III. INTRACRANIAL ATHEROSCLEROSIS -
RELATED LARGE VESSEL OCCLUSION
The development of modern imaging has
helped to identify underlying etiology of ischemic
stroke. However, a complete diagnostic workup
can be a waste of time. Clinical examinations offer
suggestions that can help quickly identify the cause
for an appropriate treatment strategy.
Acute intracranial atherosclerosis–related large
vessel occlusion (ICAS - LVO) has high failure rate
of mechanical thrombectomy and is often required
specific rescue treatments. Thus this will prolong
the procedure time leading to a poor outcome [25].
Therefore, determining whether there is intracranial
atherosclerotic disease in order to offer a optimal
treatment strategy is a key factor for improving
treatment outcomes [26].
A typical case of ischemic stroke due to large
vessel disease (including the carotid artery and the
intracranial artery) typically has a stepwise clinical
course, symptoms appear and recurrent on the same
side. The patients usually have other risk factors for
atherosclerotic disease such as diabetes, overweight,
hypertension, smoking and a history of coronary
artery disease and no obvious cause of embolism
such as atrial fibrillation or heart valve disease.
IV. ACUTE STROKE DIFFERENTIAL
DIAGNOSIS: STROKE MIMICS
The earlier the patient is treated with tPA, the
more effective the patient will receive [27]. However,
attempts to shorten door-to-needle time may
inadvertently prescribe tPA to stroke mimics patients
(4.1%) [28]. The most worrying adverse effects of
tPA are of intracerebral hemorrhage and angioedema.
Intracerebral hemorrhage can still occur in stroke
mimic patients receiving tPA, although this rate is
not high (1.2% vs 5.1% in patients with cerebral
infarction) [28,29]. Angioedema is seen in 0.5% of
patients [29]. Economy is also a problem need to be
mentioned if using the drug not in the indication.
The most common types were functional disorder
(30.8%), migraine (17.5%) and seizure (14.2%)
[28]. Depending on the cause, the clinical picture
of stroke patient will vary. Experienced neurologists
can quickly identify stroke mimic cases. In general,
the manifestations of mimic will not follow vascular
neuroanatomy. Gaze palsy, neglect, hemianopia
and facial paralysis are not presented in patients
with stroke mimic. On the other hand, aphasia not
accompany by weakness is more common in stroke
mimic [30].
7 trang |
Chia sẻ: hachi492 | Lượt xem: 12 | Lượt tải: 0
Bạn đang xem nội dung tài liệu The role of clinical evaluation in the era of cerebral reperfusion, để tải tài liệu về máy bạn click vào nút DOWNLOAD ở trên
Hue Central Hospital
Journal of Clinical Medicine - No. 62/2020 99
THE ROLE OF CLINICAL EVALUATION
IN THE ERA OF CEREBRAL REPERFUSION
Tran Duc Anh1, Duong Dang Hoa1, Doan Quoc Hoai Phuong1
DOI: 10.38103/jcmhch.2020.62.17
ASTRACT
The role of clinical evaluation in the diagnosis and treatment of acute ischemic stroke remains unclear
in current guidelines. The manifestations of stroke are diverse, so that the approach to evaluation and
treatment are not the same for each patient. In this article, we review the role of neurological examination in
diagnosis and treatment of acute stroke. In particular, the important content includes identification of large
vessel occlusions, posterior circulation stroke, intracranial artery stenosis and expansion of the therapeutic
window time for patients who are late to hospital.
Key words: cerebral reperfusion, acute stroke
1. Hue Central Hospital Corresponding author: Tran Duc Anh
Email: tranducanh211@gmail.com
Received: 8/5/2020; Revised: 17/5/2020
Accepted: 20/6/2020
I. INTRODUCTION
Treatment of acute ischemic stroke has made
great strides in recent years. Cerebrovascular
revascularization with thrombolytic agents and
intraarterial thrombectomy has been shown to
improve the function of patients with acute stroke
and has become the standard treatment [1]. The
indications of tissue plasminogen activator (tPA)
and mechanical thrombectomy are quite simple,
mainly based on the time window, the severity of
clinical symptoms relied on NIHSS, imaging studies
and the exclusion of contraindications [1].
