Assessing the effectiveness of the TDF
+ 3TC + LVP/r regimen at 6, 12, 24 months
after treatment, the results showed that:
The virological response was found in
100% of patients at all times, below the
detection threshold was 76.4%, 86.7%
and 91.7%, respectively. Similarly, 100%
of patients had an immune response and
increased over time, specifically, the
average number of TCD4 was 231, 298,
368 cells/mm3, respectively. Clinical response
increased: After 6 months of treatment,
there was up to 80.0% of patients in clinical
stage 1, and 94.9% after 24 months.
Unfortunately, there was 5.1% of patients
did not show any improvement in clinical
response even despite of the virological
response. Pham Ba Hien’s research
(2018) showed that the viral responses at
the respective times were 100%, 100%
and 97.6%. Research by Laurent F (2010)
in Cambodia showed that the average
number of TCD4 cells were 197, 258 and
372 cells/mm3, respectively [6]. This result
allows confirming the effectiveness of the
regimen if the patient adheres to therapy
Evaluation of side effects of TDF +
3TC + LPV/r regimen, we found that:
Diarrhea accounted for the highest 29.1%,
followed by fatigue 18.2%, headache 7.3%,
nausea, vomiting 18.2%, abdominal pain
9.1%, skin rash 3.6%. According to
Nguyen The Tien (2015): Diarrhea (29.3%),
nausea (13.8%), fatigue (13.8%), headache
(10.3%), abdominal pain and vomiting
(8.6% and 5.2%) [5]. Hypercholesterolemia
disorders ranged from 4.6% - 15.3%,
triglyceride hyperactivity ranged from
10.8% - 18.4%. Our research results were
similar to Nguyen The Tien’s findings, the
rate of hyper-triglyceridemia during treatment
ranged from 17.2% - 28.2%, hypercholesterolemia during treatment ranged
from 5.7% - 17.7% [5]. Our adverse effects
were also completely consistent with the
warning of the Ministry of Health [3].
6 trang |
Chia sẻ: hachi492 | Lượt xem: 7 | Lượt tải: 0
Bạn đang xem nội dung tài liệu Evaluation of the efficiency of tenofovir + lamivudine + lopinavir/ritonavir regimen in hiv/aids patients with first line treatment failure in Hai Phong (6/2012 - 6/2019), để tải tài liệu về máy bạn click vào nút DOWNLOAD ở trên
T¹p chÝ y - d−îc häc qu©n sù sè 8-2020
116
EVALUATION OF THE EFFICIENCY OF TENOFOVIR +
LAMIVUDINE + LOPINAVIR/RITONAVIR REGIMEN IN HIV/AIDS
PATIENTS WITH FIRST LINE TREATMENT FAILURE
IN HAI PHONG (6/2012 - 6/2019)
Tran Thi Thoa1, Nguyen Minh Nam2, Hoang Tien Tuyen2
SUMMARY
Objectives: To evaluate the efficiency and safety of tenofovir + lamivudine +
lopinavir/ritonavir regimen in HIV/AIDS patients with first-line treatment failure. Subjects and
methods: Retrospective and prospective cohort studies on 55 patients with virological failure of
first-line regimens (ZDV + 3TC + NVP or ZDV + 3TC + EFV), switched to TDF +3TC + LPV/r at
Viet Tiep Hospital from June 2012 to June 2019. Results: Virologic failure (HIV-RNA
> 1,000 copies/mL): was not well etablished at 6, 12 and 24 months after the end of therapy.
Mean CD4 cell count increased significantly in W24 (368 ± 102 cell/mm3) compared with W0
(150 ± 136 cell/mm3). The most common side effect of TDF + 3TC + LPV/r was mild to
moderate: diarrhea (29.1%), fatigue (18.2%). Dyslipidemia occurred at all times and the
proportion of patients with dyslipidemia after treatment was higher than starting. Conclusions:
TDF + 3TC + LPV/r showed clinical, virological and immunological effectiveness in patients with
first-line treatment failure.
