Tài chính doanh nghiệp - Chapter 1: Dividend policy

Chapter 12Dividend PolicyLearning GoalsUnderstand cash dividend payment procedures, the tax treatment of dividends, and the role of dividend reinvestment plans.Describe the residual theory of dividends and the key arguments with regard to dividend irrelevance and relevance.Discuss the key factors involved in establishing a dividend policy.2Copyright © 2006 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.Learning Goals (cont.)Review and evaluate the three basic types of dividend policies.Evaluate stock dividends from accounting, shareholder, and company points of view.Explain stock splits and stock repurchases and the firm’s motivation for undertaking each of them.3Copyright © 2006 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.Dividend FundamentalsA dividend is a redistribution from earnings.Most companies maintain a dividend policy whereby they pay a regular dividend on a quarterly basis.Some companies pay an extra dividend to reward shareholders if they’ve had a particularly good year. Many companies pay dividends according to a preset payout ratio, which measures the proportion of dividends to earnings.Many companies have paid regular dividends for over a hundred years. 4Copyright © 2006 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.Dividend Fundamentals (cont.)Dividend growth tends to lag behind earnings growth for most corporations (see next slide).Since dividend policy is one of the factors that drives an investor’s decision to purchase a stock, most companies announce their dividend policy and telegraph any expected changes in policy to the public.Therefore, it can be seen that many companies use their dividend policy to provide information not otherwise available to investors.5Copyright © 2006 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.In the financial press. Transactions in the stock on the ex dividend date are indicated by an “x” next to the volume of transactions. In general, stock prices fall by an amount equal to the quarterly dividend on the ex dividend date. Dividend Fundamentals: Cash Dividend Payment ProceduresDate of Record: The date on which investors must own shares in order to receive the dividend payment.Ex Dividend Date: Four days prior to the date of record. The day on which a stock trades ex dividend (exclusive of dividends).6Copyright © 2006 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.Dividend Fundamentals: Cash Dividend Payment Procedures (cont.)Date of Record: The date on which investors must own shares in order to receive the dividend payment.Ex Dividend Date: Four days prior to the date of record. The day on which a stock trades ex dividend (exclusive of dividends).Distribution Date: The day on which a dividend is paid (payment date) to stockholders. It is usually two or more weeks before stockholders who owned shares on the date of record receive their dividends. 7Copyright © 2006 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.ExampleAt the quarterly dividend meeting on June 10th, the Rudolf Company board of directors declared an $0.80 cash dividend for holders of record on Friday, July 2nd. The firm had 100,000 shares of stock outstanding. The payment (distribution) date was Monday, August 2nd. Before the meeting, the relevant accounts showed the following.Cash $200,000 Dividends Payable $ 0 Retained Earnings 1,000,000Dividend Fundamentals: Cash Dividend Payment Procedures (cont.)8Copyright © 2006 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.When the dividend was announced by the directors, $80,000 of the retained earnings ($.80/share x 100,000 shares) was transferred to the dividends payable account. As a result, the key accounts changed as follows:Cash $200,000 Dividends Payable $ 80,000 Retained Earnings 920,000Dividend Fundamentals: Cash Dividend Payment Procedures (cont.)9Copyright © 2006 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.Rudolf Company’s stock began selling ex dividend 2 business days prior to the date of record, which was Wednesday, June 30th. This date was found by subtracting 2 days from the July 2nd date of record. Purchasers of Rudolf’s stock on Tuesday, June 29th or earlier received the rights to the dividends; those who purchased the stock on or after June 30th did not. Assuming a stable market, Rudolf’s stock price was expected to drop by about $0.80 per share when it began selling ex dividend on June 30th. Dividend Fundamentals: Cash Dividend Payment Procedures (cont.)10Copyright © 2006 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.The net effect of the dividend payment is a reduction of the firm’s assets (through a reduction in cash) and equity (through a reduction in retained earnings) by a total of $80,000 (the dividend payment).Cash $120,000 Dividends Payable $ 0 Retained Earnings 920,000On August 2nd, the firm mailed dividend checks to shareholders of record as of July 20th. This produced the following balances in the key accounts of the firm.Dividend Fundamentals: Cash Dividend Payment Procedures (cont.)11Copyright © 2006 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.Dividend Fundamentals: Cash Dividend Payment Procedures (cont.)12Copyright © 2006 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.Dividend Fundamentals: Tax Treatment of DividendsThe Jobs and Growth Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2003 significantly changed the tax treatment of corporate dividends by dropping the tax rate to the rate applicable on capital gains, which has a maximum rate of 15%.Immediately after passage of the Act, many firms either initiated or increased dividends paid to their shareholders and this reduction in the degree of double taxation of dividends is expected to continue. 