However, the manifestations of stroke are
diverse and not the same for every patient. In the
era of cerebral reperfusion, shortening the time to
recanalization becomes the top goal. In order to
do this, a quick and accurate clinical evaluation is
needed to determine whether or not large vessel
occlusions, posterior circulation stroke and whether
intracranial arterial stenosis is underlying cause. By
answering these key questions, emergency, stroke
physicians and interventionalist can provide optimal
strategies to shorten the duration of treatment with
final aim to improve patient outcome.
II. THE ROLE OF EARLY IDENTIFICA-
TION STROKE TYPES TO MAKE TIMELY
DECISIONS
2.1. Large vessel occlusion
What is the role of early LVOs identification?
Large vessel occlusions (LVOs), variably defined
as blockages of the proximal intracranial anterior
and posterior circulation. Commonly refractory
to intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (tPA),
LVOs place large cerebral territories at ischemic
risk and cause high rates of morbidity and mortality
Bệnh viện Trung ương Huế
100 Journal of Clinical Medicine - No. 62/2020
without further treatment. Over the past few years,
an abundance of high-quality data has demonstrated
the efficacy of endovascular thrombectomy for
improving clinical outcomes in patients with LVOs,
transforming the treatment algorithm for affected
patients [2,3].
Early identification of patients with suspected
LVOs in the EDs can help to triage and provide
accurate and appropriate treatment. In particular,
in low-resource settings, performing brain
angiography for all patients with acute stroke seems
to be infeasible [4]. Therefore, screening clinically
can be an economic benefit as well as reducing the
workload for healthcare workers. In facilities that
have not been able to implement the intervention,
patients can be immediately transferred to
thrombectomy-capable centers.
In the ED, under certain circumstances when
identifying or suspecting LVO after a excluding
brain hemorrhage by NCCT, the physician may
contact the interventionalist in advance or send
patients straight to the Angio suite, without
providing or providing tPA in the Angio suite. This
will help shorten the time to recanalization. In some
places, stroke patients admitted to the hospital
with highly clinical suspicion of LVO are referred
directly to the Cath lab (without NCCT to rule out
hemorrhage) [5].
How to identify LVOs clinically?
The most common clinical scale for stroke is
the NIHSS. A number of cut-off points has been
introduced with the purpose of predicting LVOs, but
its sensitivity and specificity are still low [6].
A case of small vessel occlusion in the internal
capsular or basilar pons territory can result in stroke
with higher than 8-point NIHSS with complete limb
paralysis and severe dyspnea. Symptoms caused
by cortical damage such as aphasia, neglect, gaze
palsy or visual field deficit are associated with
LVOs. Based on the nature of the above symptoms
associated with the occurrence of conditions such as
atrial fibrillation or valvular heart disease, a number
of scales have been proposed by many authors
to predict the possibility of LVOs with higher
sensitivity and specificity (Table 1).
However, just by comprehending the vascular
neuroanatomy, the clinician can quickly identify
LVOs. In addition, if the symptoms are subtle and
difficult to detect, it may require an experienced
neurologist to identify.
Table 1: Clinical scales to detect large vessel occlusions [7 - 12]
No. of
Pts Components SEN % SPEC %
3I-SS 171 Level of consciousness, gaze deviation, motor function 67 92
FAST-ED 727 Facial palsy, arm weakness, speech changes, gaze deviation, neglect 60 89
RACE 357 Facial palsy, motor function, gaze deviation, aphasia, agnosia 85 68
PASS 3127 Level of consciousness, gaze deviation, arm weakness 66 83
VAN 62 Arm weakness, visual disturbance, aphasia, neglect 100 90
GAI2AA 259 Gaze deviation, aphasia, neglect, arm
weakness, atrial fibrillation
91 81
The role of clinical evaluation...