* Keywords: ARV; First-line regimen; HIV/AIDS; Treatment failure.
INTRODUCTION
Since 2011, the 1c/1d regimen: AZT +
3TC + NVP/EFV was one of the initial
ARV regimens recommended by the Ministry
of Health for treating naive HIV/AIDS
patients. However, some patients with
prolonged treatment appeared treatment
failure, of which viral failure was the leading
cause. Second-line ARV regimen: TDF +
3TC + LVP/r was an alternative regimen
[1]. To evaluate the efficacy, as well as
the side effects of TDF + 3TC + LVP/r
regimen, we conducted this study: To
evaluate the efficacy and determine the
side effects of TDF + 3TC + LPV/r
regimen in HIV/AIDS patients with virological
failure with 1c/1d regimen.
1Department of Infectious Diseases, Hai Phong University of Medicine and Pharmacy
2Department of Infectious Diseases, Military Hospital 103, Vietnam Military Medical University
Corresponding author: Hoang Tien Tuyen (hoangtuyena5@gmail.com)
Date received: 14/8/2020
Date accepted: 14/10/2020
T¹p chÝ y - d−îc häc qu©n sù sè 8-2020
117
SUBJECTS AND METHODS
1. Subjects, place and time of study
Our study included 55 HIV/AIDS
patients who had virological treatment
failure with first-line regimens (ZDV + 3TC
+ NVP) or 1d (ZDV + 3TC + EFV), then
were switched to second line regimen
(TDF + 3TC + LPV/r) and treated at
Outpatient Clinic, Viet Tiep Friendship
Hospital, Hai Phong from 6/2012 - 6/2019.
* Inclusion criteria:
- HIV/AIDS patients who had virological
treatment failure according to the criteria
of the Ministry of Health (2015) [2]. The
plasma viral load was > 5,000 copies/mL
(patients had been treated before 2016);
more than 1,000 copies/mL of plasma
(patients have been treated since 2016)
on two consecutive viral tests 3 months
apart in patients who have been on ARV
for at least 6 months.
- Age from 18 - 60.
* Exclusion criteria:
- Patients did not cooperate and
comply with treatment.
- Pregnant women.
- Renal diseases (glomerular filtration
rate < 10 mL/minute).
- Uncontrolled hypertension.
* Research materials:
- Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF):
300 mg tablets, 1 capsule/day.
- Lamivudine (3TC): 150 mg capsule,
take 2 capsules daily, 1 pill in the morning,
1 pill in the evening, 12 hours apart.
- Aluvia (lopinavir/ritonavir) (LPV/r):
200 mg/50 mg tablets, take 4 capsules/day,
2 pills in the morning, 2 pills in the evening,
12 hours apart.
- Drugs were provided by the PEPFAR
program, manufactured in India.
2. Methods
* Study design: Descriptive case study,
including 46 retrospective patients from
2012 and 9 prospective patients from
February to June 2019.
All patients were registered according
to the unified form
* Research targets:
+ Average age, age group; clinical
symptoms before and after each month of
treatment.
+ The viral load was measured with
Roche Diagnostic Firm COBAS®
AmpliPre/COBAS® TaqMan® HIV,
performed at the Department of
Microbiology, Bach Mai Hospital.
Detection threshold ≥ 40 copies/mL.
+ The number of lymphocytes TCD4
was performed with Cyflow SL3 at Viet
Tiep Friendship Hospital, according to the
flow cell counting principles.
The tests were done at the time of
before and the end of 6, 12, 18, 24 months
of treatment.
- Criteria for evaluating treatment failure:
+ Viral failure: HIV-RNA load > 1,000
copies/mL at 6 months of treatment.
+ Immunological failure: The number of
TCD4 at the time of testing was equal
to or lower than the number of TCD4
before treatment with ARV or the number
of lymphocytes TCD4 were less than
100 cells/mm3 at two consecutive tests
(6 months apart) and no recent etiology of
infection caused a decrease in TCD4.
+ Clinical failure: New onset or relapse
of clinical stage 4 after at least 6 months
of treatment with ARV.