13Copyright © 2006 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.Dividend Reinvestment PlansDividend Reinvestment Plans (DRIPS) enable stockholders to use dividends received on the firm’s stock to acquire additional shares—even fractional shares—at little or no transaction cost.With DRIPS, plan participants typically can acquire shares at about 5 percent below the prevailing market prices.From its point of view, the firm can issue new shares to participants more economically, avoiding the under pricing and flotation costs that would accompany the public sale of new shares.14Copyright © 2006 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.Step 1: Determine the optimal level of capital expenditures which is given by the point of intersection of the investment opportunities schedule (IOS) and weighted marginal cost of capital schedule (WMCC).The Relevance of Dividend Policy: The Residual Theory of DividendsThe residual theory of dividends suggests that dividend payments should be viewed as residual—the amount left over after all acceptable investment opportunities have been undertaken.Using this approach, the firm would treat the dividend decision in three steps as follows:15Copyright © 2006 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.Step 2: Using the optimal capital structure proportions, estimate the total amount of equity financing needed to support the expenditures estimated in Step 1.Step 3: Because the cost of retained earnings is less than new equity, use retained earnings to meet the equity requirement in Step 2. If inadequate, sell new stock. If there is an excess of retained earnings, distribute the surplus amount—the residual—as dividends.The Relevance of Dividend Policy: The Residual Theory of Dividends (cont.)16Copyright © 2006 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.In sum, this theory suggests that no cash dividend is paid as long as the firm’s equity need is in excess of the amount of retained earnings.Furthermore, it suggests that the required return demanded by stockholders is not influenced by the firm’s dividend policy—a premise that in turn suggests that dividend policy is irrelevant.The Relevance of Dividend Policy: The Residual Theory of Dividends (cont.)17Copyright © 2006 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.Overbrook Industries, a manufacturer of canoes and other small watercraft, has available from the current period’s operations $1.8 million that can be retained or paid out in dividends. The firm’s optimal capital structure is 30% debt and 70% equity. Figure 13.2 depicts the firm’s WMCC schedule along with three investment opportunity schedules (IOSs). For each IOS, the level of total new financing or investment determined by the point of intersection of the IOS and the WMCC has been noted.The Relevance of Dividend Policy: The Residual Theory of Dividends (cont.)18Copyright © 2006 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.The Relevance of Dividend Policy: The Residual Theory of Dividends (cont.)19Copyright © 2006 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.Table 13.1 shows that if IOS1 exists, the firm will pay out $750,000 in dividends because only $1,050,000 of the $1,800,000 of available earnings is needed. The table also shows the dividend payouts associated with IOS2 and IOS3. Depending on which IOS exists, the firm’s dividend would in effect be the residual, if any, remaining after all acceptable investments have been financed.The Relevance of Dividend Policy: The Residual Theory of Dividends (cont.)20Copyright © 2006 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.The Relevance of Dividend Policy: The Residual Theory of Dividends (cont.)21Copyright © 2006 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.The Relevance of Dividend Policy: Arguments for Dividend IrrelevanceMerton Miller and Franco Modigliani (MM) developed a theory that shows that in perfect financial markets (certainty, no taxes, no transactions costs or other market imperfections), the value of a firm is unaffected by the distribution of dividends.They argue that value is driven only by the future earnings and risk of its investments.Retaining earnings or paying them in dividends does not affect this value.22Copyright © 2006 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.The Relevance of Dividend Policy: Arguments for Dividend Irrelevance (cont.)Some studies suggested that large dividend changes affect stock price behavior.MM argued, however, that these effects are the result of the information conveyed by these dividend changes, not to the dividend itself.Furthermore, MM argue for the existence of a “clientele effect.” Investors preferring dividends will purchase high dividend stocks, while those preferring capital gains will purchase low dividend paying stocks.23Copyright © 2006 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.1. The firm’s value is determined solely by the earning power and risk of its asset investments.2. If dividends do affect value, they do so because of the information content, which signals management’s future expectations. 3. A clientele effect exists that causes shareholders to receive the level of dividends they expect.The Relevance of Dividend Policy: Arguments for Dividend Irrelevance (cont.)In summary, MM and other dividend irrelevance proponents argue that—all else being equal—an investor’s required return, and therefore the value of the firm, is unaffected by dividend policy because:24Copyright © 2006 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.Contrary to dividend irrelevance proponents, Gordon and Lintner suggested stockholders prefer current dividends ant that a positive relationship exists between dividends and market value.Fundamental to this theory is the “bird-in-the-hand” argument which suggests that investors are generally risk-averse and attach less risk to current as opposed to future dividends or capital gains.Because current dividends are less risky, investors will lower their required return—thus boosting stock prices.The Relevance of Dividend Policy: Arguments for Dividend Irrelevance (cont.)25Copyright © 2006 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.Factors Affecting Dividend Policy: Legal ConstraintsMost state securities