Hue Central Hospital
Journal of Clinical Medicine - No. 62/2020 101
2.2. Extending therapeutic window for late
presenting patient
Mechanism of reperfusion therapy is to
reestablish blood flow to the ischemic penumbra
where viable cells can be salvage and restore
function. The selection of patients is to choose
those who have large penumbra areas compared
to infarction core. The volume of penumbra will
gradually decrease over time. Large studies have
established treatment window for intravenous tPA
and mechanical thrombectomy 4.5 hours and 6
hours, respectively.
Infarct core can be identified on MRI. If the
clinical symptoms of the patient are severe but the
infarction core is small, then the penumbra will be
large. This is the fundamental of treatment window
expansion for late presenting patient. In 2018,
DAWN and DEFUSE 3 are two RCTs published
to expand the time window of treatment for LVO
patients coming late [13,14].
DEFUSE 3 using a high-standard modern
perfusion imaging is not available in many
centers. Meanwhile, DAWN uses clinical and MRI
mismatch as criteria which is more readily available.
Therefore, for patients who are late, if NCCT is not
shown hypodensity, adequate clinical examination
is needed to assess whether the patient has LVO or
not to order emergency MRI.
The visible infarction region on the MRI is an
irreversible necrotic area. If the patient has severe
clinical manifestations that cannot be explained
by an MRI lesion, there could be a salvageable
tissue. Therefore, the localization of lesions may
be of value in selection as well as prognosis of
patients for thrombectomy. According to this
argument, instead of selecting patients by the
volume numbers according to the MRI study,
this can be based on this. The fact that there has
been some analysis indicates that many patients
may benefit even if the volume exceeds DAWN’s
selection criteria [15,16].
2.3. Posterior circulation stroke
The presentation of posterior cerebral stroke
(PCS) is quite vague and varied especially at the
beginning, a patient with posterior circulation
stroke may still have 0-point NIHSS although the
symptom can cause significant disability [17]. As a
result, the rate of misdiagnosis of stroke in posterior
circulation in the emergency department is double
that of the anterior circulation (37% and 16%) [18].
If not diagnosed in time, PCS can lead to severe
outcomes [19].
It is not easy to diagnose a case of PCS, the
first is to identify the suspected symptoms, the key
here is establishing an abrupt onset of symptoms,
awareness of the nonspecific presentations and
consideration of basilar stroke in altered patients
[20]. Then evaluate more carefully and order the
appropriate imaging study [21,22].
However, in terms of imaging, the MRI with DWI
can miss 12% to 18% case of PCS. For those with
small strokes, the false-negative rate even reaches
53%. [22]. Meanwhile, physical examination using
HINTS (head impulse test, nystagmus and test of
skew) was 100% sensitive and 96% specificity in
differentiating neuritis from stroke [21].
Dizziness is a common reason for the ED admission
and is also an independent risk factor for misdiagnosis
[18]. Because these symptoms are so common, even
the small fraction of misdiagnosed patients translates
into a large absolute number. Recent evidence
suggests that the time-honored “symptom quality”
approach to dizziness (i.e., “what do you mean,
dizzy?”) is flawed. Despite a weak evidence base,
this approach has been the predominant paradigm for
decades; an approach based on “timing and triggers”
is more evidence-based [23,24]. Systematically
performing a neurologic examination that targets the
visual fields, cranial nerves, and cerebellar function
including gait is one strategy to reduce misdiagnosis
in these patients.
Bệnh viện Trung ương Huế
102 Journal of Clinical Medicine - No. 62/2020
Figure 1: Diagnostic approach to the acutely dizzy patient [23]
ATTEST = A, associated symptoms; TT, timing and triggers; ES, examination signs; and T, additional
testing as needed; AVS = acute vestibular syndrome; BPPV = benign paroxysmal positional vertigo; CPPV
= central paroxysmal positional vertigo; s-EVS = spontaneous episodic vestibular syndrome; t-EVS = trig-
gered episodic vestibular syndrome; TIA = transient ischemic attack.