* Data processing: By SPSS software
version 20.0.
T¹p chÝ y - d−îc häc qu©n sù sè 8-2020
118
RESULTS
Table 1: Some clinical and subclinical characteristics of pre-treatment.
Targets n = 55
Age (X̅ ± SD; min - max) (years) 41.3 ± 7.6 (18 - 60)
Age group from 31 - 50 (n, %) 49 (89.1)
Male (n, %) 40 (72.7)
BMI (X̅ ± SD; min - max) (kg/m2) 19.3 ± 2.4 (13.68 - 24.46)
1 35 (63.6)
2 2 (3.7)
3 6 (10.9)
Clinical stage
(n, %)
4 12 (21.8)
Hb < 120 g/L (n, %) 29 (52.7)
ALT > 1.25 ULN (n, %) 9/29 (31.1)
Creatinin > 120 µmol/L (n, %) 0 (0.0)
Cholesterol > 6.2 mmol/L (n, %) 1 (1.8)
TCD4 (X̅ ± SD; min - max) (cells/mm3) 150 ± 136 (11 - 375)
HIV-RNA > 1,000 copies/mL (n,%)
(X̅ ± SD; min - max) (copies/mL)
55 (100.0)
131,262 ± 225,536 (1,100 - 812,000)
The average BMI was in the low limit of normal values (19.3 ± 2.4 kg/m2), clinical
stage 4 was only available in 21.8% of patients; 100% of patients had viral load more
than 1,000 copies/mL, the lowest viral load was 1,100 copies/mL, the average number
of TCD4 was low (150 ± 136 cells/mm3), the lowest TCD4 was 11 cells/mm3.
Table 2: Clinical response during the treatment.
Time of treatment
Targets
T0 (a)
(n = 55)
T6 (b)
(n = 55)
T12 (c)
(n = 45)
T24 (d)
(n = 36) pb,c,d-a
BMI (kg/m2) (X̅ ± SD) 19.3 ± 2.4 21.2 ± 2.6 21.3 ± 1.9 21.7 ± 2.1 < 0.05
1 35 (63.6) 44 (80.0) 41 (91.4) 34 (94.9)
2 2 (3.7) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0)
3 6 (10.9) 3 (5.5) 2 (3.3) 0 (0.0)
Clinical stage
(n, %)
4 12 (21.8) 8 (14.5) 2 (3.3) 2 (5.1)
< 0.05
The average BMI improved to the high limit of normal range at the end of 6 months
of treatment and remained stable at the end of 12 and 24 months of treatment.
The difference between before and after treatment was statistically significant with p < 0.05.
Similar to the clinical stage of the disease, there was a clear improvement at the time T6.
At the time T24, there were 94.9% of patients in the clinical stage 1 and 5.1% of patients
still in the clinical stage 4.
T¹p chÝ y - d−îc häc qu©n sù sè 8-2020
119
Table 3: Virological response during the treatment.
HIV-RNA (VL)
(copies /mL)
T0
(n = 55)
T6
(n = 55)
T12
(n = 45)
T24
(n = 36) p24-0
Below the threshold VL ≤ 40 0 (0.0) 42 (76.4) 39 (86.7) 33 (91.7)
40 < VL ≤ 1,000 0 (0.0) 13 (23.6) 6 (13.3) 2 (5.6)
> 1,000 55 (100.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 1 (2.8)
< 0.05
The virological response (VL < 1,000 copies/mL plasma) occurred in 100% of patients
at the end of 6 months of treatment, of which 76.4% were below the detection threshold.
There were no patients with viral failures at T12 and T24.
Figure 1: Immune response during the treatment.
The average number of CD4 cells improved after 6 months and increased significantly
at the end of 24 months after treatment (368 ± 102 cells/mm3), the difference was
statistically significant with p < 0.05.
Table 4: Clinical side effects in patients treated with TDF + 3TC + LPV/r.
