess the
ability to identify species names base on this
marker and review quickly taxonomic status
of Stephania, from which orientation for
further research.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Sampling
In this study, four leaf samples of three
species S. japonica, S. polygona, S. rotunda
and one subspecies S. japonica var. discolor
were collected in Ha Giang, Hoa Binh, Lam
Dong Provinces and Ha Noi city. Plants were
identified basing on leaf morphological
characteristics and then stored in silicagel
(Table 1).
DNA extraction, amplification and
sequencing tag segment
Total DNA was extracted from leaf
samples using DNeasy Plant Kits (Qiagen,
Germany), then checked by electrophoresis on
agarose gel 0.8% contained dye Florosafe
DNA Stain and observed under UV light. The
concentration and purity of total DNA were
assessed by index OD260nm/280nm. Amplification
of rbcL gene was performed by PCR reaction
with primers rbcL1F: 5'-ATG TCA CCA
CAA ACA GAG ACT AAA GC-3'/,
rbcL724R: 5'-TCG CAT GTA CCT GCA
Using the chloroplast rbcL gene to clarify
111
GTA GC-3' (Fay, 1997). Amplification
reaction were conducted with a volume of 25
µl, including the components: 1X PCR
Buffer, 2.5 mM MgCl2, 2 mM dNTPs, 0.5
pM for per primers, 0.5 unit Taq polymerase
and 50 ng of total DNA. Amplification was
performed on PCR systems 9700 in the
following cycle: 1) 94
o
C: 5 minutes; 2) 94
o
C:
1 minute; 3) 55
o
C: 1 minute; 4) 72
o
C: 1
minute and repeat 35 cycles from step (2) to
(4); and finish reaction at 72
o
C: 10 minutes.
PCR products were carried out electrophoresis
on agarose gel 0.8%, and then purified using
the QIquick Gel Extraction Kit (Qiagen,
Germany). Purified PCR products were used
as template DNA for sequencing reactions
with same PCR primers. Sequencing was
performed on the ABI PRISM® 3100 Avant
Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems) at
The National Key Laboratory of Gene
Technology, Institute of Biotechnology,
VAST.
Table 1. List of sequences used in the study
No Accession Genbank/Voucher Species Origin
1 S1 Stephania japonica var. discolor This study
2 S2 Stephania polygona This study
3 S3 Stephania japonica This study
4 S4 Stephania rotunda This study
5 KF496796 Stephania japonica Genbank
6 JN051689 Stephania abyssinica Genbank
7 JN051692 Stephania elegans Genbank
8 FJ626601 Stephania longa Genbank
9 JN051691 Stephania cephalantha Genbank
10 JN051690 Stephania brachyandra Genbank
11 FJ026509 Stephania rotunda Genbank
12 EU526996 Stephania venosa Genbank
13 DQ099437 Antizoma angustifolia Genbank
14 JQ025032 Cissampelos capensis Genbank
15 GQ436370 Stephania tetrandra Genbank
16 JX944483 Stephania tetrandra Genbank
18 KF181462 Cyclea polypetala Genbank
18 FJ026482 Cyclea hypoglauca Genbank
19 FJ026481 Cyclea burmanii Genbank
20 FJ026508 Stephania laetificata Genbank
21 JN051685 Pachygone loyaltiensis Genbank
22 HQ260804 Syntriandrium preussii Genbank
Phylogenetic analysis
The dataset consists of 22 sequences, of
which 18 sequences from genbank were used
for analysis. The most fittest substitution
model was found by Partitionfinder 2.1 for 3
sub-datasets which correspond to the 1st, 2nd,
and 3rd positions of codon. Phylogenetic tree
was generated by 2 methods: Bayesian Infer
using Mr. Bayes and Maximum Likelihood
using Treefinder.