III. INTRACRANIAL ATHEROSCLEROSIS -
RELATED LARGE VESSEL OCCLUSION
The development of modern imaging has
helped to identify underlying etiology of ischemic
stroke. However, a complete diagnostic workup
can be a waste of time. Clinical examinations offer
suggestions that can help quickly identify the cause
for an appropriate treatment strategy.
Acute intracranial atherosclerosis–related large
vessel occlusion (ICAS - LVO) has high failure rate
of mechanical thrombectomy and is often required
specific rescue treatments. Thus this will prolong
the procedure time leading to a poor outcome [25].
Therefore, determining whether there is intracranial
atherosclerotic disease in order to offer a optimal
treatment strategy is a key factor for improving
treatment outcomes [26].
A typical case of ischemic stroke due to large
vessel disease (including the carotid artery and the
intracranial artery) typically has a stepwise clinical
course, symptoms appear and recurrent on the same
side. The patients usually have other risk factors for
atherosclerotic disease such as diabetes, overweight,
hypertension, smoking and a history of coronary
artery disease and no obvious cause of embolism
such as atrial fibrillation or heart valve disease.
IV. ACUTE STROKE DIFFERENTIAL
DIAGNOSIS: STROKE MIMICS
The earlier the patient is treated with tPA, the
more effective the patient will receive [27]. However,
attempts to shorten door-to-needle time may
inadvertently prescribe tPA to stroke mimics patients
(4.1%) [28]. The most worrying adverse effects of
The role of clinical evaluation...
ATTEST: Diagnostic approach to the acutely dizzy patient
Hue Central Hospital
Journal of Clinical Medicine - No. 62/2020 103
tPA are of intracerebral hemorrhage and angioedema.
Intracerebral hemorrhage can still occur in stroke
mimic patients receiving tPA, although this rate is
not high (1.2% vs 5.1% in patients with cerebral
infarction) [28,29]. Angioedema is seen in 0.5% of
patients [29]. Economy is also a problem need to be
mentioned if using the drug not in the indication.
The most common types were functional disorder
(30.8%), migraine (17.5%) and seizure (14.2%)
[28]. Depending on the cause, the clinical picture
of stroke patient will vary. Experienced neurologists
can quickly identify stroke mimic cases. In general,
the manifestations of mimic will not follow vascular
neuroanatomy. Gaze palsy, neglect, hemianopia
and facial paralysis are not presented in patients
with stroke mimic. On the other hand, aphasia not
accompany by weakness is more common in stroke
mimic [30].
V. CONCLUSION
Imaging has flourished and has become a powerful
tool for stroke physician. However, in the age of
cerebral revascularization, clinical examination and
neurolocalization play an important role in quickly
detect cases of LVO, PCS, and ICAS-LVO as well
as rule out stroke mimics.
In 2005, Shafqat stated that “the advent of
modern neuroimaging has liberated neurology from
the shackles of cerebral localization” [31]. This
statement is true. However, until 2020, clinical
value is still there and perhaps imaging will never
replace the role of neurological examination and
neurolocalization.
REFERENCES
1. Powers WJ, Rabinstein AA, Ackerson T,
Adeoye OM, Bambakidis NC, Becker K, et
al. Guidelines for the Early Management of
Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke: 2019
Update to the 2018 Guidelines for the Early
Management of Acute Ischemic Stroke: A
Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the
American Heart Association/American Stroke
Association. Stroke 2019; 50: e344 - e418.
2. Bhatia R, Hill MD, Shobha N, Menon B,
Bal S, Kochar P, et al. Low rates of acute
recanalization with intravenous recombinant
tissue plasminogen activator in ischemic stroke:
real-world experience and a call for action.
Stroke 2010; 41: 2254 - 2258.