Time of treatment
Symptoms
T0 T6 T12 T24
Total
(n = 55)
Percentage (%)
Diarrhea 0 16 0 0 16 29.1
Fatigue 0 10 0 0 10 18.2
Nausea, vomiting 0 10 0 0 10 18.2
Headache 0 4 0 0 4 7.3
Abdominal pain 0 5 0 0 5 9.1
Skin rash 0 2 0 0 2 3.6
The most common symptom was diarrhea (29.1%), time of appearance was
28.4 ± 26.7 days. Fatigue, nausea, skin rash, headache occured with incidence of less
than 20% and appeared within the first week of treatment.
T¹p chÝ y - d−îc häc qu©n sù sè 8-2020
120
Table 5: Side effects in patients treated with TDF + 3TC + LPV/r.
Time of treatment
Symptoms (n, %) T0 (a) T6 (b) T12 (c) T24 (d) pb,c,d-a
Hb < 120 g/L 29/55 (52.7) 19/55 (34.5) 6/45 (13.3) 2/36 (5.6) < 0.05
Creatinin > 120 µmol/L 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0)
ALT > 40 U/L 9/29 (31.1) 9/24 (37.5) 10/27 (37.0) 11/29 (37.9) > 0.05
Triglycerid > 4.5 mmol/L 4/55 (7.3) 7/55 (12.7) 9/45 (20.0) 5/36 (13.8) > 0.05
Cholesterol > 6.2 mmol/L 1/55 (1.8) 6/55 (10.9) 8/45 (17.8) 4/36 (11.1) > 0.05
The number of anemia patients decreased significantly following the time of treatment.
The number of patients with triglyceride > 4.5 mmol/L and cholesterol > 6.2 mmol/L
increased by the time of treatment, but there was no statistical significance between
the time points.
DISCUSSION
In Hai Phong, Vietnam-Czech Hospital
had a lot of HIV/AIDS patients managed,
monitored and treated with ZDV + 3TC +
NVP/EFV regimen, many of whom had
viral treatment failure and were transferred
to TDF + 3TC + LPV/r regimen. To accurately
assess the therapeutic effect and undesirable
effects of TDF + 3TC + LPV/r, we
selected 55 patients who met the study
criteria. On the basis of statistical data,
the average age of patients was 41.3 ±
7.6 (18 - 60), the age group from 31 - 50
accounted for 89.1%; 63.6% of patients in
clinical stage 1, 52.7% of patients with
moderate anemia, the average viral load
was 131,262 ± 225,536 (1,100 - 812,000),
the average number of TCD4 was 150 ±
136 cells/mm3 (11 - 375 cells/mm3). Pham
Ba Hien's study (2018) on 393 patients
who failed with first-line regimens and
were transferred to second-line regimens
in Hanoi showed that: The average age
was 32.74 ± 7.49, the age group 31 - 50
accounted for the majority (60.3%).
Among 43 patients treated with second-
line regimens, only 6.9% of patients was
in clinical stage 1 and had an average
TCD4 count of 100 ± 6.3 cells/mm3 (12 -
317 cells/mm3) [4]. In terms of data
differences, we found that the patients
adhered to counseling and treatment. The
data in our study of viral treatment failure
with first line regimen were similar to
Pham Ba Hien’s findings.
Assessing the effectiveness of the TDF
+ 3TC + LVP/r regimen at 6, 12, 24 months
after treatment, the results showed that:
The virological response was found in
100% of patients at all times, below the
detection threshold was 76.4%, 86.7%
and 91.7%, respectively. Similarly, 100%
of patients had an immune response and
increased over time, specifically, the
average number of TCD4 was 231, 298,
368 cells/mm3, respectively. Clinical response
increased: After 6 months of treatment,
there was up to 80.0% of patients in clinical
stage 1, and 94.9% after 24 months.