RESULTS
Extraction, amplification and sequencing of
target gene segments
We successfully isolated, amplified and
sequenced the rbcL gene for 4 Steniphia
samples from Vietnam. The total DNA has an
ratio OD260/nm/OD280nm of 1.89, which shows
good DNA quality because this ratio ranges
from 1.8-2.0. The concentration of total DNA
Vu Tien Chinh et al.
112
was estimated at 560 ng/µl. The PCR of target
segment obtained a single specific band
(Fig. 1). The size of the PCR products was
about 600 bp in length as expected. The
sequencing reactions were successfully
performed in both the forward and reverse
directions and all sequences with clear
fluorescence peaks, strong intensity, clarity
and corresponding to each nucleotide. The
sequences were checked for the target gene by
Blast Nucleotide on NCBI (National Center
for Biotechnology Information), and resultly,
all of them were choroplast rbcL gene.
Figure 1. Agarose gel electrophoresis (0.8%)
showing PCR products (600 bp) from rbcL
gene. Lanes: lane M, 1Kb DNA ladder; lane
S1: S. japonica var. discolor; lane S2:
S. polygona; lane S3: S. japonica;
lane S4: S. Rotunda
The level of genetic variation between the
three examined species of Stephania ranged
from 0% (between S. japonica and S.
polygona) - to 1.0% (between S. rotunda and
S. japonica or S. polygona) (Table 2). The
average level of diversity on the studied gene
segment was 0.48%. This was a low level of
diversity and often found in chloroplast
genomes among closely related species
(Kress, 2007). After cutting of primer
sequences, the obtained rbcL gene segment
with length of 523 bp contains: 27.72% A,
28.59% T, 22.23% G and 21.46% C,
respectively and coding for 173 amino acids
includes: Ala, Cys, Asp, Glu, Phe, Gly, His,
Ile, Lys, Leu, Met, Asn, Pro, Gln, Arg, Ser,
Thr, Val, Trp, Tyr (20 types). The average
rate of tranversion (A T and G C)/
transition (A, T G, C) mutation was
R=4,036. The data set of 22 sequences
contained 494 conservative sites, 27 variable
sites with 16 parsimony information sites and
10 single mutation sites.
Reconstruct phylogenetic tree
Phylogenetic trees was obtained with the
same topology for both methods: Bayesian
Inference (BI) and Maximum Likelihood
(MP). Based on rbcL 523 bp data, the
phylogenetic tree has separated 3 studied
species into 2 different groups. The first group
includes S. japonica, S. polygona and
sequences from Genbank such as S.
abyssinica, S. longa, S. tetrandra, S. elegans;
the second group includes S. rotunda and
other sequences from Genbank such as S.
brachyandra, S. cephalantha and S. venosa
(Figure 2). Both two groups were supported
highly by boostrap values (PP = 1, BS = 97
and PP = 0.96, BS = 87, corresponding to BI
and MP methods. These two clades
correspond to species groups with the
tuberous rootstock and species groups with
the main roots. The root structure is a key
feature of species identification to genus
Stephania (Chinh, 2015).
Genetic distance between S. japonica or
S. polygona and S. rotunda was 1.0%, while
between S. japonica and S. polygona was
0%. Thus, based on the results of the
analysis here, we found that this rbcL gene
segment could distinguish S. rotunda from
S. Japonica or S. rotunda with S. polygona
but it could not distinguish S. japonica with
S. polygona. Phylogenetic analysis showed
genus Stephania are not monophyly, instead
of the genera Antizoma, Cissampelos,
Cyclea nested in the genus Stephania. This
Using the chloroplast rbcL gene to clarify
113
result was similar to previous molecular
studies, confirming that gneus Stephania are
polyphyly (Jacques et al, 2008; Wang et al,
2007), which have been grouped together
but do not share an immediate common
ancestor. The inconsistency between the
molecular system and the traditional
classification system has been pointed out in
the genera of Menispermaceae (Jacques,
2008; Xie, 2015). Therefore, a combination
of morphological and molecular
characteristics is needed to rearrange the
classification system of Stephania genus in
the future.