3. Goyal M, Menon BK, van Zwam WH,
Dippel DW, Mitchell PJ, Demchuk AM, et al.
Endovascular thrombectomy after large-vessel
ischaemic stroke: a meta-analysis of individual
patient data from five randomised trials. The
Lancet 2016; 387: 1723 - 1731.
4. Burke JF. Cost and utility in the diagnostic
evaluation of stroke. Continuum: Lifelong
Learning in Neurology 2014; 20: 436.
5. Ribo M, Boned S, Rubiera M, Tomasello A,
Coscojuela P, Hernández D, et al. Direct transfer
to angiosuite to reduce door-to-puncture time in
thrombectomy for acute stroke. 2018; 10: 221 - 224.
6. Heldner MR, Hsieh K, Broeg-Morvay A,
Mordasini P, Bühlmann M, Jung S, et al.
Clinical prediction of large vessel occlusion in
anterior circulation stroke: mission impossible?
Journal of neurology 2016; 263: 1633 - 1640.
7. Pérez de la Ossa N, Carrera D, Gorchs M,
Querol M, Millán M, Gomis M, et al. Design
and validation of a prehospital stroke scale to
predict large arterial occlusion: the rapid arterial
occlusion evaluation scale. 2014; 45: 87 - 91.
8. Teleb MS, Ver Hage A, Carter J, Jayaraman MV,
McTaggart RAJJons. Stroke vision, aphasia,
neglect (VAN) assessment - a novel emergent
large vessel occlusion screening tool: pilot study
and comparison with current clinical severity
indices. 2017;9:122-126
Bệnh viện Trung ương Huế
104 Journal of Clinical Medicine - No. 62/2020
9. Ohta T, Nakahara I, Matsumoto S, Kondo D,
Watanabe S, Okada K, et al. Optimizing in-
hospital triage for large vessel occlusion using a
novel clinical scale (GAI2AA). 2019; 93: e1997
- e2006.
10. Singer OC, Dvorak F, du Mesnil de Rochemont
R, Lanfermann H, Sitzer M, Neumann-Haefelin
TJS. A simple 3-item stroke scale: comparison
with the National Institutes of Health Stroke
Scale and prediction of middle cerebral artery
occlusion. 2005; 36: 773 - 776.
11. Lima FO, Silva GS, Furie KL, Frankel MR, Lev
MH, Camargo ÉC, et al. Field assessment stroke
triage for emergency destination: a simple and
accurate prehospital scale to detect large vessel
occlusion strokes. Stroke 2016; 47: 1997 - 2002.
12. Hastrup S, Damgaard D, Johnsen SP, Andersen
G. Prehospital Acute Stroke Severity Scale to
Predict Large Artery Occlusion: Design and
Comparison With Other Scales. Stroke 2016;
47: 1772 - 6.
13. Nogueira RG, Jadhav AP, Haussen DC, Bonafe
A, Budzik RF, Bhuva P, et al. Thrombectomy 6
to 24 hours after stroke with a mismatch between
deficit and infarct. New England Journal of
Medicine 2018; 378: 11 - 21.
14. Albers GW, Marks MP, Kemp S, Christensen S,
Tsai JP, Ortega-Gutierrez S, et al. Thrombectomy
for stroke at 6 to 16 hours with selection by
perfusion imaging. New England Journal of
Medicine 2018; 378: 708 - 718.
15. Siegler JE, Messé SR, Sucharew H, Kasner
SE, Mehta T, Arora N, et al. Thrombectomy in
DAWN-and DEFUSE-3-Ineligible Patients: A
Subgroup Analysis From the BEST Prospective
Cohort Study. Neurosurgery 2020; 86: E156 -
E163.
16. Ducroux C, Khoury N, Lecler A, Blanc R,
Chetrit A, Redjem H, et al. Application of
the DAWN clinical imaging mismatch and
DEFUSE 3 selection criteria: benefit seems
similar but restrictive volume cut - offs might
omit potential responders. European journal of
neurology 2018; 25: 1093 - 1099.