regulations prevent firms from paying out dividends from any portion of the company’s “legal capital” which is measured by the par value of common stock—or par value plus paid-in-capital.Dividends are also sometimes limited to the sum of the firm’s most recent and past retained earnings—although payments in excess of current earnings is usually permitted.Most states also prohibit dividends when firm’s have overdue liabilities, is legally insolvent, or bankrupt.26Copyright © 2006 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.Factors Affecting Dividend Policy: Legal Constraints (cont.)Even the IRS has ruled in the area of dividend policy.Specifically, the IRS prohibits firms from acquiring earnings to reduce stockholders’ taxes.I the IRS can determine that a firm has accumulated an excess of earnings to allow owners to delay paying ordinary income taxes (on dividends), it may levy an excess earnings accumulation tax on any retained earnings above $250,000 for most businesses.It should be noted, however, that this ruling is seldom applied.27Copyright © 2006 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.Factors Affecting Dividend Policy: Contractual ConstraintsIn many cases, companies are constrained in the extent to which they can pay dividends by restrictive provisions in loan agreements and bond indentures.Generally, these constraints prohibit the payment of cash dividends until a certain level of earnings are achieved or to a certain dollar amount or percentage of earnings.Any violation of these constraints generally trigger the demand for immediate payment.28Copyright © 2006 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.Factors Affecting Dividend Policy: Internal ConstraintsA company’s ability to pay dividends is usually constrained by the amount of available cash rather than the level of retained earnings against which to charge them.Although it is possible to borrow to pay dividends, lenders are usually reluctant to grant them because using the funds for this purpose produces not operating benefits that help to repay them.29Copyright © 2006 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.Factors Affecting Dividend Policy: Growth ProspectsNewer, rapidly-growing firms generally pay little or no dividends.Because these firms are growing so quickly, they must use most of their internally generated funds to support operations or finance expansion.On the other hand, large, mature firms generally pay cash dividends since they have access to adequate capital and may have limited investment opportunities.30Copyright © 2006 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.Factors Affecting Dividend Policy: Owner ConsiderationsThe firm must establish a policy that has a favorable effect on the wealth of the majority of its owners. If a firm has a large percentage of wealthy shareholders, it may decide to pay out a lower percentage of its earnings to allow them to delay the payment of taxes until they sell the stock.Because cash dividends are taxed at the same rate as capital gains, this strategy benefits owners through tax deferral rather than as a result of a lower tax rate.31Copyright © 2006 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.Factors Affecting Dividend Policy:Owner Considerations (cont.)A second consideration is the owner’s investment opportunities.A firm should not retain funds for investment projects yielding lower returns that the owners could obtain from external investments of equal risk.A final consideration is the potential dilution of ownership.If a firm pays out a high percentage of earnings, new equity capital will have to be raised with common stock.32Copyright © 2006 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.Factors Affecting Dividend Policy:Market ConsiderationsPerhaps the most important aspect of dividend policy is that the firm maintain a level of predictability.Stockholders that prefer dividend-paying stocks prefer a continuous stream of fixed or increasing dividends.Shareholders also view the firm’s dividend payment as a “signal” of the firm’s future prospects.Fixed or increasing dividends are often considered a “positive” signal, while erratic dividend payments are viewed as “negative” signals.33Copyright © 2006 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.Types of Dividend Policies:Constant-Payout-Ratio PolicyWith a constant-payout-ratio dividend policy, the firm establishes that a specific percentage of earnings is paid to shareholders each period.A major shortcoming of this approach is that if the firm’s earnings drop or are volatile, so too will be the dividend payments.As mentioned earlier, investors view volatile dividends as negative and risky—which can lead to lower share prices.34Copyright © 2006 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.Peachtree Industries, a miner of potassium, has a policy of paying out 40% of earnings in cash dividends. In the periods when a loss occurs, the firm’s policy is to pay no cash dividends. Types of Dividend Policies:Constant-Payout-Ratio Policy (cont.)35Copyright © 2006 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.Types of Dividend Policies:Regular Dividend PolicyA regular dividend policy is based on the payment of a fixed-dollar dividend each period.It provides stockholders with positive information indicating that the firm is doing well and it minimizes uncertainty.Generally, firms using this policy will increase the regular dividend once earnings are proven to be reliable.36Copyright © 2006 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.The dividend policy of Woodward Laboratories, a producer of a popular artificial sweetener, is to pay annual dividends of $1.00 per share until per-share earnings exceeded $4.00 for three consecutive years. At that point, the annual dividend is raised to $1.50 per share, and a new earnings plateau is established. The firm does not anticipate decreasing its dividend unless its liquidity is in jeopardy. Data for Woodward’s earnings, dividends, and