Table 2. Genetic distance between 4 studied samples and 18 Genbank datas based on rbcL
segment (calculated by MEGA v6.0 and the value have not yet multiplied by 100%)
Figure 2. Phylogenetic tree based on the sequence of 523bp gene rbcL
(examined samples in bold letters)
Differences between S. rotunda, S. japonica
and S. Polygona
Base on the 523 bp rbcL sequences in this
study, S. rotunda has 5 different nucleotide
compared with sequences of S. japonica or S.
polygona. The 523 bp rbcL segment was
aligned with reference full chloroplast DNA
(contained rbcL sequence) (GenBank
accession: KU204903) to locate sites of
Vu Tien Chinh et al.
114
mutation nucleotides. The alignment result
showed that the mutations occurred at sites:
127 (A T), 147 (G A), 183 (C T),
189 (A G), 284 (G A). The
characterized nucleotides of S. rotunda are:
127A, 147G, 183C, 189A, 284G, while the
these of S. japonica or S. polygona are: 127T,
147A, 183T, 189G, 284A. We recommend the
use these different nucleotide sites for
distinguishing the species groups of the genus
Stephania. Genetic distance between S.
rotunda and S. japonica or S. polygona is
1.0% on the analyzed segment.
DISCUSSION
The rbcL gene was used as DNA barcode
to identify species in flowering plant, but its
limitations have also been shown by previous
studies. Previous studies showed that 58.5%
of sister species were not identifiable by the
rbcL gene sequence (Kang, 2017) because of
the 100% similarity. In this study, with 4
samples of 3 species and 1 subspecies were
used, the rbcL gene of 523 bp segment was
able to distinguish S. rotunda with S.
japonica or S. polygona but could not
distinguish S. .japonica with S. polygona.
However, this is a taxonomically significant
result which helps botanist to separate
species group by molecular analysis, thereby
guiding to find for morphological differences
among groups. Molecular data is a good tool
to support for morphology in species
identification and rearrangement of
classification system (Xie, 2015).
In an analysis that included genbank
sequences, we found that the tag gene
segment used in this study could not
distinguish between species in the same
group: group (1) S. abyssinica; S. longa; S.
japonica; S. elegans and group (2) S. venosa;
S. cephalantha; S. brachyandra; S. rotunda.
However, it distinguishes very well between
two species belonging to two different groups.
These are two groups with different
morphological characteristics of root, a major
feature used in key to species identification of
Stephania. About DNA barcode for genus
Stephania, we suggest that should examine
furthely other locus such as nuclear ITS,
chloroplast trnH - psbA space or study a
combination of multiple gene locus.
CONCLUSION
Using data of the rbcL gene can
distinguish several species Stephania from
each other, but is restricted to close species
because the nucleotide sequence difference
between species is quite small. Phylogenetic
tree based on partial rbcL gene have divided
3 examined species into two groups,
corresponding to the morphological
characteristics of the tuberous rootstock and
the main roots. The study has added
molecular data for 3 species and 1
subspecies of Stephania which were
collected in Vietnam.
Acknowledgements: The authors would like
to thank the Vietnam Museum of Nature and
the Graduate University of Science and
Technology for their supports and facilitation
to complete this study.
REFERENCES
Bafeel S. O., Arif I. A., Bakir M. A., Al
Homaidan A. A., Al Farhan A. H., and
Khan H. A. (2012). DNA barcoding of
arid wild plants using rbcL gene
sequences. Genetics and Molecular
Research, 11 (3): 1934–1941.
Chase M. W., Salamin N., Wilkinson M.,
2005. Land plants and DNA barcodes:
short-term and long-term goals. Phil
Trans Roy Soc B, 360: 1889‒1895.
Cowan R. S., Chase M. W., Kress W. J,.
Savolainen V., 2006. Three hundred
thousand species to identify: problems,
progress, and prospects in DNA barcoding
of land plants. Taxon, 55: 611‒616.
Fazekas A. J., Burgess K. S., Kesanakurti P.