17. Martin - Schild S, Albright KC, Tanksley J,
Pandav V, Jones EB, Grotta JC, et al. Zero on
the NIHSS does not equal the absence of stroke.
Annals of emergency medicine 2011; 57: 42 - 45.
18. Arch AE, Weisman DC, Coca S, Nystrom KV,
Wira III CR, Schindler JL. Missed ischemic
stroke diagnosis in the emergency department
by emergency medicine and neurology services.
Stroke 2016; 47: 668 - 673.
19. Richoz B, Hugli O, Dami F, Carron P-N, Faouzi
M, Michel P. Acute stroke chameleons in a
university hospital: risk factors, circumstances,
and outcomes. Neurology 2015; 85: 505 - 511.
20. Gurley KL, Edlow JA. Avoiding Misdiagnosis
in Patients With Posterior Circulation Ischemia:
A Narrative Review. Academic Emergency
Medicine 2019; 26: 1273 - 1284.
21. Newman-Toker DE, Kattah JC, Talkad AV, Wang
DZ, Hsieh Y-H, Newman-Toker DE. HINTS to
diagnose stroke in the acute vestibular syndrome
- three - step bedside oculomotor exam more
sensitive than early MRI DWI. Stroke; a journal
of cerebral circulation 2009; 40: 3504.
22. Tehrani ASS, Kattah JC, Mantokoudis G, Pula
JH, Nair D, Blitz A, et al. Small strokes causing
severe vertigo: frequency of false-negative
MRIs and nonlacunar mechanisms. 2014; 83:
169 - 173.
23. Edlow JA, Gurley KL, Newman-Toker
DEJTJoem. A new diagnostic approach to the
adult patient with acute dizziness. 2018; 54:
469 - 483.
24. Edlow JA. Diagnosing dizziness: we are
teaching the wrong paradigm! Acad Emerg Med
2013;2 0: 1064 - 6.
25. Baek J-H, Kim BM, Heo JH, Kim DJ, Nam HS,
Kim YD. Outcomes of endovascular treatment
for acute intracranial atherosclerosis–related large
The role of clinical evaluation...
Hue Central Hospital
Journal of Clinical Medicine - No. 62/2020 105
vessel occlusion. Stroke 2018; 49: 2699 - 2705.
26. Park H, Baek J-H, Kim BM. Endovascular
treatment of acute stroke due to intracranial
atherosclerotic stenosis - related large vessel
occlusion. Frontiers in neurology 2019; 10.
27. Lees KR, Bluhmki E, Von Kummer R, Brott
TG, Toni D, Grotta JC, et al. Time to treatment
with intravenous alteplase and outcome in
stroke: an updated pooled analysis of ECASS,
ATLANTIS, NINDS, and EPITHET trials. The
Lancet 2010; 375: 1695 - 1703.
28. Keselman B, Cooray C, Vanhooren G, Bassi
P, Consoli D, Nichelli P, et al. Intravenous
thrombolysis in stroke mimics: results from
the SITS International Stroke Thrombolysis
Register. European journal of neurology 2019;
26: 1091 - 1097.
29. Tsivgoulis G, Zand R, Katsanos AH, Goyal N,
Uchino K, Chang J, et al. Safety of intravenous
thrombolysis in stroke mimics: prospective
5-year study and comprehensive meta-analysis.
Stroke 2015; 46: 1281 - 1287.
30. Sarikaya H, Yilmaz M, Luft AR, Gantenbein
AR. Different Pattern of Clinical Deficits
in Stroke Mimics Treated with Intravenous
Thrombolysis. European Neurology 2012; 68:
344 - 349.
31. Shafqat SJJotRSoM. The long shadow of
cerebral localization. 2005; 98: 549 - 549.
Các file đính kèm theo tài liệu này:
the_role_of_clinical_evaluation_in_the_era_of_cerebral_reper.pdf