average stock prices for the past 12 years follow.Types of Dividend Policies:Regular Dividend Policy (cont.)37Copyright © 2006 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.Types of Dividend Policies:Regular Dividend Policy (cont.)38Copyright © 2006 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.Types of Dividend Policies: Low-Regular-and-Extra Dividend PolicyUsing this policy, firms pay a low regular dividend, supplemented by additional dividends when earnings can support it.When earnings are higher than normal, the firm will pay this additional dividend, often called an extra dividend, without the obligation to maintain it during subsequent periods.This type of policy is often used by firms whose sales and earnings are susceptible to swings in the business cycle.39Copyright © 2006 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.Other Forms of Dividends: Stock DividendsA stock dividend is paid in stock rather than in cash.Many investors believe that stock dividends increase the value of their holdings. In fact, from a market value standpoint, stock dividends function much like stock splits. The investor ends up owning more shares, but the value of their shares is less.From a book value standpoint, funds are transferred from retained earnings to common stock and additional paid-in-capital. 40Copyright © 2006 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.The current stockholder’s equity on the balance sheet of Garrison Corporation, a distributor of prefabricated cabinets, is as shown in the following accounts.Other Forms of Dividends: Stock Dividends (cont)Accounting Aspects41Copyright © 2006 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.Other Forms of Dividends: Stock Dividends (cont)Accounting AspectsIf Garrison declares a 10% stock dividend and the current market price of the stock is $15/share, $150,000 of retained earnings (10% x 100,000 shares x $15/share) will be capitalized.The $150,000 will be distributed between the common stock (par) account and paid-in-capital in excess of par account based on the par value of the common stock. The resulting balances are as follows42Copyright © 2006 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.Other Forms of Dividends: Stock Dividends (cont)Accounting AspectsBecause 10,000 new shares (10% x 100,000) have been issued at the current price of $15/share, $150,000 ($15/share x 10,000 shares) is shifted from retained earnings to the common stock and paid-in-capital accounts.43Copyright © 2006 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.Other Forms of Dividends: Stock Dividends (cont)The Shareholder’s ViewpointFrom a shareholder’s perspective, stock dividends result in a dilution of shares owned.For example, assume a stockholder owned 100 shares at $20/share ($2,000 total) before a stock dividend.If the firm declares a 10% stock dividend, the shareholder will have 110 shares of stock. However, the total value of her shares will still be $2,000.Therefore, the value of her share must have fallen to $18.18/share ($2,000/110). 44Copyright © 2006 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.Other Forms of Dividends: Stock Dividends (cont)The Company’s ViewpointDisadvantages of stock dividends include:The cost of issuing the new sharesTaxes and listing fees on the new sharesOther recording costsAdvantages of stock dividends include:The company conserves needed cashSignaling effect to the shareholders that the firm is retaining cash because of lucrative investment opportunities45Copyright © 2006 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.Delphi Company, a forest products concern, had 200,000 shares of $2-par value common stock outstanding and declares a 2-for-1 split. The total before and after split impact on stockholders equity is:Other Forms of Dividends:Stock SplitsA stock split is a recapitalization that affects the number of shares outstanding, par value, earnings per share, and market price.The rationale for a stock split is that it lowers the price of the stock and makes it more attractive to individual investors46Copyright © 2006 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.Other Forms of Dividends:Stock Splits (cont.)47Copyright © 2006 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.Research on both stock splits and stock dividends generally supports the theory that they do not affect the value of shares.They are often used, however, to send a signal to investors that good things are going to happen.Other Forms of Dividends:Stock Splits (cont.)A reverse stock split reduces the number of shares outstanding and raises stock price—the opposite of a stock split.The rationale for a reverse stock split is to add respectability to the stock and convey the meaning that it isn’t a junk stock.48Copyright © 2006 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.Other Forms of Dividends:Stock RepurchasesA stock repurchase is the purchasing and retiring of stock by the issuing corporation.A repurchase is a partial liquidation since it decreases the number of shares outstanding.It may also be thought of as an alternative to cash dividends.49Copyright © 2006 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.Other Forms of Dividends:Stock Repurchases (cont.)Alternative reasons for stock repurchases:To use the shares for another purposeTo alter the firm’s capital structureTo increase EPS and ROE resulting in a higher market priceTo reduce the chance of a hostile takeover50Copyright © 2006 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.Other Forms of Dividends: Stock Repurchases Viewed as a Cash DividendThe repurchase of stock results in a type of reverse dilution.The net effect of the repurchase is similar to the payment of a cash dividend.However, if the firm pays the dividend, the owner would have to pay tax on the income.The gain on the increase in share price as a result of the repurchase, however, would not be taxed until sold.51Copyright © 2006 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.