R., 2008. Multiple multilocus DNA
barcodes from the plastid genome
discriminate plant species equally well.
PloS ONE, 3: 2802.
Hu C. M., Luo H. S., Chen T., Gilbert M. G.,
2008. Flora of China. Vol 7: 1–166.
Jacques F. M. B., Bertolino P., 2008.
Molecular and morphological phylogeny
Using the chloroplast rbcL gene to clarify
115
of Menispermaceae (Ranunculales). Plant
Syst Evol, 274: 83–97.
Kang, Y., Deng, Z., Zang, R. et al., 2017.
DNA barcoding analysis and phylogenetic
relationships of tree species in tropical
cloud forests. Sci Rep 7, 12564.
Kress W. J., Erickson D. L., 2007. A two-
locus global DNA barcode for land plants:
The coding rbcL gene complements the
non-coding trnH-psbA spacer region. PloS
ONE, 2: e508.
Kress W. J., Wurdack K. J., Zimmer E. A.,
Lee A., Janzen D. H., 2005. Use of DNA
barcodes to identify flowering plants.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 102(23):
8369‒8374.
Lahaye R. M., Bank M. V. D., Bogarin D.,
2008. DNA barcoding the floras of
biodiversity hotspots. Proc Nat Acad Sci
USA, 105: 2923‒2928.
Lo H. S., 1978. A preliminary study on the
genus Stephania in China. Acta
Phytotaxonomica Sinica, 16: 10‒40.
Nguyen Thu Hang, Nguyen Quoc Huy, Pham
Ha Thanh Tung, Hoang Van Thuy, 2014.
Taxonomy of some species in the genus
Stephania Lour. in Vietnam using rADN-
ITS sequences. Journal of Pharmacy,
54(9): 55‒59.
Trinh Thi Phuc, Vu Tien Chinh, Tran Van
Tien, Nong Van Duy, 2019. The Species
of the Genus Stephania Lour.
(Menispermaceae) in Flora of Vietnam.
Vietnam Journal of forest Sicences, 4:
22‒35.
Wang W., Wang H. C., Chen Z. D., 2007.
Phylogeny and morphological evolution
of tribe Menispermeae
(Menispermaceae) inferred from
chloroplast and nuclear sequences.
Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution
and Systematics, 8: 141–154.
Vu Tien Chinh, Bui Hong Quang, Ritesh
Kumar Choudhary, Nian He Xia, Jongku
Lee, 2016. Stephania subpeltata H.S.Lo
(Menispermaceae): A New Recorded
Species from Vietnam. Journal Korean
Journal Plant Taxon, 46 (3): 288–294.
Vu Tien Chinh, Bui Hong Quang, Tran Thi
Phuong Anh, 2015. Morhological
Characteristics and Key to Genera of
Family Menispermaceae in Vietnam,
Proceedings of the 6th National Scientific
Conference on Ecology and Biological
Resources Hanoi, Agricultural Publishing
House: 27‒32.
Vu Tien Chinh, Duy Nong Van, Van Tien
Tran, Nian he Xia, 2019. Stephania
polygona (Menispermaceae): A new
Species from Southern Vietnam.
Phytotaxa, 400 (3): 211‒214.
Vu Tien Chinh, Trinh Thi Phuc, Tong Y Hoa,
Xia Nian He, 2019. Stephania brevipes
Crail., (Menispermaceae): A new record
for the Flora of Vietnam. Joulnal of
Tropical and Subtropical Botany, 27(3):
323‒326.
Xie D. A., He J. A., Huang J. A., Xie H. A.,
Wang Y. A., Kang Y. A. C., Jabbour F.
B., Guo J. A., 2015. Molecular phylogeny
of Chinese Stephania (Menispermaceae)
and reassessment of the subgeneric and
sectional classifications. Australian
Systematic Botany, 28: 246–255.
Các file đính kèm theo tài liệu này:
using_the_chloroplast_rbcl_gene_to_clarify_the_relationship.pdf