Unfortunately, there was 5.1% of patients
did not show any improvement in clinical
response even despite of the virological
response. Pham Ba Hien’s research
T¹p chÝ y - d−îc häc qu©n sù sè 8-2020
121
(2018) showed that the viral responses at
the respective times were 100%, 100%
and 97.6%. Research by Laurent F (2010)
in Cambodia showed that the average
number of TCD4 cells were 197, 258 and
372 cells/mm3, respectively [6]. This result
allows confirming the effectiveness of the
regimen if the patient adheres to therapy
Evaluation of side effects of TDF +
3TC + LPV/r regimen, we found that:
Diarrhea accounted for the highest 29.1%,
followed by fatigue 18.2%, headache 7.3%,
nausea, vomiting 18.2%, abdominal pain
9.1%, skin rash 3.6%. According to
Nguyen The Tien (2015): Diarrhea (29.3%),
nausea (13.8%), fatigue (13.8%), headache
(10.3%), abdominal pain and vomiting
(8.6% and 5.2%) [5]. Hypercholesterolemia
disorders ranged from 4.6% - 15.3%,
triglyceride hyperactivity ranged from
10.8% - 18.4%. Our research results were
similar to Nguyen The Tien’s findings, the
rate of hyper-triglyceridemia during treatment
ranged from 17.2% - 28.2%, hyper-
cholesterolemia during treatment ranged
from 5.7% - 17.7% [5]. Our adverse effects
were also completely consistent with the
warning of the Ministry of Health [3].
CONCLUSION
- TDF + 3TC + LVP/r regimen was a
highly effective ARV regimen. Specifically:
100% of patients had a virological response,
improved immune response at the time of
evaluation, 92.7% patients had clinical
response at the end of 24 months of
treatment.
- TDF + 3TC + LVP/r regimen caused
some side effeccts such as diarrhea,
headache, fatigue, nausea, and abdominal
pain. Increasing cholesterol, triglycerides -
metabolic disorders occured in some patients
and increased by the time of treatment.
REFERENCES
1. Bộ Y tế. Sửa đổi, bổ sung một số nội
dung trong “Hướng dẫn chẩn đoán và điều trị
HIV/AIDS” của Quyết định số 3003/QĐ-BYT,
Quyết định 4139 ban hành ngày 02/11/2011
của Bộ trưởng Bộ Y tế 2011.
2. Bộ Y tế. Hướng dẫn quản lý, điều trị và
chăm sóc HIV/AIDS. Ban hành kèm theo
Quyết định số 3047/QĐ-BYT ngày 22/07/2017
của Bộ trưởng Bộ Y tế 2015.
3. Bộ Y tế. Quyết định về việc ban hành
hướng dẫn theo phản ứng có hại của thuốc
kháng HIV (ARV) trong chương trình phòng,
chống HIV/AIDS, Quyết định số 107/QĐ AIDS
2014.
4. Phạm Bá Hiền. Nghiên cứu kháng thuốc
ở bệnh nhân HIV/AIDS thất bại với phác đồ
Zidovudine + Lamivudine + Nevirapine,
Stavudine + Lamivudine + Nevirapine và hiệu
quả điều trị của phác đồ ARV bậc 2. Luận án
Tiến sĩ Y học. Học viện Quân y 2018.
5. Nguyễn Thế Tiến. Đánh giá hiệu quả
điều trị của phác đồ TDF + 3TC + LPV/r ở
bệnh nhân HIV/AIDS thất bại với phác đồ
kháng vi rút bậc 1 tại Hà Nội. Luận văn
Chuyên khoa Cấp 2. Học viện Quân y 2015.
6. Laurent F, Vara O, et al. High efficacy of
lopinavir/r-based second-line antiretroviral
treatment after 24 months of follow up at
ESTHER/Calmette Hospital in Phnom Penh,
Cambodia. Journal of the International AIDS
Society 2011; 14:14.
Số đặc biệt Chào mừng Kỷ niệm 65 năm Ngày Truyền thống Bộ môn - Khoa
Truyền nhiễm, Bệnh viện Quân y 103 - Học viện Quân y (20/2/1956 - 20/2/2021)
Các file đính kèm theo tài liệu này:
evaluation_of_the_efficiency_of_tenofovir_lamivudine_lopinav.pdf